Professional Documents
Culture Documents
C Metal Identification
C Metal Identification
If you know the metal, you have means to find out a way to weld it. What if you do not
know the metal? Quite often Maintenance Engineers find themselves in such tricky
situations.
Let us first have a quick look where maintenance welding stands when compared with
production welding in a manufacturing shop
Production Welding - requires very high skill and speed in application, but working on
known and fresh base metals with defined welding processes and with NO DOWNTIME
PRESSURE.
Maintenance welding Most of the times need to work on unknown, contaminated
base metal, which could have been exposed to long time heat. Welding is to be done insitu with positional restrictions and poor weldability. All these when the management is
breathing fire for a quick restart can make the odds staked against a maintenance
engineer. Your therefore require ingenuity, confidence, imagination and knowledge of
physics, chemistry, metallurgy and engineering in addition to skill and speed.
In-situ Identification: When you land up with a metal with specification un-known, you
have to first identify it before deciding on the correct welding process. There are some
means of rapid identification of metals. These methods, however, do not provide positive
identification but then when the DOWN TIME PRESSURE is on you, every little help
counts. Combine them with your knowledge of metals used for a specific service and your
experience; you have good chance for a positive identification.
Let us take a hypothetical situation where you are confronted with a repair item and you
have no idea about the MOC. In this case Material-identification could start with checking
the surface appearance.
Sometimes it is possible to identify metals by their surface appearance. A surface
examination does not always provide enough information for identification but should give
us enough information to place the metal into a class
Magnet Test: This will require a magnet of the simplest type. Ferromagnetic materials,
like iron and steel, give a strong response, easily determined. Nickel, cobalt and work
hardened stainless steel may give some, weak response.
If the material is magnetic, it could be either regular steel or magnetic stainless: to go
ahead with Material-identification and find which is which, a simple spot check can be
performed.
Chemical Spot Test: Put on the cleaned surface of the material (remove oil or grease
remnants with acetone) a drop of Nital 10% solution (10% nitric acid, HNO 3, in alcohol or
methanol) from an eye drop little bottle: if there is no reaction the material is probably a
stainless, otherwise, if it is regular steel, one can see a certain reaction with tiny bubbles,
and a dark stain remains on the surface.
Then one should check if there is a plating or a surface treatment. The appearance could
tell but only experience will help. A bright shining layer could indicate chromium or nickel
plating. A drop of 10% copper sulfate (CuSO4) in water would drip away without a trace
on a plated steel, while it would leave a bright copper stain on an unplated steel surface.
Other quite common plating materials could be zinc or cadmium, usually designed for
corrosion protection of mild steel: the nature of the plating should be determined
separately.
One can readily distinguish between light alloys like aluminum and magnesium with a
simple test, but you should use the help of a chemist. Aluminum is attacked by caustic
soda (NaOH), which is a dangerous material, and also by alkaline solutions, while
magnesium is not. Conversely magnesium is attacked rapidly by usual inorganic acids
(excluding hydrofluoric and chromic acid), while aluminum is not attacked by acids like
nitric and sulfuric. Also aluminum density is about twice that of magnesium.
Hardness test: it comes next for Material-identification. Recommended is Portable
hardness testing using rebound type digital hardness tester which are available for
carrying out hardness testing at site. This is particularly useful for large objects and
where cutting of sample is not possible. But if you cannot test for hardness, at least you
can always try the chip test if the sample permits.
Chip test: The chip test is performed by removing a small amount of material from the
test piece with a sharp, cold chisel. The material removed varies from small, broken
fragments to a continuous strip. The chip may have smooth, sharp edges; it maybe
coarse-grained or fine-grained; or it may have saw-like edges. The size of the chip is
important in identifying the metal. The ease with which the chipping can be accomplished
should also be considered. The information given in table below can help you identify
various metals by the chip test.
If the file does not take chips, the material is "file hard" and also, probably, hard to weld.
You can go for a spark test using a grinding m/c.
Spark Test: It can be used to get a rough classification. The length of the spark stream,
the color, and the form of the sparks are features are what one should look for.
