Professional Documents
Culture Documents
12 - Ansiedade - Uso de Musica Vs Bloqueio Ruido
12 - Ansiedade - Uso de Musica Vs Bloqueio Ruido
12 - Ansiedade - Uso de Musica Vs Bloqueio Ruido
146
Literature Review
Music therapy is the process of bringing about
changes from undesirable, unhealthy, and uncomfortable conditions to more pleasant ones by the
deliberate use of music.3 Music has played an important role in health care and healing since the
beginning of recorded history. Mothers have
sung lullabies to soothe their children. Florence
PERIOPERATIVE MUSIC
147
Winter et al11 studied 62 women in the SDS gynecology unit. STAI was completed when they arrived
in the surgical holding area and again just before going to OR. The music group had a reduction of anxiety and stress after listening to music in the holding
area. The control group had an increase in anxiety
over the same period. The difference was significant, P , .05. All patients recommended that music be available for future patients.
Author
Study Description
Population Sample
Measurement Instrument
148
Table 1. A Review of Research Using Music to Improve Patient Outcomes of Surgery or Special Procedures
Statistical Significance
10 pts undergoing
microdiscectomies
Music groupNS
Questionnairevery
positive responses
Control groupNS
Nilsson et al5
Chlan et al6
Music group
Anxiety decreased (P 5 .002)
Pain decreased (P 5 .026)
Control group
Anxiety increased
Andrada et al8
Music group
STAI decreased (P , .01)
BP (NS)
SpO2 (NS)
HR (NS)
Yung et al9
Music group
SBP decreased (P , .01)
DBP decreased (P , .04)
HR decreased (P , .01)
Anxiety decreased (NS)
Nurse presence
SBP decreased (NS)
DBP increased (NS)
HR decreased (NS)
Anxiety decreased (NS)
Heiser et al4
Augustin and
Hains10
42 ambulatory pts
Music group
Anxiety decreased (P , .005)
DBP decreased (P , .005)
HR decreased (0.005)
RR decreased (P , .0005)
Control group
SBP decreased (P , .05)
DBP (NS)
HR (NS)
RR (NS)
Winter et al11
STAI, BP, HR
Music group
Anxiety decreased (P , .05)
BP (NS)
HR (NS)
Control groupNS
Hayes et al12
STAI
Music group
Anxiety decreased (F 5 7.5
and P 5 .007)
Lukas13
31 outpatients undergoing
orthopaedic surgery
Investigator survey
PERIOPERATIVE MUSIC
Control group
SBP increased (P , .01)
DBP increased (NS)
HR increased (P , .01)
Anxiety increased (NS)
Pts, patients; VAS, visual analog scale; NS, not significant; RCT, randomized controlled trial; NRS, numeric rating scale; BP, blood pressure; HR, heart rate; SpO2,
oxygen saturation; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; VS, vital signs; RR, respiratory rate; STAI, State Trait Anxiety Inventory; TURP, transurethral resection of prostate; SDS, same-day surgery; GYN, gynecologic; GI, gastrointestinal; EGD, esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
149
150
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to determine the
effect of music versus use of noise-blocking headphones on anxiety levels in women undergoing
SDS for gynecologic procedures. This intervention
could in turn improve the overall patient experience. It was hypothesized that both music and
headphone-only groups would have a decrease in
anxiety, with the greatest decrease in the music
group. Additional information on pain medication
while in PACU was also collected.
Methods
Study Design and Setting
An experimental three-group design was used with
pre- and postmeasurement of anxiety. The Institutional Review Board approved the study, and data
collection was conducted over a 3-month period
in 2009. All data were collected at a singleinstitution, a 550-bed tertiary care, community hospital with two surgical areas. An average of 90 cases
per day is seen in the main OR and recovered in a 24bed PACU. The PACU serves both inpatient and outpatient surgical cases. The second operating area is
The Womens Center, specifically for gynecological
surgery. The Center averages 18 procedures per day
with patients recovered in an 11-bed PACU. Most of
the surgeries are outpatient and include both invasive and noninvasive procedures.
The study was conducted in The Womens Center
for several reasons: (1) control of participant demographics; (2) tighter study control; (3) studies
have shown that women are more likely to experience preoperative anxiety than men.1
Instruments
Most studies reviewed used the State Scale of the
STAI. Frequently, only the State Anxiety Score is
used, as it measures anxiety related to the current
situation. However, because the STAI includes 20
questions, it was not used for this study.
An alternative tool, the Rapid Assessment Anxiety
tool, has been used in a previous study of patients
preoperative anxiety.1 Developed and validated by
Benotsch et al,14 this single-item numeric rating
scale provides a quick assessment of anxiety that
would be valid and time friendly in the presence
of our fast-paced OR schedules. The tool also provided the ability to detect change as it rated responses from 0 (no anxiety) to 10 (most anxiety
possible). Furthermore, it was easy for patients
to understand as it mirrored the usual pain measurement format. The initial work on this tool
demonstrated that it correlated highly with STAI
State Score demonstrating validity (r 5 0.77) in
a sample of 197 patients evaluated preoperatively.
