Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DFA Vs NLRC
DFA Vs NLRC
Facts:
On
27
January
1993,
private
respondent
from
legal
process
except
for
The
Bank's
Headquarters
(the
"Headquarters Agreement").
1. Under
the
Charter
and
Headquarters
time,
rendered
decision
in
favor
When
DFA failed
to
obtain
performed
by
them
in
their
official
granting
privileges
are
commitments
Philippine
these
immunities
treaty
voluntarily
government
covenants
assumed
which
and
and
by
the
must
be
respected.
Being an international organization that has
been extended a diplomatic status, the ADB is
independent of the municipal law. "One of the
basic
immunities
organization
is
of
an
immunity
international
from
local
legal
writs
and
processes
issued
by
the
its
responsibilities
impartially
on
institutions
covered
by
diplomatic
immunities,
There
are
two
conflicting
concepts
of
the
determination
credibility
The DFA
keep
government
regarded.
gestionis.
In
our
the
when
before
of
which,
the
Philippine
international
country, this
agreements
task falls
business
or
trade,
the
particular
act
or
sued
in
an
American
court
requests
the
allowed
the
said
Department
to
file
its
of sovereign immunity.
immunity.
foreign
government
organization
to
first
or
the
secure
international
an
executive
4. Yes.
courts
Catholic
varies.
In
International
Relative
to
the
propriety
of
the
Solicitor
'suggestion'
General
in
embodied
the
manifestation
and
(DFA
vs
NLRC, G.R.
No.
113191,
18
September 1996)
Judge
Romeo
N.
Firme
ordered
defendants