Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Compare/Contrast: Dillard and Rodriguez
Compare/Contrast: Dillard and Rodriguez
John Sanchez
Lori Brown
English IV 5th Period
17 September 2009
Compare/Contrast: Dillard and Rodriguez
Dillard’s “An American Childhood” and Rodriquez’s “Always Running” both on the
outside seem to be autobiographies about an experience when both writers were being chased.
Both writers include cultural influences on the setting to make it more clear what life was really
like for them in their autobiographies. They also both dramatize the chase to make the story more
exciting. Yet, the two writers differ in what cultural setting their autobiographies are in and what
While these two autobiographies are rooted in culture, they both differ in what exact
cultures the autobiographies nestle in. Rodriguez writes about life in a prominently poor Mexican
neighborhood. He describes many of its various aspects such as the “people … on the metal
chairs … and beer” (paragraph 1), the “stucco and wood-frame homes” (paragraph 2), and the
“neighborhood consisting mostly of Mexicans” (Paragraph 2). This poverty enriched land is such
a clash when viewed against the presumably middle class white community that Dillard
describes. Her description of the suburbs in Pittsburgh seem less poverty stricken such as with
them leaving from houses (paragraph 4) and the clothes that the man that chases them wears
(paragraph 10). She attaches no greatness or inadequacy about the homes which makes them just
regular homes. She also addresses the man’s clothes that’s chases them as city clothes consisting
These two writers, though, don’t differentiate so much about the writing techniques that
they employ on the chasing scenes. Dillard uses short choppy sentences as well as Rodriguez
when they both want to push the action forward. Such as like when Dillard in paragraph 11 with
Sanchez 2
“Wordless, we split up. We were on our turf, we could lose ourselves…” The shorter breaks in-
between punctuation creates a faster paced tempo and quick beat to the chase. Rodriguez does
the same thing like in paragraph 26, “It never stopped, this running. We were constant prey, and
the hunters soon became big blurs…” He too includes those lost of breaks and puts shorter words
to make the story flow more quickly. The two writers also employ another technique with the
techniques. Dillard does this in paragraph 13 with her describing how the man “knew what I
thought only children who trained at football knew: that you have to fling yourself at what
you’re doing…” This longer sentence helps emphasize the theme that Dillard is pushing about
perseverance and passion. Rodriguez also emphasizes a certain topic, but instead, he does so by
making the sentences even quicker and he blurs the words together by making them all repeat
with almost the same style of speaking. He does this in paragraph 26 when he describes how the
police chasing them become “big blurs: the police, the gang, the junkies, the dudes on Garvey
Boulevard who took our money, all smudged into one.” This helps Rodriguez help emphasize his
While both writers may seem both the same, and seem to talk about the same scenario of
kids being chased, Dillard puts hers in a more joyful community, while Rodriquez chooses the
culture of the repressed Mexicans in poverty stricken neighborhoods to put his in. Yet, they seem
more in tune on writing techniques to dramatize the chase, even though Dillard differentiates by
making her theme more visible by lengthening her sentences, while Rodriguez blurs his sentence
to emphasize the theme. Overall, Dillard and Rodriguez are two different writers talking about