Postoperatively, the same subjects also completed
both anxiety tools with a slight decrease in
strength of relationship (r 5 0.69). The numeric
rating tool also demonstrated sensitivity to change
that mirrored the responsiveness of the STAI
20-item scale.
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
All women undergoing gynecologic surgery at The
Womens Center were included in the study if they
were older than 18 years, undergoing an outpatient procedure, and provided written consent to
participate. Women were excluded if they had
hearing problems that would preclude their ability
to listen to music. A sample size of 120 women was
determined using G Power program. Based on an
alpha of 0.05, power of 0.80, and effect size of
0.25, a total sample of 120 subjects would be
needed for the planned analysis. A repeated measure analysis of variance with three groups and
two time points was planned to answer the research question and used as the basis for the
power analysis.
PERIOPERATIVE MUSIC
151
Control (n 5 41)
Headphones (n 5 35)
Music (n 5 43)
38.44
2.2
2.41
194.7
60.7
17.4
48.8
4.9
36.83
2.11
2.97
180
56.6
15
37.1
5.7
40.91
2.34
2.27
212.2
60.5
21.5
61.4
6.8
final total sample of 119 subjects. Additional comments from subjects were collected along with
a brief chart review of demographic information
and pain medication used in the PACU. The entire
headsets and MP3 players were sanitized with SaniCloth PLUS (Professional Disposables International, Inc., Two Nice-Pak Park Orangeburg, NY)
germicidal disposable cloths before and after use.
Results
The 119 women completing the study had a mean
age of 38.8 (standard deviation 5 2.2) years. There
were no significant differences in age or other
demographic characteristics by group (P ..05).
Table 2 provides general demographic information
for each of the three groups along with preoperative medication use and type of procedure performed.
To answer the research question, a repeated measure analysis of variance was performed using
Change in Anxiety
4.5
Level of Reported Anxiety (0-10)
4
3.5
Control (n=41)
3
2.5
Music (n=43)
2
Headphones only
(n=35)
1.5
1
0.5
0
Pre-op Anxiety
Figure 1. Changes in anxiety from pre-op to postop for each group. All subjects included. This figure is
available in color online at www.jopan.org.
152
Control (n 5 41)
Headphones (n 5 35)
Music (n 5 43)
3.98 (2.3)
2.15 (2.5)
21.83 (2.5)
4.20 (2.7)
1.46 (1.8)
22.74 (2.6)
3.74 (2.4)
1.16 (2.2)
22.58 (2.5)
PASW Statistics 17 (IBM Corp, Portsmouth, Hampshire, UK). Figure 1 shows the change in anxiety
from pre-op to post-op for subjects by group. All
groups experienced a reduction in anxiety of
about 2 units, but there were no statistically significant group differences (F 5 1.47 [2,116];
P 5 .224). Table 3 depicts the preoperative anxiety
and postoperative anxiety scores by group as well
as the change scores.
On closer examination, it was discovered that 12%
reported no anxiety pre-op and 51% had very low
levels of pre-op anxiety. Low anxiety (0-3) was
equally represented among the three groups. The
data were reanalyzed using only those with moderate to high levels of pre-op anxiety ($4/10), and
these results are reported in Table 4. When examining those with moderate or high levels of preoperative anxiety, all groups experienced a drop
in anxiety from pre- to postoperative status, but
the control group had the smallest decrease
(F 5 3.5; P 5 .03; power 5 0.63). The music group
experienced the lowest postoperative anxiety
scores, but the headphone group had a slightly
greater overall change score because this group
had a slightly higher preoperative anxiety score
(Figure 2). This significance in anxiety reduction was similar to those studies previously reviewed4-6,8-13 where P values ranged from .05
to .002.
Many subjects offered comments and opinions related to the use of music or headphones. The only
negative comments were either from those who
Discussion
Anxiety decreased after surgery; however, half
had low pre-op anxiety, making it difficult to see
the effect of music. This was surprising to us; however, as noted in the earlier study on anxiety, 35%
of women report feeling calm preoperatively.
Fifty-one percent of our participants had anxiety
ratings of 0 to 3. The fact that this unit is a new,
small, and women-only facility that focuses on
family-centered care may have had a calming effect
on the patients.
The team also considered the possibility of
measuring patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction
was at the time just starting to be measured by
Press Ganey for outpatient procedures. Although
Control (n 5 17)
Headphones (n 5 15)
Music (n 5 19)
6.0 (1.5)
3.59 (3.1)
22.41 (3.6)
6.13 (1.6)
1.93 (1.9)
24.80 (2.0)
6.05 (1.0)
1.71 (2.8)
24.08 (2.8)
Preoperative
Postoperative
Change in anxiety
*F 5 3.41 (degrees of freedom 1,2); P 5 .04.
