Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pace Et Al-2006-Journal of Cellular Physiology
Pace Et Al-2006-Journal of Cellular Physiology
REVIEW ARTICLES
Neurobiology of Pain
M.C. PACE, L. MAZZARIELLO, M.B. PASSAVANTI, P. SANSONE, M. BARBARISI, AND C. AURILIO*
Department of Anaesthesiological, Surgical and Emergency Sciences,
Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
The neurobiology of pain had a notable interest in research focused on the study of neuronal plasticity development, nociceptors,
molecular identity, signaling mechanism, ionic channels involved in the generation, modulation and propagation of action
potential in all type of excitable cells. All the findings open the possibility for developing new therapeutic treatment. Nociceptive/
inflammatory pain and neuropathic pain represent two different kinds of persistent chronic pain. We have reviewed the different
mechanism suggested for the maintenance of pain, like descending nociceptive mechanism and their changes after tissue damage,
including suppression and facilitation of defence behavior during pain. The role of these changes in inducing NMDA and AMPA
receptors gene expression, after prolonged inflammation is emphasized by several authors. Furthermore, a relation between a
persistent pain and amygdale has been shown. Molecular biology is the new frontier in the study of neurobiology of pain. Since the
entire genome has been studied, we will able to find new genes involved in specific condition such as pain, because an altered gene
expression can regulate neuronal activity after inflammation or tissue damage. J. Cell. Physiol. 209: 812, 2006.
2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
*Correspondence to: C. Aurilio, Department of Anaesthesiological, Surgical and Emergency Sciences, Second University of
Naples, Via Petrarca, 151-80151 Naples, Italy.
E-mail: caterina.aurilio@unina2.it
Received 8 March 2006; Accepted 14 April 2006
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.20693
NEUROBIOLOGY
Fig. 1. A: Skin lesion, noxious stimuli and the beginning of pain transmission. B: Skin lesion and nerve
damage. C: NGF and NGF receptor. D: Spontaneus abnormal activity and neuronal firing.
10
PACE ET AL.
NEUROBIOLOGY
11
Fig. 3. A: Sagittal Section showing the guide cannula rout leaved into cerebellum and reaching the Vc.
B: Sagittal section shoeing the guide cannula rout reaching the trigeinal caudalis nucleus. C: SOD
activity in right cortex. D: SOD activity in left cortex. E. Up: coronal section stained with the
SOD histochemical assay. Squares show the areas sampled to compare ROD in the Vc. Down: measured
ROD from both sides of the Vc.
12
PACE ET AL.
We have reviewed the different mechanisms suggested for the maintenance of pain. Dubner (2004)
studied descending nociceptive mechanisms and their
changes after tissue damage, including suppression and
facilitation of defense behavior during pain. Many
researchers emphasize the role of these changes in
inducing NMDA and AMPA receptors gene expression,
after prolonged inflammation.
Neugebauer et al. (2004) demonstrated a relation
between a persistent pain and amygdale. The amygdale
is the center of negative affective status such as
anxiety, depression, fear. Capsular lateral division of
amygdale central nucleus has recently been defined as
nociceptive-amygdale, since it has been demonstrated,
through neuroimaging techniques, neuroplastic biochemical pharmacological, and electrophysiological
changes during persistent pain.
Molecular biology is important to clarify how altered
gene expression can regulate neuronal activity after
inflammation or tissue damage. Since the entire genome
has been studied, we will be able to find new genes
involved in specific condition such as pain, hoping that
in the next future it will be possible control pain through
gene transfer.
LITERATURE CITED
Berrino L, Oliva P, Massimo F, Aurilio C, Maione S, Grella A, Rossi F. 2003.
Antinociceptive effect in mice of intraperitoneal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor
antagonists in the formalin test. Eur J Pain 7(2):131137.
Bonnington JK, McNaughton PA. 2003. Signalling pathways involved in the
sensitisation of mouse nociceptive neurones by nerve growth factor. J Physiol
(Lond) 551:433446.
Boucher TJ, Okuse K, Bennett DL, Munson JB, Wood JN, McMahon SB. 2000.
Potent analgesic effects of GDNF in neuropatic pain states. Science 290:24
127.
Cui JG, Holmin S, Mathiesen T, Meyerson BA, Linderoth B. 2000. Possible role of
inflammatory mediators in tactile hypersensitivity in rat models of mononeuropathy. Pain 88:239248.
Curran T, Franza BR, Jr. 1988. Fos and Jun: The AP-1 connection. Cell
55(3):395397.
De Jongh RF, Vissers KC, Meert TF, Booij LH, De Deyne CS, Heylen RJ. 2003.
The role of interleukin-6 in nociception and pain. Anesth Analg 96:10961103.
Draisci G, Iadarola MJ. 1989. Temporal analysis of increases in c-fos,
preprodynorphin and preproenkephalin mRNAs in rat spinal cord. Brain Res
Mol Brain Res 6(1):3137.
Dubner R. 2004. The neurobiology of persistent pain and its clinical implications.
Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 57:37.
Fokuoka T, Kondo E, Dai Y, Noguchi K. 2000. The role of neighboring intact DRG
neurons in a rat neuropathic pain model. In: Proceedings of the 9th World
Congress on Pain, Progress in Pain Research and Management, Vol. 16.
Seattle: IASP Press. pp 137146.