Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Factors Determining The Community Development Program in East Tanete Riattang, Bone, Indonesia.
Factors Determining The Community Development Program in East Tanete Riattang, Bone, Indonesia.
Factors Determining The Community Development Program in East Tanete Riattang, Bone, Indonesia.
2)3)4)
darmanmanda.ppsunm@yahoo.co.id 4)anwar288347@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to analyze the determinant factor-factor in the implementation
of community empowerment policy in Bone regency, Indonesia. Policy National
Program for Community Empowerment, (PNPM) rural area experienced various
obstacles in its implementation which is characterized by the involvement of the
community is not optimal in its implementation pf development in rural area as well as
the objectives of the program have not been realized as public expectations. Therefore,
this study examined interesting to analyze the factors determining the PNPM Rural
policy implementation in Bone County.
The results showed that community involvement in the implementation of the
program is still low because the public has not been actively involved in every process
of planning, decision-making, and implementation of the program. The factors
supporting the program are: (1) active community involvement in the process of
identifying and fixing problems; (2) the effectiveness of the achievement of: (a) the
benefits of the activity; (B) the benefits of participation RTM; and (c) the benefits of
evaluation. The factors inhibiting the program are: (1) non-involvement in the
community: (a) the planning and establishment of training; (B) the planning and
establishment of socialization; (C) planning needs; and (d) the evaluation plan; (2) lack
of community involvement in: (a) the planning, establishment, and implementation of
activities; (B) implementation of the training; (C) address the problem; (D) the
implementation of socialization; (E) planning, determination, and participation RTM; (F)
the establishment and provision of programs; (G) the establishment and implementation
of the evaluation; (3) lack of effective achievement of: (a) the results of the
implementation of activities; (B) the results and benefits of the implementation of the
training; (C) the results and benefits of overcoming the problem; (D) the results and
benefits of socialization; (E) the results of participation RTM; (F) the results and benefits
of the provision of needs; and (g) the results of the evaluation.
Keywords: Community involvement and Empowerment Program Effectiveness.
Introduction
The purpose of the PNPM Mandiri project in rural area is the increase in
income and employment opportunities of society which, has not met the expectations of
public and there are still serious problems in its implementation in rural area. This facts
shows the trend has not been successful in community development. This is supported
by data on poverty by BPS through Social Services Data Collection Program (PPLSBPS) shows data on poverty in the Eastern District of Tanete Riattang in 2008, there
were 1,502 poor households (RTM) and in 2011 as many as 3,013 or 1,511 increased by
RTM. Based on these data, it is known that in the Eastern District of Tanete Riattang the
addition of RTM as much as 100.59%.
Referring to the data-BPS PPLS such, it can be said that the empowerment of
communities through PNPM Rural implemented in order to accelerate poverty reduction
in Sub Tanete East Riattang with a budget allocation of Rp.8.250.000.000, - since the
2009 s, d 2011, has not been achieved in accordance with the objectives of the program.
Based on these data it would require an analysis of the process of implementation of the
PNPM Mandiri, to menganaisis what factors that determine the success of PNPM Rural
in District Tanete East Riattang.
Research Methods
This study is a qualitative study using qualitative descriptive analysis approach.
Researchers would like to present a true picture (naturalistic) in the field by comparing
an event, activity, and standard products and programs PNPM Mandiri.
The research instrument used CIPPO evaluation model that becomes a tool for
policy analysis PNPM Rural represented by a seven-dimensional model of
empowerment empowerment (7E), as illustrated below:
Hubungan Model CIPPO dan Model Seven Empowerment (7E)
leaders,
Project
Management
Team
(TPK),
Kader
Community
Based on the above table, the factors supporting PNPM Rural in District Tanete
East Riattang are as follows:
a. Indicators (C-E3) or the identification of the problem, namely the evaluation of the
relationship between variables contex with variable Eliminate empowerment, that
the people involved in the identification of problems that hinder the empowerment of
communities;
b. Indicators (I-E3) or the setting of the problem, namely the relationship between
variables inpit evaluation with variable Eliminate empowerment, that the community
has been involved in establishing the problems that hinder the empowerment of
communities;
Based on the table above, the limiting factors in the district PNPM Rural East Riattang
Tanete is as follows:
a. Indicator C-E1 or planning activities, namely the relationship between variables
contex with variable empowerment evaluation envision that public participation in
the planning of activities is still lacking, low, or limited;
3. What is the procedure to make changes: Missed through research findings to the
achievement of each variable empowerment.
