Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gawker
Gawker
Gawker
Plaintiffs,
v.
GAWKER MEDIA LLC,and NICK
DENTON,
Defendants.
Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1, Plaintiffs William W. Gilman and Edward J. McNerney, Jr.
provide the following Statement pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 in support of their Motion for
Summary Judgment.
I.
The Parties
A.
Defendants
1.
Defendants' Answer, Dkt. No. 8("Defs.' Ans.") 13. Denton Dep. 103:13-17.
2.
Hanchen Lu and David Matthews are no longer Plaintiffs in this matter. (Dkt. Nos. 45 and 65.)
1
3.
The websites were all operated out of Gawker's New York offices and shared a
Gawker did operate or does operate, inter alia, the following ten blogs:
Gawker.TV;
Kotaku.com;
Lifehacker.com;
Deadspin.com;
io9.com;
Gawker advertises itself as "the definitive news and gossip sheet for followers of
Gawker primarily generates its revenue from advertising. Kidder Dep. 76:18-20.
8.
This advertising revenue relies on traffic to the websites. Denton Dep. 206:4-
207:21.
9.
The primary. driver of this revenue is derived from the number of unique Internet
Gawker has been running a "significant" profit since 2009.3 Denton Dep. 117:25-
118:10.
11.
Cites to depositions in this matter shall take the form "[last name] Dep.[page:line]." The
depositions are attached to the Declaration of James Halter submitted in support of Plaintiffs'
Motion for Summary Judgment("Halter Decl.")as exhibits 151 to 162.
3 Also note that Gawker has made a judicial admission that its revenues exceed $500,000
pursuant to the FLSA definition of"Enterprise engages in commerce or in the production of
goods for commerce," 29 U.S.C. 203(s)(1)(A)(ii). Dkt. No. 88.
2
12.
13.
Denton was involved in setting Gawker's policies with respect to interns. Defs.'
and the length of internships and was personally involved in these decisions. Halter Decl., Exs..
165-167.
B.
Plaintiffs
1.
Aulistar Mark
15.
16.
Mark has a degree in journalism from the New School for Social Research, and an
associate's degree from the University of Hartford. Mark Dep. 11:19-25, 12:20-24.
17.
18.
Mark had an interest in video game journalism and worked for Gawker weblog
Kotaku.com,from May 17, 2011 through August 20, 2011. Mark Decl. ~ 5, 29.
19.
Kotaku.com is a Gawker blog devoted to news and other content regarding video
Mark worked at Gawker's headquarters in New York, New York. Mark Decl. 7.
21.
Mark was required to abide by the same company policies that applied to regular,
24.
Mark created, posted, and promoted content for Gawker. Mark Decl. 18.
25.
Mark took photos and video and edited images for Kotaku.com. Mark Decl. ~ 19.
26.
Mark conducted research and wrote posts and articles, including a reoccurring
28.
Mark moderated and managed reader comments. Mark Decl. 23. Gawker gave
Mark "moderator" status to manipulate the comment system and content on the Gawker blogs.
Mark. Decl. 13.
29.
Mark conducted interviews for stories published on Gawker. Mark Decl. 29.
30.
Mark worked independently during the E3 expo, a major video game industry
convention, while Totilo was in Los Angeles attending the expo. Mark supported Totilo during
the expo by performing day-to-day tasks. Mark Decl. ~ 24.
31.
Mark was expected to, and did, work largely independently. Mark Decl. 30.
32.
The only training Mark received was "on the job" training. Mark Decl. 34.
33.
During a typical week, Mark worked at least 20 hours. Mark Decl. 37.
34.
Mark job duties remained the same throughout his employment. Mark Decl. 32.
35.
The work assignments Mark received and Gawker's supervision of him were
similar to the work assignments and supervision of other interns. Mark Decl. 8.
36.
Mark received academic credit for his work at Gawker. Mark Dep. 48:4-6.
37.
Decl. 7.
38.
Mark received assignments from Totilo as well as other editors. Mark Decl. 9.
39.
to Mark, including a weekly article titled "iTunes Chart Topper," and articles such as "This Was
Live-Action Asteroids, And Two Other Games," published on June 8, 2010, and "Chinatown
Arcade, An Unlikely Place For Tolerance". Halter Decl. Exs. 176-180.
40.
Mark's posts and other content were viewed by at least thousands of visitors of
Gawker did not pay Mark for his work for Gawker. Mark Decl. 39
2.
Andrew Hudson
42.
Andrew Hudson has a degree in Political Science from Fordham College. Hudson
Dep. 8:6-11.
43.
Hudson now works for the Center for Care Innovations, which promotes
45.
Hudson worked for Gawker weblog io9.com from June 10, 2008 through
Io9.com is a Gawker blog devoted to science fiction and technology. Hudson Decl.
47.
Hudson was required to abide by company policies that regular employees were
5.
50.
Hudson created and promoted content for Gawker. Hudson Decl. 16; Hudson
Dep. 79:24-81:9.
51.
Hudson conducted research and wrote posts and articles. Hudson Decl. 17.
52.
53.
Hudson was expected to, and did, work largely independently. Hudson Decl. 24.
54.
The only training Hudson received was "on the job" training. Hudson Decl. 28;
During a typical week, Hudson worked at least 24 hours. Hudson Decl. 31.
56.
Hudson did not receive academic credit for his internship. Hudson Dep. 62:5-63:4.
57.
Charlie Jane Anders("Anders"), an editor at the Gawker's io9.com blog, among.others. Hudson
Decl. 8-10; Anders Dep. 17:21-19:1.
58.
Usually, the assignments Hudson received had extremely short deadlines which
required them to be completed within one to two days. Hudson Dep. 30:6-18.
59.
Hudson worked remotely from St. Louis, Missouri telecommuting to the New York
On July 20, 2008, Gawker, through its blog io9.com, published an article written
by and credited to Andrew Hudson, titled "Five Ways Reality Went Sci-Fi So Far This Century."
Halter Decl., Ex. 181. The article received a lot of traffic, approximately 80,000 views which was
substantial for io9.com at the time. Hudson Dep. 73:22-74:15.
61.
by and credited to Hudson, titled "Our Four-Color Picks For Vice President." Halter Decl., Ex.
182.
62.
Woerner, Hudson's direct supervisor, testified that "it's a perfectly fine article."
63.
Hudson's posts and other content were viewed by at least thousands of visitors of
One of the io9.com employees to whom Hudson reported may have mistaken
Gawker did not pay Hudson for his work for Gawker. Hudson Decl. 33.
C.
66.
Gawker had its "internship" program until the end of 2012. Kidder Dep. 52:18-
67.
53:15.
research, administrative tasks, and managing the reader comment threads posted alongside
Gawker's articles, as detailed below. Johnson Dep.18:18-21; Hudson Decl. 17,27; Mark Decl.
~ 21-23, 33; Halter Decl., Exs. 188, 191-194.
68.
Gawker did not provide any formal classroom training for interns; the training was
essentially "on the job." Anders Dep.68:22-70:20; Coen Dep.74:22-25; Hudson Decl. 28. Mark
Decl. 34.
69.
Using interns was essential to Gawker's business strategy. Halter Decl., Ex. 197.
71.
Gawker advertised its internships, and the advertisements referred to the internship
as a "job," and detailed various duties that the interns would undertake. Halter Decl., Ex. 207.
72.
The advertisements set forth a minimum time commitment, such as several days
73.
Gawker required that its interns sign an Internship Policy and Acknowledgment,
which stated that the intern would not be paid. Halter Decl., Ex. 170. There is no evidence that
Hudson signed such a document.
74.
One Gawker.com advertisement stated upfront that the interns would not be paid
and indicated that Gawker wanted already-trained interns: "Previous internship experience at a
newspaper, magazine, or web site is preferred, as is familiarity with the software tools of our
trade." The Gawker advertisement promoted the internship as "[i]n exchange for stressful labor
under constant deadlines, you'll get~valuable experience at whatever it is we do." The
same advertisement stated the job "will involve research, number-crunching, reporting, design,
and doing things that we'd rather not do." Halter Decl. Ex. 207 at 6.
75.
Gawker's CEO,Denton, decided that Gawker would replace its intern program with an "editorial
fellowship" program. Johnson Dep. 65:23-67:2; Newitz Dep. 119:3-120:6; Totilo Dep. 80:18-23;
Halter Decl., Exs. 172-175, 211.
76.
The tasks formerly performed by interns would,from then on, be performed by paid
editorial fellows. Johnson Dep. 65:23-67:2; Newitz Dep. 119:3-120:6; Totilo Dep. 80:18-23;
Halter Decl., Exs. 172-175.
77.
Denton testified that the fellowship program had "some ofthe same characteristics"
Editorial fellows were assured at least the minimum wage for their labors. Newitz
Io9.com fellows are paid $12.50 per hour. Newitz Dep. 121:6-121:19.
80.
Anders was an editor at the Gawker's io9.com blog. Anders Dep. 17:21-19:1.
81.
Several interns worked for her, and Gawker did not track their hours because
Anders did not see the point in doing so. Anders Dep. 33s23-34:12, 36:12-13, 38:15-39:1.
82.
The interns worked at io9.com for several months each. Anders Dep. 35:16-36:7,
The io9.com interns researched, wrote, pitched articles for themselves and other
writers to write, and moderated reader comments threads as part of their job duties. Anders Dep.
68:22-69:2, 75:4-7, 72:24-25, 76:1-3.
84.
Io9.com's permanent employees performed the same tasks as the interns did.
Newitz also had interns who worked for her at io9.com, some of which lasted as
long as a year, and most of the interns were not paid. Newitz Dep. 17:6-12, 18:5-16; 22:10-16,
50:12-15, 50:22-23, 55:16-17, 59:12-14, 60:2-3, 61:9-17.
86.
Most ofthe io9.com interns worked around ten hours per week. Newitz Dep. 51:3-
Both intern and non-intern employees at io9.com performed the same function of
Interns also researched, assisted in getting sources for articles, and wrote articles.
Newitz thought that Gawker should pay its interns and expressed anger that they
Dep. 140:20-21.
91.
supervised several interns, including Hudson. Woerner Dep. 9:5-7, 13:11-21. Hudson Decl. 8.
92.
The interns she supervised performed tasks such as research, writing, and pitching
The interns' stories are available on the io9.com website just like any of its other
94.
Gawker provided Plaintiffs with only "on-thejob training." Mark Dep. 44: 15-
45:10, 48:7-9; Johnson Dep. 17:4-6; Hudson Dep. 67:3-68:23; Hudson Decl. 28.
95.
The training was similar,ifnot identical,to how Gawker trained its paid employees.
Gawker did not expose Plaintiffs to training materials; training seminars, classes or
This on-thejob training was designed to familiarize Plaintiffs with using Gawker's
own internal systems, such as Kinja, Gawker's proprietary software used by all ofits blogs, which
was solely for Gawker's benefit. Denton Dep. 18:18-19:8; 20:12-21:18, Newitz Dep. 85:6-86:14.
98.
research that we would be asking [the interns] to do. But a lot of it also had to do with helping
write articles on the site and eventually [they] had to pitch articles on the site." Anders Dep. 68:1972:23.
10
99.
The benefits Plaintiffs received from this "training," if any, are the same benefits
that Gawker's entry-level paid employees received, which only benefitted Gawker. Newitz Dep.
90:19-91:11.
B.
100.
Gawker did not require Plaintiffs to receive academic credit. Halter Decl. Halter
In fact, Gawker welcomed interns who were not even enrolled in school. Halter
The internship program was not scheduled around the academic calendar because
the interns "work[ed] on a rolling basis, to say the least." Mark Dep. 82:3-14; Halter Decl. Ex. 185
104.
In many cases, Plaintiffs' supervisors were not aware iftheir interns were receiving
school credit, let alone whether they were enrolled in school. Anders Dep. 39:18-20; Johnson Dep.
22:7-16; Totilo Dep. 98:18-99:19.
A. Plaintiffs Displaced The Work Of Paid Employees And Vice Versa.
105.
Had Gawker not used Plaintiffs, it would have had to use paid employees do the
same work. Hudson Dep. 53:6-13; Woerner Dep. 22:20-23, 26:5-8; Mark Decl. 33.
106.
Plaintiffs did the same work that permanent employees did. Hudson Decl. 17;
posts; scouted for article/blog post topics; monitored the reader comment boards; and performed
11
other tasks essential to the operation of the company. Johnson Dep. 18:18-21; Hudson Decl.
17, 27, 30; Mark Decl. 21-23, 33, 36; Halter Decl., Exs. 188, 191-194.
108.
When paid employees were being overworked, Gawker's solution was to have
Indeed, when Gawker's revenues were suffering, Gawker's solution was that
Gawker "use the interns" more to generate traffic and the resulting revenue. Halter Decl.,Ex. 199.
110.
Shortly after class actions were filed on behalf of unpaid interns of other media
companies,Gawker changed the name ofits internship program to the editorial fellowship program
and started to pay the new individuals hired into the "fellowship" program the minimum wage.
Halter Decl., Exs. 172-175.
111.
Fellows do the same work as Plaintiffs and the other interns previously did,the only
difference is that they are paid the minimum wage. Johnson Dep. 65:23-67:2 Totilo Dep. 80:1823.
C.
112.
hire as paid employees. Anders Dep. 75:11-25; Johnson Dep. 24:4-9; Totilo Dep. 42:21; Woerner
Dep. 37:19-38:2; Halter Decl. Exs. 192 and 200.
113.
a good way of figuring out whether or not they might be a good employee." Darbyshire Dep.
63:13-16.
114.
When Gawker found an intern's work not to sufficiently benefit Gawker, i.e., by
not sufficiently "spotting" stories that were appropriate for Gawker or simply not working hard
enough, Gawker terminated that intern's employment. Halter Decl., Exs. 201-205.
Respectfully submitted,
LIDDLE & ROBINSQN,L.L.P.
James W.Halter
Robert L. Adler
800 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Phone:(212)687-8500
Fax:(212)687-1505
Email:jhalter@liddlerobinson.com
Email: radler@liddlerobinson.com
Attorneysfor Plaintiffs
13
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned attorney for Plaintiffs, James W.Halter, certifies that on August 14,2015,
he caused to be served true and correct copies of Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment, Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment,
Plaintiffs' Statement of Undisputed Material Facts Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1, and the
Declaration of James W. Halter and the exhibits attached thereto upon Defendants' counsel by
mailing a copy ofsame to Defendants' counsel by FedEx overnight delivery, addressed as follows:
Mark W. Batten, Esq.
Proskauer Rose LLP
One International Place
Boston, Massachusetts 021 10-2600
By:
ames W. Halter