Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Artigo DPPH Emulsoes
Artigo DPPH Emulsoes
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2008.00483.x
Synopsis
The antioxidant activity (AA) of substances present in several plant species has been widely studied which reflects their fundamental role in the
protection of skin tissue against the harmful action
of reactive oxygen species. Given the importance
of effective and long-lasting protection against
ultraviolet radiation, we studied the AA of several
plant derivatives and extracts over time. Several
chemical in vitro methods may be used to evaluate
antioxidant capability, among which the 1,1diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) method stands
out, despite its unspecificity, as the most cited and
described method in the literature. In this work
the AA was evaluated by measuring their capacity
to reduce DPPH in 30 min, which is suggested in
the literature, and additionally at different times
up to 8 h from the baseline reading. The methodology used to evaluate the AA over time was validated. It is important to emphasize that this study
proposes to modify the conventional DPPH
method, although considered to be non-specific, to
be used to test new antioxidant agents. This represents a considerable advantage because some substances show no significant activity during the
first 30 min of reaction. Among other plant products, we tested a proantocyanidin-rich grapeseed
extract, a hesperidin derivative, a rutin-containing
ginkgo extract, a polyphenol-containing yerba
mate extract and tocopheryl acetate, all of which
were properly standardized. As they have different
Correspondence: Carlos Eduardo de Oliveira Praes, O Boticario, Av. Rui Barbosa n 3450, 83055-900 Sao Jose
dos Pinhais, Brazil. Tel.: 55 41 3381 7506; fax: 55 41
3381 7987; e-mail: carlosep@boticario.com.br
antioxidant profiles, each ingredient showed a specific behaviour over time, which may promote the
selection of anti-radical compounds capable of
offering protection against external agents. Combining extracts and plant derivatives that present
fast, medium and slow antioxidant kinetic it is possible to create complexes capable of offering an
effective protection from the moment of application
up to several hours later. It is a perfectly feasible
method, and such combinations prove to be more
effective and have more durable effect.
Resume
Lactivite antioxydante de substances presentes
dans differentes espe`ces de plantes a ete largement
etudiee. Elle refle`te leur role fondamental dans la
protection des tissus cutane contre laction alterante des espe`ces reactives de loxyge`ne (ROS). Etant
donne limportance dune protection efficace et
durable contre les effets des radiations UV, nous
avons mene une etude portant sur lactivite antioxydante de plusieurs derives de plantes et dextraits en fonction du temps. Plusieurs methodes
chimiques in vitro ont ete utilisees pour evaluer la
capacite antioxydante, parmi lesquelles la methode
bien connue au 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl
(DPPH) qui est malgre sa non specificite, la plus
citee et la plus decrite dans la litterature. Dans ce
travail, lactivite antioxydante a ete evaluee en
mesurant la capacite a` reduire le DPPH en
30 min, ce qui est evoque dans la litterature, et de
facon complementaire, en la mesurant, a` differents
temps allant jusqua` 8 heures apre`s la premie`re
lecture. La methodologie utilisee pour evaluer lactivite antioxydante en fonction du temps a ete
73
A. R. Silva et al.
A. R. Silva et al.
75
A. R. Silva et al.
AA%
100sample absorbance - blank absorbance100
control absorbance
1
Using the AA% as a function of different concentration, it is possible to obtain the EC50 using a
linear fit (AA% vs. extracts concentration). All
analyses were performed in triplicate.
The EC50 values resulting from three trials performed during different days on each test ingredient are shown in Table I below. The EC50 values
of plant-derived substances and extracts demonstrated in Table I were considered statistically significant (P < 0.05). As observed in Table I, the
Table I EC50 values for the investigated plant-derived
substances and extracts
Proantocianidin-rich
grapeseed extract (1)
Hesperidin derivative (2)
Rutin-containing ginkgo
extract (3)
Yerba mate extract (4)
EC50
(lg mL)1)
2185
1707
2032
42 332
50 057
45 717
3249
3050
2983
656
748
704
60 068
59 841
42 192
Average EC50
(lg mL)1) SD
1975 17
46 035 12
3094 5
703 9
54 034 19
A. R. Silva et al.
The hesperidin derivative presented higher values (%AA) than the other extracts at all analysis
times, indicating a slow and long-term profile. It is
important to emphasize that the hesperidin derivative results obtained after 4 h are higher than the
results obtained after 8 h for the other extracts,
thus justifying its effective antioxidant action.
Figure 1 illustrates the AA profiles of a proanthocyanidin-rich grapeseed extract, a hesperidin
derivative, a rutin-containing ginkgo extract, a
polyphenol-containing yerba mate extract and tocopheryl acetate. It is important to say that Fig. 1
was constructed based on the data obtained in
Table II. In order to facilitate the comprehension
regarding error bar values in the Fig. 1, we present them in Table III. The average results and
their SD values demonstrated in Table III were
considered statistically significant (P < 0.05).