Research Findings and refer to recommendation Waston cited by Adi (2003), it is
recommended strategies for achieving program objectives PNPM Rural in District
Riattang Tanete East, as follows.
1. Maintain the empowerment indicators supporting factors, namely empowerment
indicators that have given space to the widest mainly poor communities to get
involved in the program, as well as indicators that have had effectiveness in
achieving program objectives;
2. Optimization of the empowerment indicators are still lacking, low, or limited, the
indicators related to community involvement in planning, decision-making, and
implementation of the program, as well as indicators related to the effectiveness of
the results and benefits of the program to improve the welfare and employment
opportunities for the community poor people groups independently;
3. Community involvement poor people groups active in the entire process of
empowerment, especially for indicators of empowerment that is apparently not or do
not involve the community, which is in the process of planning and decision-making.
This means that the people are agents of change, so that the dominance of the
executive or actors increasingly minimized programs and more focused on
mentoring activities;
4. Dissemination to create understanding and a common perception of the program and
objectives of the program should be carried out continuously on the entire process of
empowerment by encouraging and promoting leboh society as a more active role and
widest in the dissemination of information; and
5. Identify and resolve problems in konfrehensif in order to sustainability,
development, and improvement of community development programs in the future.
Conclusion
Therefore it can be concluded that the first: supporting factor is the empowerment process
in accordance with the objectives and basic principles of PNPM Rural, thus the PNPM Rural
contributing factor in the Eastern District of Tanete Riattang namely the identification of
problems that hinder the program, decision-making in define problems hindering the program,
the benefits of activity, RTM participation benefits, and benefits of the evaluation; The second:
the inhibiting factors empowerment is a process that is still lacking or not in accordance with the
objectives and basic principles of PNPM Mandiri, so the limiting factor demikianmaka PNPM
Rural in District Tanete East Riattang is planning activities, determination of activities,
implementation activities, training plan, training establishment, training, troubleshooting,
socialization planning, determination of socialization, socialization, participation planning RTM,
RTM-setting participation, participation RTM, the planning needs of the program, the
determination of the needs of the program, providing the needs of the program, the
establishment of evaluation, planning, evaluation, and implementation of the evaluation
REFERENCE
1. Adi, Isbandi Rukminto, 2003. Pemberdayaan, Pengembangan Masyarakat dan
Intervensi Komunitas. Jakarta. Lembaga Penerbit FE UI.
2. Burhan, Bungin. 2007. Penelitian Kualitatif : Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan
Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Linnya, Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group
3. Dunn, William, 1999. Analisis kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta, Gajah Mada Universty
Press.
4. Dye, Thomas R. Understanding Public Policy, Tenth Edition. Prentice-Hall, New
Jersey.2002
5. Indiahono, Dwiyanto, 2009. Kebijakan Publik Berbasis Dinamic Policy Analisys,
Yogyakarta: Gava Media
6. Jeddawi, Murtir, 2008. Implementasi kebijakan Ekonomi Daerah (Analisis
Kewenangan,
Kelembagaan, Manajemen Kepegawaian, dan Peraturan
Daerah), Yogyakarta: Kreasi Total Media
7. Ndraha, Taliziduhu. 1990. Pembangunan Masyarakat, Mempersiapkan Masyarakat
Tinggal Landas, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
8. Nugroho, Riant, 2009. Public Policy. Jakarta. Elex Media Komputindu, Kelompok
Gramedia.
9. Sugiono, 2011. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods), Bandung: Alfabeta
10. Rist, Ray C., 1995. Policy Evalution. Cambridge. Great Britain: University Press,
Cambridge
11. Sadish, William R. et.al, 1991. Foundations of Program Evaluations Theory of
Practice. London. Sage Publication.
12. Stewart, Aileen Mitchell, 1994. Empowering People (Pemberdayaan Sumberdaya
Manusia). Yogyakarta. Kanisius
13. Tayibnapis, Farida Yusuf, 2008. Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi.Jaklarta:
Penerbit Rineka Cipta