RURL POVERTY-AGRICULTURE LABOUR

SOCIOLOGY

Submitted by
KRISHNA KOUSIKI
2014065
SEMESTER I

DAMODARAM SANJIVAYYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY

VISAKHAPATNAM

NOVEMBER 2014

DAMODARAM SANJIVAYYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY

1

-VISAKHAPATNAM
CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that Miss.krishna kousiki with Reg. No. 2014065 of Ist Semester prepared the
project on Rural poverty-Agriculture Labour in partial fulfillment of his semester course in
the subject Sociology during the academic year 2014-2015 under my supervision and guidance.

Date: October; 2014

Signature of the Faculty

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
2.

INTRODUCTION

3. CAUSES FOR BACKWARDNESS IN VILLAGES

4. PROBLEMS FACING IN RURAL AREAS BY LAND LESS LABOUR
5. POLICIES FOR REDUCING RURAL POVERTY
6. RURAL EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS
7. MGNREGA ACT 2005
8. EMPRICIAL STUDY

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I have made my project titled Sociology under the supervision of Mr. M.

Lakshmipati Raju, Faculty Lecturer, Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law
University. I find no words to express my sense of gratitude for Lakshmipati
Raju sir for providing the necessary guidance at every step during the
completion of this project.
I am also grateful to the office, librarian and library staff of DSNLU, Visakhapatnam for
allowing me to use their library whenever I needed to. Further I am grateful to my learned
teachers for their academic patronage and persistent encouragement extended to me. I am once
again highly indebted to the office and Library Staff of DSNLU for the support and cooperation
extended by them from time to time. I cannot conclude with recording my thanks to my friends
for the assistance received from them in the preparation of this project.

-Krishna Kousiki
Roll no.- 2014065
Sec. - A
Semester 1

Introduction

Rural poverty refers to poverty found in rural areas,including factors of rural society,rural
economy and rural political systems that give rise to the rural poverty
Land less labour refers to the people with owning any property land and are working for their
needs.
About 75% of the Indian population lives in rural areas and about 80% of this population is
dependent on agriculture for its livelihood. Agriculture accounts for about 37% of the national
income. The development of the rural areas and of agriculture and its allied activities thus
becomes vital for the rapid development of the economy as a whole.

Causes for Backwardness in Villages

1. Zamindari System, the legacy of the British Rule
India was under British rule for 200 years. British policies were aimed in revenue collection and
not rural development. They introduced the zamindari system. The zamindars were deemed the
owners of all land and they collected as much revenue as they could from the peasants. The
system left the peasants very poor and the zamindars did very little to improve the conditions of
the villages. After the country attained independence this system was abolished, but the
conditions of the peasants is yet to transform completely.

2. The Bonded Labour System

It is equivalent to near slavery. Bonded labour is an indebted agricultural worker, who had
borrowed from the money lender at usurious rate of interest and had to work in his farm for low
wages. The system was used to permanently enslave the worker, as the worker was only able to
repay a part of interest and the loan with compounded residual interest went on swelling. The
agricultural labour can free himself eventually only by giving his son in bondage as a substitute.
Under the 20-point economic programme, the Government India under Prime Minister
Mrs.Indira Gandhi abolished bonded labour system and brought legislation to this effect in 1975.
Despite the legislation the system is known to persist here and there in select areas.

3. Other contributory reasons are the total lack of agricultural development under foreign rule,
poor communication, roads and other infrastructure development in villages, lack of education
and health facilities, and the destruction of the thriving Indian cottage industries on account of
competition from the cheap machine made goods imported under British rule

PROBLEMS FACING IN RURAL AREAS BY LAND LESS LABOUR

As we know the 60-70% of rural population in India lives in primitive conditions. This sorry
state exists even after 60 years of independence. So that Rural Development programmes have
urgency in the present condition also. There are many obstacles in the rural development
programmes which are as under
1. In 21st Century, there is no electricity supply in many villages.
2. Now also many rural peoples using primitive methods of cooking, living and farming and
they have trust on these methods.

3. By using primitive cook stoves, around 300,000 death / year takes plan due to pollution.

4. 54% of Indias population is below 25 years and most of them live in rural areas with
very little employment opportunities.

5. Literacy is the major problem in rural development programme.

6. The poor extension linkage causes slow growth of rural development.

7. Untrained, unskilled, inexperienced staff in extension linkage cannot provide satisfactory

help to rural peoples.

