Professional Documents
Culture Documents
About, Ilsen - An Exclusion Process of Migrants. Control of Gypsies and Border Police in Western Europe, 1907-1914
About, Ilsen - An Exclusion Process of Migrants. Control of Gypsies and Border Police in Western Europe, 1907-1914
Europe
Central European University, Budapest
June 22 - July 10, 2009
or
more
rarely
national
polices,
military
police
and
Gendarmerie and special border polices that are involved in the control of
Gypsy populations.
Policing the Gypsies in Europe in the 1900s: contexts and
problems.
During the 1900s, a discriminating definition of citizenship
restricted transborder migrations and the new principle of nationality
mechanically stigmatised Gypsies, who were suddenly considered as
foreigners. Paradoxically, this gradual tightening of the borders, before
WWI, produced an increasingly frequent practices of expelling caravans
in transit from one country to another. These multiple movements of
population tended to alarm the control authorities, generally represented
by police officers, which resulted in proliferating regulations, either local
police bills or national laws and decrees. The numerous testimonies from
local and national press newspapers reflects year after year the
increasingly
number
of
cases:
invasion,
multiplication,
criminal
anthropology,
legal
sociology,
and
social
hygiene.
industrial
and
urban
society
during
the
19 th
Century,
the
Switzerland,
in
the
main
province
of
the
German
Empire
hand, one can argue that Gypsies fall within a category that is
particularly targeted by the recent developments of modern policing
techniques. However, on the other hand, Gypsy control can be analysed
as an experimental laboratory for the new surveillance measures that
were imposed, from the 1920s onwards, to millions of migrants travelling
across Europe. Starting from this general framework, it seems possible to
probe the genealogy of contemporary Gypsy policies and study the
inception and development of the public security policies that have been
imposed on this specific category of population. Three major lines of
analysis appear particularly essential in this process.
The first line is the police collaboration schemes regarding the
surveillance, control and identification of Gypsies. From the antianarchist police conference, held in Rome in 1898, to the numerous
international police conferences before and after the creation of Interpol
in 1923, the relations between police heads in Europe created a
productive network on security problems, identification techniques and
control of migrants. Following some first investigations, the official
correspondence between policing agencies and the interventions of
diplomatic offices on the Gypsy question appear as an important topic
dealing with the transformation of police actions in the border lands. In
fact, a numerous and specific policing legislation and local regulations
were published after 1907 in Italy, France or Switzerland. The second line
of analysis is based on the reality of control and the effective methods and
systems used by the police to actually control Gypsies. In this way
portable identity documents, travel orders or police gazettes can be
examined and set in the historical context of identification history,
which means that it is necessary to consider both in the long run
phenomena which concern the definition of identity in modern time and
some little known objects such as file systems management and
bureaucratic procedures designed to search, watch and remotely control
individuals. The third line concerns day-to-day police practices: in fact
enacting new policing methods is no guarantee for efficiency, and
Many local bills in France and Italy are activated but it is in Bavaria that
the most elaborated system is building up with the activity of a
Zigeunerzentrale and the publication of the Zigeunerbuch in 1905. In
1906, the Federal congress of Switzerland decided to close the border to
vagrants and Gypsies and a special order tryed to impeach every society
of transportation, by rail or by river, to transport those illegal peoples.
In 1908, the control of the borders is reinforced in particular between
Italy, Germany, Switzerland and Austria-Hungary. The public hate,
amplified by the press, the mistrust of the authorities force many Gypsies
to find new way to escape (falsification of documents, usurpation of
identity) which involve in return an increase of the tensions. In Italy, in
1908, a spontaneous report of a police officer from Tuscany proposed to
establish a simultaneous and general census of all the caravans,
specialised
registers
and
individual
record,
with
anthropometrical
measures and photography. This very interesting document lists all the
reasons why the control of the Gypsies seems impossible: first, it appears
impossible to have any certainty of their identity because they dont have
any documents or they use fake names, they know many Italian dialects
and can easily disappear in the big cities, they across rural territories
where police forces are rare, when the police arrests a caravan, its
impossible for the municipality to maintain animals such as bear or
monkey more than one day, it is impossible to be sure that they are truly
expel from the country.
In 1909, Switzerland takes the initiative of an international
conference in order to resolve the Gypsy question. The project
document for the conference plans to force every Gypsy to be identify and
to create a special certificate with anthropometrical measures on the
German model of the Zigeunerbuch, and also a network of police offices
connected by a central and international service called Central service
for the anthropometrical registration of the Gypsies. But this project
failed because Switzerland wished to nationalise the gypsy populations by
all European states: in this perspective, every country should accept to
integrate as citizen their own Gypsies. Italy, for example, by its minister
of Foreign Affairs, refused to consider that some of this communities were
Italians. The project of this conference failed because all the countries
around Switzerland refused this imposed nationalisation of the Gypsies.
This conference, beside the failure of the project, indicates the passage to
another historical moment for the control of mobility and the beginning of
the internationalisation of the so called Gypsy problem.
In Italy, between 1910 and 1914, the ministry of Interior produced
many texts concerning the individual identification of the Gypsies: a
special individual document created in 1910 and several police document
dedicated to the description of individual, family or caravans. However, it
appears difficult to lead a real control without centralised means of
identification. It is why, from 1909 under the direction of the School of
scientific police in Rome and after a complete reorganisation of the
central police archives, a new category for the Gypsies is created in the
central criminal card-index system. All the files and individual cards were
sent to Rome and inserted in this special administrative category; local
Italian polices were also forced to reinforce the surveillance of the
nomads in border provinces especially. It is in France that the most
drastic measurement intervened with the creation of an anthropometrical
and personal document, on the model used for liberated convicts or by
the colonial administration in order to control special categories such as
civil servants or prostitutes. The system created in France in 1912 after
the law of July 16th, symbolised by this carnet anthropomtrique, is a
massive procedure that theoretically conducted to the control of every
movements of Gypsies from one town to another, all over the country. The
measurements defined by the law, which concerns nearly 10.000 nomads
in France, is imposed on every individual identify as a Bohmien. In
order to prevent kidnapping of children, a circular prescribed the
classification of dactyloscopic cards also for the children from 2 to 13
years.
This
measurement
introduces
very
relevant
rupture
in
of
the
migrant
populations.
Consequently,
the
repressive
impeach their entrance in the country. Those multiple cases provoked the
organisation, in March 1907, of an intercantonal conference with the
authorities of all the Province of Switzerland. It seems that this meeting
decided that every province will keep their own Gypsies and stop the
migrations to the other provinces of the federation. After the conference,
preventive arrests of Gypsies are decided by the authorities. For the first
time, the federal congress discussed in June 1907 the necessity to involve
the European countries in order to organise an international resolution
of this obsessive Gypsy Question (cette obsdante question des
tziganes) as called by the main newspaper of Switzerland.
In July 1907, two German Gypsies asked the German consulate in
Geneva for a visa in order to reach the German territory. But the German
consulate of Geneva was not allowed to delivered any visa of that kind
and accepted to give them a Zwangpass, a personnal document which
only permitted to travel through Switzerland in ten days. However they
decided, with the rest of their family, to reach the border with France
close to Geneva. At this point, all the caravan were stopped in a very
small village called Moillesulaz that correspond to a bridge between the
two country. It is important to mention that this small village was already
a regular step in the circulation of the Gypsies. In the same place, in
1899, a caravan was already arrested by the police and a pox epidemy
provoked a truly panic through the population, the intervention of
military troops and a strong sanitary surveillance. This fact and the
memory of those events surely participated to the negative reactions to
the presence of the Gypsies. But on the other side of the bridge, the
French Gendarmes who knew about this Gypsies who where in France
few weeks before decided to closed the access to the bridge. In the same
time the gendarmerie from Geneva do exactly the same thing and the
caravan remain surrounded by all the police authorities of the place. Few
days after, other caravans converged in the same village and the entire
group tried to cross the border illegally. The journal of Geneva explain to
their readers : This a new invasion of barbarians (cest une vritable
10
police
agents,
members
of
different
offices
of
the
administrations visited the place but no solution is taken and all the
caravans stayed around the bridge during more than three weeks. At the
end of July 1907, the minister of Interior of France is forced to accept
them into the French territory in order to avoid a diplomatic clash. The
condition of this agreement is the organisation by several police agencies
of an itinerary following the East border and directed to Germany. The
weakness of the French authorities are strongly criticised by many
newspapers of the time and especially by local member of the parliament.
One of them, the deputy of Savoie called Fernand David, sent an official
report in October 1907 to the chief of the French governement. He
denounced the impotency of French authorities and ask for a real
international protection against the Gypsies described as a plague : he
blamed the minister of Interior for his tolerance and denounced the
international thieves that represented for him the Gypsies who
acrossed without any real control the borders of France. One month later,
all the Gypsies of this group are arrested again in the Jura and they are
identify by anthropometric measures : most of them appeared already
convicted as criminals in France and guilty of several low crimes and
guilty of infringement to the vagrancy laws. With the help of the Parisian
service of identification, the complete list of identities and crimes
committed by this Gypsies should normally facilitate their expulsion to
Germany. Some of them are arrested and stay in prison for small period.
However, the German police impeached the rest of the Gypsies to came
11
into the country and a new conflict is created this time between French
and German polices. Then in September 1907, the circle is almost
completed when the French police tried to expel the same caravans to
Switzerland where the police stop them one more time. After an illegal
passage in another point of the border, the caravans return in France.
