Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.
90 / Thursday, May 10, 2007 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Economic Development Administration
[Docket No.: 070125020–7021–01]
Solicitation of Applications for the
University Center Economic
Development Program
AGENCY: Economic Development
Administration (EDA), Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; re-open competitive
solicitation.
SUMMARY: The Economic Development
Administration (EDA) publishes this
notice to re-open the competitive
solicitation for applications under the
University Center Economic
Development Program in EDA’s Austin
and Denver regional offices.
DATES: The new closing date and time
for receipt of electronic and paper
applications for funding under the FY
2007 University Center Economic
Development Program competition is
Friday, May 25, 2007 at 4 p.m. local
time.
ADDRESSES: Applications may be
submitted in two formats: (i) In paper
format at the addresses provided below;
or (ii) electronically in accordance with
the procedures provided on http://
www.Grants.gov. The content of the
application is the same for paper
submissions as it is for electronic
submissions. EDA will not accept
facsimile transmissions of applications.
Paper Submissions: Applicants in
Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico,
Oklahoma and Texas should submit
paper submissions (via postal mail,
overnight delivery or hand-delivery) to:
FY 2007 University Center Program
Competition, Economic Development
Administration, Austin Regional Office,
504 Lavaca Street, Suite 1100, Austin,
Texas 78701–4037.
Applicants in Colorado, Iowa, Kansas,
Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North
Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and
Wyoming should submit paper
submissions (via postal mail, overnight
delivery or hand-delivery) to: FY 2007
University Center Program Competition,
Economic Development Administration,
Denver Regional Office, 1244 Speer
Boulevard, Suite 670, Denver, Colorado
80204–3591.
Electronic Submissions: Applicants
may submit applications electronically
in accordance with the instructions
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
provided at www.Grants.gov. On
http://www.grants.gov/search/basic.do,
applicants can perform a ‘‘Basic Search’’
for this grant opportunity by completing
the ‘‘Keyword Search;’’ the ‘‘Search by
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:04 May 09, 2007 Jkt 211001
26589
Funding Opportunity Number;’’ or the
‘‘Search by CFDA Number’’ field, and
then clicking the ‘‘Search’’ button. The
Funding Opportunity Number for this
grant opportunity is EDA02142007 and
the CFDA number is 11.303.
EDA strongly encourages that
applicants not wait until the application
closing date to begin the application
process through www.Grants.gov. The
preferred file format for electronic
attachments (e.g., the Project Narrative
and exhibits to Form ED–900A) is
portable document format (PDF);
however, EDA will accept electronic
files in Microsoft Word, WordPerfect,
Lotus or Excel formats.
Applicants should access the
following link for assistance in
navigating www.Grants.gov and for a
list of useful resources: http://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
applicant_help.jsp. If you do not find an
answer to your question under
Frequently Asked Questions, try
consulting the Applicant’s User Guide.
If you still cannot find an answer to
your question, contact www.Grants.gov
via e-mail at support@grants.gov or
telephone at 1.800.518.4726. The hours
of operation for www.Grants.gov are
Monday–Friday, 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. (EST)
(except for federal holidays). For a copy
of the FFO announcement for this
request for applications, please see the
Web site listed below under ‘‘Electronic
Access.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: For
additional information or for a paper
copy of the FFO announcement, the
designated contact person in the Austin
regional office is John Christ. Mr. Christ
may be reached at jchrist@eda.doc.gov
or at 512.381.8145. The designated
contact person in the Denver regional
office is Forlesia S. Willis. Ms. Willis
may be reached at fwillis@eda.doc.gov
or at 303.844.5452. EDA’s Internet Web
site at www.eda.gov also contains
additional information on EDA and its
programs, including the University
Center Economic Development Program.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
February 2, 2007, EDA published in the
Federal Register (72 FR 5002) the
original notice regard the FY 2007
University Center Economic
Development Program competition. The
original deadline for receipt of
applications was May 3, 2007 at 4 p.m.
local time. EDA re-opens the solicitation
period to provide the public more time
to submit applications. The new
deadline for receipt of electronic and
paper applications for funding under
the FY 2007 University Center
Economic Development Program
competition is May 25, 2007 at 4 p.m.
PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
local time. All applications that are
submitted between May 3, 2007 and the
date of publication of this notice will be
considered timely. Applicants who
submitted all application materials by
the original deadline (May 3, 2007 at 4
p.m. local time) may revise their
applications in light of the re-opening of
the competitive solicitation, but all
materials must be received by the
Austin or Denver regional offices (as
appropriate) by May 25, 2007 at 4 p.m.
local time. All other information and
requirements for the FY 2007 University
Center Economic Development Program
competition remain as stated in the
February 2, 2007 Federal Register
notice (72 FR 5002).
Electronic Access: The FFO
announcement for the FY 2007
University Center Economic
Development Program competition is
available at http://www.Grants.gov.
