Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UBS RE Research
UBS RE Research
This report has been prepared by UBS Financial Services Inc. (“UBSFS”).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Residential Real Estate
1
Summary
THE UGLY THE BAD
Length of Downturn
Public Builder Market Share Gains
2
Residential Real Estate
THE UGLY
3
Negative Equity Time Series Source: First American Core Logic
N e g a ti v e E q u i ty b y M o r tg a g e V i n ta g e
45%
41%
40%
37%
35%
33%
30%
25%
22%
20% 19%
15%
13% 12%
11% 12%
10%
10%
5%
0%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
N e g a ti v e E q u i ty b y B u i l d Y e a r
45%
42%
41%
40% 38%
35% 34%
33%
30%
30% 28%
27%
25%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
4
Distribution of Negative Equity 3Q 2009 Source: First American Core Logic
12%
11%
10%
8%
6%
4%
4%
3%
3% 3%
2%
2%
0%
0% - (5%) Equity (5%) - (10%) Equity (10%) - (15%) Equity (15%) - (20%) Equity (20%) - (25%) Equity > (25%) Equity
5
Negative Equity Composition Source: Loan Performance
100.0% 2.0%
80.0%
69.0%
60.0%
98.0%
40.0%
20.0% 31.0%
0.0%
Negative Equity @ 2Q 2007 Negative Equity @ 3Q 2009
6
Mortgage Amount by Equity Level Source: First American Core Logic
$350,000
$320,000
$300,000
$280,000
$270,000
$260,000
$250,000
$250,000 $240,000
$225,000
$215,000
$200,000
$200,000
$175,000
$150,000
$100,000
$100,000
$50,000
$0
> 50% 25% - 50% 5%-25% 0% - 5% 0% - (5%) (5%) - (10%) - (15%) - (20%) - (25%) - > (50%)
(10%) (15%) (20%) (25%) (50%)
Homeowner Equity
7
Mortgage Issuance 2000-2008 Source: MBA
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Option ARM Subprime Alt-A Jumbo Conforming - Fixed Conforming - Floating FHA
8
Loan-to-Value by Loan Type Source: Loan Performance, MBA
100.0% 6.0%
15.0%
90.0% 11.0%
29.0% 30.0%
80.0%
20.0%
70.0% 26.0% 58.0%
60.0% 21.0%
24.0%
20.0%
50.0% 21.0%
40.0% 18.0%
15.0% 20.0%
19.0%
30.0%
15.0%
20.0% 36.0% 13.0%
12.0%
30.0%
10.0% 17.0%
13.0%
5.0%
6.0%
0.0%
Conforming Jumbo Alt-A Subprime Option Arm
9
Delinquency by LTV Source: Loan Performance
60% 58%
50%
50% 48%
60+ Days Delinquent
41% 42%
40%
33% 34%
21% 20%
20% 16% 15%
17%
9% 9%
10% 5% 6%
3%
0%
<=80% 80%-100% 100%-120% 120%-140% 140%+
Loan-to-Value
10
Underwriting Quality Matters Source: First American Corelogic
Alt-A
50%
45%
40%
60+ Days Delinquent
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
1 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66
M onths of Se as oning
S ub P r im e
60%
50%
60+ Days Delinquent
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
3 12 21 30 39 48 57 66
M o n th s o f Se as o n in g
11
Serious Delinquencies 3Q 2009 Source: First American Core Logic
28% 400%
26%
24% 350%
22%
300%
20%
18%
250%
16%
14% 200%
12%
10% 150%
o
pa
x
re
i
ta
e
L
CA
h
rs
m
A
cie
a
nd
ni
ga
al
,F
ac
so
,C
pi
oc
m
ia
ye
oe
rd
rla
Lu
Em
Be
Ve
d,
es
M
Ta
/B
ra
.M
on
de
Ph
ce
Sa
pl
m
t.
a
kt
au
nd
Ft
.S
er
Na
La
al
on
oc
.L
la
M
tP
Pt
yt
St
In
Ft
Da
es
W
12
N
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
ev
ad
a
A
riz
on
a
Fl
or
id
M a
ic
hi
ga
Ca n
lif
or
ni
a
G
eo
rg
ia
V
Negative Equity by State
irg
in
ia
N
at
io
M n
ar
yl
an
d
O
hi
o
Id
ah
o
Co
N lo
ew ra
H d
am o
ps
hi
Source: First American Core Logic
re
Ill
in
oi
s
U
ta
h
13
L
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
In as V
lan eg
d E as
mp
i
Ft Pho re
.L
au enix
de
rd
Or ale
lan
d
Ta o
mp
M a
Sa iam
cra i
me
W nt
o
es
tP D etr
alm oit
Negative Equity by MSA
W Be
ar ach
re
Ja n, M
ck
so I
nv
Oa ille
k
Sa land
nD
ieg
o
Lo
sA C D
ng
e
At les
l
Cl anta
ev
e
VA land
Source: First American Core Logic
Be
Sa ach
nJ
o
De se
nv
Ch er
ica
g
Irv o
ine
14
At Risk Mortgages by State Source: Lender Processing Services
25.0%
20.0%
6.8%
10.9%
2.3%
15.0% 2.4%
3.9%
3.7% 3.2% 2.6% 2.5%
4.0% 3.5% 2.8% 2.5% 1.8%
4.3% 3.2%
10.0%
15.7% 15.5%
12.7% 12.3% 13.4% 11.3% 11.3% 11.8%
5.0% 10.3% 10.7% 11.5% 11.0% 9.1% 10.0% 10.8%
11.4%
0.0%
ois
a
hio
l
an
a
ia
d
ia
da
na
a
pi
nd
na
ia
ey
id
an
an
an
rg
rn
ip
ig
ina
va
tio
O
yla
izo
or
rs
eo
Illi
iss
lifo
di
Isl
si
ich
Fl
Ne
Na
Je
irg
In
ui
ar
Ar
G
iss
Ca
e
M
Lo
M
od
tV
w
M
Ne
Rh
es
W
Delinquency % Foreclosure %
15
Default Rates – State Laws Matter Source: Loan Performance
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Feb-08
Feb-09
Oct-07
Dec-07
Jun-08
Oct-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Oct-09
Aug-07
Apr-08
Aug-08
Apr-09
Aug-09
CA & AZ FL & NV
16
Default Rates (LTV >= 125%) – State Laws Matter Source: Loan Performance
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Oct-07
Dec-07
Oct-08
Dec-08
Oct-09
Feb-08
Jun-08
Feb-09
Jun-09
Apr-08
Apr-09
Aug-07
Aug-08
Aug-09
CA & AZ FL & NV
17
Mortgage Modification Actions Source: OCC, OTS
Rate Reduction
Rate Freeze
Term Extension
Principal Reduction
10.0% Other
18
Re-Default Rates as of 2Q 2009 Source: OCC/OTS
70.0%
58.0%59.5% 58.0%
60.0% 55.0% 53.0%
51.0% 49.5%
50.0% 41.5%
46.0%
40.0% 34.0%
30.0% 28.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Agency FHA Private
19
Re-Default Rates With Principal Reduction (2Q 2009) Source: OCC/OTS
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
3 Mo. 6 Mo. 9 Mo. 12 Mo.
20
Monthly Foreclosures
Ja
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
M n-05
a
M r-0
ay 5
Ju -05
Se l-05
Nop-05
Jav-05
M n-06
a
M r-0
ay 6
Ju -06
Se l-06
Nop-06
Jav-06
M n-07
a
M r-0
ay 7
Ju -07
National Foreclosure Data
Se l-07
Total US Forclosures
Nop-07
Jav-07
M n-08
a
M r-0
ay 8
Ju-08
Se l-08
Nop-08
Jav-08
M n-09
a
Trailing 12 Months
M r-0
ay 9
Ju -09
Se l-09
Nop-09
Jav-09
n-
10
0
Source: Realtytrac
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
4,500,000
TTM Foreclosures
21
Bubble Market Foreclosure Inventory Source: Realtytrac, Trulia.com, Zip Realty
Foreclosure
MLS Listings Inventory %of MLS Listings
22
A Clog in the Foreclosure Pipeline? Source: Lender Processing Services
35.0%
30.9%
30.0%
25.0% 23.0%
21.8%
20.0%
16.0%
14.4% 13.9% 13.8%
15.0%
10.8% 10.0% 10.1%
8.5% 9.1%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
No Pmts 6 Months No Pmts 12 Months No Pmts 18 Months No Pmts 24 Months
23
Estimated Existing Excess Housing Units Source: UBS Estimates
2,300,000 2,240,000
2,100,000
1,900,000
1,750,000
1,700,000 1,600,000
1,500,000
1,300,000
1,100,000
900,000
700,000
500,000
Vacancy Rate Basis Homeownership Basis Structural Demand Basis
24
1Q
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
20
05
2Q
20
05
3Q
Cure Rates
20
4Q 05
20
0
1Q 5
20
0
2Q 6
20
0
3Q 6
20
0
4Q 6
20
0
30 Day
1Q 6
20
2Q 07
20
0
3Q 7
60 Day
20
0
4Q 7
20
0
1Q 7
20
0
2Q 8
20
90+ Days
0
3Q 8
20
4Q 08
20
0
Source: Loan Performance
1Q 8
20
0
2Q 9
20
09
25
Potential Additional National Shadow Supply Source: MBA, UBS Estimates, LoanPerformance
Avg Cure Rates 1.38% 1.23% 3.77% 5.64% Curr Cure Rates 3.01% 1.90% 4.61% 5.64%
New Inventory 788,561 702,739 2,156,293 3,226,610 New Inventory 1,720,496 1,088,112 2,635,469 3,226,610
26
Residential Real Estate
THE BAD
27
ARM Resets Source: LoanPerformance, FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA
$600
$500
$232
$131
$400
$21
$12
$69
$BN
$300
$111 $65
$5
$131
$200 $90
$95
$63 $23
$100
$151 $12 $19
$134 $59 $22
$86 $45 $50 $34 $11
$43 $27 $25
$24 $24 $13
$0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
28
Historical Homeownership Rates Source: US Census & Harvard JCHS
70.0%
69.0%
68.0%
67.0%
66.0%
65.0%
64.0%
63.0%
65
68
71
74
86
92
77
80
83
89
95
07
98
01
04
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
19
19
20
Homeownership Rate Average
29
Impact of Distressed Sales Source: Inside Mortgage Finance/Campbell Communications
4.0
$50,000
2.0
$0 0.0
Non-Distressed Short Sale Move-In Ready REO Damaged REO Short Sale Non-Distressed Move-InReadyREO Damaged REO
30
Sources of Financing (4Q 2009) Source: Inside Mortgage Finance/Campbell Communications
100%
20%
10% 22%
6%
0% 2%
Current Homeow ner Firs t Time Buy er Inv es tor Buy er
100%
15% 19%
90% 20%
30%
80%
30%
7% 48% 45%
20% 36%
10% 21%
0%
Damaged REO Move-In Ready REO Short Sale Non-Distressed
31
SF Homes Converted to Rentals Source: Foresight Analytics
1,500,000 1,420,000
1,300,000
1,100,000
SF Housing Units
900,000 720,000
700,000
500,000 400,000
290,000 320,000
300,000
100,000
(100,000)
(110,000)
(300,000)
(500,000) (390,000)
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 YTD
6/30/09
32
Residential Real Estate
THE GOOD
33
Affordability Index Source: NAR, FHFA
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2005 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q
2006 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 2007 2007 2008 2008 2008 2008 2009 2009 2009
34
Units in 000
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
1971
1974
1977
1980
1983
1986
1989
1992
1995
Single Family Housing Starts
1998
2001
2004
2007
Mar-08
Jun-08
Sep-08
Source: US Census
Dec-08
Mar-09
Average
Jun-09
Sep-09
Dec-09
35
Household Formations Source: US Census
3,000
2,500
2,000
Units in 000
1,500 Average
1,000
500
E
00
04
96
92
88
84
60
64
68
72
76
80
56
08
20
20
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
36
Prior Housing Cycle Durations Source: US Census, UBS Estimates
39 38 46.0% # -33.6%
37
Housing Supply/Demand Model Source: UBS Estimates
N o r m a liz e d D e m a n d
H o u s e h o ld F o r m a tio n s 1 ,1 0 0 ,0 0 0
N e t D e m o litio n s 2 0 0 ,0 0 0
S econd H om e D em and 1 5 0 ,0 0 0
T o ta l 1 ,4 5 0 ,0 0 0
C u r r e n t S u p p ly
S in g le F a m ily H o u s in g S ta r ts 5 5 0 ,0 0 0
M a n u f a c tu r e d H o u s in g 5 0 ,0 0 0
T o ta l 6 0 0 ,0 0 0
A b s o r p tio n 8 5 0 ,0 0 0
C u r r e n t E x c e s s S u p p ly 2 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
In c r e m e n ta l C h a n g e in H o m e O w n e r s h ip 0
C u r r e n t E x c e s s S u p p ly 2 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
C u r r e n t H o m e o w n e r s h ip R a te 6 7 .2 %
Y e a r s to A b s o r b C u r r e n t E x c e s s 2 .4
38
Housing Supply/Demand Sensitivity Analysis Source: UBS Estimates
39
Incremental Public Builder Potential Source: US Census, Company Reports, UBS Estimates
40
Supplemental Market Specific Detail
41
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
10/26/2007
11/26/2007
12/26/2007
1/26/2008
2/26/2008
3/26/2008
4/26/2008
5/26/2008
6/26/2008
7/26/2008
8/26/2008
9/26/2008
10/26/2008
LA
11/26/2008
12/26/2008
1/26/2009
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
10/26/2007 2/26/2009
11/26/2007 3/26/2009
12/26/2007 4/26/2009
1/26/2008 5/26/2009
2/26/2008 6/26/2009
3/26/2008 7/26/2009
4/26/2008 8/26/2009
5/26/2008 9/26/2009
6/26/2008 10/26/2009
7/26/2008 11/26/2009
8/26/2008 12/26/2009
9/26/2008 1/26/2010
10/26/2008
11/26/2008
San Diego
12/26/2008
California For Sale Inventory
1/26/2009
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
2/26/2009 10/26/2007
3/26/2009 11/26/2007
4/26/2009 12/26/2007
5/26/2009 1/26/2008
6/26/2009 2/26/2008
7/26/2009 3/26/2008
8/26/2009 4/26/2008
9/26/2009 5/26/2008
10/26/2009 6/26/2008
11/26/2009 7/26/2008
12/26/2009 8/26/2008
1/26/2010 9/26/2008
10/26/2008
11/26/2008
12/26/2008
Inland Empire
1/26/2009
2/26/2009
3/26/2009
4/26/2009
5/26/2009
Source: California Association of Realtors
6/26/2009
7/26/2009
8/26/2009
9/26/2009
10/26/2009
11/26/2009
12/26/2009
1/26/2010
42
-5 0 . 0 %
-4 0 . 0 %
-3 0 . 0 %
-2 0 . 0 %
-1 0 . 0 %
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
-8 0 . 0 %
-6 0 . 0 %
-4 0 . 0 %
-2 0 . 0 %
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
1/6/2001 1/6/2001
5/6/2001 5/6/2001
9/6/2001 9/6/2001
1/6/2002 1/6/2002
5/6/2002 5/6/2002
9/6/2002 9/6/2002
1/6/2003 1/6/2003
5/6/2003 5/6/2003
P a lm S p rin g s
L o s A n g e le s
9/6/2003 9/6/2003
1/6/2004 1/6/2004
5/6/2004 5/6/2004
9/6/2004 9/6/2004
H ig h D e s e rt
O ra n g e C o u n t y
1/6/2005 1/6/2005
5/6/2005 5/6/2005
9/6/2005 9/6/2005
S B C ounty
1/6/2006 1/6/2006
5/6/2006
In la n d E m p ire
5/6/2006
9/6/2006 9/6/2006
1/6/2007 1/6/2007
S B S . Coas t
V e n t u ra
5/6/2007 5/6/2007
9/6/2007 9/6/2007
1/6/2008 1/6/2008
5/6/2008 5/6/2008
S a n D ie g o
N o. S B C ounty
9/6/2008 9/6/2008
1/6/2009 1/6/2009
5/6/2009 5/6/2009
9/6/2009 9/6/2009
California Home Price Changes 2001-2009 Source: California Association of Realtors
43
Subprime Mortgages and Price Appreciation Source: Loan Performance, OFHEO
Sac/Stockton
130.0%
DC
120.0% Vegas
o
110.0%
nd
pa
rla
m
Phoenix
Ta
100.0% O
90.0%
80.0%
0.50x 1.00x 1.50x 2.00x 2.50x 3.00x
Relative Use of SP/Alt-A
44
LA
/L
on
g
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
NY Inla Be 9.0%
/N n ac
J/ d E h
W m
es p
tch ire
es
O DC ter
ra
n g Me
e tr
Co o
Sa unt
n y
Di
e
Ph go
oe
O nix
ak
la
Ch nd
La icag
s
Share of SP/Alt-A
V o
Sa eg
Exposure to Alt-A & Subprime
cr a s
am
en
At to
la
nt
a
M
Sa iam
n i
Lo Jo
n s
Ft g I e
Cumulative Share
. L sla
a n
Sa ude d
n r
Fr da l
an e
Source: First American Core Logic
cis
co
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
45
Option ARM Use by State Source: Loan Performance
Ot her
25%
Ar izona
3%
Calif or nia
Nevada 58%
3%
Flor ida
11%
46
California REO Sales Source: LPS Applied Analytics
800,000 60.0%
700,000
50.0%
600,000
40.0%
500,000
400,000 30.0%
300,000
20.0%
200,000
10.0%
100,000
0 0.0%
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan-June
2009
47
California Mortgage Loss Severities Source: LoanPerformance
80.0%
75.0%
70.0%
65.0%
60.0%
55.0%
50.0%
45.0%
40.0%
35.0%
30.0%
Se 8
9
A 8
Ju 9
A 9
09
D 8
M 09
Fe 9
Ja 8
A 9
M 9
O 8
N 8
-0
-0
l -0
-0
l -0
-0
0
-0
-0
0
0
0
n-
p-
b-
n-
ct-
ug
ug
pr
ov
ay
ec
ar
Ju
Ju
Prime Jumbo Option ARM Alt-A Subprime
48
California Housing Supply by Price Point Source: California Association of Realtors
20
18
16
14
Months Supply
12
10
0
$0-$300K $300k-$500K $500K-$750K $750K-$1MM $1MM+
2008 2009
49
California High End Risk? Source: MDA Dataquick, NAR
60,000 600,000
50,000 550,000
40,000 500,000
30,000 450,000
20,000 400,000
10,000 350,000
0 300,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
50
Housing Starts CAGR 11/94 – Peak Source: US Census
25.0% 23.4%
21.4%
20.3%
20.0% 18.4%
15.2%
15.0%
11.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
California Arizona Florida Nevada Colorado New Mexico
51
Housing Starts & Population Growth CAGR Source: US Census
0.50%
0.0% 0.00%
California Arizona Florida Nevada Colorado New Mexico
52
California Average Down Payment % Source: California Association of Realtors
20.0%
19.0%
18.0%
17.0%
16.0%
15.0%
14.0%
13.0%
12.0%
11.0%
10.0%
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
53
California Transactions w/$0 DP Source: California Association of Realtors
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
54
California Transactions w/2nd Mortgage Source: Cal. Assoc. of Realtors
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
55
California Transactions FRM vs. ARM Source: Cal. Assoc. of Realtors
100% 5% 6%
8% 9% 10% 12%
90% 17% 22%
80% 37% 40%
51%
70%
60%
50% 95% 94%
92% 91% 90% 88%
40% 83% 78%
30% 63% 60%
49%
20%
10%
0%
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
56
Commercial Real Estate
57
Summary
We are more constructive on CRE than RRE owing to:
Manageable capacity additions
Capital access/capital on the sidelines
Government intervention & Bank/Servicer “Flexibility”
58
Capacity Additions Source: PPR
3.5%
3.0%
Capacity Additions
2.5%
2.0%
1.5%
1.0%
0.5%
0.0%
06
08
90
98
00
02
04
92
94
96
E
10
12
20
20
20
20
20
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
Retail Industrial Office Multifamily
59
REIT Capital Market Activity Source: SNL Financial
$30,000
$4,600 $5,500
$25,000
$7,730 $18,300
$20,000
$14,889
$MM
$15,000
$656
$10,000
$17,135 $5,600
$4,600
$0
2006 2007 2008 2009
60
CRE Debt Maturities Source: Company Reports, Bloomberg, SNL Financial, Trepp, UBS Estimates
$500
$50
$400 $36
$150 $135
$135
$300 $32
$BN
$70
$53
$200 $331
$240 $202
$186
$100
$26 $33 $30 $30
$0
2010 2011 2012 2013
61
CMBS Maturities 2010-2018 Source: Trepp
$160,000
$140,000
$11,614 $17,885
$120,000
$100,000 $10,310
$80,000
$129,280
$124,639
$60,000
$34,980
$94,943
$14,831
$27,928
$20,000 $35,267
62
CMBS Maturities 2010-2018 Source: Trepp
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Amortizing I/O
63
CMBS Maturities > $25MM/Loan Source: Trepp
180 $16
160 $14
140
$12
120
$10
# of Loans
100
$ BN
$8
80
$6
60
$4
40
20 $2
0 $0
10
13
13
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
13
13
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
1Q
2Q
3Q
4Q
1Q
2Q
3Q
4Q
1Q
2Q
3Q
4Q
1Q
2Q
3Q
4Q
# of Loans Maturing Loans >= $25MM
64
CMBS Loan Characteristics 2010-2012 Source: Trepp
Avg. Loan Size ($MM) $26.43 $10.55 $17.66 $9.78 $29.85 $13.08
65
CMBS Underwriting – Back to the Future? Source: Rating Agency Pre-Sale Reports
LTV
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Pr e - 2 0 0 5 2005-2008 DDR 2 0 0 9 Bof A 2009 JPM 2 0 0 9
L TV ( UW ) L TV ( A g e n c y )
DS CR
1 .6 0 x
1 .5 5 x
1 .5 0 x
1 .4 5 x
1 .4 0 x
1 .3 5 x
1 .3 0 x
1 .2 5 x
Pr e - 2 0 0 5 2005-2008 DDR 2009 BofA 2009 JPM 2 0 0 9
66
CRE Vacancy and Rent Trends Source: Property Portfolio Report
V a c a nc y
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
M ultifa mily O ffic e R e ta il Ind ustria l
2Q 08 2Q 09
C ha ng e in R e nt
5%
0%
-5%
-10%
-15%
M ultifa mily O ffic e R eta il Ind ustria l
2Q 08 2Q 09
67
CRE Recession Vacancy Source: Property Portfolio Report
68
CRE and Inflation – Who is Best Positioned? Source: SNL Financial, UBS estimates
5
Years
0
Multifamily Industrial Office - Suburban Office - CBD Shopping Center Regional Mall
69
CMBS Delinquency by Property Type Source: Trepp
12.0%
10.0%
8.0%
6.0%
4.0%
2.0%
0.0%
4Q 08 1Q 09 2Q 09 3Q 09 4Q 09 Jan-10
70
Outstanding CMBS by Property Type Source: Trepp
Ot her
Self St or age 8%
2%
Indust r ial
5% Ret ail
30%
Hot el
8%
Of f ic e Mult if amily
31% 16%
71
CRE Transaction Market (>$5MM/TX) Source: Real Capital Analytics
$600
$502
$500
$400 $353
$302
$BN
$300
$206
$200 $142
$122
$101
$79
$100 $46
$0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
72
Manhattan Office Transaction Funding Source: Real Capital Analytics
100% 2.0%
90% 19.0%
73
Southern California
74
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
W W
es es
tL tL
A A
14.0% 13.0%
15.0% 13.7%
D D
T T
LA LA
D 14.8% D 13.6%
T T
LA 15.1% LA 14.0%
C C
la la
s s s
A s
12.1%
A
10.6%
12.4% 11.2%
In In
.E .
m Em
In p. In
.E 23.1% .
p.
22.4%
m 23.7%
Em
22.9%
p. p.
C C
la la
ss ss
A A
36.8% 36.1%
37.2% 36.7%
O O
C C
18.7%
O 20.6% O 19.1%
C C
C C
la la
ss ss
A A
22.5% 20.3%
22.6% 20.3%
D D
T T
SD SD
D 15.0% D 14.5%
T
Southern California Office Vacancy
T
SD 14.5% SD 14.3%
9/30/09 T o tal Vaca n c y
C C
la la
ss ss
A A
15.6%
9/30/09 Direct Vacancy
15.0%
15.1% 14.8%
Su Su
b. b.
S D SD
18.2%
Su Su 16.6%
b. b.
SD 18.0% S D 16.6%
Cl Cl
a ss a ss
A A
22.6% 20.7%
21.7% 19.9%
Source: REIS, Colliers International
75
Downtown LA Source: REIS, Colliers International
2 1 .0 %
1 9 .0 %
1 7 .0 %
1 5 .0 %
1 3 .0 %
1 1 .0 %
9 .0 %
7 .0 %
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
96
97
97
98
99
00
00
01
02
03
03
04
05
06
06
07
08
09
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
D ir e c t V a c a n t T o ta l V a c a n t T o t a l A v a ila b ilit y
$ 4 0 .0 0 6 0 .0 %
$ 3 5 .0 0
5 0 .0 %
$ 3 0 .0 0
4 0 .0 %
$ 2 5 .0 0
$ 2 0 .0 0 3 0 .0 %
$ 1 5 .0 0
2 0 .0 %
$ 1 0 .0 0
1 0 .0 %
$ 5 .0 0
$ 0 .0 0 0 .0 %
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
96
97
97
98
99
00
00
01
02
03
03
04
05
06
06
07
08
09
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
