Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bulletin of The International Association of ENGINEERING GEOLOGY N 3 7 Paris 1 9 8 8 I
Bulletin of The International Association of ENGINEERING GEOLOGY N 3 7 Paris 1 9 8 8 I
BASIC GEOTECHNICAL
PROPERTIES,
SOILS FROM S.W. NIGERIA
CHEMISTRY
N ~ 37
AND MINERALOGY
PROPRII~TI~S GI~OTECHNIQUES
FONDAMENTALES,
CHIMIE
QUES SOLS LATI~RITIQUES DU SUD OUEST DU NIGI~RIA
PARIS
OF SOME
ET MINI~RALOGIE
1988
LATERITE
DE QUEL-
O G U N S A N W O Olufemi*
Abstract
Laterite soils derived from four basement complex rocks and a sedimentary formation from Southwestern Nigeria are analysed for their basic
geotechnical properties, chemistry and mineralogy. Results obtained show that the granite gneiss derived and the sedimentary laterite soils are
good engineering materials. The amphibolite derived laterite soil has a linear shrinkage of 10 % and contains SO]- ions. The quartz schist derived
and the micaschist derived laterite soils contain rather high amounts of muscovite - 30 % and 25 % respectively.
The usability of the laterite soils and the implications of the presence of SO] ions and mica and the high linear shrinkage are discussed.
R4sum6
Les propriet~s geotechniques fondamentales, la chimie et la mineralogie de sols latdritiques derivds de quatre roches du socle et d'une formation
sedimentaire du sud-ouest du Nig6ria sont analys6es. Les resultats obtenus montrent que les sols lateritiques derivds de granite-gneiss et de
sddiments sont de bons materiaux geotechniques. Le sols latdritiques derives d'amphibolites ont un retrait lineaire de 10 % et contiennent des
ions SO~-. Les sols lat~ritiques d6rives de schistes quartzeux et de micaschistcs contiennent des taux de muscovite assez eleves, 30 % et 25 %
respectivement.
L'utilisation des sols lateritiques et les implications de la pr4sence d'ions SOl et de micas ainsi que le fort retrait lineaire sont discutds.
Introduction
Laterite soils derived from both rock types are generally characterized by rather great thickness (Smyth a n d
M o n t g o m e r y , 1962; Jackson, 1980; a n d O g u n s a n w o ,
1986b). The laterite soils used for this study are all
taken from the pallid ( s a p r o l i t e ) / m o t t l e d horizons for
the following reasons :
132
6OE
8~
I
i
\
I
I
Iteshcl
O
I
k
Ife
O
Ife',~arQ
o
OkegIgbo
Akure
o
Cndo
I
I
I
t
6~
Fig.
: Areas of study9
Chemical Analyses were carried out via X-ray fluorescence (XRF) using the Kaever type analyses on an
EG & G Ortec System 5000. SO]- and CI- ions were
tested for through gravimetric analyses. The mineralogy
of the bulk samples of the laterite soils as well as the
clay size fraction ( < 2 gm) was determined by means
of an X-Ray Diffractometer (xRD). For the clay size
fraction, the iron oxide present was removed using the
method of Mehra and Jackson (1960). The system was
however buffered with potassium chloride.
