Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Revised Decentralization
Revised Decentralization
Vol. XX
January-December 2011
Abstract
The study determined the effectiveness and responsiveness of the
decentralization policy in the first district of Ilocos Sur. It employed the
descriptive survey research design with documentary analysis on the provisions
of Republic Act No. 7160 in the areas of basic services. The findings revealed
that the group respondents had favorable responses with a descriptive evaluation
of highly effective in the areas of (1) Community-Based Forestry Projects; (2)
Municipal Agricultural Services; (3) Health Services and (4) Social Welfare
Services. Furthermore, the group respondents had similar view as to the
effectiveness and responsiveness of the decentralization policy for extension and
on-site services and facilities and infrastructure services. It is indicated in this
study that the visibility of the projects provides better insights in evaluating the
development programs of the LGUs. However, there were varied responses as to
the effectiveness and responsiveness of the decentralization policy for health
services and social services. The primary respondents provided an objective
evaluation as to the implementation of their implemented their programs while
the secondary respondents evaluated the current state of health services and
social services in the LGUs.
1.0 Introduction
The implementation of Republic
Act No.7160 otherwise known as the
Local Government Code of 1991 had
evolved to new structural process through
the application of decentralization system
in local governance. In this mandate, the
Local Government Units were given more
powers, authority, responsibilities and
resources to become responsive and self-
1.1 Objectives
This
study
assessed
the
effectiveness and responsiveness of the
decentralization policy in the first district
of Ilocos Sur. It specifically determined
the socio-demographic profile of the
secondary and primary respondents in
terms of: (a) age; (b) sex; (c) monthly
income;
(d)
plantilla
position;
(e) educational attainment; and (f) years
of government service. It analyzed the
effectiveness and responsiveness of the
decentralization policy of the group
respondents on a) extension and on-site
research services and facilities of the
municipal agriculture office b) health
services of the Rural Health Units in the
83
84
result
of
research
studies
on
decentralization which includes the
primary
analysis
of
the
fiscal
administration in relation to the Internal
Revenue Allotment (IRA) and budgetary
allocation of the municipality. The
development initiatives were taken from
the implementation of the devolved basic
services along agriculture, health,
environment, and infrastructure. Lastly,
the aspect on popular participation
included the effectiveness of the service
delivery provided by the municipality.
Vol. XX
January-December 2011
85
Effectiveness of
the Decentralization Policy
for Basic Services of the
Local Government Units
A. Agriculture
Extension and OnSite Research
Services and
Facilities
B. Health Services
C. Social Welfare
86
2.0 Methodology
This study employed the descriptive
survey research design with documentary
analysis on the provisions of Republic Act
No. 7160 in the areas of basic services.
This research study evaluated the extent
of effectiveness and responsiveness of the
decentralization policy of the Local
Government Units through the delivery of
basic services with the goal of improving
the quality of life of the people of the
municipality. The basic services and
facilities evaluated in this study were; (1)
Extension and On-Site Research Services
(2) Community-Based Forestry; (3)
Health Services; (4) Social Welfare
Services; and (5) Infrastructure Services.
The questionnaires were gathered
through
the
__________
group
respondents who provided relevant data
and information on the extent of
effectiveness and responsiveness of the
decentralization policy of this study:
Group A - LGU executive officials for
elective positions: (1) Mayors; and (2)
Sangguniang Bayan Members; Group B Chiefs/Heads of Departments: (1)
Municipal Head and Personnel; (2)
Municipal
Treasurers; (3) Assessor
Officers; (4) Budget Officers; (5)
Bookkeepers; (6)Accountants; Group C
Local Governance and
Development
Officers: (1) Local Government Officers;
and (2) Municipal Development Planning
Officers; and Group D Agriculturists
and Medical Personnel : (1) Agricultural
Technicians; (2)Agricultural Officers; (3)
RHU Medical Officers and Personnel;
and (4) Social Welfare Officers.
Vol. XX
January-December 2011
Description
Very High Level of
Effectiveness and
Responsiveness ( VH )
High Level of
Effectiveness and
Responsiveness ( H )
Average Level of
Effectiveness and
Responsiveness ( A)
Low Level of
Effectiveness and
Responsiveness ( L)
Not Effective and
Responsive ( NE)
87
Profile of Respondents
Group A
No.
%
Age
Over 60
2
6.60
51 60
2
13
41 50
9
60
31 40
2
13.40
21 30
Total
15
100
Sex
Male
8
53.33
Female
7
46.67
Total
15
100
Monthly Income
26,000- 30,000
21,000 - 25,999
15
100
16,000 - 20,999
11,000 - 15,999
Below 10,999
Total
15
100
Plantilla Position
Permanent
15 Journal
100
88Elective
UNP Research
Total
15
100
Table 1 continued
Group B
No.
