Model I.R. - GSB+WBM GR - II+CC - 20.01.2014

DATA INPUTS
ENTER DATA IN RED CELLS ONLY

1
Date of Inspection
::
12.01.2014
Name of the Work
::
R/F Kanagal to Thurkapally via Thimmajigudem,

Kanagal (M)
Block
::
Kanagal
Sub-Division
::
PIU Munugode
Division
::
PIU Nalgonda
District
::
Nalgonda
Admn.Sanction
::
Vide Go.Rt.No.647 dated 27.04.2011 of PR & RD

Dept. Govt.of A.P.
Name of the Grant
::
NABARD RIDF XVI-Ph-II (SCP)
Estimate Cost
::
Rs.195.35 Lakhs
10 Length of the Road
::
5.60 KM
11 Technical Sanction
::
T.S.No.
Nabard,Hyd
12 Agreement
::
SE(PR)Nalgonda Agrt.No.
09.01.2012
13 Date of the Commencement
::
17.01.2012
15 Time fixed for Completion
/10-11 dated 26.05.2011 of CE(PR)

/11-12 dated :
11 Months
15 Date of Completion
::
Not Specified.
16 Name of the Agency
::
Sri.G.Narender Reddy ,R/O Nalgonda.
17 Tender Premium
::
(-) 2.25% Less than the sanctioned Esst Rates

2010-2011.
-2.25
18 SSR
::
2010-11
19 EOAT
::
20 M.Book Nos.
::
A/635/08-09, A/637/08-09 & A/636/08-09.
21 Name of the Executing Staf
EE ::
DYEE ::
AEE ::
22 Name of the QC Inspection Staf
DYEE ::
AEE ::
Er.A.Bhaskar Rao.EE(PIU),Nalgonda
Er.K.Ramchandra Reddy,PIU SD Munugode.
Er.G.Shankar Babu,AEE
Er.Y.Neelakanteshwar.
Er.K.Ravi Kumar.
Asst.Executive Engineer-1,
DATA INPUTS
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
1 Items Inspected
::
a
GSB 200mm thick - KM 0/0 to 4/0
WBM Gr II layer - KM 0/0 to 4/0
CC M30 Mix 200mm - 0/0 to 0/25, 3/5 to 4/0.
CD Works- 1V x 900MM dia-3 Nos, 2V x 900mm dia, 1V x 600mm dia-4 Nos
Granular Shoulders - 0/0 to 4/0.
2 GSB
Chainage
0/0 - 1/0
Location
0/4-5 L
Thickness (Specified)
Thickness (Observed)
1/0 - 2/0
0/8+46 R 1/4+9 L
2/0 - 3/0
2/0-22 R
3/0 - 4/0
2/4+12 L 2/8+12 R 3/4+28 L 3/8+12 R
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
LS
205
210
195
198
200
205
210
215
200
205
197
199
200
205
205
210
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.05
4.06
4.02
4.05
4.03
4.01
4.05
RS
Width in Mtrs (Specified)
Width in Mtrs (Observed)
Length in Mtrs (Specified)
1000.00
1000.00
1000.00
1000.00
995.00
1000.00
1000.00
1000.00
Length in Mtrs (Observed)

Estimate Qty.(Compact)
400.00
GSB Rate
415.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
3 WBM Gr.II
Chainage
0/0 - 1/0
Location
0/4-5 L
Width in Mtrs (Specified)
2/0-22 R
2/0 - 3/0
3/0 - 4/0
2/4+12 L 2/8+12 R 3/4+28 L 3/8+12 R
3.75
Width in Mtrs (Observed)
3.76
Thickness in mm (Specified)
Thickness in mm (Observed)
1/0 - 2/0
0/8+46 R 1/4+9 L
3.75
3.74
3.73
3.76
3.75
3.75
3.79
81
70
74
81
81
77
78
75
LS
77
76
79
73
72
78
76
76
81
RS
79
76
71
73
82
79
79
80
33
35
34
32
29.5
30
34
33
90mm
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
63mm
4.50
2.00
4.50
3.00
5.50
2.00
1.00
5.00
53mm
8.00
25.00
8.00
9.00
12.00
8.00
9.00
8.00
45mm
7.50
5.00
7.50
10.00
10.50
10.00
11.00
7.50
11.50
2.00
11.50
9.00
4.00
12.00
14.00
11.60
140.63
140.63
140.63
140.63
140.63
140.63
140.63
140.63
Total(Specified)Wt.in Kgs.
Total(Observed)Wt.in Kgs.
31.85
SIEVE ANALYSIS( Retained On)
22.4mm
Estimate Qty.(Compact)
281.25
RATE OF WBM Gr.II
281.25
281.25
281.25
1451.71
6 CC PAVEMENT
Chainage
Width
in Thickness in
Width in Mtrs
Mtrs
mm
from Start (Specified)
(Observed) (Specified)
of CC
i Kanagal village- 250.00mts.

0/0 to 0/25
ii Turkapally village- 500.00mts.

3/5 to 4/0
Thickness in mm
(Observed)
LS
RS
Average Thk
Observed
Qty. Reprsd
30
3.75
3.78
200
210
208
209
22.50
60
3.75
3.70
200
195
198
197
22.50
90
3.75
3.82
200
190
190
190
22.50
120
3.75
3.78
200
196
197
197
22.50
150
3.75
3.80
200
208
200
204
22.50
180
3.75
3.75
200
180
185
183
22.50
210
3.75
3.76
200
196
198
197
22.50
240
3.75
3.75
200
198
194
196
22.50
30
3.75
3.78
200
210
208
209
22.50
60
3.75
3.75
200
215
206
211
22.50
90
3.75
3.82
200
205
200
203
22.50
120
3.75
3.78
200
196
192
194
22.50
150
3.75
3.80
200
208
200
204
22.50
RATE OF M30 CC
CD WORKS
180
3.75
3.75
200
206
205
206
22.50
210
3.75
3.65
200
200
210
205
22.50
240
3.75
3.75
200
198
215
207
22.50
270
3.75
3.78
200
200
198
199
22.50
300
3.75
3.75
200
208
200
204
22.50
330
3.75
3.82
200
206
205
206
22.50
360
3.75
3.78
200
200
210
205
22.50
390
3.75
3.8
200
198
215
207
22.50
420
3.75
3.75
200
215
206
211
22.50
450
3.75
3.76
200
205
200
203
22.50
480
3.75
3.75
200
200
198
199
22.50
4350
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