8. Every one want to go to the cities, so that rural peoples remains as ignores part by the
policy makers also.

9. Privatization concept is useful for rural development but, government not praying much
attention to this aspect.

10. Policy makes prepared policies, programmes for betterment of rural people but, if these
programmes are not implemented very well then have no used.

POLICIES FOR REDUCING RURAL POVERTY

To design policies that have a chance of effectively helping the rural poor, the focus of policy
should be on four major groups:

small landowners who cultivate their land;

landless tenants who cultivate other people's land;

landless laborers who depend on casual or long-term employment in the farm or

nonfarm sectors; and
women, who could also be part of any of the three preceding groups.

All of these groups will benefit from good macroeconomic managementwhich helps keep
inflation in check and maintains unsubsidized pricesbecause it facilitates sustained economic
growth through private investment and competitive markets. Needless to say, unfair laws or poor
enforcement of existing laws, exclusion of the poor from decision making, and pervasive
corruption in the public sector are no less detrimental to the well-being of the poor than they are
to the country's overall economic growth.
Achieving agricultural growth by applying new technologies is one of the most important ways
to reduce rural poverty. The impact of such efforts on the rural poor, however, depends on initial
conditions, the structure of relevant institutions, and incentives. Research shows that agricultural
stagnation has harmed the rural poor in sub-Saharan Africa by creating food shortages and higher
prices that have reduced their ability to buy food and find work. Conversely, experience with the
Green Revolution showed that rapid agricultural progress made a big difference in reducing rural
poverty in parts of South Asia. Researchers have found that higher crop yields reduce both the
number of rural poor and the severity of rural poverty. But these effects are strong only if certain
conditions are met:

land and capital markets are not distorted by a high concentration of ownership of natural
resources (agricultural land), including unfair tenancy contracts, and repression in the capital
markets (with restricted access to finance);

public policy on pricing, taxes, and the exchange rate does not penalize agriculture and
encourage or subsidize labor displacement;

public investment in basic education and health care is high and used effectively; farmer
literacy and good health have great influence on farm productivity;

public sector support for agricultural research is strong and resulting improvements are
made available to small farmers is effective;
physical capital, like irrigation systems, access roads, is adequately maintained;

safety nets and social assistance are available for the very poor, particularly the landless
(casual) workers and rural women, in the form of public works programs, microfinance, and
food subsidies; and

the rural poor are directly involved in the identification, design, and implementation of
programs to ensure effective use of resources and equitable distribution of benefits.

Since the rural poor are a varied group, we need to understand how macroeconomic changes and
policies can affect them. The three major ways in which policies affect the rural poor are
through markets,infrastructure (including public services), and transfers.
The markets in which the rural poor participate are those for products, inputs (labor and
nonlabor), and finance (from formal and informal sources). Several important features of these
markets can affect conditions in rural areas.
The infrastructure that directly affects the rural sector's productivity and the rural poor's quality
of life includes the economic (transport, communications, extension services, and irrigation) and
the social (education, health care, water, and sanitation). Given that most elements of a country's
infrastructure are provided through public funding, the level of spending, cost effectiveness,
quality of service, and access of the rural poor to infrastructure and public services have
important effects on human capital and productivity in rural areas.
Transfers, which are both private and public, provide some insurance against anticipated and
unanticipated economic shocks. Most of the rural poor depend on private transfers among
households, extended families, and other kinship groups. Public transfers can take the form of
redistribution of such assets as land, employment on public works projects, and targeted
subsidies for inputs and some consumer products. These transfers supplement or displace private
transfers, depending on the policy instrument and how it is used. But these channelsmarkets,
infrastructure, and transfersdo not work in the same way for all of the rural poor because each
group has quite different links to the economy.

RURAL EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS

RLEGP-Rural land less labour employment guarantee program
RLEGP was introduced on August 15, 1983, with the objective of (a) improving and
expanding employment opportunities for the rural landless with a view to providing guarantee of
employment to at least one member of every landless household up to 100 days in a year and (b)
creating durable assets for strengthening the infrastructure so as to meet the growing
requirements of the rural economy.
8