The effect of the alloying element may slow or accelerate the carbon spark or make the
carrier line lighter or darker in color. Molybdenum, for example, appears as a detached,
orange-colored spearhead on the end of the carrier line. Nickel appears to suppress the
effect of the carbon burst; however, the nickel spark can be identified by tiny blocks of
brilliant white light. Silicon suppresses the carbon burst even more than nickel. When
silicon is present, the carrier line usually ends abruptly in a white flash of light.
Grade
Group
Magnet
Test
Spark
Test
302
303Se
304
Spoiled egg
odor - heavy
black smudge
Few forks
- short,
reddish
303
ChromiumNonAustenitic
Nickel
Magnetic
308
Full red
without
many
forks
309
310
Garlic odor
Strong
>165
attack Brinell
green
Fast attack after
crystals gas formation
heated to and dark
1800oF
surface
and water
quench
Few forks
- short,
reddish
316
317
321
Chromium
Magnetic
410
Long
white with
few forks
414
416
Martensitic
420
431
430F
> 280
Brinell
after
heated
to
Long
o
1800
F
white-red
with burst and water
quench
Long
white with
few forks
Rapid reaction
- dark green
solution
Spoiled egg
odor - heavy
black smudge
Garlic odor
Long
white-red
with burst
440 A, B,
C
430
Very slow
attack
347
416Se
Slow
attack tan
surface
turns
brown
Ferritic
Long
180 - 250
white with Brinell
few forks
after
heated to
Spoiled egg
Garlic odor
Full red
without
many
forks
1800oF
and water
quench
By this time you would have a fair idea on the identity of the metal. But all these tests
are there to reconfirm your initial idea about the possible identity of the metal based on
your experience and your knowledge on the property of metals required for different
services. That would be the single most important factor in successful identification of the
metal.
The single best and most useful qualitative Material-identification test that is available
(although unsuitable for the lightest elements) is called X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF)
Spectroscopy. It is immediate and non destructive, and is performed using special
equipment, fixed or portable.
The method consists in exciting the atoms of the elements present in the sample with
primary x-ray photons of the required energy. Excitation means removing certain
electrons from the atoms to an unstable (ionized) status. The relaxation from the excited
condition is accompanied by characteristic spontaneous x-ray emission called
fluorescence.
As each element has a unique set of known electron energy levels, the x-ray emissions
have a well defined energy level for each of the possible electron transitions, providing a
"fingerprint" for Material-identification. The computer analysis of the spectrum of all the
collected x-ray emissions (arranged according to their energy or wavelength) permits at
least a qualitative Material-identification with various degree of precision depending on
the details of the program used.
More Tests: If you need more definitive and precise analyses for Material-identification,
those can be performed by well equipped laboratories using Spark Emission
Spectrography or quantitative Chemical Analysis (called by interesting names like AAS or
ICP), but these are costly and specialized tests which are rarely required for routine
welding, except if incurring in unexpected difficulties.
Summing up, even if one cannot identify through Material-identification procedures the
exact composition of an unknown item to be welded, knowing to which "family" it belongs
and what hardness it presents should be sufficient to devise the best procedure to be
applied with the welding process available. It is strongly recommended to make a welding
trial and to test it to destruction to reveal any problems, before tackling the job itself.
It is obvious that in case of failure of the test, the Material-identification should be
pushed further and the reasons for lack of success should be determined before starting
production.
Many other tests are available to determine the Material-identification of metal samples.
One quite simple but most useful (acceptance) test consists in performing on a small
specimen the usual heat treatment (mostly hardening and tempering if it is steel) and
then checking the hardness obtained. If the result is not what it should be, the material is
probably different from what presumed.
Another, called the Thermo-electric comparative test, displays a value of electromotive
force (similar to that obtained from a thermocouple) on a dial, when touching the surface
of the sample, located on the instrument base plate, with a heated copper electrode: the
required ranges have to be determined beforehand with known samples.
We may mention that other tests for Material-identification require more specialized
knowledge and laboratory equipment, probably not readily available to most welding
shops. One of the most informative and useful for welding purposes, even more than
complete chemical analysis reports, consists in metallographic examinations, performed
under optical microscope on specially ground, polished and etched specimens, by
knowledgeable metallurgists.