% S u b le a s e D e a ls D ir e c t A v e r a g e R e n t S u b le t A v e r a g e R e n t
76
Downtown LA Source: TWR
4,000 16.0%
3,500 14.0%
3,000 12.0%
2,500 10.0%
000 SF
2,000 8.0%
1,500 6.0%
1,000 4.0%
500 2.0%
0 0.0%
19 0
19 1
19 2
19 3
19 4
19 5
19 6
19 7
19 8
20 9
20 0
20 1
20 2
20 3
20 4
20 5
20 6
20 7
20 08
20 9E
E
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
19
0
New Supply New Supply/Stock
77
West LA Source: REIS, Colliers International
2 1 .0 %
1 8 .0 %
1 5 .0 %
1 2 .0 %
9 .0 %
6 .0 %
3 .0 %
2Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
96
97
98
98
99
00
01
01
02
03
04
04
05
06
07
07
08
09
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
D ir e c t V a c a n t T o ta l V a c a n t T o t a l A v a ila b ilit y
$ 5 5 .0 0 3 0 .0 %
$ 5 0 .0 0 2 5 .0 %
$ 4 5 .0 0
2 0 .0 %
$ 4 0 .0 0
1 5 .0 %
$ 3 5 .0 0
1 0 .0 %
$ 3 0 .0 0
$ 2 5 .0 0 5 .0 %
$ 2 0 .0 0 0 .0 %
2Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
96
97
98
98
99
00
01
01
02
03
04
04
05
06
07
07
08
09
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
% S u b le a s e D e a ls D ir e c t A v e r a g e R e n t S u b le t A v e r a g e R e n t
78
000 SF
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
0
500
19
9
West LA
19 0
9
19 1
9
19 2
9
19 3
9
19 4
9
19 5
9
19 6
9
19 7
9
19 8
9
New Supply
20 9
0
20 0
0
20 1
0
20 2
0
20 3
0
20 4
0
Source: TWR
20 5
0
20 6
0
New Supply/Stock
20 7
0
20 8
20 09
10
E
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
79
Orange County Source: REIS, Colliers International
2 1 .0 %
1 9 .0 %
1 7 .0 %
1 5 .0 %
1 3 .0 %
1 1 .0 %
9 .0 %
7 .0 %
5 .0 %
4Q
2Q
4Q
2Q
4Q
2Q
4Q
2Q
4Q
2Q
4Q
2Q
4Q
2Q
4Q
2Q
4Q
2Q
00
01
01
02
02
03
03
04
04
05
05
06
06
07
07
08
08
09
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
D ir e c t V a c a n t T o ta l V a c a n t T o ta l A v a ila b ility
$ 3 2 .0 0 2 0 .0 %
$ 3 0 .0 0 1 8 .0 %
$ 2 8 .0 0 1 6 .0 %
$ 2 6 .0 0 1 4 .0 %
$ 2 4 .0 0 1 2 .0 %
$ 2 2 .0 0 1 0 .0 %
$ 2 0 .0 0 8 .0 %
4Q
2Q
4Q
2Q
4Q
2Q
4Q
2Q
4Q
2Q
4Q
2Q
4Q
2Q
4Q
2Q
4Q
2Q
00
01
01
02
02
03
03
04
04
05
05
06
06
07
07
08
08
09
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
% S u b le a s e D e a ls D ir e c t A v e r a g e R e n t S u b le t A v e r a g e R e n t
80
Orange County Source: TWR
3,500 8.0%
3,000 7.0%
2,500 6.0%
5.0%
000 SF
2,000
4.0%
1,500
3.0%
1,000 2.0%
500 1.0%
0 0.0%
20 7
20 2
20 4
20 08
2001
2005
20 6
20 9
20 0
20 3
19 7
19 5
1998
19 2
1994
19 6
1991
19 0
19 3
20 9E
E
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
9
9
9
9
9
9
10
19
0
New Supply New Supply/Stock
81
San Diego Source: REIS, Colliers International
3 0 .0 %
2 5 .0 %
2 0 .0 %
1 5 .0 %
1 0 .0 %
5 .0 %
0 .0 %
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
99
00
00
01
02
03
03
04
05
06
06
07
08
09
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
D ir e c t V a c a n t T o ta l V a c a n t T o ta l A v a ila b ility
$ 4 0 .0 0 3 5 .0 %
$ 3 8 .0 0
3 0 .0 %
$ 3 6 .0 0
$ 3 4 .0 0 2 5 .0 %
$ 3 2 .0 0 2 0 .0 %
$ 3 0 .0 0
$ 2 8 .0 0 1 5 .0 %
$ 2 6 .0 0 1 0 .0 %
$ 2 4 .0 0
5 .0 %
$ 2 2 .0 0
$ 2 0 .0 0 0 .0 %
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
4Q
3Q
2Q
1Q
99
00
00
01
02
03
03
04
05
06
06
07
08
09
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
