Professional Documents
Culture Documents
T2 Resident Status 2015
T2 Resident Status 2015
Question 3
Jack from New Zealand, arrived in Malaysia on 1.1.2008. He left Malaysia permanently on
31.10.2009. James has the following record of stay:
Dates
1.1.2008-31.3.2008
1.4.2008-13.4.2008
14.4.2008-31.7.2008
1.8.2008-31.12.2008
Country
In Malaysia
Seminar in Hong
Kong
In Malaysia
In Hawaii
1.2.2009-31.10.2009
In Malaysia
No. of days
Mr. Arthur Douglas is a citizen of Australia and his pattern of stay in Malaysia was as follows:
Year
No of days stayed in
Malaysia
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
95
92
174
105
92
0
365
31
223
181
He did not stay in Malaysia in the year 2005. The period of stay in the year 2007 was linked to
his period of stay in Malaysia of 365 days in 2006.
Required:
Based on the information provided, determine his tax resident status for each of the year of
assessment under the Income Tax Act 1967 (as amended).
Period of stay
Place
No of days
01.12.2000 31.12.2000
In Malaysia
31
01.01.2001 31.01.2001
01.02.2001 31.05.2001
01.06.2001 31.07.2001
01.08.2001 31.10.2001
01.11.2001 31.12.2001
In Malaysia
In Singapore
In Malaysia
In Bali
In Malaysia
31
120
61
92
61
01.01.2002 31.03.2002
01.04.2002 14.04.2002
15.04.2002 31.07.2002
01.08.2002 30.09.2002
01.10.2002 31.12.2002
In Malaysia
Australia - social visit 14
In Malaysia
In Thailand
In Malaysia
91
01.01.2003 31.03.2003
01.04.2003 13.04.2003
14.04.2003 31.07.2003
01.08.2003 31.12.2003
In Malaysia
Seminar in Taipeh
In Malaysia
In Hong Kong
90
13
109
153
01.01.2004 30.04.2004
01.05.2004 31.07.2004
01.08.2004 31.12.2004
In Hong Kong
In Malaysia
In Japan
120
92
153
01.01.2005 31.12.2005
In Japan
365
01.01.2006 31.01.2006
01.02.2006 31.12.2006
In Japan
In Malaysia
31
335
01.01.2007 31.01.2007
01.02.2007 31.10.2007
In Japan
In Malaysia
31
273
108
61
92
Required:
Determine Mr. As resident status for all the years of assessment.
Answer:
3
Period of stay
2000
2001
1.12.2000-31.12.2000
1.01.2001-31.01.2001
1.06.2001-31.07.2001
1.11.2001-31.12.2001
2002
1.01.2002-31.03.2002
1.04.2002-14.04.2002
15.04.2002-31.07.2002
1.10.2002-31.12.2002
Residence Status
31 days
31 days
61 days
61 days
NR
153 days
R (7(1))b)) Link
to YA 02
91 days
14 days-Home leave
108 days
92 days
291 days
2003
1.1.2003-31.03.2003
14.4. 2003 31.7.2003
R (7(1)(a))
90 days
109 days
199 days
R (7(1)(a))
2004
1.5.2004-31.7.2004
92 days
R (7(1))c))
2005
Not in Malaysia
R (7(1)(d))
2006
1.2.2006 31.12.2006
335 days
R (7(1)(a))
2007
1.2.2007-31.10.2007
273 days
R (7(1)(a))
Note:
(1):
The 153 days in 2001 are linked to a period of more than 182 consecutive days in 2002
i.e. 212 consecutive days inclusive of the 14 days for social visits.
(2)
31 days in 2000 are not linked to period of 182 or more consecutive days in 2001.
There are only 153 days in 2001 and they are not consecutive.
Period of stay
No of days
4
1991
1992
01.08.1991-31.12.1991
01.01.1992-18.06.1992
19.06.1992-09.08.1992
153 days
170 days
52 days
Summer vacation outside
Malaysia.
The IRB treated the taxpayer as not resident for the year of assessment 1991 and 1992 since
they did not comply with section 7(1) (a) or section 7(1) (b).
The taxpayer contented that the period of presence in Malaysia in 1991 of 153 days is linked to
another period of 182 days or more in 1992. they argued that the absence of 14 days in the
aggregate under the proviso to section section 7(1) (b) can be at any point of time - and the fact
that the taxpayer did not return to Malaysia at the end of the 14 days i.e. be in Malaysia on
the 15th day is irrelevant since the Income Tax Act 1967 (as amended) does not provide any
conditions to that effect. In other words that taxpayer wanted to take 14 days out of the period
of 52 days to form part of the period of 170 days to make 182 days or more, while the IRB
insisted that the taxpayer should be in Malaysia on the 15 day and not continue to be absent.
At the special commissioners stage, it was held that the taxpayer was resident as they have
satisfied the conditions under the ITA for residence and section 7(1)(b) does not stipulate any
condition as regards the 14 days.
However, on appeal to the High Court, the taxpayer lost the case because the summer
vacation is not a social visit.
Question 8
Self-Revision
The law in relation to section 7 does not define immediate family. The IRB however has
indicated that immediate family would include spouse (husband and wife) children and
parents. The other members are not included.
Social visit
The 14 days absence for social visits need not be consecutive; and it can occur in any one of
the two periods (i.e. the long period or the short period). Social visits are taken to mean
visiting relatives and friends. It excludes vacation and holiday trips.
The temporary absence clause allows to treat period of absences to be included in the period of
stay and is only applicable to section 7(1) (b