TABLE 1: SHOWING GENDER OF THE RESPON

DENTS

Frequency Table

Sex
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Male 13 65.0 65.0 65.0
female 7 35.0 35.0 100.0
Total 20 100.0 100.0
The above table shows that 65% of respondents are male and the remaining 35% are
females.
Interpretation:
It is understood that majority of the respondents are male. Since agriculture is
a long term process majority of female does not have time to look after both ho
me and agriculture.
TABLE 2: SHOWING ABOUT THE PEOPLE BENEFITED IN THE PER
CENTAGE OF RAINFALL
Rainfall
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Best 1 5.0 5.0 5.0
Good 7 35.0 35.0 40.0
better 4 20.0 20.0 60.0
Bad 8 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 20 100.0 100.0
The above table infers that 40% of respondents describe rainfall has bad influen
ce on agriculture
Interpretation:
The larger picture suggests that the rainfall had negligible influence on agricu
lture. Since farmers mostly depend on storage water such as bour well, well etcâ ¦

TABLE 3: AWARENESS OF THE RESPONDENTS

Awareness
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Yes 14 70.0 70.0 70.0
No 6 30.0 30.0 100.0
Total 20 100.0 100.0
From the above table we can evident that 70 % of the respondents are given as th
ere is more awareness about subsidies provided by government and 30% are least a
ware of it.
Interpretation:
Since agriculture is the backbone of India, Government is providing more subsidi
es for agriculture and creating awareness among farmers.

TABLE 4: SATISFACTION OF RESPONDENTS.

Satisfaction
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly satisfied 1 5.0 5.0 5.0
Satisfied 3 15.0 15.0 20.0
Neutral 8 40.0 40.0 60.0
dissatisfied 6 30.0 30.0 90.0
highly dissatisfied 2 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 20 100.0 100.0
The above table describes only 5% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 15% a
re satisfied, 40% are neutral, 30% are dissatisfied and 10% are highly satisfied
.
Interpretation:
Even though government is creating more awareness, there are certain problems re
garding workforce, high cost of fertilizers etcâ ¦people neither highly satisfied
nor highly dissatisfied but their satisfactory level is neutral.

TABLE 5: ABOUT THE WATERING TECHNIQUE ADOPTED:

Watering
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid canal 18 90.0 90.0 90.0
drops 2 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 20 100.0 100.0
The table shows that the 90% of the people are benefited by using canal water,10
% are by drop water.
Interpretation:
The table infers that more people are using canal water for their irrigation.
TABLE6: METHOD OF PLOUGHING:
Ploughing
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid bullock 3 15.0 15.0 15.0
tractor 16 80.0 80.0 95.0
other 1 5.0 5.0 100.0
Total 20 100.0 100.0
The table describes that 15% of method are used by bullock,80% are by tractor an
d others are at 5%.
Interpretation:
The above table infers that most of the people are getting benefited by ploughin
g through tractor.
TABLE 7: FERTILITY OF SOIL:
Soil fertility
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Good 5 25.0 25.0 25.0
normal 13 65.0 65.0 90.0
Bad 2 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 20 100.0 100.0
The above table shows that 65% of the respondents say that normal soil fertility
is needed for good agricultural output.
Interpretation: From the above table we can infer that plays a normal role in ag
riculture.
TABLE 8:NO OF FAMILY MEMBERS:
family members
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 2 4 20.0 20.0 20.0
3 11 55.0 55.0 75.0
4 4 20.0 20.0 95.0
>4 1 5.0 5.0 100.0
Total 20 100.0 100.0
The above table shows that only 55% of the family members are involved in agricu
lture.
Interpretation:
From the above table we can infer that only less number of people are involved i
n agriculture.

TABLE 9: MEMBERS IN AGRICULTURE:

Members in agriculture
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid <2 4 20.0 20.0 20.0
2 11 55.0 55.0 75.0
3 5 25.0 25.0 100.0
Total 20 100.0 100.0
The table shows that members doing agriculture in every family is only 2.
INTERPRETATION
This shows that the number of people doing agriculture in every family is less.

Livingstandard
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid sophisticated 3 15.0 15.0 15.0
Moderate 13 65.0 65.0 80.0
non sophisticcated 4 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 20 100.0 100.0

The above table shows that 65% of the respondents say that the living standard i
s moderate.
INTERPRETATION
Thus the persons doing agriculture living standard is moderate.
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
rainfall * livingstandard 20 100.0% 0 .0% 20 100.0%

rainfall * living standard Cross tabulation

Count
livingstandard Total
sophisticated moderate non sophisticcated
Rainfall Best 1 0 0 1
Good 0 5 2 7
Better 2 2 0 4
Bad 0 6 2 8
Total 3 13 4 20
This table shows that the respondents have best and better rainfall over the pre
vious year have sophisticated living standard and with good level of rainfall ha
s moderate level and with bad level of rainfall have non-sophisticated living st
andard.
Interpretation
Thus rainfall has an effect on the agriculture and the living standard of the pe
ople.

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 12.647a 6 .049
Likelihood Ratio 12.540 6 .051
Linear-by-Linear Association .606 1 .436
N of Valid Cases 20
a. 11 cells (91.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .15.