% S u b le a s e D e a ls D ir e c t A v e r a g e R e n t S u b le t A v e r a g e R e n t
82
San Fernando Valley Source: Costar
2 0 .0 % $ 3 2 .0 0
1 8 .0 %
$ 3 0 .0 0
1 6 .0 %
1 4 .0 %
$ 2 8 .0 0
1 2 .0 %
1 0 .0 % $ 2 6 .0 0
8 .0 %
$ 2 4 .0 0
6 .0 %
4 .0 %
$ 2 2 .0 0
2 .0 %
0 .0 % $ 2 0 .0 0
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
V a c a n y R a te A ve r a g e R e n t / S F
2 ,0 0 0 8.0%
1 ,8 0 0
7.0%
1 ,6 0 0
6.0%
1 ,4 0 0
1 ,2 0 0 5.0%
000 SF
1 ,0 0 0 4.0%
800
3.0%
600
2.0%
400
200 1.0%
0 0.0%
20 E
20 E
E
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
10
11
12
20
20
20
20
20
20
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
N e w S u p p ly N e w S u p p ly / S t o c k
83
Burbank Source: Costar
3 0 .0 % $ 3 8 .0 0
$ 3 6 .0 0
2 5 .0 %
$ 3 4 .0 0
2 0 .0 % $ 3 2 .0 0
$ 3 0 .0 0
1 5 .0 %
$ 2 8 .0 0
1 0 .0 % $ 2 6 .0 0
$ 2 4 .0 0
5 .0 %
$ 2 2 .0 0
0 .0 % $ 2 0 .0 0
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
V a c a n y R a te A ve r a g e R e n t / S F
900 18.0%
800 16.0%
700 14.0%
600 12.0%
500 10.0%
000 SF
400 8.0%
300 6.0%
200 4.0%
100 2.0%
0 0.0%
20 E
20 E
E
08
09
04
05
06
07
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
90
91
92
93
10
11
12
20
20
20
20
20
20
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
19
19
19
N e w S u p p ly N e w S u p p ly / S t o c k 20
84
Glendale Source: Costar
2 5 .0 % $ 3 6 .0 0
$ 3 4 .0 0
2 0 .0 %
$ 3 2 .0 0
$ 3 0 .0 0
1 5 .0 %
$ 2 8 .0 0
1 0 .0 %
$ 2 6 .0 0
$ 2 4 .0 0
5 .0 %
$ 2 2 .0 0
0 .0 % $ 2 0 .0 0
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
V ac a n y R a te A ve r a g e R e n t / S F
1,200 30.0%
1,000 25.0%
800 20.0%
000 SF
600 15.0%
400 10.0%
200 5.0%
0 0.0%
20 E
20 E
E
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
20 9
0
10
11
12
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
N e w S u p p ly N e w S u p p ly / S t o c k 20
85
Pasadena Source: Costar
2 0.0% $ 38 .00
1 8.0% $ 36 .00
1 6.0% $ 34 .00
1 4.0%
$ 32 .00
1 2.0%
$ 30 .00
1 0.0%
$ 28 .00
8.0%
$ 26 .00
6.0%
4.0% $ 24 .00
2.0% $ 22 .00
0.0% $ 20 .00
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
V ac a ny R a te A ve r a g e R e n t / S F
350 4.5%
4.0%
300
3.5%
250
3.0%
200 2.5%
000 SF
150 2.0%
1.5%
100
1.0%
50
0.5%
0 0.0%
20 E
20 E
E
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
N e w S u p p ly N e w S u p p ly / S t o c k 20
86
El Segundo Source: Costar
3 0 .0 % $ 3 1 .0 0
$ 2 9 .0 0
2 5 .0 %
$ 2 7 .0 0
2 0 .0 %
$ 2 5 .0 0
1 5 .0 % $ 2 3 .0 0
$ 2 1 .0 0
1 0 .0 %
$ 1 9 .0 0
5 .0 %
$ 1 7 .0 0
0 .0 % $ 1 5 .0 0
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
V a c a n y R a te A ve r a g e R e n t / S F
1,000 7 .0 %
900
6 .0 %
800
700 5 .0 %
600
4 .0 %
000 SF
500
3 .0 %
400
300 2 .0 %
200
1 .0 %
100
0 0 .0 %
E
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
N e w S u p p ly N e w S u p p ly / S t o c k
87
Long Beach Source: Costar
3 0 .0 % $ 2 9 .0 0
$ 2 7 .0 0
2 5 .0 %
$ 2 5 .0 0
2 0 .0 %
$ 2 3 .0 0
1 5 .0 %
$ 2 1 .0 0
1 0 .0 %
$ 1 9 .0 0
5 .0 %
$ 1 7 .0 0
0 .0 % $ 1 5 .0 0
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
V a c a n y R a te A ve r a g e R e n t / S F
500 6 .0 %
450
5 .0 %
400
350
4 .0 %
300
000 SF
250 3 .0 %
200
2 .0 %
150
100
1 .0 %
50
0 0 .0 %
E
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
N e w S u p p ly N e w S u p p ly / S t o c k
88