The Dark Side Of Caribbean

Cruises
By Jack Widdowson
(B00554877)
MGMT 2702

Everyyearmillionsofpeoplebookaholidaytosailonaluxurycruiseship. (Corbin,2013,p.53)
Theemissionsfromtheseshipsfunnelsaresimplyblownawaybythewind,soeverythingisfine.Orisit?
Whatistheenvironmentimpactofthesecruiseships?Luxurylinersareanenvironmentaldisaster.They
sailthesevenseaspoweredbyheavyfueloil.(Soares&Pena,2013)Thisisathicktoxicsubstancethats
farmoreharmfultotheenvironmentthangasolineordiesel.TheseLuxuryLinersarelikefloating
incineratorsforhazardouswastewithoutfilters.Theyemitconcentratedsulfurs,phosphor,nitrogen,heavy
metalsandotherharmfulsubstancesindangerouslyhighquantities.(Soares&Pena,2013)Cruiseships
todaycancarryasmanyas6000passengerswith1500crewmembers.(Jones,2011,p.180)Tobringthis
intoperspective,mynativeislandofSt.Kittshasapopulationof50,000,roughly14,000ofwhichresidein
thecapitalofBasseterre.AnaveragecruiseshipdaycanseethepopulationofBasseterredouble.
Astonishinglytheseshipsrepresentlessthan1%oftheglobalmerchantfleetyetithasbeenestimatedthat
theyareresponsiblefor25%ofallwastegeneratedbymerchantvessels.(Ivanovic,2011)Thesevesselsuse
1500tonsoffuelperdaywhenatsea.Inportitrequiresonaverage50tonstomeetthelinerselectricity
demands.(Soares&Pena,2013)Cancercausingsootparticlesfromtheoceangiantsarealsospreadbythe
wind.Thereareover50,000shipsoperatingwithintheCaribbeanandthenumberisontheincrease.
(Corbin,2013,p.53)Therearealsothousandsofhugetankersandevenmorecontainerships,someof
whichalsorunonheavyfueloil.Thesehighemissionscouldbeprevented,iftheshipsranondieselit
wouldbeacleaneralternativebutcostswouldrisesignificantly.Thehighlevelsofsulfurcanbereduced
considerably;filtersandcatalysiswouldhelptomaketheemissionslesstoxic.Theelectricityconsumedby
theshipswhileatportcouldcomefromlandbasedsourcesandnotfromthevesselsengines.SmallIsland
developingstatessuchasSt.Kittsarecaughtbetweenarockandahardplace.Ononehandthecruiseships
providealivingforthemajorityofcitizensbutontheotherhandthesevesselsareslowlydestroyingthe
veryhabitatvisitorsareenticedtosee.Withoutadoubttheislandcanputpoliciesinplacethatcanrestrict
thecruiselinersbutthatcouldpotentiallydrivethemawaywhichwouldbedevastating.Trueprogresswill
comewiththeunityofallCaribbeannationstakingastandtogether.

Annotated Bibliography

Alberto,C.(2013).Differentiatingthemethodsofwastetreatmentinthewidercaribbeanregion:introducinga
comprehensivedatacollectingmodeltopromotewastetoenergypractices.RetrievedfromUppsala
University,DisciplinaryDomainofScienceandTechnology,EarthSciences,DepartmentofEarth
Scienceswebsite:http://uu.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:628816/FULLTEXT01.pdf

ThisarticlehighlightsthedifficultiestheCaribbeanfacesintermsofwastemanagementregulation.TheAuthor
expressesthroughthisarticlehiscommitmenttofindsolutionstowasteabundanceandenergyscarcity,througha
holisticviewofshipgeneratedwastemanagement.

Burrowes,J.,Klaessens,Y.,&Appels,D.(2003).Justcruising?:Environmentaleffectsofcruiseships(1
877274232).RetrievedfromOfficeoftheParliamentaryCommissionerfortheEnvironmentwebsite:
http://www.pce.parliament.nz/assets/Uploads/Reports/pdf/just_cruising.pdf

AreportconductedbytheNewZealandEnvironmentalauthoritiesinregardtothesourcesofenvironmentalrisk
fromcruiseships.Verycomprehensiveinformationonwastedischargesinthewaterandair.Identifies
biosecurityrisksandmaritimeaccidents.DespitetheresearchbeingconductedbytheNewZealandauthoritiesit
reviewsenvironmentaleffectsbycruiseshipsintheCaribbeanaswellasotheroverseasexamples.