An outlay of Rs. 500 crores to be fully financed by the Central Government was provided
under this programme in the sixth Plan. The implementation of the programme was entrusted to
the states and union territories, but they were required to prepare specific projects for approval
by a central committee.
During 1983-85, the central committee approved 320 projects with an estimated cost of
Rs. 906.59 crores. The target for employment generation in 1983-84 and 1984-85 was fixed at
360 million many days against which 260.18 million many days of employment was actually
generated.
Mid-way through the sixth Plan, the RLEGP was revamped. It started with the dual
objective of expanding employment opportunities in the rural areas and providing sharper focus
on the landless labour households which constitute the hardcore of the people below the poverty
line.
Efforts are being made to implement a limited guarantee for providing 80 to 100 days
employment to the landless labour households through this programme. In the seventh Plan an
outlay of Rs. 1,250.81 crores has been provided for NREP in the Central Sector which will be
matched equally by the states. An outlay of Rs. 1,743.78 crores has been provided in the seventh
Plan for RLEGP which will be borne entirely by the Centre. Based on the average wage of Rs.
8.61 per day as in 1984-85 and a wage material cost ratio of 50:50, a total employment of 1,445
million many days under NREP and 1,013 million many days under RLEGP is likely to be
generated during the seventh Plan period at an average rate of around 290 million many days and
200 million man days per annum respectively.

MGNREGA ACT 2005

The National Rural Employment Guarantee Act 2005 (No 42), also known as the "Mahatma
Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act", and abbreviated to MGNREGA, is an
Indian labour law and social security measure that aims to guarantee the 'right to work' and
ensure livelihood security in rural areas by providing at least 100 days of guaranteed wage
employment in a financial year to every household whose adult members volunteer to do
unskilled manual work. The UPA Government had planned to increase the number of working
days from 100 to 150 before the 2014 Lok Sabha Elections in the country but failed. The statute
is hailed by the government as "the largest and most ambitious social security and public works
programme in the world". The more comprehensive survey of Comptroller and Auditor General
(CAG) of India, a Supreme Audit Institution defined in Article 148 of the Constitution of India,
reports serious lapses in implementation of the act.
9

Targeting poverty through employment generation using rural works has had a long history in
India that began in the 1960s. After the first three decades of experimentation, the government
launched major schemes like Jawahar Rozgar Yojana, Employment Assurance Scheme, Food for
Work Programme, Jawahar Gram Samridhi Yojana and Sampoorna Grameen Rozgar Yojana that
were forerunners to Mahatma Gandhi NREGA. The theme of government approach had been to
merge old schemes to introduce new ones while retaining the basic objective of providing
additional wage employment involving unskilled manual work and also to create durable assets.
The major responsibility of implementation was also gradually transferred to the Panchayati Raj
Institutions. Unlike its precursors, the Mahatma Gandhi NREGA guaranteed employment as a
legal right. However, the problem areas are still the same as they were in the 1960s. The most
significant ones are: lack of public awareness, mismanagement and above all mass corruption.
The statement of the law provides adequate safeguards to promote its effective management and
implementation. The act explicitly mentions the principles and agencies for implementation, list
of allowed works, financing pattern, monitoring and evaluation, and most importantly the
detailed measures to ensure transparency and accountability. Further the provisions of the law
adhere to the principles enunciated in the Constitution of India.
The comprehensive assessment of the performance of the law by the constitutional auditor
revealed serious lapses arising mainly due to lack of public awareness, mismanagement and
institutional incapacity. The CAG also suggests a list of recommendations to the government for
corrective measures. The government, however, had also released a collection of reportedly
independent researches evaluating the functioning of the act whose results significantly differed
from the CAG report. Meanwhile, the social audits in two Indian states highlight the potential of
the law if implemented effectively.

