Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Recusalbrfdefs
Recusalbrfdefs
17
26
27
28
1 On April 14, 2006, the Court issued an Order (Dkt. 59) regarding its review of this
2 matter for possible recusal. In the Order, the Court invites the parties to submit briefs
3 addressing the matters in the Order. Order at 6:1-6. Defendant AT&T CORP. (“AT&T”)
4 submits this response.
5 AT&T agrees with the Court’s analysis and does not believe that Judge Walker’s
7 predecessors constitutes a conflict of interest that would require recusal under 28 U.S.C.
19
By /s/ Bruce A. Ericson
20 Bruce A. Ericson
Attorneys for Defendants
21 AT&T CORP. and AT&T INC.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28