Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Homework 5
Homework 5
PLSC 210
Prof. Miller Lee
2/29/10
Homework #5
Sweden: 5/6ths must agree in the Chamber of the Parliament to pass an amendment and can only
be amended if the Riksdag passes resolutions on two diff. occasions separated by an election.
http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/2707/a/15187
Britain: “standing committees debate and consider amendments at the committee stage; a new set
of members Is appointed to them to consider each bill. Each has btwn 16 and 50 members with a
party balance reflecting as far as possible that in the House as a whole.”
http://www.servat.unibe.ch/icl/uk00000_.html
If you had the power to do so, in what way would you change the procedures for amending the
U.S. constitution? Why?
I would give the president a say in the constitutional amendment being made by the Congress.
The president might listen to the people a bit more than Congress would, allowing for
amendments to be good ones, unlike the 18th amendment that prohibited something everyone
wanted.
4. (a)Identify the 4 main differences between a supreme court and a constitutional court.
Supreme has more concrete reviews because makes precedents, While a const.court is more
abstract. (Hague 266) Supreme is the highest court of appeal, while the const. court deals with
only “constitutional issue”. (Hague 266) Supreme court officials require legal expertise and
political approval, while the const. court ones need to fulfill more political criteria. (Hague 266)
Supreme court judges can work til they desire, while those in the const. courts, can work for only
up to nine years. (Hague 266)
(b) Australia, Canada, India. have supreme courts.
Austria, Germany, and Russia, all have constitutional courts.
5. (a) what is the power of judicial review?
It protects the constitution by using supreme courts. “Judicial review has the power to override
the decisions and laws produces by democratic governments”. “Review stabilizes and limits
democracy and is only partially limited by the constitution.” (Hague 263)
(b) Is this power listed in the U.S. Constitution, or did it come from somewhere else?
It came from another place, The power of Judicial Review was determined by Marbury Vs.
Madison.
6. (a) Identify the 5 methods for selecting judges.
Popular election, Election by the assembly, Appointment by the government, appointment by the
independent panel, co-option.
(b) Assess the benefits and drawbacks of each regarding responsiveness to the public vs. political
impartiality.
Pop. Election: By selecting judges using popular elections, America would receive more of their
desired responses to issues presented to the judiciary branch; however, the politics of the matter
would be more biased, possibly resulting in unfair trials.
Election by Assembly: Would be more inclined toward the beliefs of the assembly members.
Semi-Impartial, Less responsive to public.
Appt.by Gov’t: Appointed by pres. Is mostly fair because doesn’t have same interest, simply
qualifies for position.
Appt. By Indpt. Panel: May be biased according to beliefs of panel. Un responsive to public, not
impartial.
Co-option: elected by committee may also create bias but be somewhat responsive to public
desires.
7. Do you think the U.S. Supreme Court should interpret the U.S. Constitution based on the
original intent of the Founders or on contemporary conceptions of justice? Explain the arguments
in favor of each approach to constitutional interpretation, providing examples.
The U.S. Supreme Court should interpret the U.S. constitution based on contemporary
conceptions of justice because then room for change is allowed for the benefit of society, for
instance, if we didn’t have Brown V. The Board of Education, African-Americans might still
face prejudices in schools; However, they do not because we have not interpreted the
Constitution on the basis of the Founder’s main intent.
8.(a)Give the names and subjects of at least four cases representing conservative judicial
activism by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Dred Scott vs. Sandford – forbidding slavery violated the laws of property
Plessy vs. Ferguson – separate but equal accommodations for black / white are constitutional.
Santa Clara County vs. Southern Pacific Railroad – corporations are legal persons but slaves
aren’t.
Lochner vs. New York – “Right of contract” limited states’ ability to regulate business.
(b) Give the names and subjects of at least four cases representing liberal judicial activism by the
U.S. Supreme Court.
Hudson P.74 :
Brown vs. Board of Education – expanded civil rights for Black Americans
(c) The two circumstances under which judicial activism should be permitted are when “a
particular majority [might] at a given pt. in time try to freeze representative institutions to
prevent new majorities from forming” and when “an electoral majority may deny to minority
groups the fundamental rights of participation”. (Hudson p. 89)
(d) Do you agree or disagree with Ely? Explain.
I disagree, I believe Judicial activism should not be allowed at all because it is unfair to
whomever the judge does not support. Unless all judges are good, then i might agree but
depending on their political position they might not help the minority group as Ely proposed.
9. During which periods did republican appointees constitute a majority on the court, and during
which periods did democratic appointees constitute a majority?
Civil Liberties
10. List at least 15 of the rights guaranteed in the bill of rights (Constitutional amendments 1-10)
11. The 1st amendment protects the right to political dissent. List at least 6 examples of
government attempts to repress political dissent, despite this amendment.