Division of Rizal

District of Pililla
MALAYA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee:
TOMAS B. MARBELLA, JR.
Position: Teacher I____________
Review Period: April, 2015 -March, 2016
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:_______________
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
MFQs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

Teaching-Learning Prepared daily lesson log of

Process
activities including 75% of
appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials.

TIMELINE

June, 2015March, 2016

Name of Rater: THELMA C. PEREZ

Position: Master Teacher I_______________
Review Period: ___________________

WEIGHT
PER KRA

WEIGHT PER
OBJECTIVE

40%

20%

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,

Efficiency, Timeliness

Outstanding (5)
Complete daily logs of activities including 100%
appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials provided
Very Satisfactory (4)
Complete daily logs of activities including 9990% appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials provided
Satisfactory (3)
Complete daily logs of activities including 8970% appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials provided
Unsatisfactory (2)

Complete daily logs of activities including 6950% appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials provided
Poor (1)
Complete daily logs of activities including 49%
and below appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials provided

2. Facilitated learning in three

Grade V Science classes through
functional daily logs and innovative
teaching strategies that elicited
75% of pupils interaction for school
year 2015-2016

June, 2015March, 2016

10%

Outstanding (5)
Teaching method and strategies
elicited 100% pupils interaction
Very Satisfactory (4)
Teaching method and strategies elicited 9990% pupils interaction
Satisfactory (3)
Teaching method and strategies elicited 8970% pupils interaction
Unsatisfactory (2)
Teaching method and strategies elicited 6950% pupils interaction
Poor (1)
Teaching method and strategies elicited 49%
and below pupils interaction

3. Initiated discipline of 28 pupils or

75% out of 35 Grade V Bronze
including 75% observation
ofclassroom rules and guidelines
within the School Year 2015-2016.

June, 2015March, 2016

15%

Outstanding (5)
Pupils were 100% and above guided in the
observation in the classroom rules and
guidelines as evidenced by the descriptive
rating in the report card.
Very Satisfactory (4)

75% out of 35 Grade V Bronze

including 75% observation
ofclassroom rules and guidelines
within the School Year 2015-2016.

March, 2016

Pupils were 99-90% guided in the observation

of classroom rules and guidelines as evidenced
by descriptive rating in the report card.

Satisfactory(3)
Pupils were 89-70% guided in the observation
of classroom rules and guidelines as evidenced
by descriptive rating in the report card.
Unsatisfactory (2)
Pupils were 69-50% guided in the observation
of classroom rules and guidelines as evidenced
by descriptive rating in the report card.
Poor (1)
Pupils were not guided in the observation of
classroom rules and guidelines as evidenced
by descriptive rating in the report card.

Pupils/ Students
Outcomes

1. Monitored, evaluated and

maintained 28 pupils out of 35 with
75% progress within the School
Year 2015-2016.

June, 2015March, 2016

20%

5%

Outstanding (5)
Class record reflected the bases of
100% of pupils ratings in all classes/subject
areas handled
Very Satisfactory (4)
Class record reflected the bases of 90-99% of
pupils ratings in all classes/subject areas
handled
Satisfactory (3)

Class record reflected the bases of 70-89% of

pupils ratings in all classes/subject areas
handled
Unsatisfactory (2)
Class record reflected the bases of 69-50% of
pupils ratings in all classes/subject areas
handled
Poor (1)
Class record reflected the bases of 50% and
below of pupils ratings in all classes/subject
areas handled
2. Conducted remediation/
enrichment programs to 12 0r 35%
of 35 pupils of Grade V Bronze to
improve performance within the
rating period.

June, 2015March, 2016

5%

Outstanding (5)
Remediation/Enrichment Program is offered
to 100% and above of pupils with 100%
improvement in performance

Very Satisfactory (4)

Remediation/Enrichment Program is offered to
90-99% and above of pupils with 100%
improvement in performance
Satisfactory (3)
Remediation/Enrichment Program is offered to
89-70% and above of pupils with 100%
improvement in performance
Unsatisfactory (2)
Remediation/Enrichment Program is offered to
100% and above of pupils with 50-69%
improvement in performance
Poor (1)

Remediation/Enrichment Program is offered to

100% and above of pupils with 49% and below
improvement in performance
3. Maintained updated pupils
school records of the 100% of the
Grade V-Bronze pupils within the
rating period

June, 2015March, 2016

10%

Outstanding (5)
Class records reflected the bases of 100%
and above of the pupils rating in all subject
areas handled.
Very Satisfactory (4)
Class records reflected the bases of 99-90%
and above of the pupils rating in all subject
areas handled.
Satisfactory(3)
Class records reflected the bases of 89-70%
and above of the pupils rating in all subject
areas handled.
Unsatisfactory (2)
Class records reflected the bases of 69-50%
and above of the pupils rating in all subject
areas handled.
Poor (1)
Class records reflected the bases of 49% and
below of the pupils rating in all subject areas
handled.