The antioxidant kinetics represented in the Fig. 1
shows that a significant difference exists between
the profile of the hesperidin derivative and the profiles of the other two ingredients. The hesperidin
derivative shows high and increasing values even
after 8 h, which indicates a continuous and significant action during this entire period. This behaviour is defined as slow antioxidant kinetics.
On the other hand, the proanthocyanidin-rich
grapeseed extract, the rutin-containing ginkgo
extract and the polyphenol-containing yerba mate
extract show a less effective protection profile than
the hesperidin derivative. Nonetheless, this may be
considered satisfactory, as their AA values reached
a peak 6 h after the beginning of the reaction.
This behaviour suggests that these ingredients may
provide an important contribution in achieving
long-lasting protection, which is consistent with
an intermediate type of antioxidant kinetics. Considering the high AA of yerba mate extract in the
Table II Percentage of antioxidant activity (AA%) and increase of this activity over time [D (%) AA]
Rutin-containing
ginkgo extract
Hesperidin
derivative
Proantocianidin-rich
grapeseed extract
Tocopheryl
acetate
Polyphenol-containing
yerba nate extract
Time
(h)
% AA
D (%)
AA
% AA
D (%)
AA
% AA
D (%)
AA
% AA
D (%)
AA
% AA
D (%)
AA
0.5
1
2
4
8
48.74
53.69
60.13
66.59
71.20
0
10.16
23.38
36.63
46.10
52.69
64.95
75.34
82.96
87.89
0
23.28
43.01
57.46
66.82
49.60
54.90
60.34
65.67
70.60
0
10.67
21.65
32.39
42.32
58.24
59.33
60.74
62.47
64.80
0
1.88
4.30
7.27
11.26
56.91
60.63
65.24
70.94
77.87
0
6.55
14.64
24.66
36.83
77
A. R. Silva et al.
100
90
80
70
%AA
60
50
40
Hesperidin derivative
Rutin-containing ginkgo extract
30
20
Tocopheryl acetate
10
0
0
0.5
Time (h)
Table III Standart deviation of antioxidant activity (AA) for three independent experiments over time
Antioxidant activity % (Mean SD)
Time
(h)
Rutin-containing
ginkgo extract
Hesperidin
derivative
Proantocianidin-rich
grapeseed extract
Tocopheryl
acetate
Polyphenol-containing
yerba mate extract
0.5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
48.74
53.68
60.13
64.04
66.59
68.33
69.52
70.47
71.20
52.68
64.95
75.34
80.15
82.96
84.79
86.12
87.11
87.89
49.60
54.90
60.34
63.49
65.67
67.32
68.62
69.68
70.60
58.24
59.33
60.74
61.72
62.47
63.13
63.74
64.29
64.79
56.91
60.63
65.24
68.38
70.94
73.05
74.85
76.47
77.87
2.81
3.41
5.85
7.62
8.67
9.37
9.78
10.05
10.17
0.80
1.60
1.78
1.58
1.38
1.22
1.09
0.99
0.94
1.33
1.63
2.13
2.46
2.64
2.79
2.93
3.00
3.07
2.73
2.71
2.83
2.96
3.05
3.14
3.18
3.22
3.29
1.07
0.96
0.89
0.86
0.93
0.97
1.07
1.17
1.26
A. R. Silva et al.
Methodology validation
The analytical method used to evaluate the AA
over time is according to the parameters required
by United States Pharmacopeia (USP) [31]. The
specificity analysis revealed that there is no interference of the extract components in the wavelength used. The method was demonstrated to be
linear, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9992.
The recovery results in the accuracy test varied
between 97.7% and 100.4% and the RSD was
under 2.86% [31].
Conclusion
The DPPH method was found to be adequate for a
preliminary study of antioxidant substances. This
study demonstrates that substances screened by
the traditional methodology, which only involves
a reading after 30 min, may be considered as
potential antioxidants when evaluated by the modified DPPH method proposed here (antioxidant
kinetics).
In addition, this study identified antioxidant profiles that may be complementary, given the possibility of combining plant extracts and derivatives
with different kinetics to build complexes capable
of providing effective and long-lasting protection.
However, any combination of substances with fast,
intermediate and slow kinetics should be carefully
investigated to ensure that it will deliver the
desired potential activity.
Although plant extracts and derivatives contain
phenolic phytochemical classes in their composition, such ingredients may display very different
behaviours regarding the immediate and long-term
protection they offer. The diversity of phytochemical species and their concentration are known to
promote antioxidant behaviour, which is consistent with the results of this study. The use of hesperidin derivatives, proanthocyanidin-rich extracts
and rutin-containing extracts alone or in association with other cosmetic substances is promising
for protective or therapeutic skin care when
applied in emulsions, gels, lotions, etc. Based on
the results of this study, additional specific tests
will be conducted in the future to determine longterm AA by means of further in vitro chemical
79
A. R. Silva et al.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.