This story is not isolated. Between 1907 and 1913, many cases of
vagrant groups and Gypsies created multiple tensions between Italian
and Austrian police authorities. An in-deep study of the police archives in
Italy show an increasingly number of cases that revealed the strategies
adopted by the agents in order to expel the people from their country. A
silent war is creating by the new rules on expulsion that concern Gypsies
but also foreigners considered as criminal or suspects. The most
astonishing case probably happened in October 1907 when a caravan
with 8 people is immobilized right behind the border landmark at the
border between France and Belgium : during seven months two squads of
French and Belgium Gendarmes stay at this point, build some barracks in
order to survey one family of Gypsies.
The immediate consequences of thoses cases are the project of law
realised
by
the
French
parliament
for
reinforcement
of
the
identification and the control of the Gypsies, using new signaletic forms
and individual authorisation and passport for circulation ; this is exactly
the first version of the restrictive law adopted later in 1912 which created
the obligation to carry the special carnet anthropometrique. In
Switzerland, the year 1908 appears also as a crucial moment when a
project emerged to create a permanent and international police office
responsible for the identification and the control of all the Gypsies in
Europe. An international conference is projected and many countries
were involved in this process but, for many reasons, the conference never
took place. In 1913, the Departement of police in Zwitzerland decided to
centralised all the information on Gypsies in a centralise card-index using
a system of registration called Zigeunerregistratur.
12
in
the
fragile
balance
between
the
different
Gypsy
number
of
cases:
invasion,
multiplication,
criminal
anthropology,
legal
sociology,
and
social
hygiene.
13
14
15
References
About, Ilsen. 2007. Histoire dun vagabond, les vies de Rodolfo Kreinitz.
La police didentification dans lItalie des annes 1910. Dans Gens
de passage en Mditerrane de lAntiquit lpoque moderne.
Procdures de contrle et didentification, d. Claudia Moatti et
Wolfgang Kaiser, 481-512. Paris: Maisonneuve & Larose.
Albrecht, Angelika. 2002. Zigeuner in Altbayern 1871-1914 : eine sozial-,
wirtschafts- und verwaltungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung der
bayerischen Zigeunerpolitik. Munchen: Kommission fur Bayerische
Landesgeschichte.
Asseo, Henriette. 1994. Les Tsiganes. Une destinee europeenne. Paris:
Gallimard.
---. 1999. La perception des Tsiganes en France et en Allemagne, 18701930. Dans Les exclus en Europe : 1830-1930, d. Andre Gueslin et
Dominique Kalifa, 221-233. Paris: ditions de lAtelier.
---. 2002. La gendarmerie et lidentification des "Nomades" (1870-1914).
Dans Gendarmerie, tat et Socit au XIXe sicle, d. Jean-Nol
Luc, 301-311. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.
---. 2007. Linvention des Nomades en Europe au XXe sicle et la
nationalisation impossible des Tsiganes. Dans Lidentification des
personnes. Gense dun travail dtat, d. Gerard Noiriel, 161-180.
Paris: Belin.
Ayass,
Wolfgang.
1988.
Feinderklarung
und
Pravention
:
Kriminalbiologie, Zigeunerforschung und Asozialenpolitik. Berlin:
Rotbuch Verlag.
Bonillo, Marion. 2001. "Zigeunerpolitik" im Deutschen Kaiserreich, 18711918. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Egger, Franz. 1982. Der Bundesstaat und die fremden Zigeuner in der
Zeit von 1848 bis 1914. Studien und Quellen, no. 8: 49-74.
Filhol, Emmanuel. 2004. Un camp de concentration francais. Les
Tsiganes alsaciens-lorrains a Crest, 1915-1919. Grenoble: Presses
Universitaires de Grenoble.
---. 2006. Les Tsiganes en France : du contrle la rpression (18951946). Revue trimestrielle des droits de lhomme 17, no. 68: 9891008.
---. 2007. La loi de 1912 sur la circulation des "nomades" (Tsiganes) en
France. Revue europenne des migrations internationales 23, no. 2:
135-158.
Hehemann, Rainer. 1987. Die "Bekampfung des Zigeunerunwesens" im
Wilhelminischen Deutschland und in der Weimarer Republik : 18711933. Frankfurt am Main: Haag & Herchen.
Huonker, Thomas. 2004. "Jusqu la ceinture dans le grand marais".
Roma, Sinti et Yniches en Suisse, quelques aspects dune
perscution de longue dure . Le cartable de Clio, no. 4: 130-136.
Huonker, Thomas, Ludi, Regula. 2009. Roms, Sintis et Yniches, La
16
17