Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Miguel Avila-Martinez, A200 561 097 (BIA July 21, 2015)
Miguel Avila-Martinez, A200 561 097 (BIA July 21, 2015)
Department of Justice
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Board ofImmigration Appeals
Office of the Clerk
5107 leesburg Pike, Suite 2000
Falls Church, Virginia 20530
A 200-561-097
Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case.
Sincerely,
bCWUL
{!t1AAJ
Donna Carr
Chief Clerk
Enclosure
Panel Members:
Grant, Edward R.
Userteam: Docket
Date:
JUL J l 2015
APPEAL
ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Jose Emique Perez, Esquire
ON BEHALF OF DHS:
Denise C. Hochul
Senior Attorney
APPLICATION: Reopening
The respondent, a native and citizen of Mexico, appeals the Immigration Judge's
decision, dated March 26, 2013, denying the respondent's motion to reopen his proceedings in
which he was ordered removed in absentia. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
opposes the appeal.
In the respondent's motion to reopen, he alleged that he had to obtain a ride from a friend
and he arrived late for his hearing, and his motion was supported by his affidavit. The
Immigration Judge's order merely states that the "[r]espondent failed to establish 'exceptional
circumstances' for his failure to appear. See attached DHS response and exhibits."
Under these circumstances, we find the record inadequate for review. An Immigration
Judge's decision that lacks sufficient analysis does not provide an adequate opportunity to the
alien to contest the Immigration Judge's determinations on appeal and leaves the Board without
adequate means of reviewing the bases for the Immigration Judge's decision in light of the
respondent's arguments on appeal. See Matter ofA-P-, 22 I&N Dec. 468 (BIA 1999); Matter of
M-P-, 20 I&N Dec. 786 (BIA 1994) (finding that an Immigration Judge must fully explain the
reasons for denying a motion in order to allow the respondent a fair opportunity to contest the
decision and the Board an opportunity for meaningful appellate review). Accordingly, the record
will be remanded to the Immigration Judge for the issuance of a full decision.
In remanding this case, we intimate no opinion as to the ultimate merits of the
respondent's appeal.
ORDER: The record is returned to the Immigration Court for further proceedings in
accordance with this decision.
Cite as: Miguel Avila-Martinez, A200 561 097 (BIA July 21, 2015)
IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS
,; .
l.,:. ,_.
t- ..
\.._-
IN THE MATTER OF
AVILA-MARTINEZ, MIGUEL
FILE A 200-561-097
ON THE PARTIES.
FF
LAW OFFICE OF
PEREZ, JOSE E.
120 EAST WASHINGTON ST., #925
SYRACUSE, NY 13202
..
..,.
1
2
3
4
NOT-DETAINED
7
8
9
1o
11
12
13
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
AVJLA-MARTINEZ, Miguel
In REMOVAL Proceedings
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
/-tt..r-Jis.'tf-'P-..wPI.
.plfJ ,_.,,..,,.,
,e, "'
.:1-N-l.3
Date
#.
TE!;fnd:
J,,cc.-
.{4,&---J
on Judge
24
25
26
27
28
Certificate of Service
Mail
Personal Service
This document was seived by:
Alien c/o Custodial Officer __ Alien's Atty/Rep
Alien
To:
DHS
By: Court Staff -------Date: