Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No.

37 / Monday, February 25, 2008 / Notices 10051

A copy of the plats may be obtained cedar bark, mountain goat wool, and pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (13), the
from the Land Office at the Oregon/ commercial wool, and the design figures museum does not have right of
Washington State Office, Bureau of are dyed black, blue, and yellow, on a possession to the object of cultural
Land Management, 333 S.W. 1st natural white background. patrimony. Lastly, officials of the Alaska
Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204, upon The ‘‘multiplying wolf’’ design State Museum have determined that,
required payment. A person or party depicted on the tunic is a primary crest pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is
who wishes to protest against a survey of the Wolf House of the Kaagwaantaan a relationship of shared group identity
must file a notice that they wish to clan of Sitka, AK. The ceremonial use of that can be reasonably traced between
protest (at the above address) with the the tunic by members of the Wolf House the object of cultural patrimony and the
Oregon/Washington State Director, is documented in photos from the late Central Council of the Tlingit & Haida
Bureau of Land Management, Portland, 19th century to early 20th century. Indian Tribes and Sitka Tribe of Alaska,
Oregon. Several images show the tunic being both acting on behalf of leaders of the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: worn by Jake Yarquan (Yaak waan), a Wolf House of the Sitka Kaagwaantaan
Chief, Branch of Geographic Sciences, leader of the Wolf House who was most clan.
Bureau of Land Management, (333 S.W. likely the caretaker of the tunic. Representatives of any other Indian
1st Avenue), P.O. Box 2965, Portland, Following Mr. Yarquan’s death, the tribe that believes itself to be culturally
Oregon 97208. tunic was purchased from his widow, affiliated with the object of cultural
Lily Yarkwan, by the Historical Library patrimony should contact Mr. Bruce
Dated: February 12, 2008. and Museum Commission, and donated Kato, Chief Curator, Alaska State
Fred O’Ferrall, to the Alaska Historical Library and Museum, 395 Whittier Street, Juneau,
Branch of Lands and Minerals Resources. Museum, Territory of Alaska (now AK 99801–1718, telephone (907) 465–
[FR Doc. E8–3473 Filed 2–22–08; 8:45 am] known as the Alaska State Museum). 2901, before March 26, 2008.
BILLING CODE 4310–33–P Under Tlingit law, the tunic is Repatriation of the object of cultural
considered at.oow of the Wolf House of patrimony to the Central Council of the
the Sitka Kaagwaantaan, and is by Tlingit & Haida Indian Tribes and/or
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR definition the property of the group. Sitka Tribe of Alaska, on behalf of the
Based on Tlingit law, the tunic is an Wolf House of the Sitka Kaagwaantaan
National Park Service object of cultural patrimony and has clan, may proceed after that date if no
ongoing cultural importance to the clan. additional claimants come forward.
Notice of Intent to Repatriate a Cultural
While at.oow is cared for by a clan
Item: Alaska State Museum, Juneau, Dated: January 22, 2008
leader it remains communal property. In
AK Sherry Hutt,
this case, the tunic was alienated by the
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. widow of the caretaker, Lily Yarkwan, Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
ACTION: Notice. who belonged to another clan. [FR Doc. E8–3457 Filed 2–22–08; 8:45 am]
According to museum records, Mrs. BILLING CODE 4312–50–S
Notice is here given in accordance Yarkwan presented herself as legal
with the Native American Graves owner of the tunic to museum officials,
Protection and Repatriation Act who subsequently purchased it in good DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3005, of the intent faith. There is no evidence that the Wolf
to repatriate a cultural item in the House itself was directly involved in the National Park Service
possession of the Alaska State Museum, alienation or that the transaction was
Juneau, AK, which meets the definition handled in accordance with Tlingit law. Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural
of ‘‘object of cultural patrimony’’ under The Alaska State Museum has Items: Arizona State Museum,
25 U.S.C. 3001. received claims for this object by the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
This notice is published as part of the Central Council Tlingit & Haida Indian AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
National Park Service’s administrative Tribes (on behalf of Mr. Andrew ACTION: Notice.
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 Gamble, a leader of the Wolf House),
U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations and by the Sitka Tribe of Alaska (on Notice is here given in accordance
in this notice are the sole responsibility behalf of Mr. Herman Kitka, a clan with the Native American Graves
of the museum, institution, or Federal leader of the Wolf House). During Protection and Repatriation Act
agency that has control of the cultural consultation with the tribes and clan (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3005, of the intent
items. The National Park Service is not officials, the parties presented similar to repatriate cultural items in the
responsible for the determinations in information on the details, meaning, possession of the Arizona State
this notice. and history of the tunic, as well as Museum, University of Arizona,
The one cultural item is the traditional Tlingit law, but differed Tucson, AZ, that meet the definition of
Woodzixéedi Gooch Naazein Kudás’ or regarding the present leadership of the ‘‘unassociated funerary objects’’ under
Multiplying Wolf Tunic (ASM catalogue Wolf House. All parties agreed that the 25 U.S.C. 3001.
number II–B–1356). The tunic is woven tunic is an object of cultural patrimony This notice is published as part of the
in the Chilkat technique, made by an and was alienated without the consent National Park Service’s administrative
unknown weaver in the style common of the Wolf House. responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
in the late 19th century. The one-piece, Officials of the Alaska State Museum U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations
sleeveless tunic is worn draped over the have determined that, pursuant to 25 in this notice are the sole responsibility
shoulders and over other clothing by U.S.C. 3001 (3)(D), the tunic has of the museum, institution, or Federal
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES

both men and women. It has a figurative ongoing historical, traditional, or agency that has control of the cultural
design of wolves woven on the front and cultural importance central to the items. The National Park Service is not
geometric designs on the back. One side Native American group or culture itself, responsible for the determinations in
of the tunic is permanently closed, rather than property owned by an this notice.
while the other side closes with leather individual. Officials of the Alaska State In 1958, cultural items were removed
ties. The tunic is hand woven from Museum also have determined that, from a burial at the Mission San Xavier

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:34 Feb 22, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM 25FEN1

You might also like