Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Musgos
Musgos
Musgos
National da Pesquisas Espaciais - INPE, CP 515, Sao Jose dos Campos, CEP 12201-970. Sao Paula, Brazil
bInstitute of Hydrology,
Maclean Building,
Crowmarsh
Gifford,
Wallingford,
Oxon, OX10 888, UK
Abstract
A long-term model of stream acidification, MAGIC, has been applied to an acidic moorland catchment, the Gwy,
in mid-Wales.This application has been used to examine the effects of variability of weathering on soil, groundwater
and stream water chemistry from 1844 to the present day and onwards to 2080 with a predicted acidic oxide reduction
of 60% in the future. The results show that weathering initially affects soil, groundwater and stream water chemistry
profoundly. Despite this, the results indicate that a simple two-layer (one soil and one groundwater
end-member)
model can still provide a good prediction of long-term stream water quality even when each soil and groundwater area
is heterogeneous in composition. The work provides support for the use of the lumped MAGIC model.However,for
the predictions to be applicable it is shown that it is critical that the relative contribution of waters and soil exchange
materials from the hydrochemically distinct regions within the catchment are adequately represented within the model.
This probably means that further field work is required to examine source area contributions.
Keywords: Heterogeneity;
Weathering;
Modelling;
1. Introduction
Rain is involved in a complex but poorly defined
mixture of physical, chemical and biological processeswithin the soil and groundwater areas on
transport through catchments to generate a stream
flow response.These processescontrol the surface
drainage water chemistry and this critically im-
* Corresponding author.
0048-9697/96/$15.00
SSDI
control strategies.
0048-9697(95)04935-G
of emission
and land
use
E8E
M.C.
Forti
et al. /The
Central to planning new environmental management strategies is the development of reliable longterm bydrochemical
models which describe the
chemical transfers occurring in catchments. These
models are needed to predict the effects of changes
in atmospheric pollution and land use on the
various chemical stores within catchments and
hence on stream water chemistry. While the nature
of catchments is such that they are complex and
highly heterogeneous, in relation to soil and
groundwater chemistry, the models are relatively
simple in structure in that they lump together
such variability
(Christophersen
et al., 1993).
ile such lumping is necessary, given the
complex environment being described and the ease
sf overparameterising
model structures,
both
theoretical
and
practical
difficulties
arise
(Christophersen
et al., 1993; Neal, 1995). The theoretical difficulties occur because, in lumping, the
underlying equations that apply at any instance at
the local (e.g. micropore) scale are not necessarily
applicable at the time averaged or the large (e.g.
catchment) scale. Practical problems occur due to
the difficulties of adequately measuring chemical
variability and our inability in knowing how to integrate the variability into catchment average
values, on the basis of flux transfers, for use in the
lumped models. There may be missing processes
that account for acidity regulation in the soil and
groundwaters,
and field prograrnmes
are still
required to identify them (Neal, 1995).
Recent desk studies, following field measurement of chemical variability, have highlighted the
problems of spatial heterogeneity within catchment in terms of chemical variations within the
soil (Neal, 1992; Neal et al., 1994). These studies
describe the impact of variations
in the exchangeable cation fraction of the soil matrix which
is a critical control in determining the regulation of
soil water acidity by base cation supplies from the
soil surface and hence, on transfer to the stream,
stream water acidity. However, no adequate companion studies have been undertaken to examine
the effects of heterogeneous weathering reactions
in the soil and groundwater zones. This shortfall is
potentially an important omission as (1) variations
in chemical weathering probably provide the main
driving force for ensuring the high variations in
the exchangeable cation fractions of the soil ma-
Environmenr
180 (1996)
187-200
M. C. Forti
et al. /The
Environment
180 (1996)
187-200
!89
(S042-)/[C
+ (S0,2-)1
capacity of
190
h4.C. Forti
et al. /The
the soils and C is half the saturation concentration. This allows for the lags which can occur between atmospheric deposition and the resultant
changes in stream water sulphate concentrations.
Chloride, nitrate and fluoride are assumed not to
have an adsorbed phase. Loss of ammonia and nitrate to the vegetation is included within the model
by estimating a percentage uptake.
(2) Cation exchange processes involving aluminium, sodium, calcium, magnesium and potassium
are assumed to be operative. The general form for
the exchange reactions between the ions IV+ and
N+ and their adsorbed states MX,,, and NX,, is
n Mm+ + m NX, = m N+ + n MX,,,
The total cation exchange capacity is then defined as
CEC=C
Exchangeable cations.