Symbol
Rock
Type
Sampling
Localities
Depth
Roadcut
Depth
of
Sampling
of
Colour on the
RAL 840HR (1971)
colour chart
Texture
Comments
ORD
Quartz
Schist
lfe-Ondo Road
6.5 m
5.5 m
3012 BEIGERED
1015 L I G H T IVORY
Sandy
Saprolitic
exhibits
schistosity
ILE
Mica
Schist
lfe-Akure Road
8.2 m
6.5 m
8001 O C H R E B R O W N
1015 L I G H T IVORY
Silty
Saprolitic
exhibits
schistosity
OJT
Coastal
Plain
sands
(Benin sands)
Ojota Quarry
Marryland, Lagos
7.5 m
(quarry)
6.5 m
8023 O R A N G E B R O W N
Sandy
UNI
Granite
Gneiss
Driveway
Dept. of Geology
Unife
3 m
8023
8001
1011
1014
ORANGEBROWN
OCHREBROWN
BROWNBEIGE
IVORY
Sandy
Mottled
8023 O R A N G E B R O W N
Clayey
Uniform
colour
IFW
Amphibolite
I fe-I fewara
Road
4.2 m
3.2 m
Uniform
colour
133
thereby make their detection difficult (Ogunsanwo,
1968a). Test conditions in the X R D :
Results
Basic Geotechnical Properties
According to the grain size distribution curves (Fig. 2),
the fractional percentages and textures of the laterite
soils are in Table 2. They vary from silty sand to silty
clay.
Table 2 : Chemical analyses (%) of the bulk samples of the laterite soils.
SYMBOL
P
( k g / m ~)
Ps
(kg/m')
ORD
1682
2840
G R A I N SIZE
FRACTIONS (%)
l
SOIL
GROUP
Gravel
Sand
Silt
Cla~
46
40
12
A T T E R B E R G CONSISTENCY
LIMITS (%)
SIUFY SAND
Wk
Wp
Ip
1_,S.
35.2
23.6
I 1.6
3.2
LOSS 03,
IGNITION
(850 ~
PLOT ON
PI.ASTICITY
DIAGRAM
UM : Medium
plastic silt
ILE
1881
2760
35
60
OJT
1730
2707
48
15
UNI
1781
2730
12
35
IPN
1723
2723
23
7.0
SANDY SILT
42.2
35.7
6.5
2.3
UM : Medium
35
CI.AVEY SAND
49.5
21,1
28.4
6.9
TM : Medium
plastic day
7.0
24
29
CLAYEY SAND
47.9
19.7
28.2
6,3
TM : Medium
plastic clay
7. I
36
38
SILTY CLAY
55.5
25.4
30.1 I 10.0
plastic silt
TM : Medium
~LAY
Fine
IMedium
SILT
Eoorse I Fine
IMedium
SA,NO!Coarse
4.2
plastic clay
10.5
IFine !Medium
GRAVEL..
ILoarse
100
II
1
o;
0.001 0.002
...> /
I
0.006
0.02
..3>rI ii ii I
./.i. "" {
. . . .
0.06
0-2
I! !
QuArTz scHIsT
0.63
--t. 1-1;
2-0
6.3
20
d (ram)
I!.
50
63 100
134
60-
./
TA
L
I
I
J
i
I
i
30.
I
I
I
20.
Ii / ,
TL
7
t~
!]
TM x . , /
Ij
ST ~ [ I
]L-#" IUL Ii
. . . . .
i--
SU
9OtUMlJ
0
II
20
10
30
OT
55
~0
50
60
70
90
80
100
WEt*/.)
Fig. 3: Plots of the laterite soils on the Plasticity Diagram (DIN 18196, 1984).
ILE
OJT
UNI
SiO,
62.59
68.83
67. I I
62.37
51.41
AI:O,
25.40
19.30
21.21
23.93
25.82
2.36
IFW
Fe:O,
3,87
5,87
5.30
12.52
TiO,
0.47
0.64
0.90
0.64
0.81
0.49
0.62
0.32
0.17
0.57
0.43
2.62
0.22
MgO
0.19
CaO
Na,O
--
K,O
0,11
0.13
1.63
4.10
Cu
Table 4a : Mineralogy (%) of the clay size fraction ( < 2 gm) of the
laterite soils (after r e m o v a l of iron oxide).