Additional information is available
through EDA’s Internet Web site at
http://www.eda.gov.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 11.303,
Economic Development—Technical
Assistance.
Dated: May 4, 2007.
Benjamin Erulkar,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Economic Development.
[FR Doc. E7–8995 Filed 5–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–892]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 7, 2006, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published in the Federal
Register its preliminary results in the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on carbazole
violet pigment 23 (CVP 23) from the
People’s Republic of China (PRC) for the
period June 24, 2004, through November
30, 2005. See Carbazole Violet Pigment
23 from the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review and
Rescission in Part, 71 FR 65073
(November 7, 2006) (Preliminary
Results). We invited interested parties to
comment on the Preliminary Results.
10MYN1
 26590 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 90 / Thursday, May 10, 2007 / Notices
Based upon our analysis of the
comments received, we have made
changes to our margin calculation;
however, the final dumping margin for
Tianjin Hanchem Trading Co., Ltd.
(Hanchem) does not differ from the
Preliminary Results. Hanchem’s final
dumping margin is listed in the ‘‘Final
Results of Review’’ section below.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 10, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca Trainor or Terre Keaton, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4007 or (202) 482–
1280, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 7, 2006, the Department
published its Preliminary Results in this
administrative review. We invited
interested parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. On November 27,
2006, the petitioners1 submitted
additional surrogate value information.
On December 7, 2006, the petitioners
and Clariant Corporation, a domestic
interested party, filed case briefs. On
December 14, 2006, Hanchem filed a
rebuttal brief. On January 23, 2007, we
extended the final results by 60 days.
See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from
the People’s Republic of China; Notice
of Extension of Time Limit for Final
Results, 72 FR 2855 (January 23, 2007).
We have conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.213.
Period of Review
The period of review (POR) is June 24,
2004, through November 30, 2005.
Scope of Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is carbazole violet pigment 23
identified as Color Index No. 51319 and
Chemical Abstract No. 6358–30–1, with
the chemical name of diindolo [3,2–
b:3′,2′-m] triphenodioxazine, 8,18–
dichloro–5, 15–diethy–5,15–dihydro-,
and molecular formula of
C34H22Cl2N4O2.2 The subject
merchandise includes the crude
pigment in any form (e.g., dry powder,
paste, wet cake) and finished pigment in
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
1 The petitioners are Nation Ford Chemical
Company and Sun Chemical Company.
2 The bracketed section of the product
description, [3,2-b:3′,2′-m], is not business
proprietary information, but is part of the chemical
nomenclature.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:04 May 09, 2007 Jkt 211001
the form of presscake and dry color.
Pigment dispersions in any form (e.g.,
pigments dispersed in oleoresins,
flammable solvents, water) are not
included within the scope of this order.
The merchandise subject to this order is
classifiable under subheading
3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheading is
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of this order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the post–
preliminary comments by parties in this
review are addressed in the
memorandum from Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, to David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of
the 2004–2005 Administrative Review
of Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the
People’s Republic of China ‘‘ dated May
3, 2007, (Issues and Decision
Memorandum), which is hereby
adopted by this notice. A list of the
issues raised, all of which are in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum, is
attached to this notice as Appendix I.
Parties can find a complete discussion
of all issues raised in the briefs and the
corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum, which is on file in
the Central Records Unit (CRU), room
B–099 of the Department of Commerce.
In addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Web at
http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy
and electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of comments
received, we have made certain changes
in the margin calculation. For a
discussion of these changes, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum, at
Comments 2 and 3.
Final Results of Review
The weighted–average dumping
margin for the period June 24, 2004,
through November 30, 2005 is as
follows:
Exporter/Manufacturer
Tianjin Hanchem International
Trading Co., Ltd. ...................
PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine, and
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department will
issue assessment instructions directly to
CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of these final results of
administrative review. Pursuant to 19
CFR 351.106(c), we will instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review if any importer–specific
assessment rate calculated in the final
results of this review is above de
minimis (i.e., is not less than 0.50
percent). We calculated the importer–
specific ad valorem duty assessment
rate based on the ratio of the total
amount of the dumping margin
calculated for the examined U.S. sale to
the total entered value of that sale.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This
clarification will apply to entries of
subject merchandise during the POR
produced by Hanchem included in
these final results of review for which
Hanchem did not know its merchandise
was destined for the United States. In
such instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the ‘‘All
Others’’ rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of this notice of final results
of administrative review for all
shipments of CVP 23 from the PRC
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date, as provided for by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
Hanchem, the cash deposit rate will be
zero; (2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not listed above
that have a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company–specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) the cash deposit
rate for all other PRC exporters will be
241.32 percent, the current PRC–wide
rate3; and (4) the cash deposit rate for
Weighted– 3 See The Final Results of Redetermination
Average Pursuant to United States Court of International
Margin Per- Trade Remand Order, Goldlink Industries Co., Ltd.,
centage Trust Chem Co., Ltd., Tianjin Hanchem
International Trading Co., Ltd. v. United States,
Slip Op. 06-65 (May 4, 2006), confirmed by the CIT
0.00 percent on December 8, 2006. See also Carbazole Violet
Pigment 23 from the People’s Republic of China:
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM 10MYN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 90 / Thursday, May 10, 2007 / Notices
all non–PRC exporters that do no have
their own rate will be the rate applicable
to the PRC exporter that supplied that
non–PRC exporter. These cash deposit
requirements shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APOs) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these
final results of review in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213.
