The document summarizes a Supreme Court ruling that found a Memorandum of Agreement on Ancestral Domain (MOA-AD) between the Philippine government peace panel and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) to be unconstitutional. The MOA-AD sought to create an autonomous Bangsamoro Juridical Entity with powers that included self-governance, entering trade relations with foreign states, and exploiting natural resources. However, the Supreme Court ruled that this exceeded the powers granted to local governments under the Constitution and threatened national sovereignty and territorial integrity. Specifically, the agreement violated Constitutional articles regarding the structure of local governments and procedures for creating autonomous regions.
The document summarizes a Supreme Court ruling that found a Memorandum of Agreement on Ancestral Domain (MOA-AD) between the Philippine government peace panel and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) to be unconstitutional. The MOA-AD sought to create an autonomous Bangsamoro Juridical Entity with powers that included self-governance, entering trade relations with foreign states, and exploiting natural resources. However, the Supreme Court ruled that this exceeded the powers granted to local governments under the Constitution and threatened national sovereignty and territorial integrity. Specifically, the agreement violated Constitutional articles regarding the structure of local governments and procedures for creating autonomous regions.
The document summarizes a Supreme Court ruling that found a Memorandum of Agreement on Ancestral Domain (MOA-AD) between the Philippine government peace panel and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) to be unconstitutional. The MOA-AD sought to create an autonomous Bangsamoro Juridical Entity with powers that included self-governance, entering trade relations with foreign states, and exploiting natural resources. However, the Supreme Court ruled that this exceeded the powers granted to local governments under the Constitution and threatened national sovereignty and territorial integrity. Specifically, the agreement violated Constitutional articles regarding the structure of local governments and procedures for creating autonomous regions.
PEACE PANEL Bangsamoro RP Negotiating Panel entered
into a MOA-AD (Ancestral Domain) w/ MILF for creation of Bangsamoro Juridical Entity (BJE): - recognizing the Bangsamoro peoples right to self-governance - empowers it to enter into trade relations w/ foreign states - ensuring its participation in international meetings (ASEAN, UN, etc) on border agreements and other related matters - granting it rights to internal waters and territorial waters and sharing of minerals/economic resources w/ national government over the latter (3:1 in favor of BJE) - joint jurisdiction over territorial waters, but exclusive jurisdiction over internal waters, w/ full right to exploit resources therein - guaranteeing that it will secure its territory against foreign invasion - stating that Bangsamoro ancestral domain not part of the public domain (treated as Bangsamoro homeland) - practically treats BJE as an associated state in international law (a transitional device leading to full independence as exemplified by Micronesia & Mashall Islands w/ respect to US) SC Ruling: UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
Concept of associated state not recognized by the Constitution, implies powers
that go beyond anything that may be validly granted to LGUs under the Consti. Violated Art. X, Sec. 1 (no such creature under Consti. as BJE) only province, city, municipality, barangay, & autonomous regions recognized Violated Art. X, Sec. 15 creation of autonomous regions [assuming it even was one] must be consistent w/ national sovereignty & territorial integrity (both violated by BJE) BJE was practically a sovereign state w/in context of Montevideo Convention (elements: people, territory, government, sovereignty all satisfied) Various municipalities automatically included in it w/o plebiscite (just bec. they agreed to be part of ARMM, doesn't mean that they agree to be part of BJE, must have new plebiscite) Cannot possibly be covered by Art. X, Sec. 20 (9) such other matters as may be authorized by law... imbues BJE w/ diplomatic & treaty-making powers w/c are solely vested in the President, cannot simply be granted to BJE by law Violates Art. II, Sec. 22 promotes rights of indigenous cultural communities, but must not be inconsistent w/ national unity (in this case, defeats national unity, causes division) Violates Organic Act of ARMM recognizes all Moros & Indigenous peoples of Mindanao to be accepted as Bangsamoros indiscriminately, against the classifications found in Organic Act of ARMM Violates Indigenous Peoples Rights Act violates clear procedures necessary to constitute ancestral domains, instead arbitrarily delineates them Violates international law indigenous people only have right to internal selfdetermination, does not obligate states to grant them near-independent status of an associated state True that president has power to conduct peace negotiations (unstated residual powers) she may consider implementation of policies requiring statutory/constitutional amendment, but cannot unilaterally implement them w/o assent of Congress, she may only recommend them. But in this case, she is binding the RP under international law to implement them (in fact w/ a deadline). This is unconstitutional!