PERIOPERATIVE MUSIC
153
8
7
6
Control (n=17)
5
Music (n=18)
Headphones
only (n=15)
3
2
1
0
Pre-op Anxiety
our goal was to ultimately improve the overall experience of the patient, we did not feel patients
should receive another questionnaire to fill out at
that time. We felt a reduction in anxiety was
a needed outcome and measurable.
Pain reduction was considered initially as a purpose
of the study. However, to truly explore the effects of
music on pain, everything else would need to be
controlled. The surgeon, the amount of marcaine
used in the incisions, the type of surgery being preformed, and the use of Toradol or other analgesics
preoperatively would all need to be controlled.
This did not appear to be feasible at our institution
at that time. In addition, the literature appeared to
have stronger support for anxiety reduction rather
than pain reduction (Table 1). The procedure of
starting the music in SDS and continuing it on into
the PACU is ideal. In our facility, we have continued
to offer music to preoperative patients in our
Womens Center. A sign in the pre-op room tells
patients they may ask for MP3 players. In addition,
we have SDS nurses who have seen the benefits of
the music and are initiating it. Keeping track of
the players is a challenge, and each unit adopting
this intervention should have a procedure in place
to track the patients and equipment. We are noting
on the chart the patient has one of the players. SDS
nurses are giving a patient sticker to PACU nurses so
that the PACU nurse can be watching for the player.
After each use, the PACU staff sanitizes and recharges the players.
At this time, we are implementing this procedure
in our main perioperative area. Patients attending
Limitations
All subjects were given music before pre-op medication; however, some had the opportunity to
154
Conclusion
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Linda S. Baas, PhD, RN, ACNP, Director of Nursing Research, The Christ Hospital, for her assistance
with the design of the study and the statistical analysis of the results; Joyce Burke, RN, BES, CPAN, PACU, Clinical Manager, for
her support throughout the study; and PACU nurses Lisa Haubner, RN, BSN, Diane Stapp, RN, and Kimberly Latham, RN, BSN,
CCRN, for their assistance with the study.
References
1. Rosen S, Svensson M, Nilsson U. Calm or not calm: The
question of anxiety in the perianesthesia patient. J Perianesth
Nurs. 2008;23:237-246.
2. Nightingale F. Notes on Nursing. New York, NY: Dover
Publications, Inc; 1969.
3. Morris DL. Music therapy. In: Dossey BM, Keegan L, eds.
Holistic Nursing: A Handbook for Practice. 5th ed. Sudburry,
MA: Jones and Bartlett; 2009:327-346.
4. Heiser R, Chiles K, Fudge M, Gray S. The use of music during the immediate postoperative recovery period. AORN J.
1997;65:777-785.
5. Nilsson U, Unosson M, Rawal N. Stress reduction and analgesia in patients exposed to calming music postoperatively: A
randomized controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22:
96-102.
6. Chlan L, Evans D, Greenleaf M, Walker J. Effects of a single
music therapy intervention on anxiety discomfort, satisfaction,
and compliance with screening guidelines in outpatients undergoing flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2000;23:
148-156.
7. Spielberger CD, Gaudry E, Vagg P. Validation of the statetrait distinction in anxiety research. Multivariate Behav Res.
1975;10:331-341.
8. Andrada JM, Vidal AA, Aguilar-Tablada TC, et al. Anxiety during the performance of colonoscopies: Modification using music
therapy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;16:1381-1386.
9. Yung PM, Chui-Kam S, French P, Chan TM. A controlled
trial of music and pre-op anxiety in Chinese men undergoing
transurethral resection of the prostate. J Adv Nurs. 2002;39:
352-359.
10. Augustin P, Hains A. Effects of music on ambulatory surgery patients preoperative anxiety. AORN J. 1996;63:750-758.
11. Winter MJ, Paskin S, Baker T. Music reduces stress and
anxiety of patients in the surgical holding area. J Post Anesth
Nurs. 1994;9:340-343.
12. Hayes A, Buffum M, Lanier E, Rodahl E, Sasso C. A music
intervention to reduce anxiety prior to gastrointestinal procedures. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2003;26:145-149.
13. Lukas L. Orthopedic outpatients perception of perioperative music listening as therapy. J Theory Constr Test. 2004;8:
7-12.
14. Benotsch EG, Lutgendorf SK, Watson D, et al. Rapid anxiety assessment in medical patients: Evidence for the validity of
verbal anxiety ratings. Ann Behav Med. 2000;22:199-203.
15. Obenrader J. Equianalgesic dosing of opioids for pain
management. Prescribers Letter. V004; (200915):1-3.