Community
Development

1. Conducted regular/periodic
HRPTA meetings/conferences of
Grade V-Bronze pupils with 75%
attendance within the rating period

June, 2015March,2016

30%

10%

Outstanding (5)
100% and above accomplishment with set
agreements.
Very Satisfactory (4)
99-90% of planned meetings conducted
producing only set of agreements and partial
accomplishments.

Satisfactory(3)
89-70% of planned meetings conducted
producing set of agreements.
Unsatisfactory (2)
69-50% of planned meetings conducted with
minimized results.
Poor (1)

Undertaken/Initiated one (1)

HRPTA Project in Grade V-Bronze
class with external funding and with
75% accomplishment results at the
end of March, 2016.

June, 2015March, 2016

10%

49% and below of planned meetings conducted

with results.
Outstanding (5)
100% and above project
accomplishment with full documentation report
on completion.
Very Satisfactory (4)
99-90% project accomplishment with partial
completion.
Satisfactory(3)
89-70% project initiative only with no
completion report
Unsatisfactory (2)
89-70% project initiative only with no
completion report
Poor (1)
No project initiated.

Visited parents of 4 or 10% slow

learners out of 35 Grade V-Bronze
pupils needing academic of followup every semester within the
school year 2015-2016

January, 2016February, 2016

10%

Outstanding (5)
100% and above
accomplishment of set of visits successful
interventions.
Very Satisfactory (4)

pupils needing academic of followup every semester within the

school year 2015-2016
99-90% accomplishments of visits with partial
success in implementation of interventions.
Satisfactory(3)
89-70% accomplishments of visits with
suggested planned interventions.

Professional
Growth and
Development

1. Participated in 10 school
activities like teachers association
with 75% of attendance within the
school year 2015-2016.

June, 2015March, 2016

10%

2.5%

Unsatisfactory (2)
69-50% accomplishment of visits with planned
interventions.
Poor (1)
49% and below accomplishment of visits with
no interventions.
Outstanding (5)
Attained 100% and above participation
Very Satisfactory (4)
Attained 99-90% and above participation
Satisfactory(3)
Attained 89-70% and above participation
Unsatisfactory (2)
Attained 69-50% and above participation
Poor (1)
Attained 49% and below participation

2. Acted as E.A Coordinator/DRRM

Coordinator with 75%
accomplishment in assigned task
with complete documentation
within the school year 2015-2016.

April, 2015March, 2016

2.5%

Outstanding (5)
100% and above accomplishment with full
documrntation report on completion
Very Satisfactory (4)

Coordinator with 75%

accomplishment in assigned task
with complete documentation
within the school year 2015-2016.

March, 2016

90-99% and above accomplishment with full

documrntation report on completion

Satisfactory(3)
89-70% and above accomplishment with full
documrntation report on completion
Unsatisfactory (2)
69-50% and above accomplishment with full
documrntation report on completion

Poor (1)
49% and below accomplishment with full
documrntation report on completion
Attended atleast 5
seminars/trainings in any level with
75% accomplishment within the
school year 2015-2016

June, 2015March, 2016

5%

Outstanding (5)
Attended 5 and above seminars/training
with 100% complete documented report
Very Satisfactory (4)
Attended 4 and above seminars/training with
100% complete documented report
Satisfactory(3)
Attended 3 and above seminars/training with
100% complete documented report
Unsatisfactory(2)

Attended 2 and above seminars/training with

100% complete documented report
Poor (1)
Attended 2 and above seminars/training with
100% complete documented report
*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned.

THELMA C. PEREZ
Rater

TOMAS B. MARBELLA, JR.

Ratee

CRISTINA C. JUANGCO
Approving Authority

TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL
RESULTS

RATING

SCORE

OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISH
MENTS