PANCHAYAT RAJ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
INSPECTION REPORT BY QUALITY CONTROL

WING
NALGONDA DISTRICT
DATE OF INSPECTION
:: 12.01.2014
NAME OF THE WORK
::
ESTIMATE COST
:: Rs.195.35 Lakhs
NAME OF THE GRANT
:: NABARD RIDF XVI-Ph-II (SCP)
NAME OF THE MANDAL
:: Kanagal
NAME OF THE SUB-DIVISION
:: PIU Munugode
NAME OF THE DIVISION
:: PIU Nalgonda
ITEMS COVERED
a GSB 200mm thick - KM 0/0 to 4/0
R/F
Kanagal
to
Thurkapally
Thimmajigudem, Kanagal (M)
via
b WBM Gr II layer - KM 0/0 to 4/0

c CC M30 Mix 200mm - 0/0 to 0/25, 3/5 to 4/0.
d
CD Works- 1V x 900MM dia-3 Nos, 2V x

900mm dia, 1V x 600mm dia-4 Nos
e Granular Shoulders - 0/0 to 4/0.

INSPECTION REPORT BY QUALITY CONTROL WING NALGONDA DISTRICT
CHECK SLIP
Name of Work R/F Kanagal to Thurkapally via Thimmajigudem, Kanagal (M)
Est Cost-Rs
Rs.195.35 Lakhs
ANNEXURE-I
Sl No
Item
Whether details
given Yes/No
Name of Inspecting officer
Yes
Date of Inspection
Yes
Work details
a)Name of the Work
b)Estimate Cost.
Yes
Yes
c) Grant.
Yes
d) Admn.Sanction.and date
Yes
e) Tech.Sanction.and date
Yes
g) Date of commencement
Yes
h) Date of completion as per agrement
Yes
i) Actual date of completion
Yes
j) EOAT Details
Yes
k) Deviation items executed on the date of inspection
Details of Estimate provisions
Yes
Details of all items of work done as on the day of inspection
Yes
QC verification details by QC Wing

a) Previous inspection details
Yes
i) Status of previous recovery proposals
Yes
ii) Recovery details voucher wise
iii) Recovery details with MB reference
b) Present inspection details

i) Details of items done after prevoius inspection
ii) Details of items not inspected with reasons
Yes
-
iii) Items in which deficiency found during this inspection
Yes
v) Details pertaining to recovery amount
Yes
vi) Whether calcutations sheets enclosed
Yes
Details of Recovery Rates

a) Details like TP ,OH,CP etc considered
Yes
b) Whether followed circulars for Over Size Metal
Yes
c) Whether Names of Executing staf given
Yes
(If Deficiency more than 20%)

d) Whether MB Reference is given
( for Items in which deficiency more than 20%)
Yes
Tests for various items of work done or not
BT items
1) Thickness of Layer
Yes
2) Weight of Sample
Yes
3) Sieve Analysis for Chips
4) Bitumin Extract Test

b
Yes
WBM
1)Thickness of Layer
Yes
2)Weight of Sample
Yes
3)Sieve Analysis for Metal
Yes
4)Aggregate Impact Test
5)% Defciency for Over Size
Yes
6)Weight of Screenings
7)Sieve Analysis
CC Roads
1)Grade of Cement
2)Mix Design
3)Strength of Cubes casted
4)Core samples and strengths
5)Width and Thickness
Yes
Dy.Executive Engineer,
(PR) V & Q.C.Sub.Division, Nalgonda.

INSPECTION REPORT BY QUALITY CONTROL WING NALGONDA DISTRICT

QC Ref.No: AEE1/V&QC/NLG/DVK/51/2013-14, date :: 14.06.2013
Mandal ::
Kanagal
Sub Division ::
PIU Munugode
Division ::
PIU Nalgonda
Date of Inspection ::
12.01.2014
Name of the Work
:: R/F Kanagal to Thurkapally via Thimmajigudem, Kanagal (M)
Estimate Cost.
:: Rs.195.35 Lakhs
Name of Grant.
:: NABARD RIDF XVI-Ph-II (SCP)
Admn.Sanction.
:: Vide Go.Rt.No.647 dated 27.04.2011 of PR & RD Dept. Govt.of A.P.
Technical Sanction.
:: T.S.No.
Agreement No.& Date
:: SE(PR)Nalgonda Agrt.No.
Name of the Agency

executed the work
Tender Percentage
:: (-) 2.25% Less than the sanctioned Esst Rates 2010-2011.
SSR Adopted
:: 2010-11
10
Date of Commencement.
:: 17.01.2012
11
Date of completion.
:: Not Specified.
12
Extension of Time Details
:: -
13
M.Book References
:: A/635/08-09, A/637/08-09 & A/636/08-09.
14
Names of the Executive Staf
who
/10-11 dated 26.05.2011 of CE(PR) Nabard,Hyd

/11-12 dated : 09.01.2012
:: Sri.G.Narender Reddy ,R/O Nalgonda.
E.E. :: Er.A.Bhaskar Rao.EE(PIU),Nalgonda

Dy.E.E. :: Er.K.Ramchandra Reddy,PIU SD Munugode.
A.E.E. :: Er.G.Shankar Babu,AEE
15
Name of the Q.C. Staf

Inspected the Work.
who
Dy.E.E. :: Er.Y.Neelakanteshwar.
A.E.E. :: Er.K.Ravi Kumar.
16
S.No.
Estimate Provisions ::
Description of Item
As per
Working Estimate
Chainage
Qty.
Apprvd
Clearing & grubbing road land
::
0/25 to 3/5
10080
EWE from Side Pits
::
0/25 to 3/42
7774
Unit
Sqm
As per Work Done/

Executed till date.
Chainage
Qty.
Executed
0/25 to 3/5
10080
Cum 0/25 to 3/42
7774
Remarks
EWE from borrow pits
::
GSB - 200mm
::
WBM Grade-II 75 mm
:: 0/2+50 to 4/0
M30 CC Pavement 200mm
Granular Shoulders of 150mm
Constn. Of CD works
0/0 to 4/0
0/0 to 0/2+50,
3/5 to 4/0
::
::
(PR) Vig & QC Sub-Division, Nalgonda.
0/0 to 4/0
15470
Cum
3200
Cum
0/0 to 4/0
3200
1456.88 Cum
0/2+50 to
4/0
1456.88
Mtrs
0/0 to 0/2+50,
3/5 to 4/0
250,
100
2621.03 Cum
0/0 to 4/0
250,
100
15470
2621.03
CD Works- 1V x 900MM
dia-3
Nos,
2V
x
900mm dia, 1V x
600mm dia-4 Nos
Submitted to the Executive Engineer (PR) Vig.& QC Division, Hyderabad for information.
Copy Submitted to the Executive Engineer (PRI) Division Miryalaguda for neccessary action.
3200
Office of the Deputy Executive Engineer (PR)

Vigilance & Quality Control Sub-division Nalgonda.
GENERAL OBSERVATION SHEET
Name of The work
::
R/F Kanagal to Thurkapally via Thimmajigudem, Kanagal (M)
Estimate Cost
Grant
::
::
Rs.195.35 Lakhs
The above road is inspected on dated: 04.01.2013 along with the concerned field
staf .
Stage of the Work
Work completed.
Previous inspection details
Not Inspected earlier
ii
Details of Previous Inspection.

Item Inspected
Deficiency Observed
Recovery
Proposed
Remarks
N/A
The Present Inspection covers the following items.
GSB 200mm thick - KM 0/0 to 4/0
WBM Gr II layer - KM 0/0 to 4/0
c
d
e
CC M30 Mix 200mm - 0/0 to 0/25, 3/5 to 4/0.

CD Works- 1V x 900MM dia-3 Nos, 2V x 900mm dia, 1V x 600mm dia-4 Nos
Granular Shoulders - 0/0 to 4/0.
Present Inspection Details are as follows.
1) Road Furnitures :a
Physicals::
KM / HM Stones are fixed.
ii
4 Nos KM Stones are provided.
iii
16 Nos HM stones are provided.
iv
Road Nomenclature/Display board fixed at the starting of the road.
Sign Boards such as Mandatory, Cautionary, Informatory are provided as per IRC 67-2001.
Observations::
i
ii
iii
The Size/Dimensions of the KM and HM Stones are not as per the IRC 8-1980 , IRC-26-1967
standard specifications respectively.
The KM and HM stones shall be fixed in M15 (1:2:4) concrete cradle all round as per the IRC
codal stipulations.
Some of the sign boards are not confirming the IRC stipulations.
iv
The Sign Boards shall be fixed in M15 (1:2:4) concrete cradle all round as per the IRC codal
stipulations.
Suggestions::
IRC -8-1980 & IRC-26-1967 prescribes the standards for KM/HM Stones and shall be followed
in case of KM/HM stones.
ii
Pl. refer this office Circular on Road Furniture on KM/HM Stones vide Cir.No. AEE/HM-KM
Stones/VQC Nlg/2013. Dated: 28.06.2013 for the gist of IRC provisions.
iii
The Size / Colouring of Sign Boards shall be as per IRC-67-2001 and the Lettering &
Numbering of the Sign Boards shall be as per the IRC 30-1968 Codal provisions.
Deficiencies & Recoveries::
One KM Stone and Two HM Sones are proposed for rejection as the Size & Colouring &
Lettering is not as per standards presribed and not properly fixed in concrete cradle.
ii
Amount proposed for recovery due to non-standard Road furniture.
Rs.
2500.00
2) Sub Base :a
Physical Measurements::
The Width & Depth of GSB are measured and tabulated in Annexure -I.
ii
The Length of GSB is measured and tabulated in Annexure -I.
Observations::
The Gravel sub base is executed with locally available gravel soils.
ii
The Compaction of the GSB Layer to OMC is not achieved.
iii
The Field density of the GSB layer is conducted and the density observed is 1.98gms/cc.
iv
Surface defects::The corrugations(bumps), pot holes, ruts (depressions ) in wheel track,

ravelling (separation) , surface erosion, soft spots are appeared in some reaches.
Structural Defects:: Failure of sub-grade are not noticed.
The Super Elevation & extra widening at horizontal curves at Ch..are not observed.
Suggestions::
i
ii
The Gradation of Soils shall confirm to the Table 8.2 of IRC _SP_20-2002. The soil material
shall yield min. CBR of 15.
Density of layer shall not less than the 98% of max.dry density as Cl. 8.4.1 of IRC _SP_202002.
iii
The Horizontal alignment :; The edge of carriage way shall be correct with in the tolerable
limits of 20mm as per Cl.3.6 of IRC-SP-77-2008 .
iv
Surface Levels :: The Tolerance in surface level shall be with in the limits of 10mm as per
IRC-SP-77-2008.
The Surface regularity :; The max.permitted diference between the gravel surface and
straight edge shall be 12mm for longitudinal profile and 10mm for cross profile as per IRCSP-77-2008
vi
The Surface defects and Structural defects shall be corrected.
vii
The Super Elevation at horizontal curves 7% minimum shall be provided at Ch.as per
Cl.2.10.3 of IRC-Sp20-2002. The connected extra widening shall be provided min. 60cm to
90cm as per Table 2.17 IRC-Sp20-2002.
viii
The Horizontal curves & Transitional curves shall be provided as per IRC-Sp-20-2002 vide
Cl.2.10.2 & 2.10.5
The deficiency is observed in length of layer in 1st Km and tabulated in Annexure -I.
ii
No deficiency in width is observed.
iii
The deficiency is observed in thickness of layer in 2nd Km and tabulated in Annexure -I.
iv
Recovery for deficient qty. are calculated and tabulated in Annex -II.
Rs.
11360.00
3) WBM Grade II :a
The Width & Depth of WBM Gr.II are measured and tabulated in Annexure -III.
ii
The Length of WBM Gr.II is measured and tabulated in Annexure -III.
Observations::
The machine crushed /hand brocken metal was used in the WBM Gr.II layer.
ii
Sieve Analysis of WBM Gr.II Metal is carried out & tabulated in Annexure -IV.
iii
Oversize metal in 63mm sieve is observed at certain locations & tabulated in Annexure -IV.
iv
Undersize metal in 45mm/22.4mm sieve was observed at certain locations & tabulated in
Annexure -IV.
The weight of metal observed at various sections are tabulated in Annexure -III. The
variation observed from highest to lowest weigths are more than 20%.
vi
The quantity of screenings are observed lesser than the approved in the WBM Gr.II Layer.
vii
The excess gravel blindage was used in the WBM Gr.II Layer.
viii The required camber @ 3.50% to 2.50% is not observed.

