Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Disciplinary Procedures Updated Apr 2012
Disciplinary Procedures Updated Apr 2012
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE
INTRODUCTION
1 In the process of ensuring that all staff maintain the standards required of them as
employees of the University, the need is recognised to have in being a University-wide
procedure for taking decisions on disciplinary matters, which incorporates best practice
in relation to fairness and natural justice.
2 This Disciplinary Procedure is based on the following principles:
The opportunity for the individual to hear allegations against her/him and to
answer those allegations at a formal interview.
The reason for any proposed disciplinary action to be clearly stated and the
outcome recorded as outlined in the procedures that follow.
The provision for wiping records clean and inspection of personal files by staff.
Notes of disciplinary hearings and appeal panels will be taken by a person not
involved in the decision-making process. The notes taken will constitute the
only record of the hearing/appeal.
6 These procedures will be applied in accordance with the provisions of Article 57 of the
Memorandum and Articles of Association, which relate to Academic Freedom.
7 Senior Post Holders as designated by the Board of Governors of the *London South
Bank University, may only be suspended by the Chairman or Deputy Chairman of the
Board of Governors in accordance with the Clauses 61, 63, 64 of the Articles of
Association of the *London South Bank University. Dismissal and appeal against
dismissal for such office holders shall be in accordance with Clauses 65, 66, 67, 68 of
the same Articles.
Disciplinary Procedure
8 In the course of promoting the quality of the teaching, research and administration of
the University and the performance of each individual member of staff, there will be a
considerable amount of discussion, information and advice between the Vice
Chancellorate, the Deans, * Heads of Departments and other members of staff, as well
as from outside agencies such as the internal auditors, the *QAA and Her Majestys
Inspectorate (HMI). Such communication, which may include critical advice to
individual members of staff at all levels, is an essential and proper part of good
leadership and is without prejudice to the following procedure, which is intended to
deal with cases where the conduct of an individual member of staff has fallen below
required standards, where infringements of rules and regulations occur or where there
is any conduct injurious to the safe and/or effective operation of the University. In rare
cases the single action of a member of staff may constitute misconduct that is of such
a serious nature as to merit immediate action, which may be taken in accordance with
paragraph 47 of this document, which relates to suspension.
9 This Disciplinary Procedure shall apply to all members of staff, other than those subject
to probationary assessment.
10 Within this Procedure Representative shall mean a work colleague or a Trade Union
Representative.
11 Occasionally at a hearing evidence may be presented which, if substantiated, would
imply misconduct clearly in excess of that commensurate with the stage reached. In
such exceptional cases and with prior approval of a *Pro Vice Chancellor and the
Director of Human Resources, management may take the matter to the next stage of
the procedure after terminating the current hearing and giving the member of staff
appropriate warning and the due period of notice.
12 It is a fundamental requirement of good management practice that the authority to
instigate disciplinary proceedings is vested in an individuals direct line manager. In
accordance with natural justice to ensure that an employee is afforded the benefit of a
fair and equitable decision, the line manager will always be accompanied by at least
one other manager who has not previously been involved, and a senior member of the
Human Resources Department.
13 The term Manager is used throughout this Procedure. To determine those postholders who have authority to take action under the stages of this Procedure, reference
should be made to Appendix 1 for Academic Staff and Appendix 2 for Support Staff.
14 Any Manager who is anticipating using the Disciplinary Procedure is required to consult
a senior member of the Human Resources Department before proceeding.
3
the Hearing taking place. In the case of dismissal this letter will give the reasons for
dismissal, and the date on which employment will terminate.
37 In the case of demotion this letter will give the reasons for demotion, the grade at
which the member of staff will be designated, and the effective date of demotion.
38 The member of staff will also be informed that she or he has the right to appeal against
this decision.
APPEAL AGAINST DISMISSAL OR DEMOTION
39 If a member of staff wishes to appeal against dismissal or demotion, she or he will
have the right to have the appeal heard by the Vice Chancellor and two Lay Governors.
40 In such cases the member of staff must write to the Director of Human Resources
within 5 working days of receipt of the *Pro Vice Chancellors letter.
41 The member of staff is entitled to submit any additional information in support of their
Appeal for consideration by the Panel. This information must be submitted at the same
time as the Appeal is lodged with the Director of Human Resources.
42 The Director of Human Resources will make arrangements for the Appeal to be heard
within 10 working days of receipt of the request.
43 The member of staff will have the right to attend and be accompanied by a
representative at the Appeal Hearing.
44 The decision of the Panel will be final and will be notified to the member of staff in
writing within 5 working days of the hearing.
45 In the case of an Appeal Hearing held under this stage, the dismissal or demotion shall
not take effect until the outcome of the Appeal Hearing has been determined.
