Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10 1109-Icelmach 2008 4800157 PDF
10 1109-Icelmach 2008 4800157 PDF
Paper ID 1257
I.
INTRODUCTION
,,,
:'1"
i
i
i
i
IOrque
H'8h
speed~
'--_
_ Con .... torque _-_.~II""-EC........
rPower
Torque
Stator voila
i
i
i
i
i
i
"lax............
_speed
Speed
Speed
(a)
Speed
(b)
Base 5pCGII
Maximum speod
Speed
hopuWon
~
Chal'tJCteriltic&
J>_~lty
E;//Icmfcy
Controllability
Reliability
TecIrIoIag/cIII
II/IIIJII'Ity
Con
I Total
TABLE I
COMMON EVs AND THEIR PROPULSION SYSTEMS
DcMoior
.-
~
SRM
DC
1M
PM
2.S
l.S
B
3.S
S
3
S
S
S
S
5
4
4
4
..
22
27
2S
23
3.S
3.S
3
S
4
.-.
-
Propullloa Sysfetll
PSA
TABLE III
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS OF ELECTRIC MOTORS
PerInm.n MItpet
Synchronous Motor
EffiCiency, '.
Nissaa/Tino (JapwI)
..
"~"""~'~'--;-'~'~~~~;;<."'" ~.,
Penn..-I Magnet
Synchronous Motor
SlIM
,'w''',',
,~~.,..
DC
..
-~~":"".!'''"~'',(!''~-''' '~'~~~:'.~.
.ao
1M
"
118
10
8&
,','
'8
Penn..-I Magnet
Synchronous Motor
.'
....
IndUClion Motor
...
biif
1M
BMWIXS (Gernuny)
PM
4 10
400
Induction Motor
Induction Motor
2110
lIoO
DC
IncIUCIion Motor
iiilf
!IlIO
j60
..
10
ao
&
10
10
110
Motor
HC(grlkm)
CO(grlkm)
NoX(grlkIii)
Consumotion(LlI00km)
PM
0.16
0.738
0.168
6.4
88
1!6
84
1500
Cycle
Vmax(kmlh)
Vav2(kmIh)
A.'ce1ay.(mls2 )
A.!ec.avimls2)
CYCUDDS
91.25
31.51
0.5
-0.58
Constant
60
96.56
96.56
0
0
NurembergR36
53.7
14.33
0.58
-0.55
TABLE V
CYC-UDDS CYCLE
Motor
HC(grlkm)
Co(grlkm)
Nox(grlkm)
Consumption(Lll00km)
1M
0.168
0.819
0.185
6.8
PM
0.16
0.738
0.168
6.4
BLDC
0.158
0.729
0.167
6.3
TABLE VI
CONSTANT SPEED CYCLE
Motor
HC(grlkm)
Co(grlkm)
Nox(grlkm)
Consumption(LlI00km)
1M
0.168
0.819
0.185
6.8
PM
0.16
0.738
0.168
6.4
BLDC
0.158
0.729
0.167
6.3
The output of the software for the BLDC motor case has
been shown in Fig. 6. The operating points for the engine of
the vehicle in the torque- speed space have been depicted in
Figs. 7- 9. As can be seen. the brushless DC and the permanent
magnet motors have a rather good priority over induction
motors in terms of fuel consumption and pollution. As
brushless DC and permanent magnet motors are not so much
different with respect to fuel consumption and pollution, a
detailed comparison with respect to motor control, cost,
starting torque and performance at high
"""ueJN m
1M
0.168
0.819
0.185
6.8
BLDC
0.158
0.729
0.167
6.3
Fig. 7. Operating points of the engine for the PM motor
[4]
IV. CONCLUSION
The induction motors have been known as the best candidate
for the EV applications because they are robust, less costly,
mature in technology and need less maintenance. However, in
this paper it is demonstrated that in terms of pollution and fuel
consumption, the permanent magnet and the brushless DC
motors have more priorities such as less pollution, less fuel
consumption and more power to volume ratio which makes
them attractive in the EV applications.
REFERENCES
[I]