ix
The Super Elevation & extra widening at horizontal curves at Ch..are not observed.
The surface undulations in longitudinal direction (

8mm) are exceeding the prescribed limits.
Suggestions::
The quantity of screenings shall be as per Table 5 of IRC-19-2005 & blindage material shall
be limited to the prescribed limits as per Clause 3.5.2 of IRC 19-2005.
ii
The blindage material shall confirm to the specifications laid down in the IRC Sp 20-2002.
iii
The required camber at 3.5% shall be maintained as per the Table 2.11 of IRC SP-20-2002,
in case the WBM surface is the end surface or else 3.0% for end surface of BT, or else
2.50% for end surface of CC.
iv
The Super Elevation at horizontal curves 7% minimum shall be provided at Ch.as per
Cl.2.10.3 of IRC-Sp20-2002. The connected extra widening shall be provided min. 60cm to
90cm as per Table 2.17 IRC-Sp20-2002.
The Horizontal curves & Transitional curves shall be provided as per IRC-Sp-20-2002 vide
Cl.2.10.2 & 2.10.5
vi
The rolling shall be scientifically done as per this office circular dt.10.01.2014
vii
The side shoulder shall be constructed simultaneously with WBM Layers as per Cl.8.6.1 of
IRC Sp 20-2002.
viii
The surface evenness in longitudinal direction ( Max. permitted undulations 12mm ) and
transverse direction ( 8mm) shall be adhered to as per Table 6 of IRC-19-2005.
ix
The edges of carriage way shall be with in the tolerance limits of 25mm with respect to
center line of carriage way as per Cl.7.2.2 of IRC-Sp-11-1988.
No deficiency is observed in length of layer and the observations are tabulated as

annexure-III.
12mm ) and transverse direction (
ii
The deficiency in width is observed in 2nd Km

annexure-III.
and the observations are tabulated as
iii
No deficiency is observed in thickness of layer and the observations are tabulated as

annexure-III.
iv
Oversize metal is observed in 1st, 2nd, 3rd km and are tabulated in annexure IV.
Recovery for deficient qty. are calculated and tabulated in Annex -V.
The recovery was efected as per Govt. in PR&RD Dept Memo
No.15320/VIG.I/2005-1,dt.12.5.2006
Rs.
82390.00
vi
Recovery for Oversize of metal was calculated and tabulated in

Annex -VI, as per Govt. in R&B Dept. vide Cir. Memo dt. 17.10.2006
Rs.
4456.00
5) CC Pavement::
a
Physical measurements of the CC pavements in the village Kanagal -250.00mts & CC

