Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Law
Law
LEGAL DEFINITION
BY children bureau federal agency
Those cases which stated in statute of the state as violation of state law
or municipal ordinance by children and youth of juvenile court age, serious
antisocial as interfere with the rights of people of others or to menace the
welfare of delinquency himself or of community.
This definition includes conduct, which violates the law only by children,
e.g. truancy ungovernable behavior and running away; also include traffic
Death
Imprisonment
Fine
removal from office
disqualification from office
NATURE OF DELINQUENCY:
A person guilty of antisocial conduct fall under ambit of delinquency.
Behavior on the part of children which are subject to juvenile court under
law fall under the ambit of juvenile delinquency .The main factor involve
in juvenile delinquency are given below:
Sociological factors,
Age factors,
Sex factors,
Poverty,
Child abuse,
Schools , peer groups and family
Sub culture and gangs, and
Economic depression with un employment etc.
SOCIOLOGICAL FACTORS
AGE FACTORS
SEX FACTORS
POVERTY
CHILD ABUSE
SCHOOLS
Delinquency committed due to adverse or negative school experiences of
some youth, there are fundamental defects with in educational system as
it touches lower income youth actively contribute to such negative
experience .A child who reject in his school group and experience failure,
easily develops patterns of delinquency. Slow learner cant compete the
other student then he will choose the illegitimate alternative. With the
rigid curriculum and without special help such children are unsuccessful in
meeting the requirement of normal curriculum they become frustrated
and hostile; begin to express themselves through delinquent behavior.
Such type of children disturbs the class room environment as well as
violates school discipline.
SOCIAL CLASS
In the lower class sectors, typically those children who lives in slum areas
rejected parental values and take part in gang activities. If his gangs
activity is delinquent in character, he will become a delinquent. This may
be due to conflict between main culture and sub culture.
FAMILY
The society has responsibility to assist the family in providing care and
protection and ensuring physical and mental well being of children.
TYPES OF DELINQUECY
SOCIALIZED DELINQUENCY
(Reiss1952,Hewit&Jenkin 1947)
Most research on delinquency has concentrated on this type, such
delinquency account for the great majority of crimes such delinquency
does not suffer from any particular psychological disorder, other than
those which characterize. Such behavior is not motivated by deep seated
anxiety or unresolved conflict but by simple desire to conform to the norm
of his gang. The typical adolescent such type delinquent boy comes from
the transitional urban area where a gang subculture becomes entered.
Often in early childhood the socialized delinquency join a gang and
imbibes the values and habits of delinquent sub culture.
in short Edwin Sutherland, the child learn to become criminal through
differential association with delinquents (Sutherland& cressey 1924)
NEUROTIC DELINQUENCY
From society point of view such type of delinquency is very dangerous for
young criminal. The psychopathic delinquency traits are (1) lasting
emotional relationship like other human being (2) his almost total lack of
guilt or inhibition. Psychopath does not suffer from internal conflict and
anxiety and also does not find emotional satisfaction in gang membership
such type of delinquent commit a wide gamut of crime investigation. They
have been raised in home characterized by extreme parental brutality
neglect, discard and intensely severe discipline. Many have come from
foster homes or orphanage. The psychopath suffer from neurological
disorder, perhaps of a type that decreases his ability to inhibit impulses.
(Mc cord& Mccord)
CAUSES OF DELINQUENCY
Case study method will use to collect the data. The case studies will make
collecting data with the help of an interview guide. In interview guide
structured as well as unstructured question will formulate. Question will
formulate according to the requirement and relevance to the research
SAMPLE:
RESEARCH TOOLS:
CHAPTER NO: 2
Literature Review
This chapter reviews the literature on the problem under study; it
sharpens the understanding of the researcher on the topic. It helps to
define the research problem in a more concise manner. The literature
review on juvenile delinquency is as follows:
Glueck(1950) study relates to frustration and inconsistent
familial background, such Childs are not able to fulfill their basic needs of
life, they are frustrated and join gang to fulfill their basic needs ,they
search out alternative ways to achieve their goals .
Cohen (1955) Clouward and Ohlin (1960)and miller (1958)
studied that child delinquency sources are found in social structure and
specific pattern of neighborhood and community life where delinquent
gang abound high popular density, low socio economic status ,high social
and family disorganization.
In 1952, Merril examined gathering of 300 reprobate and
contrasted them and comparable number of non-reprobate. Subsequent
to coordinating sex age and home neighborhood with distinctive
ecological variable, it was found that half of reprobate and 20% of the
controls originated from broken home (separate, mother/father dead,
isolated and remarried of father/mother .
Nadeem and Durani (1983) in their study title with socio-mental parts of
wrongdoing in Pakistan ", discover that individuals captured in reported
wrongdoing in Pakistan are more often than not because of groups,
quarrels, area question, ladies chastity, old ill wills, frivolous debate and
family issues. The majority of individuals having age of 17-27 years
include in such wrongdoing.
estimations of society, those tyke who have internal frail security draw in
by it and include in adolescent misconduct.
THEORATICAL APPOROACH
Clash hypothesis
Marking hypothesis
ANOMIC THEORY
Emile Durkheim and Robert K Merton presented term in 1893 book "the
division of work in society". Anomic condition is deregulation of society
which may be occur because of breakdown of rules and good standards of
society.
cultural goals
institutionalized
means
conformity
innovation
ritualism
retriatism
rebellion
+&_
+&-
a.
b.
c.
d.
adolescent's experience.
e.
f.
Different phrasing.
Exemptions:
indicates that states focus the presence and degree of the issue in their
state and exhibit endeavors to decrease it where it exists.
Segment 50 of the Children & Young Persons Act 1933 states: "It might be
definitively assumed that no tyke less than ten years old years can be
blameworthy of any offense."
3. Child rearing
This school based officer works with staff and other nearby organizations
to:
5. Tutoring
Grown-up justices' courts can just attempt trials and sentence individuals
for offenses for which the most extreme punishment is six months in jail.
As a rule, Magistrate manage cases including individuals beyond 18 years
old years. In spite of the fact that they can manage youngsters yet just on
the off chance that they are being attempted with a grown-up individual.
This segment manages all cases including youngsters less than 18 years
old. Officer courts are served by youth board justices and region judges.
The young board justices and region judges have the ability to give
Detention and Training Orders of up to2 years. Individuals from general
society are not permitted in youth courts on the grounds that Youth courts
are basically private spots. On the other hand, the casualty of the
wrongdoing has the chance to go to the hearings of the court on the off
chance that they need to.
2. Non-Custodial Disposals
Youngsters first cause harm, they act hostile to socially or confer minor
offenses. They can typically be managed by the police and nearby power.
Its motivation is to stop youngsters getting sucked ahead of schedule into
the adolescent equity framework.
Pre-court measures
Reprimand
Final Warning
Different measures
Supervision Order
Referral Order
Reparation Order
Fine
Conditional Discharge
Absolute Discharge
4. Custodial Sentences
Segment 100 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000), set
up another custodial sentence, the Detention and Training Order (DTO) for
youngsters matured under 18 years. The new sentence was contrived to
legitimize the sentencing courses of action which beforehand existed for
those matured under 18 and to make authority more successful in
anticipating reoffending. The DTO supplanted the sentences of
confinement in a youthful wrongdoer organization (DYOI) for 15-17 year
olds, and the sentence of the protected preparing request (STO) for 12-14
year olds.