Equilibrium expressions for the cation reactions
are approximated by
SMUIN= ( N+ ) m En&( Mm+ ) n EmN
where Sr,,rVIN
is the selectivity coefficient
between M
= A13+ + 3 HZ0
(4) Allowance is made for dissolution of carbonic acids caused by the elevated Pco2 levels in
the soils, and for the effects of degassing as water
moves from the soils to the stream.
(5) It is assumed that there are constant longterm net inputs of base cations from mineral
weathering. These are difticult to measure and
must therefore be estimated.
Environment
180 (1996)
187-200
using
M.C.
Forti
et al. /The
Environment
180 (1996)
187-200
191
comes from a high weathering zone. In this application, it is therefore assumed that ion-exchange
occurs in only the soil layer and that the ion exchange capacity of the groundwater
zone is small
enough to be neglected. On the other hand,
weathering
takes place predominantly
in the
groundwater zone.
The soil characteristics
used in the model are
given in Table 1. The depth of the soil (0.9 m) corresponds to the average combined depth of the 0,
E, B and C horizons and of the peats. The bulk
density and cation exchange of the soil is
calculated from field data for the Gwy soils (Robson, 1993). An average depth of 1 m is assumed for
the groundwater
zone. The groundwater
layer is
represented as being denser and of lower porosity
than the soil layer. The partial pressure of carbon
dioxide is assumed to be 30 times atmospheric
pressure for both the soil and the groundwater
zones (Neal and Whitehead, 1988). For the stream,
the PCO, is set to 2.5 times atmospheric pressure,
in line with average observed values for the
Plynlimon streams (Neal and Hill, 1994).
The concentration of organic acids in the two
MAGIC
layers is calculated from the average
observed dissolved
organic carbon, using a
calibrated conversion
formula from the programme of Schecher
and Driscoll
(1988),
ALCHEMI
(Robson, 1993): this conversion is
equivalent to assuming 18 carbon atoms per molecule of organics. The organic dissociation constants used in MAGIC are specified to be the same
in both the soil and groundwater
zones; they
match the default diprotic system values for the
ALCHEMI
programme.
Very little is known
about the sulphate
characteristics of the Gwy soils. The selected constants which describe the isotherms were chosen to
be typical of values used in earlier MAGIC applications to the uplands (Jenkins et al., 1988;
Whitehead et al., 1988; Jenkins and Cosby, 1989).
The same sulphate absorption isothe;m was used
in the two layers.
The model was calibrated to the present day
chemistry of the stream water, the soil water and
the groundwater
by adjusting weathering rates,
uptake rates and the initial soil base saturation
(Table 2). Given the limitations of the assumptions
required within the mixing approach, and the analytical error in the chemical measurements, a
perfect match between the modelled and the
observed chemical species in the stream is not
Table 1
Soil characteristics
Table 2
Calibrated
parameters
cation to the Gwy
Depth Cm)
Porosity
Bulk density (kg/m3)
E, (mequiv./kg)
C (mequiv./m3)
Cation Exchange Capacity
(mequiv.!kg)
Temperature
(C)
Pco, (atm)
%lo(KAl(oH)3)
Exchangeable
Na
K
Mg
Ca
BS
Cation
MAGIC
model
Soil layer
Groundwater
zone
0.9
0.55
800
3
70
45
1
0.35
1460
3
70
0. I
7.6
0.009
7.5
Top
Weathering
(mequiv.
m2/year) (negative
values = uptake)
Percentage uptake (of
the input to the layer)
Selectivity coefficients
7.6
0.009
9.5
Initial
(%) 1984:
0.10
0.00
1.90
4.8
6.7
base saturation
Ca
Mg
Na
K
NH.,
NO,
Ca
m
Na
K
layer
5
0
-11
0
98
15
-1.4
0.14
-1.35
-5.09
16.15
(1844)
Na
K
Mg
Ca
0.10
0.05
7.0
9.0
MAGIC
appli-
Bottom
layer
47
35
32
-15
0
80
192
M. C. Forti
et al. /The
Environment
180 (1996)
187-200
M.C.