Corbin,C.(2013).ThereisnoGreenwithoutBlue?:Ananalysisoftheimportanceofcoastalandmarine
resourcestothedevelopmentofGreenEconomiesbyCaribbeanSIDS.CaribbeanJournalof
InternationalRelations&Diplomacy,1(3),4759.Retrievedfrom
http://libraries.sta.uwi.edu/journals/ojs/index.php/iir/article/view/397/356
TheneedforSmallislanddevelopingstates(SIDS)toembracesustainabilitythroughtheconservationof
naturalresources,maintenanceofthenaturalresourcebaseincludingprotectingbiodiversityandecosystems;
useofrenewablesourcesofenergy;reductionofwaterconsumption;maintenanceofculture,traditionsand
heritageandthepromotionofculturaltoleranceandrespect;generationofincomeforlocalcommunities;and
alleviationofpovertyinlocalcommunities.TheseCaribbeanstatesareadistinctgroupofdevelopingcountries
facingspecificsocial,economicandenvironmentalvulnerabilities.Theyrelyheavilyontourism,whichis
payingatollontheenvironment.

Ivanovic,J.(2011,September19).CruiseShipPollution.AustralianScience.Retrievedfrom

http://www.australianscience.com.au/environmentalscience/cruiseshippollution/
ProvidingabasicbackgroundtotheproblemsCruiseshippollutionhascaused.Signifiestheneedformore
attentiononthisparticulartopic.HighlightstheNorwegianCrowncruiseshipgroundingsiteinBermudaandthe
aftermath.

Jones,R.J.(2011).Environmentaleffectsofthecruisetourismboom:sedimentresuspensionfromcruiseships
andthepossibleeffectsofincreasedturbidityandsedimentdepositiononcorals(Bermuda).
BULLETINOFMARINESCIENCE.Retrievedfromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5343/bms.2011.1007

EmphasizesthetransitionfromlandbasedtoshipbasedtourismwithintheCaribbean.Mostimportantlythis
articlebringstothereadersattentiontheeffectsofsedimentationthatdriftsontoreefscausebylargecruiseships.

Klein,R.A.(2013).EnvisioningEnvironmentalPolicyasSocialPolicy:TheCaseoftheInternationalCruise
LineIndustry.EnvironmentalPolicyisSocialPolicy?SocialPolicyisEnvironmentalPolicy,3,pp
181196.doi:10.1007/9781461467236_13

OffersaninterestinginsightthroughcasestudytotheissuesrelatingtoCruisetourism.Demonstratestheneedfor
responsibletourismforidentifyingsocialandenvironmentalimpactsincludingthewelfareoffisheriesand
recreationalcoastalareas.

Ross,M.(2014,January7).NoSmoothSailinginTakingontheCruiseIndustry.HuffingtonPost.Retrievedfrom
http://www.huffingtonpost.com

Bestpracticesneedtobefollowedbythecruiseindustry.Theindustryshouldbemandatedtousethemost
effectiveandaccessibletechnologiesfordealingwithpollution.Millionsofgallonsofgreywateramongstother
hazardouswastesaredumpeddirectlyintotheocean.

Soares,G.,&Pena,L.(2013).MonitoringthequalityofairintheportofNaples.RetrievedfromTaylor&
FrancisGroupwebsite:http://wpage.unina.it/quaranta/testi/congressi/IMAM%202013.pdf

Thisarticleshowsacomprehensivestudyoftheimpactofatmosphericemissionofcruiseshipsintheportof
Naples.ThisisamajorcruiseportfordestinationsaroundtheMediterranean.Theresultsfromthiscouldbein
directcorrelationwithCaribbeanportairquality.

Thurau,B.,Seekamp,E.,Carver,A.D.,&Lee,J.G.(2013).ShouldCruisePortsMarketEcotourism?A
ComparativeAnalysisofPassengerSpendingExpectationswithinthePanamaCanalWatershed.
InternationalJournalofTourismResearch.doi:10.1002/jtr.1965

Analyzesthespendingpatternsofcruiseshippassengersastheydisembarkdifferentportsofcall.Thestudysuggests
thatecotourismrelatedmarketsegmentsexpecttospendsignificantlymoremoneyinportthanconventionaltourist.
Thisproventrueshowsthatthemarketneedstochange.Morepeoplewanttocruiseinasustainableway.