The main DTO sentences accessible to the courts are ones of 4, 6, 8, 10,
12, 18 and 24 months. 50% of the sentence is served in care and the
other half under supervision in the group. Continuous sentences are
additionally accessible to the courts yet just up to a most extreme of 24
months (i.e. 12 months in care). Area 37 Main point "to avoid insulting by
kids and youthful persons."
that a man matured under 18 (at the season of the offense) indicted
homicide should be sentenced to be kept at Her Majesty's pleasure
. Area 91 (some time ago Sections 53(2) and 53(3) of the 1933 Act) gives
that kids and youngsters declared guilty certain predefined "genuine"
offenses other than homicide which on account of a grown-up are culpable
with detainment for a long time or more. If no different systems for
transfer are considered suitable be sentenced up to the grown-up most
extreme for the offense which may be forever. The methodology for the
arrival of those youngsters sentenced to detainment at her Majesty's
pleasure or confinement forever are like those for grown-up Lifers and
include thought by the Parole Board.
(iii) Sentences for Public Protection and for Certain Violent or Sexual
Offenses
Segment 226 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 gives that youngsters
declared guilty a predetermined sexual or fierce offense conveying a most
extreme punishment of 10 years' detainment or more and who are
considered by the court to be hazardous will be qualified to get a sentence
of confinement for open assurance unless the court considers that:
Segment 228 of the 2003 Act gives that youngsters who have been
declared guilty indicated sexual or fierce offenses (counting on the off
chance that they have been indicted an offense conveying a most
extreme punishment of 10 years or more) and who are considered by the
court to be unsafe, will be qualified to get an Extended Sentence which
develops the period on permit and bars them from ahead of schedule
discharge with the exception of on parole.
Right to Survival;
Right to Protection;
Right to Development.
The Juvenile Justice Act (JJA) (GOI, 1986) was insufficient; this Act did not
specifically concern with youngster sexual misuse. Notwithstanding the
law youngsters were confined tormented and discharged in the morning.
CHAPTER NO.3
METHOD AND PROCEDURE
This study was designed to analyze social and cultural factors involved in
juvenile delinquency. This chapter describes method and procedure
adopted for conducting the study. The selection of this topic was done
after observing the crime in school life when researcher lived in rural
areas and with the passage of time researcher shifted to urban area.
Researcher observed that some of their class fellows and neighbor whose
belong to prestigious family committed crime. With the passage of time
researcher observed in their education career, mostly fellow those
involved in delinquent behavior. They feel proud to violate rules and
regulation of the society. Some of students belong to noble family and
some are from poor and backward areas that are why researcher chooses
this topic to find the main factor behind such delinquent behavior. Why
they commit some reported or non-reported crime.
3.1 POPULATION:
There were 100 convicted juveniles prisoners in the jail Faisalabad.
The researcher included the male cases of different delinquent behavior
people of different districts.
Only those prisoners were interviewed whom court convicted.
Some juvenile delinquent release on parole those who belong to elite
family, researcher contact some of them but they did not give reasonable
response.
3.2 SAMPLE:
For the purpose of sampling, at the first stage, 20 cases
were selected out of 100 cases. According to requirement of research
work, Out of the whole population 20 cases were selected through simple
random sampling technique at the jail Faisalabad .Total sample of this
research was included 20 cases of male. . Only those prisoners were
interviewed whom court convicted. The case histories were made after
thorough discussions.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE TOOLS FOR DATA COLLECTION:
A case study method was used to collect data. For case studies
a structured and unstructured interview were formulated. In interview
question were developed according to objectives of research work.
Interview guide was developed in English for academic purpose and
administered in local languages like Urdu ,Punjabi and Siraiki for the
convenience of the research and for the respondent.
3.3.1 VALIDATION OF THE TOOLS:
The research tool structured and unstructured interview
were got validated by some experts, available at the department of law.
pre-testing was done on 5 respondents after this changes were made in
the research tool. The researcher visited Faisalabad jail many times.
Often respondent were ignorant and not want to tell any information
about their past. Researcher did extra effort to create friendly
environment as a result some respondent were ready to tell the correct
information about their cases through interview guide.
3.6 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
Specific statistic like frequency and percentage were computed
to compare the most and least socio economic factor of crime were
involved.
PERCENTAGE:
Percentages were calculated directly with the help of following formula
Percentage
=F/N x100
Where
F
= Frequency of class
= Total frequency
CHAPTER NO.4
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
CASE NO. 1
Age of the convict
16 years
Education
primary
Offence
murder
Punishment awarded
25 years
was some law violators in his locality and he had contact with them. His
friends were also engaged in illegal activities and arrested sometimes but
never sent to jail for convictionby police. He never used any type of
narcotics and never stayed out late night with friends. Topics of
conversation among friends were often gossiping. He had no sexual
attachment Garden, playing, fields, billiard club and movies shop was the
typical leisure time activities in his locality. Playing sports and gadding
was his spare time activities.
ANALYSIS
Association of criminals and law violators and fiery nature
were main determinants of his criminal action. Family disrespect and land
dispute were secondary factors because respondent had often-moral
conflicts with others.
CASE NO. 2
Age of the convict
13 years
Education
primary
Offence
murder
Punishment awarded
14 years
with them. He never stayed out late night with friends. Topics of
conversation among friends never used any type of narcotics. There were
no parks, cinema or video games in his locality. His favorite activities in
spare time were watching T.V and video films.
ANALYSIS
Respondent realized that provocation had bad effect because
he was only and golden earning hand and conviction family budget
decreased. So family and he himself faced financial constraints in
pursuing case.
CASE NO. 3
Age of the convict
17 years
Education
primary
Offence
murder
Punishment awarded
17 years
CASE NO. 4
Age of the convict
Education
18 years
primary
Offence
Narcotics
Punishment awarded
2 years
took less interest in family affairs so his control upon family affairs was
less. Mothers attitude with family members and other relatives was loving
and soft. She had full control upon family hold affairs.
Respondent was primary education holder and he took less
interest in religious instruction and ffairs. He stopped further education
and worked with narcotics supplier and earned around 5000 rupees per
month, so his family income was approximately 9000 rupees per month.
He was convicted for 2 years in the offence of illicit trafficking of drugs
and narcotics that he committed due to poverty. He had completed 1 year
imprisonment along with 2 months in judicial lockup. No one pursued the
case. Friends motivated him to do such action. They were also involved in
the illegal activities but never arrested or sent to jail by the police.
Criminals and law violators also lived in his surrounding. He often stayed
out late night with friends and used narcotics and watched movies. He ran
away from house two times. Topics of conversation among friends were
often vulgar. He had sexual attachment. In his spare time he watched
movies and enjoying smoking.
ANALYSIS
Poverty and surrounding environment affected respondent and
compelled him to adopt such mean to become rich overnight.
CASE NO. 5
Age of the convict
18 years
Education
illiterate
Offence
Dacoity
Punishment
3 years
Respondent lived in the village of district vehari. His house
CASE NO. 6
Age of the convict
17 years
Education
middle
Offence
kidnapping
Punishment awarded
25 years
CASE NO. 7
Age of the convict
18 years
Education
middle
Offence
kidnapping
Punishment award
4 years
CASE NO. 8
Age of the convict
Education primary
Offence
Punishment awarded
18 years
primary
murder
25 years
CASE NO.9
Age of the convict
16 years
Education
primary
Offence
Punishment awarded
14 years
was more. His family was comprised of 8 members that was a large family.
They all were living in pacca house.
Convicts father was a job less person, both husband and wife
were illiterate. While convicts mother could recite the Holy Quran.
Parents attitude with family and relatives was loving. Elder sister helped
mother in house hold affairs.
Respondent had completed primary education and took
interested to some extent in religious affairs and instruction. Police
arrested him first time so it was his first conviction. At the time of arrest
he was a worker and earned 4000 rupees per month. Total family income
was 8000 rupees per month. He had completed 11 months of
imprisonment out of 14 years in judicial lockup. It was self-motivated
action. His elder brother was pursuing the case. His close friends never
involved in illegal activities. There were some law violators in his locality.
He never ran away from home because parents always fulfilled his basic
needs. His spare time activities were sleeping and swimming.
ANALYSIS
Family environment affected him. Although it was act of retaliation
but teasing or irritator behavior or other compelled him to do so. His
conviction threw bad effect upon family because he was himself an
earning hand.
CASE NO.10
Age of the convict
20 years
Education
primary
Offence
murder
Punishment awarded
12 years
CASE NO.11
Age of the convict
17 years
Education
primary
Offence
murder
Punishment awarded
25 years
CASE NO. 12
Age of the convict
Education
18 years
middle
Offence
murder
Punishment awarded
25 years
ANALYSIS:
Company of bad friends and friendship with criminal were main
factor, which affected respondents nature.
CASE NO.13
Age of the convict
17 years
Education
primary
Offence
murder
Punishment
25 years
CASE NO.14
Age of the convict
18 years
Education
illiterate
Offence
murder
Punishment awarded
25 years
was 6000 rupees per month. It was his first arrest and conviction. He was
convicted for 25 years in the offence of murder. Friends motivated to
commit such action. Three year imprisonment along with 9 month judicial
lockup had completed. Parents were pursuing the case. His brothers never
arrested and sent to jail for conviction.His friends were involved illegal
activities. Criminal people also lived in his surrounding and contact with
them. He never stayed out late night. In his spare time he played cricket
and watching movie.
ANALYSIS:
Association with criminal and pressure of friends enforce such
action. media which played main role in committing such crime.
CASE NO.15
Age of the convict
16 years
Education
middle
Offence
murder
Punishment awarded
14years
ANALYSIS:
Association with criminal and pressure of friends enforce such
action. He was found of pigeon competition. Sudden irritation and
provocation was the root of his conviction and discontinuing of his studies.
Media which played main role in committing such crime.
CASE NO. 16
Age of the convict
Education
Offence
Punishment awarded
20 years
illiterate
Narcotics
4 years
upon their childrens education was more. His total family size was
consisted of 10 members that was large family. They were living in pacca
house.
Convicts father was a butcher while mother as a housewife.
Both parents were illiterate. Fathers attitude with family members and
other relatives was soft while with neighbors his attitude was loving. He
took less interest in family affairs so his control upon family affairs was
less. Mothers attitude with family members and other relatives was loving
and soft. She had full control upon family hold affairs.
Respondent was illiterate and he took less interest in religious
instruction and ffairs. He ran his own chiken shop and earned around 6000
rupees per month, so his family income was approximately 13000 rupees
per month. He was convicted for 3 years in the offence of illicit use of
drugs and narcotics that he committed due to drug addiction. He had
completed 1 year imprisonment along with 7 months in judicial lockup. No
one pursued the case. Friends motivated him to do such action. They were
also involved in the illegal activities but never arrested or sent to jail by
the police. Criminals and law violators also lived in his surrounding. He
often stayed out late night with friends and used narcotics and watched
movies. He ran away from house three times. Topics of conversation
among friends were often vulgar. He had sexual attachment. In his spare
time he watched movies and enjoying smoking and drinking.
ANALYSIS
CASE NO.17
Age of the convict
11 years
Education
illiterate
Offence
Punishment awarded
12 years
was loving. Both were alive and enjoying good health. He took less
interest in family affairs so his control upon family affairs was less.
Mothers attitude with family members and other relatives was loving and
soft. She was housewife.She had full control upon family hold affairs.
.
Respondent was illiterate and could not recite the holy Quran.
Police arrested him two time so it was his second conviction. At the time
of arrest he was a worker in hotel and earned 2000 rupees per month.
Total family income was 9000 rupees per month. He had completed 5
years of imprisonment out of 12 years in judicial lockup. It was selfmotivated action. His father was pursuing the case. His close friends were
involved in illegal activities. There were some law violators in his locality.
He ran away 2 time from home. His spare time activities were
drinking,play cards,cinema. Watching movies and use of drugs.
ANALYSIS
He was naturally corrupt. Although it was act of retaliation but
teasing or irritator behavior or other compelled him to do so. Media played
role in his carrier because he was himself an earning hand.
CASE NO. 18
Age of the convict
16 years
Education
middle
Offence
murder
Punishment awarded
5 years
CASE NO. 19
Age of the convict
15 years
Education
middle
Offence
murder
Punishment awarded
25 years
CASE NO. 20
Age of the convict
16 years
Education
primary
Offence
murder
Punishment awarded
14 years
sexual experience. In his spare time he watched T.V and play cricket and
hockey.
ANALYSIS
Emotional personality trait, wish for power and association of
criminal friends were main reasons of committed such action. This
conviction affected his future carrier.
Results
Table:4.1
Percentage distribution of the respondents according to their age:
Age
10-12
13-15
16-18
19-21
Total
Frequency
1
2
15
2
20
Percentage
5
10
75
10
100
Age is the main factor of society. Table4.1 showed that more percentage
is 75 which lies 16-18 years of respondent. 10 percent people were
involve in crime that has 13-15 and 19-21 years old people. Less
percentage is 5 which lies 10-12 years of old people
Table:4.2
Percentage distribution of the respondents according to their education:
Level of education
Illiterate
Primary
Middle
Total
Frequency
4
10
6
20
Percentage
20
50
30
100
Education is the main component which control the crime. Table 4.2
showed that more percentage is 50 which lies primary level of educated
people. 30 percent people had got middle education and 20 percent
people were illiterate.
Table:4.3
Percentage distribution of the respondents according to crimes that they
committed:
Nature of crime
Murder
Illicit sexual activity
Narcotics
Frequency
13
2
2
Percentage
65
10
10
Dacoity
Kidnapping
Total
1
2
20
5
10
100
Table:4.4
Percentage distribution of the respondents according to occupation of
their father :
Occupation
Agriculturist
Govt.job
Private.job
Business man
Laborer
Any other
Total
Frequency
8
3
0
3
4
2
20
Percentage
40
15
0
15
20
10
100
Table:4.5
Percentage distribution of the respondents according to occupation of
their mother :
Occupation
Housewife
Working lady
Died
Total
Frequency
16
2
2
20
Percentage
80
10
10
100
Table:4.6
Percentage distribution of the respondents according to their total family
income:
Income
2500-5000
5001-7500
7501-10,000
10,000+
Total
Frequency
7
5
5
3
20
Percentage
35
25
25
15
100
Table 4.6 showed that 35 percent respondents family income was 25005000 rupees per month. 25 percent had family income 5001-7500 and
7501-10,000 rupees per month. 15 percent had above 10,000 rupees per
month.
Table:4.7
Percentage distribution of the respondents according to their family size:
Family size
3-5
6-8
9-11
12+
Total
Frequency
2
6
10
2
20
Percentage
10
30
50
10
100
Table 4.7 showed that 50 percent respondents family size were 9-11
members. 30 percent respondents family size were 6-8 members.10
percent respondents family size were 3-5 and above 12 members.
Table:4.8
Percentage distribution of the respondents according to their occupation:
Occupation
Student
Laborer
Business
Private job
Any other
Total
Frequency
4
9
3
0
4
20
Percentage
20
45
15
0
20
100
Table:4.9
Percentage distribution of the respondents according to their residential
location:
Area
Frequency
Percentage
Rural
Urban
Total
17
3
20
85
15
100
Table 4.9 showed that 85 percent respondent were belong to rural areas.
15 percent were belong to urban areas.
Table:4.10
Percentage distribution of the respondents according to their house
condition:
Condition
Kacha
Pacca
Both
Total
Frequency
6
3
11
20
Percentage
30
15
55
100
Table 4.10 showed that 55 percent respondent had kacha and pacca both
houses.30 percent respondent had kacha houses.15 percent respondent
had pacca houses.
