Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Armstrong Review
Armstrong Review
Armstrong Review
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Library Quarterly:
Information, Community, Policy.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 143.117.170.217 on Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:52:48 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
REVIEWS
273
This content downloaded from 143.117.170.217 on Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:52:48 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
274
THE LIBRARYQUARTERLY
of theKing(1874). Armstrongtook her title from the eighth plate in Talbot's The
PencilofNature,a.photographof two shelvesof books in LacockAbbey.The ninth
plate in this book is titled "Fac-Simileof an Old PrintedPage." It is from a book
in Talbot'slibrary,and in her descriptionof it Armstrongsays,"of all Talbot'splates
it is the mostassertiveof its statusas a printedpage.At the sametimeit demonstrates
its difference from the larger context of printed pages into which it is inserted:
hand-letteredin Norman French calligraphythat is evidentlydifferentfrom the
letterpressof The Pencil of Nature,and glued ratherthan sewnin, it illustratesits
own intrusioninto the printedspaceof the book" (p. 151). The typographyof the
page from the old book is certainlydifferentfrom that of ThePencilof Nature,but
it is definitelynot a specimen of calligraphy.Armstrongevidentlymisunderstood
Talbot'sdescriptionof this page, which begins, "takenfrom a black-lettervolume
in the Author'slibrary,containingthe statutesof Richardthe Second, writtenin
NormanFrench."
This content downloaded from 143.117.170.217 on Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:52:48 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
REVIEWS
275
Armstrong'sthirdchapteris devotedmainlyto two albumsof cyanotypesof seaweed compiledbyAnnaAtkinsbetween1843and 1854,thoughit also discussesher
book on ferns and books on similarsubjectsby severalother authors.This chapter
containsa particularlylargenumberof illustrations.There are thirty-onefull-page
platesof seaweed,twoof whichare in color (shadesof blue, as theyare cyanotypes);
four full-pageplates of title pages and table-of-contentspages from the seaweed
albums;and severalplatesfrom other books.The twoillustrationsin color are also
reproducedin blackand white.The large numberof seaweedplatesseems almost
too much of a good thing.
The book has no bibliography,but there are sixty-fourpages of notes at the end
of the volume.Armstronghas read widely,though I did not find any mention of
Helmut Gernsheim'sbibliography.
In her notes Armstrongcalls Elmer Adler, the man who formed Princeton's
graphicartscollection,a "nineteenth-centuryprinter."Adler taughtat Princeton
from 1940 until 1952,and he wasnot a printer.She also saysthat FredericEugene
Ives,the inventorof the halftone process,lived in Chicago,but it would be more
accurateto say that he lived in Philadelphia.More than once Armstrongspelled
the pluralof apparatus"apparatii."
In her remarkson Fox Talbot'sThePencilofNature(London:Longman,Brown,
Green & Longmans,1844-1846), Armstrongwrote, "Finally,ratherthan a point
of origin in the teleologicaldevelopmentof the photographtowardits manifest
destinyas a massmedium,I wish to understandit [the photographicallyillustrated
book] againas an experiment,but by no meansa foregone conclusion,in the 'massification'of the photographand the photographicallyillustratedbook, sewnwith
its author'sgentlemanlyambivalenceon thatscore,withthe marksof his contrarian
desireto preserveits privacyand its preindustrialnature,and withthe unfamiliarity
of anotherera besidesour ownwhosevalueswere other than ours.No matterhow
the formand obviousthe contentof ThePencilofNaturemightseem
self-explanatory
to us now, it is worth the labor to make it strange" (p. 112).
Armstronghasa knackfor makingsimplethingsappearto be muchmore complicatedand strangethantheyare,at leastin myopinion. She evidentlyset out to write
a difficultbook, and in thatshe has succeeded.Readerswho arenot au courantwith
the latestacademicjargon will likelyfind it problematic.I thinkArmstrongwould
have servedher readersbetterif she had paid less attentionto Barthesand Comte
and more attentionto Strunkand White.
PhilipJ. Weimerskirch,SpecialCollections,
ProvidencePublic Library,RhodeIsland
This content downloaded from 143.117.170.217 on Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:52:48 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions