Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Concrete Bridge Design (Recovered)
Concrete Bridge Design (Recovered)
&
Reference
Calculation
1.0ABBREVIATIONS&UNITS
Ac
Area of concrete
Acc
Area of concrete in compression
As
Area of tension reinforcement
As min
Minimum area of tension reinforcement
av
Length of that part of member traversed by shear failure plane
b
With (breath) or effective width of section
c
Cover to outer diameter
d
Effective depth of section
Fc
Basic force used in defining compressive forces
Ft
Basic force used in defining tie forces
fcu
Characteristic strength of concrete
fs
Estimated design service stress in the tension reinforcement
fy
Characteristic strength of reinforcement
G
Shear modulus
H
Maximum horizontal force
Hx
Horizontal force in x direction
Hy
Horizontal force in y direction
h
Section Overall depth
KEL
Knife edge load
L
Critical perimeter
lx
Dimension of element on x direction
ly
Dimension of element on y direction
lz
Dimension of element on z direction
M
Design ultimate resistance moment
Mx
Moment on x axis
My
Moment on y axis
Mz
Moment on z axis
q
Surcharge load
r
Internal radius of bend
SLS
Serviceability limit state
T
Traction force
t
Thickness of the element
ULS
Ultimate limit state
V
Shear force due to design ultimate loads or design ultimate value of a
concentrated load
fLfL
f 3
id
or
or
or
1.15
1.75
1.15
f 3
&
Reference
Calculation
1.1
BRIDGE GEOMETRY
Number of Girders
Distance between girders
Cantilever Distance
Width of Carriage Way
Bridge kerb Width
Kerb Thickness
Kerb Chamfer
Camber height at Mid-Width
Bridge Slab Thickness
Girder Thickness
Thickness of surfacing layer ,hf
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
4
2000
900
7000
400
200
50
50
200
280
80
500
7800
1.2
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Unit Weight of Steel
Strength of Steel ,fy
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel ,Es
Unit Weight of Concrete,c
Strength of Concrete ,fcu
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete ,Ec
=
=
=
=
=
=
78.5
460
200
24
25
27
18
20
9.81
2
30
= 10.19
= 19.62
=
20
=
=
25
16
Wheel Load
100
&
Reference
Calculation
1000
500
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
LOADING
Aburtments and Wing Walls
Surcharge due to vehicular Traffic (k N/m2)=
Coefficient of active pressure, ka=
Lateral Pressure at top of wall (kN/m2)=
Lateral Pressure at bottom of wall (kN/m2)=
1.0 Dead Loads
(i) Nominal Loads
Slab:
Kerb:
Surfacing:
BS 5400
part 4
5.2.2.1
and
Part 2
4.4
0.2 x 24 ,
0.5 x ( 0.35+0.4 ) x 0.2 x 24 ,
0.08 x 20 ,
fL f 3
BS 5400
part 2
3.2.9.3.1
10
0.333
= 4.80
= 1.80
= 1.60
= 6.35
= 3.62
= 3.22
= 4.80
= 2.16
= 1.92
= 20.00
= 5.71
20 / 3.5
&
Reference
Calculation
(ii) KEL
BS 5400 part 2 defines Nominal Knife Edge Load, KEL, as 120 Kn per
Notional Lane
Fro this bridge, specified load
KEL = 2/3 X 120 / Notional Lane
UDL therefore KEL / Notional lane =
80 / 3.5
= 80.00
= 22.86
= 9.86
= 39.43
= 6.86
= 27.43
fL f 3
fL f 3
(v) Cracks
UDL:
5.71.
fL
KEL:
22.86.
The
. f 3 x 1.2 x 0.83 ,
fL . f 3 80 x 1.2 x 0.83
= 5.69
= 22.77
pressure =
say
300
mm
Therefore for the same load , a square contact area of 300 mm or a circular
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Adolf
Pucher
chart 17
By making use of Adolf Pucher Chart 17, the following dimensionless values are
read out to enable this Moment to be determined
x= 220.8 / 32
1.1 1.8
3.5
7.0
13.4
=
6.9
2.5 4.0
5.7
7.8
20.0
Wheel Load, P =
100
4.2 5.5
7.0
8.4
25.1
5.4 6.5
7.6
8.1
27.6
=2/3 x 100 x
fL f 3
6.4 7.3
8.2
8.6
30.5
=2/3 x 100 x 1.5 x 1.1
7.2 8.0
8.6
9.0
32.8
=
110
M
=
px
7.7 8.5
9.1
9.4
34.7
6.9 x 110
7.9 9.6
9.5
9.7
36.7
8x
220.8
= 30.215
=
=
=
=
2.868
0.129
3.912
0.429
7.34
=
=
1.00
3.992
5.0
37.6
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
37.6
Adolf
Pucher
chart 20
By making use of Adolf Pucher Chart 20, the following dimensionless values are
read out to enable this Moment to be determined
y= 44.2 / 32
0.12 0.13
0.16
0.17
0.58
= 1.3813
0.22 0.30
0.35
0.40
1.27
Wheel Load, P =
100
0.45 0.60
0.70
0.80
2.55
0.55 0.80
1.00
1.10
3.45
=2/3 x 100 x
fL f 3
1.00 1.40
1.50
1.60
5.50
=2/3 x 100 x 1.5 x 1.1
1.40 1.90
2.10
2.30
7.70
=
110
Mpy= 1.38125 x 110
1.70 2.40
2.90
3.20
10.20
2.10 2.95
3.80
4.10
12.95
8x
44.20
= 6.0485
500
=
=
=
6.35
3.22
9.57
3.48
KNm
=
=
=
9.86
39.43
49.29
1000
800
600
400
200
0
500
17.92 KNm
Adolf
Pucher
chart 5
ARBITRARY DIMENSIONLESS
MEASURE
Y -DIRECTION
6.00
9.50
15.00
X- DIRECTION
2.00
4.00
6.50
A'
A
x.y
12.0
38.0
97.5
12.0
26.0
59.5
A
7.5
6.5
5.5
90.0
169.0
327.3
24.50
29.00
29.00
10.00
19.00
10.00
245.0
551.0
290.0
x=
A
=
A
Wheel Load, P =
=2/3 x 100 x x
147.5
306.0
290.0
841.0
4.5
3.5
2.5
663.8
1071.0
725.0
3046.0
3.62
KN
100
fL f 3
KNm
Adolf
Pucher
chart 6
ARBITRARY DIMENSIONLESS
MEASURE
Y -DIRECTION
2.00
3.50
5.50
8.50
14.00
26.00
3.00
A'
x.y
9.0
24.5
74.3
170.0
406.0
754.0
87.0
X- DIRECTION
4.50
7.00
13.50
20.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
y=
A
=
A
Wheel Load, P =
9.0
15.5
49.8
95.8
236.0
348.0
87.0
841.0
A
6.5
5.5
4.5
3.5
2.5
1.5
1.0
58.5
85.3
223.9
335.1
590.0
522.0
87.0
1901.8
2.261
100
KN
=2/3 x 100 x x
f3
fL
=2/3 x 100 x 1.5 x 1.1 x 2.26
8x
=
9.90
KNm
In the direction of the main reinforcement
Mx= Md + Mpx OR Md + ML whichever is graeter
Mpy
9.90
19.34
OR
= 21.40
3.48+17.92
Mx
= 21.401
My
9.90
1000
500
500
w d x L2
where wd=9.57KN/m
Therefore, Md = 9.57 x 2
9
4.25
KNm
w L x L2
where wL=49.29KN/m
Therefore, ML = 49.29 x 2
9
21.90 KNm
Adolf
Pucher
chart 16
x=
ARBITRARY DIMENSIONLESS
MEASURE
Y -DIRECTION
0.80
3.50
5.00
5.60
X- DIRECTION
3.00
7.30
7.20
6.60
39.0
= 4.875
8
Wheel Load, P =
100
3.8
10.8
12.2
12.2
39.0
=2/3 x 100 x
fL f 3
=2/3 x 100 x 1.5 x 1.1
=
110
Mpx= 4.875 x 110
8x
= 21.348
4.25+21.90
25.60
OR
= 26.16
Mx
26.16
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
w d x L2
14
where wd=9.57KN/m
Therefore, Md = 9.57 x 2
14
2.73
KNm
w L x L2
14
where wL=0.00KN/m
Therefore, ML = 49.29 x 2
14
14.08 KNm
Bending
duePucher
to wheel
load
By makingmoment
use of Adolf
Chart
12, the following dimensionless values are
read out to enable this wheel load Moment to be determined in the Y-Direction
Mpx
Adolf
Pucher
chart 12
ARBITRARY DIMENSIONLESS
MEASURE
Y -DIRECTION
7.0
11.5
20.0
X- DIRECTION
2.0
4.0
8.5
A'
x.y
14.0
46.0
170.0
A
14.0
32.0
124.0
A
6.5
5.5
4.5
91.0
176.0
558.0
29.0
29.0
29.0
13.0
22.0
7.5
377.0
638.0
217.5
x=
A
=
A
Wheel Load, P =
207.0
261.5
217.5
856.0
3.5
2.5
1.5
724.5
653.8
326.3
2529.5
2.955
KN
100
=2/3 x 100 x x
f3
fL
=2/3 x 100 x 1.5 x 1.1 x 2.96
8x
Mpx
=
12.94
KNm
Mpx
12.94
Bending
duePucher
to wheel
load
By
makingmoment
use of Adolf
Chart
13, the following dimensionless values are
read out to enable this wheel load Moment to be determined in the Y-Direction
Mpy
Adolf
Pucher
chart 13
ARBITRARY DIMENSIONLESS
MEASURE
Y -DIRECTION
1.5
3.0
5.0
7.5
11.5
21.5
7.5
A'
x.y
6.0
21.0
36.5
135.0
333.5
623.5
217.5
X- DIRECTION
4.0
7.0
11.5
18.0
29.0
29.0
29.0
x=
A
=
A
Wheel Load, P =
A
6.0
15.0
36.5
77.5
198.5
290.0
217.5
841.0
A
6.5
5.5
4.5
3.5
2.5
1.5
1.0
39.0
82.5
164.3
271.3
496.3
435.0
217.5
1705.75
2.028
100
KN
=2/3 x 100 x x
f3
fL
=2/3 x 100 x 1.5 x 1.1 x 2.03
8x
=
8.88
KNm
Mpy
8.88
15.67
OR
= 16.82
2.73+14.08
Mx
16.82
My
8.88
1000
500
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
Now
M
bd2fcu
0.0572
mm
Mu
o.87fyZ
622
mm2
Check for minimum and maximum areas of main( Top and Bottom) reinforcement
Min area of steel should not be less than 0.15% bd
Therefore Ast(min)
=
BS 5400
part 4
mm2/m
6.8.5
Therefore Ast(max)
4% x 1000 x200
100
8000 mm2/m
=
Provide, Y
12
150
mm2/m
753.6 mm2/m
According to BS 5400 part 4 clause 6.8.8.2.2 spacing should not exceed 150 mm for
Longitudinal bars and 300 mm for transverse bars in order to satisfy the requirements
of BS 5400 part4 clause 5.1.1.1
Check Deflection
From BS 8110 part 1 clause 3.4.6.3 span/effective depth ratios are given as follows:Cantilever =
v)Deflection check
M/bd2= 9.272
N/mm2
Service stress,fs =(5fyAsreq/8As prov)=
5
Modification factor,mf =0.55+(477-fs)/(120(0.9+M/bd2))=
0.866
Basic span/effective ratio (L/d) ratio
7
Limiting span/effective ratio (L/d) ratio=
29
Actual span/effective ratio, (L/d), ratio for the deck sla
Therefore,
(Cantilever)
5.56
O.K.
Therefore an effective depth of 162 is adequate for the continous part of the slab
drg here
drg here
=
=
=
=
=
=
3.38
0.24
5.71
3.22
4.91
19.6
33.5
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
=
=
=
=
12.70
6.44
19.64
78.54
117.3
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
27.76
0.785
0.785
RB =4.71KN
2000
RA + RC = 3.38 KN
MB= 0 ;
RC =-1.33KN
1000
104.6
52.309
RC = -1.33
KN
RB =
KN
0.5333
RB =0.30KN
0.533333
333
RC =-0.06KN
1000
2000
RA + RC = 0.24 KN
MB= 0 ;
RC =
RB =
KN
0.9
6.35
RB =13.10KN
RC =11.66KN
1000
0.9
2000
Uniformly distributed load due to slab = 6.35 KN
RA + RC = 5.71 +12.70+6.35 KN =
MB= 0 ;
24.76
RC=
11.66
KN
RB =
13.10
KN
Case 4- Shear forces due to superimposed asphalt surfacing a, the UDL and KEL live loads
KN
52.3
104.6
26.2
A'
400
400
500
RB =69KN
500
2000
1000
2000 RC =114KN
1000
NB: the asphalt surfacing, the UDL and KEL live loads act on the carriageway
away from the raised kerbs
UDL load, w =3.22+9.82+39.27
=
52.31 KN/m
Total load due to slab A'-B =
26.2
KN
Total load due to slabB-C =
104.6
KN
Total load due to slab C-D =
52.3
KN
RB + RC = 26.15 +104.62+52.31 KN =
MB= 0 ;
183.1
KN
RC= 114
KN
RB = 69
KN
52.31X1
VAB'
VAB'
VAB'
VAB'
VAB'
V
bd
0.392
From table 8 , BS 5400 part 4, the value of s for a slab 200 mm thick by interpolation
BS 5400
Part 4
table 8
s
s = 1.25 - 25 / 35 x (1.25-1.2)
1.25
1.2
= 1.214
175
210
200
From table 5 , BS 5400 part 4, the ultimate shear stress vc is also obtained by interpolation
100. As
bd
100 x 754
1000 x 162
vc
0.5
0.465
0.5
0.465
0.35
0.25
vc=
0.582
N/mm2
vp
N
Critical perimeter x d1
BS 5400
part 4
clause
6.4.4.2
Critical perimeter = 2( a + b) + 2r
= 2( a + b) + 2 x 3/2 d
= 2( a + b) + 3d
Therefore, Vp =
N
[ 2( a + b) + 3d]d1
where
d= slab depth,
d1 = effective depth
291
KN
C
i
SERVICEABILITY CHECK
Flexural stress at the serviceability limit state; (SLS) Elastic Modular Ratio method theory
1.46
0.11
1.94
0.97
4.37
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
100
KN
fL f 3
=2 x 100 x
KNm
Ecc
Fcc
2x
3
d1
d1-x
Fst
st
Strain
Stress
fcc
cc
or
fcc =
cc . Ecc
-------1
fst =
st . Est
-------2
(stess)
(strain)
therefore 1 bx Fcc
2
=Ast . Fst
Est
Ecc
Rearranging,
Modular Ratio
= Ast(d1-x). Est
Ecc
x
= Ast(d1-x). M
x
1000 bx2 +
x +
2
Solving,
162.0
mm
15
m = 200/27 =
2 (753.6).(15 ) x 2.(162).(15) = 0
a=
1
b 22.608
c= 3662.5
22.608 x -3,662.50 = 0
x=
but x = nd1, or
and k = (d-d1)
(1-n)d1
d1=
=n
0.31
200 - 162
(1 - 0.31)162
0.34
fst =
Q=
213
N/mm2
26.35 x 102
1000(162)(162)
M
db2
A
bd
754
1000 x 162
H=
Q
p
0.005
1.00
1.00
0.0047
216
160.0 N/mm2
6.2
N/mm2
N/mm2
368 N/mm2
and
Limiting stress for concrete at SLS = 0.5fcu
12.5 N/mm2
fL f 3
=2 x x
50.26
KNm
mm
diagram
From the above figure, the average strain at the level where cracking is considered is
by the eqn:-
fst
st
y
. st
d1-x
where d1 = effective depth, st is steel strain and y is the distance from the neutral
Axis to position of crack and x= depth of N_A
st =
fst
Est
hence
Then, fst=
y
d1-x
206.6 N/mm2
and 1 =
y
(162 -50)
207
x
. fst
Est
but fst =
INPUT
fcu=
25 N/mm2
fy=
460 N/mm2
Area of reinforcement " As " =
754 mm2
b = 1000 mm
h=
200 mm
d=
162 mm
Minimum cover to tension reinforcement " CO " =
25 mm
Maxmum bar spacing " S " =
150 mm
Bar dia " DIA " =
12 mm
" acr " =(((S/2)^2+(CO+DIA/2)^2)^(1/2)-DIA/2) as
mm or enter other value =
75default
"acr " is distance from the point considered to the surface of the
nearest longitudinal bar
22.6 KNm
CALCULATIONS
moduli of elasticity of concrete " Ec" = (1/2)*(20+0.2*fcu) = 12.5 KN/mm2
moduli of elasticity of steel " Es " = 200 KN/mm2
Modular ratio " a " = (Es/Ec) = 16.0
" r " = As/bd =
0.0047
52 mm
depth to neutral axis, "x" = (-a.r +((a.r)2 + 2.a.r)0.5.d =
" Z " = d-(x/3) = 145
Reinforcement stress " fs " = Ms/(As*Z) = 207 N/mm2
Concrete stress " fc " = (fs*As)/(0.5*b*x) = 6.05 N/mm2
Strain at soffit of concrete beam/slab " e1 " = (fs/Es)*(h-x)/(d-x) =
0.0014
Strain due to stiffening effect of concrete between cracks " e2 " =
e2 = b.(h-x)2/(3.Es.As.(d-x)) for crack widths of 0.2 mm Used Bs 5400 table 1
e2 = 1.5.b.(h-x)2/(3.Es.As.(d-x)) for crack widths of 0.1 mm
e2 =
0.00044
Average strain for calculation of crack width " em "= e1-e2 =
0.00095
Calculated crack width, " w " = 3.acr.em/(1+2.(acr-c)/(h-x))
CALCULATED CRACK WIDTH, 'w' = 0.13 mm
From table 1 of BS 5400 part 4 clause 5.1.1 Allowable crack width can be
taken as 0.2 mm
Serviceability requirements for Crack width Met
DESIGN OF BEAMS
DETERMINATION OF LOADS AND LOAD DISTRIBUTION USING THE
SIMPLIFIED INFLUENE LINE METHOD
1.45
1.363
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.25
1.0/2 = f1/2.725
1.0/2 = f2/2.533
f1=
f2 =
f3 =
1.363
1.267
2.103
Since load due to slab is UDL influence factor is the area of triangle btn beam
B2 and extreme end of slab
= 0.5 x 1.45 x 2.9=2.103
(iv) Surfacing
=
2.103
Since load due to surfacing is UDL influence factor is the area of triangle btn beam
B2 and beginning of carriage = 0.5 x 1.25 x 2.5= 1.563
(iv) cantilever 1.0/2 = f4/2.393
slab haunch
f4 =
1.563
1.197
(i) Kerb 1 =
0.20
(i) Kerb 2 =
0.20
(iii) Slab 3 =
0.20
(iii) Surfacing = 0.08
(iv)Beam
0.28
(vi)Cantilever 0.76
haunch =
(i) Kerb 1 =
0.20
(i) Kerb 2 =
0.20
(iii) Slab 3 =
0.20
(iii) Surfacing = 0.08
(iv)Bea =
0.28
(vi)Cantilever 0.76
haunch =
=
=
=
=
=
4.61
0.31
13.35
5.03
4.44
0.72
28.46
=
=
=
=
=
2.75
0.18
10.09
3.00
3.36
0.00
19.39
Live Loads
Live loads on Beams B1(B4) ULS
(i) UDL =
= 15.41
(ii) KEL =
= 61.63
= 10.72
(ii) KEL =
= 42.87
b) Cracks
(i) UDL =
= 8.90
(ii) KEL =
= 35.58
1.0/2
1.0/2
1.0/2
1.0/2
1.0/2
1.0/2
= f1/0.9
= f2/0.725
= f3/0.533
= f4/0.333
= 1/4*1-1/2*.25*0.5
= 1/4*1-1/2*.25*0.9
f1=
f2 =
f3 =
f4 =
f5 =
f6 =
0.450 (-ve)
0.363 (-ve)
0.267 (-ve)
0.197 (-ve)
1.938 (+ve)
1.798 (+ve)
=
=
=
=
=
-0.61
-0.03
-0.09
6.24
11.41
4.44
21.37
=
=
=
=
=
-0.61
-0.03
-0.09
3.72
8.63
3.36
14.98
5.714 x 2 x1.5x1.15
= 19.71
(ii) KEL =
22.86 x 2 x1.5x1.15
= 78.86
= 13.71
(ii) KEL =
22.86 x 2 x1.2x1.0
= 54.86
b) Cracks
(i) UDL =
= 11.38
(ii) KEL =
= 45.53
LL
19.71
KN/m
LL + DL
41.08
KN/m
DL
21.37
KN/m
KEL
78.86
KN/m
DL + LL
DL + LL
DL
Case i
KEL
KEL
DL + LL
DL + LL
DL
Case ii
DL + LL
DL + LL
DL
Case iii
KEL
DL + LL
DL
Case iv
Maximum moment on span CD and DE
DL + LL
DL + LL
DL
Case i
KEL
DL + LL
AB
Case ii
DL + LL
DL
DL + LL
B
Case iii
KEL
DL + LL
A
KEL
DL + LL
A
Case ii
DL + LL
DL
Case iv
Case i
KEL
DL + LL
DL + LL
DL
1
20.08.2013
03.09.2013
13.09.2013
Output
UNITS
M2
M2
M2
KN/m
mm
mm
mm
mm
N
N
N/mm2
N/mm2
N/mm2
N/m
KN
KN
KN
mm
KN
mm
mm
mm
mm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KN/m
mm
KN
mm
KN
N
N
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
,
KN/m
KN/m
1
20.08.2013
03.09.2013
13.09.2013
Output
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
m
KN/m
N/mm
N/mm
KN/m
N/mm
N/mm
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
m
KN/m
KN/m2
KN/m
mm
mm
KN
1
20.08.2013
03.09.2013
13.09.2013
Output
KN/m2
KN/m2
KN/m2
KN/m2
KN/m2
KN/m2
KN/m2
KN/m2
KN/m2
mm
HA =
30
KN/ Linear
Metre
KN/m
1
20.08.2013
03.09.2013
13.09.2013
Output
KEL =
120
KN/ Linear
Metre
KN/m
KN/m2
KN/m2
KN/m2
KN/m2
KN/m2
KN/m2
KN
KN
KNm
KNm
KN
KN
KNm
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
Md =
3.48KNm
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
Md =
17.92KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
Md =
4.25KNm
ML =
21.90KNm
KN
KN
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
Md =
2.73KNm
ML =
14.08KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
Bottom) reinforcement
e given as follows:-
(Cantilever)
1000
1.33
1000
0.0636
6.35
1000
13.10
69
obtained by interpolation
bx2
ing is considered is
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
KN/m
LL
19.71
KN/m
LL + DL
41.08
DL
21.37
KN/m
KEL
78.86
41.08
21.37
21.37
PNT LOAD1
L1
PNT LOAD2
L2
PNT LOAD3
L3
0.125
0.125
0.167
SPAN
KN/M
(M)
DF
K
FEM
0.429
-123.228
0.571
0.429
123.228 -64.09786
0.571
0.571
64.097856 -64.09786
64.0979
123.2279
CO
61.6139
BAL
-51.747 -68.99653
68.9965
-34.49827 34.49827
CO
BAL
CO
133.1
-133.1
29.6
-29.6
133.1
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
SUP. MMTS
0.0
CASE II
UDL
KN/M
41.08
21.37
21.37
PNT LOAD1
78.86
L1
PNT LOAD2
L2
PNT LOAD3
L3
0.125
0.125
0.167
SPAN
(M)
DF
K
FEM
0.429
-182.373
0.571
0.429
182.373 -64.09786
0.571
0.571
64.097856 -64.09786
64.0979
182.3729
CO
91.1864
BAL
-89.769 -119.6922
119.692
-59.84612 59.84612
CO
BAL
CO
183.8
-183.8
4.3
-4.3
183.8
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
SUP. MMTS
0.0
CASE III
UDL
41.08
41.08
21.37
PNT LOAD1
L1
PNT LOAD2
L2
PNT LOAD3
L3
SPAN
KN/M
(M)
DF
K
FEM
10
10
10
0.075
0.075
0.100
0.429
-342.3
342.2996
0.571
342.3 -342.2996
0.571
0.571
342.2996 -178.0496
0.429
178.05
CO
171.15
BAL
-73.35 -97.79989
-70.39286 -93.85714
50.8713
CO
BAL
CO
-35.19643
-48.89994 25.43566
-46.9286
15.0842 20.11224
10.056122 13.40816
26.8163
5.028061
10.056122 13.40816
6.70408
-2.1549 -2.873178
-10.05612 -13.40816
-3.8309
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
-5.028061
-1.436589 -1.915452
-6.70408
2.15488 2.873178
1.4365889 1.915452
3.8309
0.718294
1.4365889 1.915452
0.95773
-0.3078 -0.820908
-1.436589 -1.915452
-0.54727
BAL
CO
BAL
SUP. MMTS
0.0
454.9
-455.3
233.1
-233.1
209.2
CASE IV
UDL
KN/M
41.08
41.08
21.37
78.86
78.86
L1
PNT LOAD2
L2
PNT LOAD3
L3
10
10
10
PNT LOAD1
SPAN
(M)
DF
K
FEM
0.075
1
-458.224
0.075
0.429
0.571
391.981 -458.2238
0.100
0.429
0.571
0.571
391.9814 -178.0496
178.05
-91.68506 -122.2467
50.8713
458.2238
CO
229.112
BAL
-69.801 -93.06829
CO
BAL
CO
-45.84253
-46.53414 25.43566
-61.1234
19.6468 26.19573
9.0422082 12.05628
34.9276
4.521104
13.097865 17.46382
6.02814
-1.9376 -2.583488
-13.09787 -17.46382
-3.44465
-6.548933
-1.291744 -1.722325
-8.73191
2.80669 3.742247
1.291744 1.722325
4.98966
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
SUP. MMTS
0.0
0.645872
1.8711236 2.494831
0.86116
-0.2768 -0.738139
-1.871124 -2.494831
-0.49209
571.5
-571.9
262.8
-262.8
201.9
41.06
41.06
41.06
PNT LOAD1
L1
PNT LOAD2
L2
PNT LOAD3
L3
10
10
10
SPAN
KN/M
(M)
DF
K
FEM
0.075
1
0.075
0.429
-342.167
0.571
342.167 -342.1667
0.100
0.429
0.571
0.571
342.16667 -342.1667
342.167
342.1667
CO
171.083
BAL
-73.321
-97.7619
97.7619
-48.88095 48.88095
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
SUP. MMTS
0.0
439.9
-439.9
293.3
-293.3
439.9
CASE II
UDL
41.06
41.06
41.06
PNT LOAD1
L1
PNT LOAD2
L2
PNT LOAD3
L3
SPAN
KN/M
(M)
DF
K
10
10
10
0.075
0.075
0.100
FEM
0.429
-342.167
0.571
0.429
342.167 -342.1667
0.571
0.571
342.16667 -342.1667
342.167
342.1667
CO
171.083
BAL
-73.321
-97.7619
97.7619
-48.88095 48.88095
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
SUP. MMTS
0.0
439.9
-439.9
293.3
-293.3
439.9
CASE III
UDL
41.06
41.06
41.06
PNT LOAD1
KN/M
L1
PNT LOAD2
L2
PNT LOAD3
L3
10
10
10
SPAN
(M)
DF
0.075
FEM
0.075
0.429
-342.167
0.100
0.571
0.429
342.167 -342.1667
0.571
0.571
342.16667 -342.1667
342.167
342.1667
CO
171.083
BAL
-73.321
-97.7619
97.7619
-48.88095 48.88095
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
SUP. MMTS
0.0
439.9
-439.9
293.3
-293.3
439.9
CASE IV
UDL
41.06
41.06
41.06
PNT LOAD1
L1
PNT LOAD2
L2
PNT LOAD3
L3
10
10
10
0.075
0.075
0.100
SPAN
KN/M
(M)
DF
K
FEM
1
-342.167
0.429
0.571
342.167 -342.1667
0.571
0.571
342.16667 -342.1667
0.429
342.167
342.1667
CO
171.083
BAL
-73.321
-97.7619
97.7619
CO
BAL
CO
-48.88095 48.88095
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
CO
BAL
SUP. MMTS
0.0
439.9
-439.9
293.3
-293.3
439.9
41.08
KN/m
78.86
KN/m
41.08
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0.125
0.429
-123.2279
123.228
-123.23
-61.61393
51.7474
-133.1
0.0
41.08
78.86
3
0
0
0
0
6
0.125
0.429
-182.3729
182.373
-182.37
-91.18643
89.76918
-183.8
0.0
21.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0.075
0.429
-178.0496
1
178.05
-178.05
-89.0248
38.15349
20.11224
-2.873178
2.873178
-0.410454
-209.2
0.0
21.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0.075
0.429
-178.0496
1
178.05
-178.05
-89.0248
38.15349
26.19573
-2.583488
3.742247
-0.36907
-201.9
0.0
41.06
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0.075
0.429
-342.1667
1
342.167
-342.17
-171.0833
73.32143
-439.9
0.0
41.06
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0.075
0.429
-342.1667
342.167
-342.17
-171.0833
73.32143
-439.9
0.0
41.06
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0.075
0.429
-342.1667
342.167
-342.17
-171.0833
73.32143
-439.9
0.0
41.06
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0.075
0.429
-342.1667
1
342.167
-342.17
-171.0833
73.32143
-439.9
0.0