Questionnaire Comenius Project Music of art and art of music...

2014-2015, second year.

Teachers
1.

2.

Project in my own school

1.1 Involvement of teachers
1.2 Impact on these teachers
1.3 Involving students
1.4 Impact on these students
1.5 Involving parents
1.6 Impact on these parents
1.7 Support by school administration
1.8 Support by local administration
1.9 Cooperation with local institutions
1.10 Communication with community and parents
1.11 Motivation of staff
1.12 Amount of Comenius work was appropriate
1.13 Amount of money for the project was appropriate
TOTAL

Cooperation with partners

2.1 Communication between partners
2.2 Use of the language between partners
2.3 Exchange of materials
2.4 Respect for the deadlines

Very
poor

Poor

Very
good
% Perccentages
30
70
30
70
15
85
15
85
15
70
15
57
43
15
85
28.5
28.5
43
15
85
15
70
15
57
43
43
57
43
57
73.5
428
753

Very
poor

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

15
15

70
70
43
43

Satisfactory

Good

Very
good
15
15
57
57

2.5 Relationship among partners

2.6 Freedom to express opinions
2.7 Results of the common work
TOTAL

3.a

Meeting in UK
3a.1 Time for project- work
3a.2 Time for social- contact
3a.3 Time for sightseeing
3a.4 Free time
3a.5 Duration of the meetings
3a.6 Timetable
3a.7 Organization of activities
3a.8 Information about school- system
3a.9 Reception and attendance of the participants
3a.10 Work atmosphere
TOTAL

3.b

Meeting in Spain
3b.1 Time for project- work
3b.2 Time for social- contact
3b.3 Time for sightseeing

30

70
57
57
410

Very
poor
100

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

30
43
43
260

Very
good

100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
600

Very
poor

300

100

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Very
good
57
70
70

43
30
30

3b.4 Free time

3b.5 Duration of the meetings
3b.6 Timetable
3b.7 Organization of activities
3b.8 Information about school- system
3b.9 Reception and attendance of the participants
3.10 Work atmosphere

28.5

TOTAL

Very
poor

Coordinator

5.

Final products (second year)

5.1 Relation between the objectives of the project and the
final products
5.2 Quality of the final products
5.3 dissemination of products in your country
TOTAL

43
57
70
85
70
85
70
677

28.5

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Very
good
85
57
70
85
85
70
70
522

4.1 Communication with partners

4.2 Support from the coordinator to the partners
4.3 Respect for the deadlines
4.4 Instruction for the work
4.5 Clear distribution of responsibilities
4.6 Provide management and information given
4.7 Investment of the coordinator in the project
TOTAL

28.5
43
30
15
30
15
30
294.5

15
43
30
15
15
30
30
208

Very
poor

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Very
good

30

70

30
43
103

70
57
197

8 Teachers have completed the questionnaires

Comments: Very good experiences, good job of the coordinators, a big disappointment
with UK for not coming to the meeting in Spain

Parents
Very
poor

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Very good

Percentages %

a) In what measure you believe that this

project:
1. Has involved the pupils
2. Contributes to widen the cultural horizon of the pupils

15

32

53

57

36

3.

Contributes to increase the awareness to belong to an

ampler community: Europe, the World

15

43

42

4.
5.
6.
7.
8.

Promotes creativity

25

32

42

Promotes the learning of the art and music languages

28

65

Promotes the learning of English language

32

46

Can propose new knowledge

22

42

36

Can develop positive attitudes

28

65

152

273

356

Comenius corners

40

53

Scholastic festivals

46

47

TOTAL

c) In what measure you believe that the

initiatives, thin to you now realize, has
been interesting:
1. Reception foreign delegations: meeting
(Only UK and Spain)

2.
3.

4.

Laboratory of art and music

5.

Laboratory of English language

6.

Didactic use character-mediator, Little Chameleon

7.

Performances, demonstrations

TOTAL

28 families have completed the questionnaires

Comments: A rewarding project for stundents

10

50

40

19

32

42

18

42

40

47

53

257

275

61