EMPRICIAL STUDY
NAME

VILL

A GE

EDU

FA
10

RE

BPL

CHI

WO

MG

AGE

G ND
E ER

A CAT
ST ION
E

MIL LIG
Y
ION

S.ANJIN
AYLLU

YLA
MAN
CHILI

5
5

M
AL
E

O
C

PRI
6
HIN
MAR EXT DH
Y
EN
U
DE
D

M.VENT
ARAO

UTAD
A

6
5

M
AL
E

O
C

ILLE
TEA
TE

HIN
DH
U

K.SAHA
DEVUD
U

PENU
MAD
AM

6
1

M
AL
E

SC PRI
6
MAR
Y

CHI
RST
IAN

T.SREEN YELA
U
MAN
CHILI

4
0

M
AL
E

O
C

PRI
7
MAR
Y

HIN
DH
U

J.R.VSA
TYANA
RYANA

YELA
MAN
CHILI

3
8

M
AL
E

O
C

PRI
3
MAR
Y

HIN
DH
U

K.SIVAN YELA
ARYAN MAN

3
0

M
AL

O
C

HIG
H

HIN
DH

11

LD
RE
N

AI
LY
W
A
G
ES

RKI
NG
DA
YS

MA
LE2

40
0/-

230
DA
YS

MA
LE2

30
0/-

MA
LE1
FE
MA
LE1
1000 NO
0/PER
MO
NT
H
6000 FE
/MA
PER LEMO 1
NT
H
8000 FE
/MA

6000
/PER
MO
NT
H
7000
/PER
MO
NT
H
5000
/PER
MN
TH

HI
L
D
L
A
B
O
R
N
O

NE
RG

200
DA
YS

N
O

YE
S

20
0/-

200
DA
YS

N
O

NO

50
0/-

365
DA
YS

N
O

NO

20
0/-

240
DA
YS

N
O

NO

20
0/-

250
DA

N
O

YE
S

NO

CHILI

SCH
OOL

S.PEDIR
AJU

YELA
MAN
CHILI

4
5

M
AL
E

O
C

PRI
4
MAR
Y

HIN
DH
U

M.RATN
AM

YELA
MAN
CHILI

6
0

FE
M
AL
E

SC ILLE
TER
ATE

HIN
DH
U

G.SUBB
A RAO

YELA
MAN
CHILI

6
0

M
AL
E

SC HIG
H
SCH
OL

HIN
DH
U

G.VARA YELA
PRASAD MAN
CHILI

4
0

M
AL
E

SC HIG
H
SCH
OOL

HIN
DH
U

B.VEER
A
SWAMI

YELA
MAN
CHILI

7
6

M
AL
E

B
C

ILLE
TAR
ATE

HIN
DH
U

T.SESHA YELA
MA
MAN
CHILI

6
5

FE
M
AL
E

B
C

ILLE
TER
ATE

HN
DH
U

12

PER
MO
NT
H
9000
/-ER
MO
NT
H

LE2

MA
LE1
FE
MA
LE1
1000 MA
/LEPER 2
MO
NT
H
6000 MA
/LEPER 3
MO FE
NT
MA
H
LE1
5000 MA
/LEPER 2
MO
NT
H
2000 MA
/LEPER 3
MO FE
NT
MA
H
LE2
200/ MA
LEPER 2
MO FE

YS

30
0/-

230
DA
YS

N
O

NO

12
5/-

10D N
AYS O

NO

25
0/-

250
DA
YS

N
O

NO

30
0/-

260
DA
YS

N
O

NO

12
5/-

10
DA
YS

N
O

NO

15
0/-

150
DA
YS

N
O

NO

NT
H
C.SIRINI
VAS
RAO

YELA
MAN
CHILI

3
7

M
AL
E

O
C

PRI
5
MAR
Y

HIN
DH
U

R.RAMU CHIN
CHIN
ADU

4
0

M
AL
E

O
C

ILLE
TER
ATE

HIN
DH
U

MA
LE1
8000 MA
/LEPER 1
MO FE
NT
MA
H
LE1
7000 MA
/LEPER 2
MO
NT
H

60
0/-

365/
DA
YS

N
O

NO

60
0/-

250
DA
YS

N
O

NO

CONCLUSION
Agriculture is the back bone of India economy .so,the rural poverty leads to
the deacline in economy of nation.enactment of new laws regarding the health of the people,
giving subsidy to the farmer,providing free electricity,giving good selling prices,abolishment of
tax while transporting the agricultural goods,protecting the agricultural lands leads to increase in
economy of nation.devolping and creating the awerance regarding MGNREG Act,minimum
daily wages Act,RLEGP Abolishment of bonded labour gives the remarkable result.
It also underlines the main cause of a deceleration in agriculture in the postreform period and makes policy suggestions for the regeneration of Indian agriculture. The
differential growth of various sectors in India in the post independence period has resulted in
major changes in the composition of gross domestic product (GDP) of India. The level of land
productivity in any country is determined by a combination of demographic, geographic,
structural and institutional and policy factors. The number of workers engaged in agriculture is,
in turn, determined by the level of demand for food and other agricultural products, the
demographic pressure on land, the extent of diversification of the economy and capital intensity
13

of agricultural production process. A rapid growth in agriculture that leads to increased

productivity and income of a large number cultivators and agricultural labourers therefore
becomes an important vehicle for accelerating growth in the secondary and tertiary sectors of the
economy through forward, backward and consumption linkages. In India for nearly four decades
from 1950-51 to 1990-91, agricultural policy has constituted a part and parcel of overall planning
of the economy. With the initiation of economic reforms in 1991, both the overall macroeconomic policy framework as well as agricultural policy has undergone a significant change.
These changes have had a significant impact on the growth of agriculture in the post-reform
period.

http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/20083156469.html

14

15