Table 3
Rainfall, stream
water
Ca
et al. /The
Environment
I80 (1996)
187-200
193
Rainfall
Na
Forri
Grassland
Peat
Stream
Oh
Eag
Bs
113
(0- 1026)
9
(O-89)
108
(43-222)
126
(48-209)
126
(74-209)
169
(83-470)
146
(109-217)
;:-29)
;:-29)
122
(61-174)
13
(2-30)
;:-26)
;;-91)
:;9-78)
:07_248)
:fO-23)
p:*-78)
:367-57)
p:3-70)
(5263-293)
:2:-80)
;O-46)
143
(8-1239)
70-28)
147
(42-338)
:o-11)
157
(48-310)
:o-9)
141
(54-254)
;l-16)
140
(51-237)
:o-18)
165
(101-282)
%208)
;;O-219)
1:2-W)
f;a-94)
(659-119)
40-26)
201
(68-451)
112
(O-625)
;;-1210)
&07)
$84-7.7)
;;-86)
4.2
(3.9-4.7)
&IO)
4.5
(4.2-4.8)
:09_164)
4.8
(4.4-5.0)
fo6_436)
(6250-117)
pzso-105)
f97_45)
lb-7)
34
(o-208)
:o-22)
;;-33)
403
(150-1500)
:p6-66)
15
(O-30)
261
(75-625)
:0-n)
3.9
(3.5-4.1)
145
(72-302)
0
;o-19)
5.2
(4.8-6.7)
6
(O-15)
4
(O-10)
176
(54-350)
Mg
K
Cl
so4
;:8-125)
NO3
PH
;30-4.7)
H
Al
DOC
;?6-2250)
in parentheses;
units
are in pequiv./l
Ca
Mg
Na
46.2
4.33
23.2
4.63
0.16
0.09
0.08
0.04
0.28
0.0
0.21
0.0
0.04
0.0
0.03
0.0
&4)
133
(32-292)
except
for aluminium
1144
(392-2750)
and DOC
(PmolIl)
and pH (dimen-
M.C.
194
Table 5
Modelled
two-layer
Na
Ca
Mg
K
Cl
so4
NO3
PH
Alk
DOC
Forti
et al. /The
and groundwater
chemistry
Stream
Soil water
Groundwater
142.6
38.9
52.4
2.4
165.1
71.3
8.6
5.2
-8.3
30.0
138.1
24.5
38.8
3.5
165.1
76.8
14.8
4.2
-51.8
120.0
146.6
51.7
64.4
1.4
165.1
66.2
3.0
5.3
30.2
21.0
Environment
180 (1996)
for the
ALKALINTR
30
'\
PH
'.\
-SO
1844
1884
1924
1964
2004
2044
2084
SULFATE
CALCIUM
CI,.
1844
-----k
\._
1924
1884
1964
I1
1.
2004
2044
2084
MAGNESIUM
BSh
15-
187-200
..
.\
-..\
lo-
.\
..,_. *.l
-.------
57
1844
STREAM
-..-..-
.-
SOIL WATER
water
chemistry
I
1884
1924
1964
__- - - - - _
(Alkalinity,
2004
GROUhTI
Ca, SO,
2044
2084
WATER
and Mg
in mequiv.il,
M.C.
Forti
et al. /The
Science
of the Total
modelled record. Stream pH falls rapidly as deposition increases in the 1950s levels out in the
1980s and then rises in the future in response to
increase followed by decrease in atmospheric deposition. The stream chemistry follows a similar
pattern to the soil and groundwater,
but the pH
variations are greater owing to the lower partial
pressure of carbon dioxide in the stream. As a consequence, CO2 degassing occurs as water moves
from catchment to stream, and the pH of the
stream is not bounded by the two end-member pH
values, especially at higher pH levels. Sulphate
concentrations in the stream, soil and groundwater
change in line with the assumed changes in sulphate deposition. The groundwater takes longer to
adjust to changes in sulphate concentration
because it is replenished from the soil and is therefore
only indirectly linked to the rainwater. The stream
Environment
180 (1996)
187-200
195
two- by two-layer
case
ALKALINITY
(al
40
.._
SOIL
---_._
\V;\TER
-.
180-
, .______--
,, GROUND
----WATER
. . . . ..,,,,,.,.,,......... ......
120-
M3
M2
D2
-..
D3
TWO
weathering
rate values:
and pH; (b) Magnesium
LAYER
196
44. C. Forti
et al. /The
Science
(b)
180 (1996)
187-200
MAGNESIUM
80 -
,, -\
,,
60 -
,I
__,
.:
,-.
,*
.-
,/..
. . ,,...... -.._,,,.,,...
\ SOIL
*\
..
:
.
..., \ 1
WATER
1~~~,,~,~-~,~
.,,,,,,_._,................
.
.,_.._
--------.._..
_.-..-.._.__,
207.
1844
,
,884
,
1924
,
1984
,
2004
2044
2084
CALCIUM
14Oj
80
,*-.
..
L
\
SOIL
,--a_
(lo
___-----,._. ...
,.
----____
--
M3
-\
WATER
M2
.,, .,.,.._...
80 i
r-
D2
-..
. ...,
..,
...