Dated: May 3, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix I: Issues Addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: Surrogate Value for
Chloranil
Comment 2: Surrogate Financial Ratios
Comment 3: Surrogate Value for
Triethylamine
Comment 4: Brokerage Fees and
Terminal Charges
[FR Doc. E7–9042 Filed 5–9–07; 8:45 am]
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony with Final
Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value, 72
FR 327 (January 4, 2007).
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:49 May 09, 2007 Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–122–840]
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review: Carbon
and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from
Canada
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 6, 2006, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published the preliminary
results of its third administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on
carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod
from Canada. The review covers the
shipments of subject merchandise to the
United States by Ivaco Rolling Mills
2004 L.P. (‘‘IRM’’), and Sivaco Ontario,
a division of Sivaco Wire Group 2004
L.P., (‘‘Sivaco’’) (collectively, both IRM
and Sivaco are referred to as ‘‘Ivaco’’).1
The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is October
1, 2004, through September 30, 2005.
Based on our analysis of comments
received, these final results differ from
the preliminary results. The final results
are listed below in the Final Results of
Review section.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 10, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Damian Felton or Brandon Farlander, at
(202) 482–0133 or (202) 482–0182,
respectively; AD/CVD Operations,
Office 1, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 6, 2006, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
preliminary results of the third
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on carbon and
certain alloy steel wire rod from Canada.
See Notice of Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Notice of Initiation of
Changed Circumstances Review: Carbon
and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from
Canada, 71 FR 64921 (November 6,
2006) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
1 On March 30, 2007, the Department determined
that Ivaco Rolling Mills 2004 L.P. was the
successor-in-interest to Ivaco Rolling Mills L.P.; and
Sivaco Ontario, a division of Sivaco Wire Group
2004 L.P., was the successor-in-interest to Ivaco Inc.
See Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Changed Circumstances Review: Carbon and
Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Canada, 72 FR
15102 (March 30, 2007).
PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
26591
We invited parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. On December 11,
2006, we received case briefs from the
respondent, Ivaco, and the petitioners,
Gerdau Ameristeel US, Inc., ISG
Georgetown, Inc., Keystone
Consolidated Industries, Inc., and North
Star Steel Texas, Inc. (herein after
referred to as ‘‘the petitioners’’). Ivaco
submitted its rebuttal brief on December
18, 2006. No public hearing was
requested.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this order
is certain hot–rolled products of carbon
steel and alloy steel, in coils, of
approximately round cross section, 5.00
mm or more, but less than 19.00 mm, in
solid cross-sectional diameter.
Specifically excluded are steel
products possessing the above–noted
physical characteristics and meeting the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) definitions for
(a) stainless steel; (b) tool steel; (c) high
nickel steel; (d) ball bearing steel; and
(e) concrete reinforcing bars and rods.
Also excluded are (f) free machining
steel products (i.e., products that
contain by weight one or more of the
following elements: 0.03 percent or
more of lead, 0.05 percent or more of
bismuth, 0.08 percent or more of sulfur,
more than 0.04 percent of phosphorus,
more than 0.05 percent of selenium, or
more than 0.01 percent of tellurium).
Also excluded from the scope are
1080 grade tire cord quality wire rod
and 1080 grade tire bead quality wire
rod. Grade 1080 tire cord quality rod is
defined as: (i) grade 1080 tire cord
quality wire rod measuring 5.0 mm or
more but not more than 6.0 mm in
cross-sectional diameter; (ii) with an
average partial decarburization of no
more than 70 microns in depth
(maximum individual 200 microns); (iii)
having no non–deformable inclusions
greater than 20 microns and no
deformable inclusions greater than 35
microns; (iv) having a carbon
segregation per heat average of 3.0 or
better using European Method NFA 04–
114; (v) having a surface quality with no
surface defects of a length greater than
0.15 mm; (vi) capable of being drawn to
a diameter of 0.30 mm or less with 3 or
fewer breaks per ton, and (vii)
containing by weight the following
elements in the proportions shown: (1)
0.78 percent or more of carbon, (2) less
than 0.01 percent of aluminum, (3)
0.040 percent or less, in the aggregate,
of phosphorus and sulfur, (4) 0.006
percent or less of nitrogen, and (5) not
more than 0.15 percent, in the aggregate,
of copper, nickel and chromium.
10MYN1