Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Neighbors Motion For Summary Judgment 9-13-15
Neighbors Motion For Summary Judgment 9-13-15
9/13/2015
Plaintiff,
]
v.
Case # 15-4921-DDC
LAWRENCE POLICE
Defendants
Comes Now Guy Neighbors Propria Persona Im representing myself in Propria Persona (in your own
person) or pro-per Qualified me as an attorney in fact, according to Blacks Law Dictionary.By
asserting my Sovereign Right to represent myself in legal matters establishes my status as my own
attorney. To proceed in Pro Per, means that the court cannot impose the same standard up on me as are
imposed on a licensed attorney. This court will treat me as my own attorney, differently that it
would treat me as the defendant, and Moves this court for Summary Judgment for all claims asserted
by plaintiff Guy Madison Neighbors,
11. Neighbors investigator from Woods investigative services interviewed several witnesses who claimed
Lawrence Police officer Rantzs and Bialek were impersonating FBI, no real investigation was ever done,
and no one was interviewed by the FBI, agent Bob Schaefer, yet he cleared the Lawrence Police.
12. The only evidence that would show Neighbors did or did not have on a seat belt would be the police
dash cam. The still shot from the police dash cam marked Exhibit A and B will show the police
officer could not see who was driving the vehicle, and no way could he ever see if the driver had a
seatbelt or not.
13. Officer Wech Knew Neighbors vehicle due to the signage displayed on the door of the vehicle, and
also was aware that Neighbors had beat a seat belt ticket already.
14. In as much as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only,
a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor
substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of
this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything
other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them." (Doan's Administrators vs.
Pen.hallow, 3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54, Supreme Court of the United States 1795).
15. Fraud on The Court: Officers of this court are involved in fraud in that this Municipal Court Only
has Administrative authority and is acting as an "Article III" court when it is Not. Whenever any
officer of the court commits fraud during a proceeding in the court, he/she is engaged in "fraud upon
the court". In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), the court stated "Fraud
upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the
parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. ... It is where the court or a member is
corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial
function --- thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted."
16. Treason: Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged
in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980);
Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821) Any judge or attorney who does not
report the above judges for treason as required by law assumes liability.
II. Standard
When filing a motion for summary judgment, the moving party claims that all necessary factual issues are
resolved or need not be tried because they are so one-sided. In this case the plaintiff has on record many
serious issues that prove the defendant came to court with unclean hands the exhibits will show a very
long and serious pattern of abuse and mis-conduct that span almost 10 yrs. Plaintiff has shown he was
forced into a trial without a jury against his will. The documents filed in federal court will show
misconduct that is already on the record in federal court criminal cases but have been ignored.
This court clearly lacked jurisdiction, and when Neighbors addressed the issue in a letter written to the
traffic court became arrogant, and commented that he did not think he would have any trouble defending
himself against Neighbors civil action. So here we are and Neighbors is moving for summary judgment
and if the defendants cannot respond sufficiently and produce evidence to rebut what is contained in this
motion for summary judgment, the motion should be granted in full and the requested damages should be
awarded and or what the court deems just and fair.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on the 14th day of Sep, 2015, the foregoing document was filed
in person with the clerk of the court In Topeka KS. by the Plaintiff, to be emailed out to all
parties.
_______________________
Respectfully Submitted
VERIFICATION:
I Guy Madison Neighbors, declare under penalty of perjury in accordance with the Laws of the
United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct and complete to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
____________________________
On this ______day of____________, 2015 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in
and for State of Kansas, personally appeared the above-signed, known to me
to be the one whose name is signed on this instrument, and has acknowledged to me that s/he has
executed the same.
Signed:_________________________________________
Printed Name:____________________________________
Date:___________________________________________
My Commission Expires:____________________________