pavement at Thurkapally village -100.00mts are verified.
ii
The Length of CC pavement is measured and tabulated in Annexure-XI.
iii
The width & depth of CC Pavements at the edges are measured and enclosed in AnnexureXI.
iv
Rebound Hammer tests on surface of CC Pavements are conducted randomly and the
results are tabulated. (Statement Enclosed).
Observations::
The Expansion Joints with 25mm Mastic Pad at every 27mtrs, at road junctions, at joint with
old CC Pavements etc., are not adhered to as per IS-6509-1995 code.
ii
The Contraction Joints at every 4.50m c/c are not properly executed as per IS-6509-1995
code.
iii
The edges are not finished properly. Many honey combs are visible.
iv
The surface finish is not as per IRC
The metal was exposed at certain places.
vi
The loose mortar was visible on CC Surface indicating excess W/C ratio, excess fine
aggregates.
vii
The longitudinal alignment is not to line & length.
Suggestions::
The Executive Engineer (PIU) Nalgonda is requested to assess the strength of concrete by
cube/core extraction test before making payment, as the field engineers are not submitted
the compressive strength results of cc cubes.
ii
The sides of CC Pavement shall be neatly finished.
iii
The longitudinal alighnment should true to line & length and the variation should not
exceed 10mm as per IRC 34-3009.
iv
v
vi
The spacing of expansion & construction joints should be provided as per IS-6509-1995.
( 4.50m c/c for Contraction joints & 27m c/c for Expansion Joints). And the construction
procedure as per the Cl.8 of IRC -15-1981.
The expansion & construction joints should be filled with bitumen sealant as per the
provisions of Cl.9.20 of IRC 15-2002 and the method of sealing joints shall be as per Cl.6 of
IRC-57-1974.
Admixtures conforming to 18:6925 and IS:9103 may be used.
vii
The surface shall be of correct alignment, grade and contour specified. At any point tested,
the concrete shall not show a departure greater than 4 mm from the true surface as per
Cl.9.22.5 of IRC-15-2002.
viii
The surface evenness in longitudinal direction ( Max. permitted undulations 8mm ) and
transverse direction ( 4mm) shall be adhered to as per Table 7.1 of IRC-SP-11-2005.
ix
The actual surface levels shall not vary from designed levels by 10mm as per Cl.7.2.2 of
IRC-Sp-11-1988.
Texture depths shall be in the range of 1.0mm to 1.25mm depth (IRC_15-2000)
xi
The construction of CC Pavements shall be as per the Cl.9 of IRC-15-2002
xii
The edges of carriage way shall be with in the tolerance limits of 25mm with respect to
center line of carriage way as per Cl.7.2.2 of IRC-Sp-11-1988
The surface texture shall be applied on top of cc pavements to control skidding and improve
xiii the riding quality. Surface Texture depths shall be in the range of 1.0mm to 1.25mm depth
(Table 9 of IRC_15-2002)
It has to be checked that no extra water or bleeding shall occur on the top surface of
xiv concrete. Excessive water at the top will make the top surface very weak and there will be
more abrasion (IRC:SP:20-2002).
xv
Steel Box Containers:: Pl.refer the Chief Engineer (Designs & Admn.),PR, Hyd. vide Cir.Memo
No.AEE4/DEE1(D)/CC ROADS/2008 Dt 23.10.2008 that the Measurement of Volume Mix
concrete in rural areas is generally done by locally made containers and there is no
uniformity in size. It is advisable to key 6 steel boxes each with a volume of half bag, the
size being 300 x 300 x 195mm with 2 handles. With usage of this boxes quality of concrete
improves.
Pl.refer this office Cir.No. AEE1/CC Roads/VQC Nlg/2013, Dated: 16.08.2013 for
xvi comprehensive Planning, Design & Construction of Cement Concrete Pavements in rural
areas compiled from various IRC Codes.
d
Deficiency in Length , Width & Depth of CC surface are observed.
ii
Recovery is proposed for deficiencies in length, width & thickness.
Rs.
7) Shoulders:a
The Width & Depth of Gravel Shoulders are observed as 1.50M & 150mm thick.
ii
The shoulders are laid all along the road.
iii
No deficiency in Length , Width & Depth of GSB is observed with respect to the M.Book
recordings. (Statement is enclosed ).
Observations::
The Gravel shoulders are executed with locally available gravel soils.
ii
The compaction of the Gravel shoulders to OMC is not achieved.
iii
iv
The transverse slope at 4% and or more than 0.50% of carriage way slope are not
maintained.
The edges of Road Way shall be with in the tolerance limits of 40mm with respect to
center line of carriage way as per Cl.7.2.2 of IRC-Sp-11-1988
The sectioning of shoulders is not done properly.
The rain gullies on the shoulders are observed.
Suggestions::
The pot holes and rain gallies should be attended.
ii
The construction shall be done in layers each matching the thickness of adjoining layer.
Only after a layer of WBM, shoulder shall be laid and compacted. Next corresponding layers
in pavement shall be taken up after the completion of first layer of WBM and shoulder.
iii
The transverse slope and sectioning of shoulders should be as per the IRC SP6 -2004.
iv
The compaction requirement of earthen shoulder is 100% of Standard Proctor Density ( IS2720-1980).
The crossfall for earth shoulders should be at least 0.5 % steeper than the slope of the
pavement subject to a minimum of 4%. On super elevated sections, the shoulders should
normally have the same crossfallas the pavementto drain of surface water.
No recovery is proposed.
Rs
8) CD Works
a
The following CD Structures are constructed
RCC NP3 Pipe culverts:: (1) 1V x 600mm dia at ch(2) 1V x 900mm dia at ch.,
(3) 2V x 900mm dia a ch.....
ii
The body walls and parapet wall are constructed with M15.
iii
The length & depth of Body wall ,the length, width & depth of Parapet wall are measured.
The overall outer to outer length of parapet was and observed as 7.5m.
Observations::
The overall outer to outer length of pipe culvert at ch.
ii
The Length,Width and Depth of parapet are measured.
iii
The culvert body wall is not true to line and plumb.
iv
The parapet walls are intruding into the roadeway width and not aligned parellel to the
center line of carriage way.
The alignment of pipes are not parallel to the stream.
vi
The invert of the pipes are not placed 150mm below the average bed level as per this office
circular instructions dt.11.12.2013.
vii
The cushion between the top of the pipe and the road top level shall was observed only
40cm (approx).
was and observed as 7.5m.
viii The sufficient distance between pipe rows are not maintained.
c
Suggestions::
A culvert should be located to fit the natural channel in line and grade as far as is practical
and aligned to give the stream a direct entrance and a direct exit and should be aligned the
natural skew in a channel as far as possible.
ii
The Numbering of CD works shall be as per IRC-7-1971.The methodology for inscribing

numbers on parapets, RCC posts has been given, in IRC:7 'Recommended Practice for
Numbering of Bridges and Culverts. The size of letter shall not be less than 100mm high
and shall conform to IRC:30' Standard Letters and Numerals of Diferent Heights for Use on
Highway Signs'.
iii
The cushion between the top of the pipe and the road top level shall not be less than 600
mm. (IRC SP13-2004) and preferably 1.0M (IRC_SP-20-2002).
iv
The Clear Distance between Pipes may be adopted as 500mm for pipes dia. less than
1000mm and 600mm for the pipes above 1200mm. (IRC_SP-20-2002).
A quadrilateral revetment on four sides with RR Stones not less than 225mm thick with
150mm gravel backing shall be provided to safe guard the embankment against scour as
the embankment is quite high.
vi
The protection of entry and exit ends are desirable by way of providing stone approns.
No recovery is proposed.
Rs
8) Observations on Geometrics:i
The Camber at 3.5% is not observed any where.
ii
The Superelevations and Extra width at curves are not properly designed & executed.
iii
Surface irrgularities are observed beyond tolerable limits.
iv
The Geometrical design standards for rural roads shall be adopted as per IRC-73-1980
The Sectioning of Embankment slopes are to be corrected to 2:1 section as per EW

Calculation sheets.
9) General Observations & Sugggestions:

i
The Existing Road Crust particulars are neither recorded in the M.Book nor it is attested by
E.E.PR concerned. The designed crust as per IRC Codes based on Traffic Survey is not
furnished.
ii
The quality control register was not submitted by the field engineers during inspection.
iii
Physical requirements of coarse aggregates for WBM shall be as per IS: 2386 or IS: 5640
iv
Grading requirements of coarse aggregates for WBM Gr.II / Gr.III shall be followed as per
Table 2 of IRC-19-2005
Details of Material test results

furnsished during inspection.
vi
The field staf are requested to test Granular Material for PI value, CBR value, MDD & OMC
and WBM metal for the Gradation, AIV value and satisfy them selves before executing the
works in all future works.
vii
During inspection the QC staf was unable to ascertain the degree of % of compaction for
granular sub base & shoulders in obsence of Lab MDD Test results.
viii
The compaction requirement of earthen shoulder is 100% of Standard Proctor Density ( IS2720-1980).
for Granular material and Metal aggragates are not
10) Overall Recovery.
Rs.
100706.00
The Executive Engineer (PR) PIU Nalgonda is requested to instruct the field staf
to attend the above stated remarks, recover the amount for deficient iems calculated here
under and report compliance. The recovery statement shall be forwarded to this office on
monthly basis for onward submission. The field obseravation calculation sheets are
enclosed.
Submitted to the Executive Engineer (PR) Vig.& QC Division, Hyderabad for information.
Copy Submitted to the Executive Engineer (PRI) Division Miryalaguda for neccessary action.
VIGILANCE & QUALITY CONTROL SUB-DIVISION NALGONDA.

Name of the Work :-
Estt Cost:-
Rs.195.35 Lakhs
Grant :-
ANNEXURE-I
Physical Measurements of Granular Sub Base
Thickness Measured in mm
L/S
Centre
R/S
Average
Specified
thickness
in mm
0/4-5 L
205
200
203
0/8+46 R
210
205
Sl.No
Location
Avg. for 1st KM
Width of the Carriage Way in

Length of the GSB in Meters
Meters
%
Deficiency
As per
%
As per
% Deficiency
in
Estimate/ Observed Deficiency Estimate/ Observed
in Length
Thickness
M.Book
in Width
M.Book
8
10
200
4.00
4.00
208
200
4.00
4.05
206
200
4.00
4.03
1/4+9 L
195
197
196
200
4.00
4.06
2/0-22 R
198
199
199
200
4.00
4.02
198
200
4.00
4.04
Avg. for 2nd KM
1.25%
2/4+12 L
200
200
200
200
4.00
4.05
2/8+12 R
205
205
205
200
4.00
4.03
203
200
4.00
4.04
Avg. for 3rd KM
3/4+28 L
210
205
208
200
4.00
4.01
3/8+12 R
215
210
213
200
4.00
4.05
211
200
4.00
4.03
Avg. for 4th KM
11
10
11
1000.00
995.00
0.50%
1000.00
1000.00
1000.00
1000.00
1000.00
1000.00

Name of the Work :- R/F Kanagal to Thurkapally via Thimmajigudem, Kanagal (M)
Estt Cost:-
Rs.195.35 Lakhs
Grant :-
ANNEXURE-II
Recovery Calculations towards Deficiency in Quantity of Gravel Sub Base.
S.No.
Chainage
Total Est.Qty.
the Sample
represented
(compact)
cum
0/0 - 1/0
% of
Deficiency in
% of
Deficiency
% of
Deficiency
Total
Rate
Amount of
Deficiency Qty. due to Deficiency in Qty. due Deficiency in Qty. due Deficiency applicable/ recovery in Rs
in
Less
in Width
to Less
in Length
to Less
in Qty. due
(cum)
Thickness
Thickness
Width
Length
to Less
(cum)
(cum)
(cum)
Thickness/
Width
(cum)
4
800.00
0.00
0.50%
1/0 - 2/0
800.00
1.25%
10.00
2/0 - 3/0
800.00
0.00
3/0 - 4/0
800.00
0.00
10
4.00
4.00
405.66
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1623.00
4057.00
TOTAL RECOVERABLE AMOUNT
5680.00
DOUBLE RECOVERY
11360.00

Name of the Work :-
Estt Cost:Grant :-
Rs.195.35 Lakhs
ANNEXURE-III
Physical Observations of WBM Gr.II Layer
Thickness Measured in mm
Sl.No
Location
L/S
Centre
R/S
Average
Thickness
Specified in
mm
Width of the Carriage

Way in Meters
Observed
Spcified
Length
observed in
Mtrs
in Kgs
0/4-5 L
70
73
71
71
75
3.76
3.75
33.00
0/8+46 R
74
73
75
74
75
3.75
3.75
35.00
73
75
3.76
3.75
Avg. for KM
10
Weight of Metal
Observed
1000.00
11
34.00
1/4+9 L
76
77
79
77
75
3.74
3.75
34.00
2/0-22 R
75
74
78
76
75
3.73
3.75
32.00
77
75
3.74
3.75
Avg. for KM
1000.00
33.00
2/4+12 L
81
78
82
80
75
3.76
3.75
29.50
2/8+12 R
81
76
79
79
75
3.75
3.75
30.00
80
75
3.76
3.75
Avg. for KM
1000.00
29.75
3/4+28 L
77
76
79
77
75
3.76
3.75
34.00
3/8+12 R
78
81
80
80
75
3.75
3.75
33.00
79
75
3.76
3.75
Avg. for KM
1000.00
33.50

Name of the Work :-
Estt Cost:-
Rs.195.35 Lakhs
Grant :-
ANNEXURE-IV
Gradation of WBM Gr.II Metal Layer
Pit No.I
Location
0/4-5 L
Wt. Sample Obtained
in the Standard Pit of Size 0.50M x 0.50M
33.00 kgs
IS sieve
Weight
retained
(kgs)
Cumulative
Weight
retained
(kgs)
% of
weight
retained
% of
weight
passing
% of
passing
specified
% of oversize
/under size
90 mm
63 mm
53 mm
45 mm
22.4 mm
0.00
4.50
8.00
7.50
11.50
0.00
4.50
12.50
20.00
31.50
0.00
13.64
37.88
60.61
95.45
100.00
86.36
62.12
39.39
4.55
100
90 -100
25 - 75
0 - 15
0-5
O/S
O/S
O/S
U/S
U/S
Nil
3.64 %
Nil U/S Nil
24.39 %
Nil
Pit No.II
Location
0/8+46 R
Wt. Sample Obtained
90 mm
63 mm
53 mm
45 mm
22.4 mm
Location
0.00
2.00
25.00
5.00
2.00
0.00
2.00
27.00
32.00
34.00
0.00
5.71
77.14
91.43
97.14
35.00 kgs
100.00
94.29
22.86
8.57
2.86
100
90 -100
25 - 75
0 - 15
0-5
O/S
O/S
O/S
U/S
U/S
Nil
Nil
2.14 %U/S Nil
Nil
Nil
Pit No.III
1/4+9 L
Wt. Sample Obtained
90 mm
63 mm
53 mm
45 mm
22.4 mm
0.00
4.50
8.00
7.50
11.50
0.00
4.50
12.50
20.00
31.50
0.00
13.24
36.76
58.82
92.65
34.00 kgs
100.00
86.76
63.24
41.18
7.35
100
90 -100
25 - 75
0 - 15
0-5
O/S
O/S
O/S
U/S
U/S
Nil
3.24 %
Nil U/S Nil
26.18 %
2.35 %
Pit No.IV
Location
90
63
53
45
2/0-22 R
Wt. Sample Obtained
mm
mm
mm
mm
0.00
3.00
9.00
10.00
0.00
3.00
12.00
22.00
0.00
9.38
37.50
68.75
32.00 kgs
100.00
90.62
62.50
31.25
100
90 -100
25 - 75
0 - 15
O/S
O/S
O/S
U/S
Nil
Nil
Nil U/S Nil
16.25 %
IS sieve
22.4 mm
Location
Weight
retained
(kgs)
2
9.00
Cumulative
Weight
retained
(kgs)
3
31.00
% of
weight
retained
% of
weight
passing
96.88
3.12
Wt. Sample Obtained