%
Group C
No.
%
Group D
No.
%
2
8
6
2
18
11
44.44
33.33
11.11
100
4
12
2
22.22
66.67
11.11
9
10
1
18
100
20
10
8
18
55.55
44.44
100
10
8
18
55.55
44.44
100
10
10
20
1
8
3
5
1
18
5.56
44.44
16.66
27.78
5.56
100
3
7
8
16.67
38.89
44.44
18
18
100
18
18
100
Vol. XX
18
TOTAL
No.
%
2
17
39
11
2
71
2.82
23.94
54.93
15.49
2.82
100
50
50
100
38
33
71
52.52
46.48
100
100
7
3
10
20
35
15
50
100
4
30
18
8
11
71
5.63
42.25
25.36
11.27
15.49
100
100
20
100
56
100
45
50
5
78.87
21.13
January-December 2011
20
100
56
100
Profile of Respondents
With MA Units
College Grad.
Total
Years of Govt. Serv.
Above 20
16-20
11-15
6-10
0-5
Total
Group A
No.
%
Group B
No.
%
15
100
18
100
2
2
8
3
15
13.35
13.35
53.00
20.00
100
7
7
2
38.89
38.89
11.11
2
18
11.11
100
Group C
No.
%
3
16.67
15
18
100
Group D
No.
%
20
20
100
12
6
16
80
1
2
1
20
5
10
5
100
18
66.67
33.33
100
TOTAL
No.
%
3
4.22
69
95.78
71
100
35
15
10
20
8
71
89
90
Vol. XX
January-December 2011
Group A
D
3.43 H
Group B
D
3.17 A
Group C
D
3.18
H
Group D
D
4.00
H
Average
D
3.44
H
3.50
3.25
3.42
3.89
3.52
2.08
3.15
2.62
1.85
3.62
A
A
A
L
H
1.81
2.72
2.92
1.83
3.69
L
A
A
L
H
1.58
2.20
1.70
1.45
3.69
NA
L
NA
NA
H
1.33
2.59
1.09
1.30
4.05
NA
NA
NA
NA
H
1.70
2.66
2.08
1.61
3.76
NA
A
L
NA
H
3.62
2.54
H
L
3.54
3.00
H
A
2.70
3.75
A
H
3.38
2.18
A
L
3.31
2.87
A
A
2.62
2.58
2.59
3.94
3.02
3.33
3.37
3.44
4.50
VH
3.66
2.94
2.90
3.73
2.93
2.88
HEALTH
SERVICES
1. Primary Health
Care
2. Maternity Health
Care
3. Communicable
And Non
Communicable
Services
4. Access To
Secondary And
Tertiary Health
Services
5. Purchase of
Medicines,
Medical
Supplies And
Equipment
Group A
D
Group B
D
Group C
Group D
D
Primary
Respondents
Group D
3.57
3.67
3.90
3.40
3.12
4.56
VH
3.38
3.42
3.82
3.60
3.56
4.44
VH
4.09
(H)
4.00
(H)
3.30
3.25
3.45
3.44
3.36
3.66
3.51
(H)
3.08
3.09
3.09
3.44
3.18
4.11
3.64
(H)
3.62
3.5
3.45
3.33
3.47
3.88
3.68
(H)
Secondary Respondents
Average
Ave.
Social Welfare
Services
Group A
Group B
Group C
Group D
Group D
Primary
Respondents
Average
Decentralization
Welfare
3.62
3.50
3.75
3.67
3.62
3.63
3.31
3.38
A
A
3.29
3.54
A
H
3.82
3.64
H
H
3.33
3.67
A
H
3.62
3.67
H
H
3.47
3.58
H
H
3.15
3.46
3.55
3.22
3.62
3.40
2.61
2.67
2.33
2.67
3.50
2.76
3.38
3.46
A
H
6.57
3.46
H
H
3.09
3.36
A
A
3.88
3.16
H
A
3.50
3.33
H
A
3.48
3.35
H
A
3.46
3.27
3.18
3.77
3.89
3.51
Policy
on
Social
Variables
1. Extension and On Site
Research and Facilities
2. Health Services
3. Social Services
F-ratio
Value
of T
Critical
Value
Interpretation
4.18
1.78
2.84
1.86
1.761
Not Significant
Significant
Significant
.179
95
4. Conclusions
The respondents who were 20
years old and above were within the age
of maturity, thus their decisions were
based on their professional responsibility/
96
Vol. XX
January-December 2011
97