0.01
H:O'
5,30
4,08
3,47
4,72
3,85
H:O-
0.70
0.38
0.57
1.01
0.37
ORD
--
30
Total
99,25
98,83
99,67
99,88
99,78
ILE
--
75
15
3,85
5.75
4.68
4.00
2.61
QJT
--
--
100
0,05
UNI
30
60
IFW
90
(S)/(R)
so~-
Symbols
CI-
Feldspar
Quartz
10
traces
10
traces
traces
traces
traces
traces
traces
Feldspar
Quartz
Kaolinite
Muscovite
G oe t hi t e
Others
traces
Sillimanite
5
ORD
lie
--
40
25
30
traces
60
10
25
--
OJT
--
50
35
--
15
--
UNI
50
30
10
--
10
--
I FW
30
traces
55
10
--
135
Discussions
The laterite soils studied are from an area which has
been said to be well drained. It is therefore not
surprising that minerals such as those of the smectite
group which cause soils to possess undesirable geotechnical properties are absent. Even the halloysite
present in the clay fraction of the soils is only in traces.
Also these soils possess natural densities (1962 to 1881
kg/m 3) which are much higher than the 20 to
70 lb/cu.ft. (320 to 1121 kg/m 3) ascribed to problem
laterites (Gidigasu, 1973).
According to the Engineering Use Chart for Soils (after
Wagner, 1957) and based on the plots of the soils on
the Plasticity Diagram (DIM 18196, 1984), the soils
should be good engineering construction materials
when compacted. In the compacted state, they are
expected to
(i)
be impervious in terms of permeability
(ii) possess fair shearing strengths when saturated
(iii) possess medium compressibilities when saturated
and
(iv) have good to fair workabilities as construction
materials.
The amphibolite derived and the granite gneiss derived
as well as the sedimentary laterite soils are however
rated best for use as homogeneous embankments and
cores in rolled earth dams on the same chart. However,
the linear shrinkage of 10% obtained for the amphibolite derived laterite soil makes it unfavourable as this
may cause field compaction problems (Gidigasu, 1973).
The values of Fe,O3 for some of the soils are very low
while the values of SiO 2 are high. This could be due
to the presence of primary minerals such as muscovite,
feldspar and sillimanite. In this hot environment of
intense leaching, secondary minerals such as oxides of
iron (hematite, goethite) and of aluminium (gibbsite,
boehmite) with kaolinite are the expected minerals in
the soil (Loughnan, 1969). As feldspar, muscovite and
sillimanite breakdown, the silica released may be
leached away. This causes depletion in the SiO, values
which will then enhance the values of Al_,O3 and Fe2Oj.
The muscovite, a mica, present in the quartz schist and
the mica schist derived laterite soils (30% and 25 %
respectively) may cause field compaction problems
(Gidigasu, 1973).
The presence of SO]- ions ( < 0,05 %) in the amphibolite derived laterite soils poses some problems. Pyrite
and chalcopyrite mineralization in the amphibolite
rock from which this soil has been derived had been
reported by Olade and Elueze (1979). With the breakdown of the pyrite and chalcopyrite in this oxidising
environment, SO]- ions are quickly formed. The World
Health Organisation (WHO, 1971) permits a maximum
of 0,04 % (400 ppm) of SO]- ions in drinking water.
Also, the presence of SO]- ions tends to aid the
corrosion of certain construction materials.
good engineering construction materials by consideration of their basic geotechnical properties, chemistry
and mineralogy. The high linear shrinkage obtained for
the amphibolite derived laterite soil and the high mica
contents of the quartz schist and the mica schist derived
laterite soils makes them unfavourable as these might
cause field compaction problems. However, specialized
tests will need to be performed in order to ascertain
where each soil is best suited,
The presence of sulphate ions in the amphibo[ite
derived [aterite soil causes some concern. They could
make groundwater contained in them rather unsafe for
human consumption and may hasten the corrosion of
construction materials such as iron, steel and even
concrete.
References
DIN t8122/1, 1984, Baugrund; U n t e r s u c h u n g von Bodenproben:
Zustandsgrenzen (Konsistenzgrenzen) Bestimmung der Fliess
-- und Ausrollgrenze. Deutsches Institut fiir N o r m u n g e.V.
DIN
Conclusion
WHO,