Watson,B.(2014,January20).DoesCarnival'spollutiontechsignalbigchangesforthecruiseindustry?The
Guardian.Retrievedfromhttp://www.theguardian.com/

Thisarticlewaswhatpeekedmyinitialinterestinthetopic.CarnivalCruiselineismakinganefforttoimproveits
wastemanagement.Someofithasbeengovernmentpolicyforcingchangesbutasignificantamountofpressurehas
comefortheconsumer.AlltheNorthAmericanCarnivalshipswillhaveanewexhaustfiltrationsystem,whichwill
costawhoppingestimateof$180milliontoimplement.Itisfarfromsatisfactorybutonestepcloserinloweringthe
cruiseindustryenvironmentalimpact.

Appendix

Does Carnival's pollution tech signal

big changes for the cruise industry?
With a culture of exorbitant luxury, cruises seem at odds with
the concept of sustainability. Amid stricter standards, though,
the industry leader is taking surprising new steps

A Carnival cruise ship. In 2011, Carnival consumed 25m metric tonnes of water
and 3,394,214 metric tonnes of fuel. Photograph: Alamy
When it comes to environmental sustainability, few industries face a more
fundamental challenge than cruise ships. Cruising, after all, is an exercise in large
numbers and grand expenditures. For example, a cruise on a Dream Class
Carnival ship involves loading up to 3,646 passengers and 1,367 crew members
onto a 1,004ft ship that weighs more than 128,000 gross tons. The cruise then
takes them around the Caribbean, feeding them, laundering their clothes and
pampering them. The environmental impact is similarly stunning: in 2011,
Carnival consumed 25m metric tonnes of water and 3,394,214 metric tonnes of
fuel, while producing 145,480 metric tonnes of sulfur dioxide and 11m tonnes of
greenhouse gasses.

Yet, for all the seemingly inherent wastefulness of the cruise industry, many
cruise lines are making a concerted effort to improve their waste streams, cut
down on their fuel consumption and generally reduce their impact on the earth.
Some of these changes have been the result of laws, others consumer pressure,
but the end effect is the same: an industry that is working to improve its
environmental footprint, even as some activists argue it isn't doing enough.
Recently, the largest cruise company in the world, Carnival, docked in the
spotlight when it received the New Economy's Clean Tech Award for Best Marine
Solutions Company. The award recognized Carnival's decision to install a new
exhaust filtration system on its North American ships, at an estimated cost of
$180m.
The filtration system, which scrubs sulfur, nitrogen and particulate matter from
exhaust, will enable the company to massively reduce its air pollution. This is a
potentially industry-transforming development, and the manner in which it came
about highlights both the promise and challenges facing the industry's move
toward sustainability.
First try: scrubbers scrapped
Most cruise ships are powered by bunker fuel, an extremely low-quality, highpolluting fuel blend. Carnival first experimented with scrubbers several years ago,
installing a system on a Holland America ship, Tom Dow, Carnival's vicepresident for public affairs, explains. However, it took up too much space and
released large amounts of polluted wastewater. Carnival scrapped the program.
Then, in 2010, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) designated a 200mile zone around the US and Canada as an "emissions control area" and, two
years later, mandated that ships traversing the areas around North America must
use fuel with a sulfur content no higher than 1%. On 1 January 2015, that
percentage will drop to 0.1%. To put this in context, the worldwide sulfur limit is
3.5%.
Industry-wide, the effects of this reduction will be huge. The EPA estimates that,
by 2020, the ECA around the United States will prevent 5,500-14,000 premature
deaths, 3,800 emergency room visits and 4.9m cases of "acute respiratory
symptoms". As the largest cruise ship company operating around the US,
Carnival represents both a large part of the pollution problem and a large part of
the solution.
The original ECA treaty called for companies to use low-sulfur fuel, which would
reduce harmful exhaust, but would also cost significantly more. While fuel costs
vary depending on where a particular ship buys its fuel, the "rule of thumb is that
this will add between 70% and 100% to the cost of fuel," Dow says. This means
that using the low-sulfur fuel would effectively double the fuel cost of cruise
shipping and undermine Carnival's business model.