0.00
5.50
12.00
10.50
4.00
0-5
% of oversize
/under size
U/S Nil
Pit No.V
2/4+12 L
90 mm
63 mm
53 mm
45 mm
22.4 mm
% of
passing
specified
0.00
5.50
17.50
28.00
32.00
0.00
18.64
59.32
94.92
108.47
29.50 kgs
100.00
81.36
40.68
5.08
-8.47
100
90 -100
25 - 75
0 - 15
0-5
O/S
O/S
O/S
U/S
U/S
Nil
8.64 %
Nil U/S Nil
Nil
Nil
Pit No.VI
Location
2/8+12 R
Wt. Sample Obtained
90 mm
63 mm
53 mm
45 mm
22.4 mm
Location
0.00
2.00
10.00
20.00
32.00
0.00
6.67
33.33
66.67
106.67
100.00
93.33
66.67
33.33
-6.67
100
90 -100
25 - 75
0 - 15
0-5
O/S
O/S
O/S
U/S
U/S
Nil
Nil
Nil U/S Nil
18.33 %
Nil
Pit No.VII
3/4+28 L
Wt. Sample Obtained
90 mm
63 mm
53 mm
45 mm
22.4 mm
Location
0.00
2.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
30.00 kgs
0.00
1.00
9.00
11.00
14.00
0.00
1.00
10.00
21.00
35.00
0.00
2.94
29.41
61.76
102.94
34.00 kgs
100.00
97.06
70.59
38.24
-2.94
O/S
O/S
O/S
U/S
U/S
Nil
Nil
Nil U/S Nil
23.24 %
Nil
Pit No.VIII
3/8+12 R
Wt. Sample Obtained
90 mm
63 mm
53 mm
45 mm
22.4 mm
100
90 -100
25 - 75
0 - 15
0-5
0.00
5.00
8.00
7.50
11.60
0.00
5.00
13.00
20.50
32.10
0.00
15.15
39.39
62.12
97.27
33.00 kgs
100.00
84.85
60.61
37.88
2.73
100
90 -100
25 - 75
0 - 15
0-5
O/S
O/S
O/S
U/S
U/S
Nil
5.15 %
Nil U/S Nil
22.88 %
Nil

Name of the Work :-
Estt Cost:-
Rs.195.35 Lakhs
Grant :-
ANNEXURE-V
Recovery Calculations for Physical Deficiencies in Grade-II Metal
Sl.
No
Chainage
Required Observed
% of
Required Observed % of
Specified Observed
% of
% of
Total
Deficie
Rate
Amount of
Thickness Thickness Deficien
Width
Width
Deficien weight in
weight in Deficie deficiency quantity ncy Qty applicable recovery in
(mm)
(mm)
cy
(mm)
(mm)
cy
(0.5X0.5 (0.5X0.5 m) ncy in considered required
(cum)
/ (cum)
Rs
Avg.
in
in
m) pit in pit in kgs
Weight
for
(compact)
Thicknes
Width
kgs
Average
recovery
cum
s
10
11
12
13
14
15
0/0 - 1/0
75
73
3.33%
3.75
3.76
31.85
34.00
3.33%
281.25
9.37
1419.05
1/0 - 2/0
75
77
3.75
3.74
0.40%
31.85
33.00
0.40%
281.25
1.13
2/0 - 3/0
75
80
3.75
3.76
31.85
29.75
6.59%
6.59%
281.25
18.53
3/0 - 4/0
75
79
3.75
3.76
31.85
33.50
0.00%
281.25
0.00
16
13296.00
1604.00
26295.00
0.00
41195.00
Double Recovery = 82390.00

Name of the Work :-
Estt Cost:-
Rs.195.35 Lakhs
Grant :-
ANNEXURE-VI
Recovery Calculations for Over Size in Grade-II Metal
Sl.No
Chainage
Total
Quantity
(Loose)
Size of the
Sieve
% over size
(Average)
Diference
cost from
the next
higher size
metal
Net rate
including
T.P
% recovery Quantity As
for over size per Estimate
0/0 - 1/0
329.88
63 mm
1.82%
100.00
97.75
1.82%
329.88
587.00
53 mm
1.07%
30.00
29.33
1.07%
329.88
104.00
1/0 - 2/0
373.49
63 mm
1.62%
100.00
97.75
1.62%
373.49
591.00
53 mm
0.00%
30.00
29.33
0.00%
373.49
0.00
2/0 - 3/0
350.29
63 mm
0.00%
100.00
97.75
0.00%
350.29
0.00
53 mm
0.00%
30.00
29.33
0.00%
350.29
0.00
3/0 - 4/0
375.00
63 mm
2.58%
100.00
97.75
2.58%
375.00
946.00
53 mm
0.00%
30.00
29.33
0.00%
375.00
0.00
10
Amount of
recovery in Rs
11
2228.00
Double Recovery =
4456.00

Name of Work
Estimate Cost
Rs.195.35 Lakhs
Grant
ANNEXURE-XIII
Physical Observations of CC Pavement

M30 Grade
Cement Concrete
Sl.No
Location
Thikness Thickness Observed

Width
Width
Length
@ Edges
Specified
Average
Specified Observed Specified
in mm
L
R
Length
Observed
Kanagal village- 250.00mts.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
30.00
60.00
90.00
120.00
150.00
180.00
210.00
240.00
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
Turkapally village- 500.00mts.