. ..-----I
GROUND
D3
WATER
TWO LAYER
SODIUM
,42 ___^--------___,----..--.---~
----.-__SOIL
,40
.._......
. . . . . . .._....
____
104 GROUND
WATER
158 _
._,_ ,,~~,~,,,,,,,,,,,_,,_,_,,,,.,,
952 -
--
M3
....
M2
D2
Fig. 2. Continued.
WATER
. ..--- . . . . . .._........_........................
-..
D3
lW0
LAYER
M. C. Forti
et al. /The
Science
of the Total
142.0
___.__---__.___l--.-..--
.___,________
Environment
180 (1996)
197
187-200
_----
SODIUM
141.0 -
TWO LAYER
MODEL
----and two-
TWOBYTWOLAYERMODEL
by two-layer
model
from
are
198
M.C.
Forti
et al. /The
Science
of the
respondence to the two-layer and the two- by twolayer models; the results are the same, for practical
purposes.
Total Environment
180 (1996)
187-200
Table 6
Calibrated
parameters
values for the MAGIC
the recalibrated
two-layer
model
5. Discussion
The results presented here show that variations
in weathering rate will have a very strong influence
on soil and groundwater
chemistry. Changes in
weathering rate change cation supplies to the soil
solution.
Thus increasing
or decreasing
the
weathering rate provides corresponding
increases
or decreases in base cations and alkalinity.
In nature, there is a large variation in soil and
groundwater compositions and, in part, variations
in weathering clearly can have a substantial influence. Despite the heterogeneity, the integrated
value, characterized by the stream chemistry, indicates that, volumetrically, the extremes observed
in the soil and groundwater
areas may well have
little influence on the modelled values as they
counterbalance each other out. For this reason, it
may well be argued that there is no need for undue
effort in trying to match models to include these
extremes. Furthermore,
if one tries to recalibrate
the two-layer model using weathering rates higher
or lower than the optimised value, it becomes
more and more difficult to fit the averaged base cation levels. Thus it seems that the model has provided a means of estimating the gross weathering
rate reasonably well.
STREAM
Weathering
(mequiv.
m*/year)
(negative
values = uptake)
Percentage uptake (of
the input to the layer)
Selectivity
coefficients
Ca
Mg
Na
K
NH,
NO,
K
Ca
Mg
Na
K
Initial
Top layer
Bottom
layer
18.7
18.0
3.1
11.5
5.5
5.5
98
15
0
80
6
of
-1.9
-0.19
3.01
-1.76
base saturation
W44)
42.21
0.11
0.10
18.0
25
Na
K
Mg
Ca
WATER
5o1
application
TWOLAYER
--___
Fig. 4. Modelled
predictions
for Alkalinity
(mequiv./l)
two-layer
construct where the catchment is represented
by three (D3) two-layer
calibration.
TWO
BY TWO LAYER
_..-.._
TWO
LAYER
RECALIBRATED
and pH for the case where the stream water is modelled on the basis of the
as a straight average of the weathering
rate values times three (M3) and divided
M.C.
Forti
Table I
Modelled
stream, soil water and groundwater
quiv./l) for the year 1984 and exchangeable
saturation
(%) for the years 1984 and 1844
Stream
Na
Ca
Mg
K
Cl
so4
NO3
PH
Alk
1984
BS%
Ca
Mg
Na
K
1844
BS%
Ca
water
140.1
39.4
53.7
2.8
165.1
69.0
10.9
5.2
-8.6
chemistry
(pecations and base
Soil water
Groundwater
137.5
33.8
51.0
3.5
165.1
77.0
14.8
4.3
-30.8
145.6
50.9
59.4
1.4
165.1
52.3
3.0
5.3
37.3
27.4
19.6
7.7
0.07
0.07
43.2
25
18
0.11
0.1
Mg
Na
K
Table 8
Adsorbed
cations
Adsorbed
ratio
ratio
values calculated
weathering
I80 (1996)
199
187-200
rates
D3
D2
Two-layer
M2
M3
MAX
NaiCa
Na/Mg
Ca/Mg
Al/Na3
A12/Ca3
A12/Mg3
0.00088
0.00163
1.85
312 057
66.8
423
0.00079
0.00159
2.00
277 325
38.8
309
0.00057
0.00142
2.50
187 585
6.48
101
0.00033
0.00112
3.41
37 624
0.0499
1.97
0.00026
0.00088
3.41
2791
0.00014
0.00537
3.4
1.8
1.8
112
4.8 x 10
7.9 x lo4
ratio
and minimum
values
200
M.C.
Forti
180 (1996)
187-200