Table:4.11
Percentage distribution of the respondents according to their relation with
law violators:
Relation with criminal
Yes
No
Total
Frequency
10
10
20
Percentage
50
50
100
Table: 4.12
Percentage distribution of the respondents according to their motivation
towards crime:
Motivation source
Friends
Parents
Relatives
Frequency
4
3
3
Percentage
20
15
15
Self-motivated
Total
10
20
50
100
Table: 4.13
Percentage distribution of the respondents according to their mothers
attitude with family:
Attitude
Loving
Ignoring
Total
Frequency
17
3
20
Percentage
85
15
100
Table: 4.14
Percentage distribution of the respondents according to their fathers
attitude with family:
Attitude
Loving
Ignoring
Harsh
Total
Frequency
17
1
2
20
Percentage
85
5
10
100
CHAPTER NO.5
This study was designed to analyze social and cultural factors involved in
juvenile delinquency. The selection of this topic was done after observing
the crime in school life when researcher lived in rural areas and with the
passage of time researcher shifted to urban area. Researcher observed
that some of their class fellows and neighbor whose belong to prestigious
family and some from poor family committed crime. With the passage of
time researcher observed in their education career, mostly fellow those
involved in delinquent behavior. They feel proud to violate rules and
regulation of the society. Some of students belong to noble family and
some are from poor and backward areas that are why researcher chooses
this topic to find the main factor behind such delinquent behavior. Why
they commit some reported or non-reported crime.
FINDINGS
There are 75 percent of respondent belonged to age group 16-18. It was
showed that young generations are involved in crime. (table 4.1)
5.2 CONCLUSIONS
The conclusion extracted from data showed that majority of the
respondent belonged to age group 16-18. It was showed that young
generations are involved in crime. So it was not in favor of nation and
country. Most respondent got primary education it was showed that less
educated people are more responsible of crime. Majority of the people
committed murder crime which is highest among other crimes. It showed
that the people has less emotion for others. Mostly criminals father was
agriculturist. It was showed that most crimes were belonging to land
dispute, water dispute and family disrespect. Majority of respondents
mother was house wife. Mostly respondents family income was 25005000 rupees per month.it was showed that poverty is a main factor to
increase crime. Mostly respondents family size were 9-11 members. It
was guessed that large family size mostly involve in crime due to lack of
fulfillment of basic needs and lack of attention through parents. Mostly
respondent were labourer. It was represented laborer were involve in
crime due to bad company of friends and self-earning hand. Majority of
people commit crime which belonged to rural areas. It was showed that
lack of awareness and lack of education in rural areas thats why people
committed crime. Mostly respondent had kacha and pacca both houses.it
was expressed that they have good living status in society but involve in
crime. Mostly respondent had relation to law violators and mostly
respondent had no relation with law violators. It was showed that it is not
necessary to relation with law violators then they commit crime. Mostly
respondent was self-motivated towards crime. It was showed that it is not
necessary to stress from family, friends and relatives then they commit
crime. Mostly respondents mother attitude with family loved. It was
showed that loving attitude of mother has bad impact on children
personality. Majority of respondents father attitude with family was
loving. It was showed that loving attitude of father is bad for their
children.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
In the light of above conclusions the following suggestions are given to
prevention of juvenile delinquency in society.
Control measures by law-enforcement agencies.
Educational campaigns to encourage every parent to educate their
children.
Promotional efforts by civic-minded groups to develop the needed
recreational, vocational, educational, psychological and medical services
to meet these special needs of many children.
Parents must maintain check and balance system upon their children with
in home and outside home.
At the early age of childhood children must seek religious education and
societial norms.
Society must point out virtue and evil before children.
Schooling of children must encourage them curricular and co-curricular
activities.
Government must save the children at all level not only extend to policy
but implemented.