1
30.00
200
2
60.00
200
3
90.00
200
4
120.00
200
5
150.00
200
6
180.00
200
7
210.00
200
8
240.00
200
9
270.00
200
10
300.00
200
11
330.00
200
12
360.00
200
13
390.00
200
14
420.00
200
15
450.00
200
16
480.00
200
210
195
190
196
208
207
196
197
208
205
201
197
200
185
198
194
209
200
195.5
196.5
204
196
197
195.5
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.78
3.70
3.82
3.78
3.80
3.75
3.76
3.75
250.00
245.00
210
214
204
196
208
207
200
199
200
208
201
200
199
214
202
200
208
206
200
192
200
205
210
215
198
200
205
210
215
206
200
198
209
210
202
194
204
206
205
207
199
204
203
205
207
210
201
199
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.78
3.75
3.82
3.78
3.80
3.75
3.65
3.75
3.78
3.75
3.82
3.78
3.80
3.75
3.76
3.75
500.00
500.00

Name of the Work :-
::
Estt Cost:-
::
Rs.195.35 Lakhs
Grant :-
::
ANNEXURE-XIV
Recovery Calculations for Physical Deficiency in CC Pavement
Sl.No
Chainage
Location
Length
Specified
Length
Observed
% of
Deficiency
in
Length
245.00
2.00%
500.00
Kanagal village1 0/0 to 0/25

2
2
4
4
6
6
8
250.00mts.
30
250.00
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
Turkapally village- 500.00mts.

3/5 to 4/0
30
500.00
1
2
60
3
90
4
120
5
150
6
180
7
210
8
240
9
270
10
300
11
330
12
360
13
390
14
420
15
450
16
480
Recovery
Required
for
Width
deficiency
(mm)
in
Length in Rs
Observed
Width
(mm)
% of
Deficiency
in
Width
Recovery
for deficiency
in
Width in Rs
Required
Thickness
(mm)
Observed
Thickness
(mm)
Avg.
Deficiency
in
Thickness
(mm)
% Unit Price
Payable as
per IRC 15
against
deficy. in
Col.6
Recovery
for
deficiency
in
Thickness
in Rs
Quantity
represented
(compact)
cum
Rate
applicable/
(cum)
Total
Recovery
in Rs
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
15308
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.78
3.70
3.82
3.78
3.80
3.75
3.76
3.75
0
1.33%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1276
0
0
0
0
0
0
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
209
197
190
197
204
183
197
196
0
3.50
10.00
3.50
0
17.50
3.00
4.00
0
0.00
0.87
0.00
0
0.75
0.00
0.00
0
0
83235
0
0
71755
0
0
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
180.00
4252.13
15308
1276
83235
0
0
71755
0
0
171574
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.78
3.75
3.82
3.78
3.80
3.75
3.65
3.75
3.78
3.75
3.82
3.78
3.80
3.75
3.76
3.75
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.67%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2551
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
209
211
203
194
204
206
205
207
199
204
206
205
207
211
203
199
0
0
0
6.00
0
0
0
0
1.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.00
0
0
0
0.87
0
0
0
0
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0
0
0
83235
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
22.50
360.00
4252.13
0
0
0
83235
0
0
2551
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
85786

Model I.R. - GSB+WBM GR - II+CC - 20.01.2014

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Model I.R. - GSB+WBM GR - II+CC - 20.01.2014

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Model I.R. - GSB+WBM GR - II+CC - 20.01.2014

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DATA INPUTS

ENTER DATA IN RED CELLS ONLY

Name of the Work

R/F Kanagal to Thurkapally via Thimmajigudem,

Vide Go.Rt.No.647 dated 27.04.2011 of PR & RD

Name of the Grant

NABARD RIDF XVI-Ph-II (SCP)

10 Length of the Road

13 Date of the Commencement

15 Time fixed for Completion

/10-11 dated 26.05.2011 of CE(PR)

16 Name of the Agency

Sri.G.Narender Reddy ,R/O Nalgonda.

(-) 2.25% Less than the sanctioned Esst Rates

A/635/08-09, A/637/08-09 & A/636/08-09.

21 Name of the Executing Staf

GSB 200mm thick - KM 0/0 to 4/0

WBM Gr II layer - KM 0/0 to 4/0

CC M30 Mix 200mm - 0/0 to 0/25, 3/5 to 4/0.

CD Works- 1V x 900MM dia-3 Nos, 2V x 900mm dia, 1V x 600mm dia-4 Nos

Granular Shoulders - 0/0 to 4/0.

2/4+12 L 2/8+12 R 3/4+28 L 3/8+12 R

Length in Mtrs (Observed)

Width in Mtrs (Specified)

2/4+12 L 2/8+12 R 3/4+28 L 3/8+12 R

Width in Mtrs (Observed)

SIEVE ANALYSIS( Retained On)

i Kanagal village- 250.00mts.

ii Turkapally village- 500.00mts.

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

INSPECTION REPORT BY QUALITY CONTROL

NAME OF THE WORK

NAME OF THE GRANT

:: NABARD RIDF XVI-Ph-II (SCP)

NAME OF THE MANDAL

NAME OF THE SUB-DIVISION

NAME OF THE DIVISION

a GSB 200mm thick - KM 0/0 to 4/0

b WBM Gr II layer - KM 0/0 to 4/0

CD Works- 1V x 900MM dia-3 Nos, 2V x

e Granular Shoulders - 0/0 to 4/0.

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

NABARD RIDF XVI-Ph-II (SCP)

Name of Inspecting officer

h) Date of completion as per agrement

i) Actual date of completion

k) Deviation items executed on the date of inspection

Details of Estimate provisions

Details of all items of work done as on the day of inspection

QC verification details by QC Wing

i) Status of previous recovery proposals

ii) Recovery details voucher wise

iii) Recovery details with MB reference

b) Present inspection details

iii) Items in which deficiency found during this inspection

v) Details pertaining to recovery amount

vi) Whether calcutations sheets enclosed