Because ships leaving Baltimore and Norfolk would have to spend a large amount
of time in the US ECA, these ports were no longer economically attractive. The
company decided to move the ships out of those cities, cutting hundreds of jobs.
Facing a choice between paying higher fuel costs and rearranging all of its
cruises, Carnival sought another solution. Encouraged by the US Environmental
Protection Agency, it revived its filtration program, working to develop scrubbers
that could be deployed in the limited space available on ships. In 2013, the
company successfully tested its first scrubber system on the cruise ship Queen
Victoria and announced plans to install scrubbers on 32 ships that ply the US and
Canadian ECAs, as well as 10 ships on AIDA, its German line.
It's a significant achievement: the scrubbers will reduce sulfur and nitrogen to
well within the ECA limit. Moreover, Dow notes, the filtration system also
removes particulate matter, "so we'll end up with a better outcome than we would
if we just burned the more expensive compliant fuel."
The cost of reducing pollution
However, the 42 ships due to be retrofitted represent less than half of the 101
ships currently in its fleet. The reason is simple: Carnival is not required by law to
do so, and it's not cost-effective to do it voluntarily.
This isn't to say that Carnival will never retrofit its ships. However, its decision to
do so will likely be motivated by increased regulation. As Jim Van Langen,
Carnival's vice-president for management Systems, points out, numerous
countries are considering ECAs. "The US is not the only area that is
environmentally or politically sensitive to these types of emissions," he says, "so
there's a possibility that we could face similar regulatory pressures in other parts
of the world."
By 2020, in fact, the IMO plans to reduce the amount of sulfur allowed in ship
fuel from 3.5% to 0.5% across the globe. If that happens, it will become costeffective for Carnival to install scrubbers on all of its ships. While the company
currently limits its scrubber program to ships that have "significant operating
time" in the North American ECA, it "has intentions to roll out this program
beyond those 32", Dow says.
A larger rollout could be the key to reducing emissions, especially as the number
of cruises increases. While Carnival's ships already produce fewer greenhouse gas
emissions per kilometer, thanks to the partial rollout - 298 metric tonnes in 2011,
compared to 347 in 2008 - the company's overall emissions have grown to 11m
metric tonnes in 2011 from 10.3m in 2008. In addition, exhaust is only one of
many areas where the company is working to reduce its environmental footprint,
Dow says. It has undertaken a wide variety of initiatives, including reducing
water and power usage. It's developing more efficient propeller and hull designs,
and is experimenting with a Mitsubishi air lubrication system that, Dow claims,
could cut power expenditures by 7%.

But while Carnival holds itself to a higher standard than that required by the
published standards in many cases, it mostly limits itself to the legal
requirements.
More regulation needed to drive change?
Those requirements may be insufficient. Marcie Keever, oceans and vessels
program director for Friends of the Earth, a watchdog organization that rates
cruise ships' environmental impact, argues that the industry "has been underregulated and unregulated for many years".
Part of the problem is registries: cruise ships, she notes, often operate under
"flags of convenience", which means that they're registered to countries with less
stringent regulations. "I think there's one cruise ship, of the entire worldwide
fleet, that's flagged to the United States."
Beyond that, many regulations are voluntary. "In the US, beyond three nautical
miles, you can discharge raw sewage," she says. "The cruise industry says that
they don't discharge within 12 nautical miles, but there's no one policing that.
That's a voluntary standard, and we have no idea if they're following it."
Admittedly, Carnival is only one of several cruise companies sailing the seas. And,
while its grades for sewage treatment, air pollution reduction and water quality
compliance vary greatly from ship to ship, Friends of the Earth gives the company
an C- for environmental sustainability overall.
Some companies do better. Disney Cruise Line, for example, has advanced
sewage treatment systems, docks 73% of its trips in ports that use cleaner
shoreside electricity and maintains a high standard of water quality. In 2013, it
became the first cruise ship line to receive an A from Friends of the Earth.
But while Disney's work is impressive, it only operates four ships and has a 2.5%
market share. Carnival, on the other hand, has between 45% and 50% market
share and operates the third-largest fleet in the world, after the United States and
Russian navies. In other words, while smaller companies might move the needle
on environmental sustainability, Carnival's actions drive the industry.
Unfortunately, Carnival's history suggests that the cruise ship leviathan only
moves when laws compel it to do so.

2014 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights
reserved.