46 The procedure to be adopted at the Appeal Hearing is outlined in Appendix 4.
SUSPENSION
47 When a *Pro Vice Chancellor becomes aware of an allegation against or an action of a
member of staff which, if subsequently proved, would amount to gross misconduct, the
Pro Vice Chancellor may, acting under powers delegated to her/him by the Vice
Chancellor, in accordance with the Articles of the University, suspend that member
from duty on the employees average earnings and require that member to leave the
premises of her or his normal employment while the matter is investigated, subject to
the member being given reasonable opportunity to make suitable arrangements of a
personal nature. If circumstances require, the power to suspend may be delegated to
another member of the Executive by the Vice Chancellor. As at April 2012, members of
the Executive are the Vice Chancellor, Pro Vice Chancellors, Executive Director of
Finance, University Secretary and Clerk to the Board of Governors and Executive
Deans. Such suspension will not imply pre-judgment of guilt, but will serve only to
reserve the position while investigations are made and to remove the person against
whom the allegations are made from her or his place of employment. In this way any
investigation can be seen, not only to be completely impartial and uninfluenced by the
members presence, but also the member can demonstrate her or his lack of influence
upon the investigation.
6
Depending on the outcome of the investigation the appropriate *Pro Vice Chancellor
will decide whether or not the member is to be disciplined, and the stage which would
be appropriate.
Such a course of action will only be taken in exceptional
circumstances i.e. involving alleged offences of such gravity that it would be
inappropriate to deal with them under other stages of the Disciplinary Procedure.
GROSS MISCONDUCT
48 The examples listed below are considered to be conduct of such gravity that the
Procedure would be entered at Stage 4. The list is neither exclusive nor exhaustive,
but provides an illustration of the conduct for which an employee may be dismissed:
49 Any *Head of Department, Dean or member of the Vice Chancellorate who becomes
aware of such allegations or actions should immediately report the situation to the
appropriate *Pro Vice Chancellor so that the situation can be immediately investigated.
APPENDIX 1
POST HOLDERS WITH AUTHORITY TO TAKE ACTION UNDER THE DISCIPLINARY
PROCEDURE FOR ACADEMIC STAFF
DISCIPLINARY PANEL
APPEAL PANEL
Stage 1
* Head of Department
Dean
Stage 2
* Head of Department
Dean
Stage 3
* Head of Department
Stage 4
Dismissal/Demotion
NB: The Authority to suspend a member of staff rests with a * Pro Vice Chancellor or as
appropriate, may be delegated by the Vice Chancellor to a member of the Executive.
APPENDIX 2
POSTHOLDERS WITH AUTHORITY TO ACT UNDER THE DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR SUPPORT STAFF
STAFF GROUP
STAGE 1 DISCIPLINARY
APPEAL
STAGE 2 DISCIPLINARY
Support
Departments
Deputy Director/Deputy
Head/Unit Manager or
equivalent
Faculties
Faculty Manager or
equivalent
Technicians
Technical Services
Manager or equivalent
APPEAL
APPENDIX 2
POSTHOLDERS WITH AUTHORITY TO ACT UNDER THE DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR SUPPORT STAFF
STAFF GROUP
STAGE 3
DISCIPLINARY
APPEAL
STAGE 4
DISCIPLINARY
APPEAL
SUSPENSION
Support
Departments
Director/Head of
Department or
equivalent
Any postholder
empowered to take
disciplinary action
under stage 3 who
has not previously
been involved
Faculties
Executive Dean/Pro
Dean
Any postholder
empowered to take
disciplinary action
under stage 3 who
has not previously
been involved
Technicians
Head of Academic
Department/Executive
Dean/Pro Dean
Any postholder
empowered to take
disciplinary action
under stage 3 who
has not previously
been involved
NB: The authority to suspend a member of staff rests with a *Pro-Vice Chancellor, or as appropriate, may be delegated by the Vice
Chancellor to a member of the Executive.
10
APPENDIX 3
Disciplinary Procedure, Conduct of Disciplinary Hearings
1.
2.
3.
12
APPENDIX 4
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE CONDUCT OF APPEAL PANELS
1.
2.
When the Appellant has completed their presentation the Panel may, through the
Chair, ask further questions.
In addition, the Appeal Panel may request the attendance of the line-manager (or
other persons involved) to present information on the circumstances, which led to
disciplinary action.
The Chair of the Appeal Panel may allow both parties to ask questions of each other.
Both parties will have the opportunity to sum up their cases if they so wish, the
appellant having the right to do so last.
At the conclusion of the hearing the Chair of the Appeal Panel will explain that after
declaring the hearing closed the Panel will now give consideration to all the
submissions made with a view to making a decision.
The Chair of the Appeal Panel will notify both parties of the outcome of the hearing,
in writing, within 5 working days of the conclusion of the hearing.
The Chair may exercise discretion on behalf of the Panel to inform the Appellant
orally of the outcome of their appeal, at the conclusion of the Hearing.
Where an Appeal is upheld all papers pertaining to the case will be returned to the
Human Resources Department. No information concerning the case will be retained
on the individuals personal file.
(webloaded/17MAY12/TP)
14