This summary covers chapters 6-9 from a law textbook on contracts and obligations. Chapter 6 discusses rescissible contracts, which are valid but allow rescission under certain conditions, such as economic damage. Chapter 7 covers voidable contracts that have valid essential elements but defective consent that allows annulment. Chapter 8 describes unenforceable contracts that are valid but unenforceable in court without ratification. Chapter 9 defines void or inexistent contracts that produce no legal effect due to defects in essential elements or compliance with formalities.
This summary covers chapters 6-9 from a law textbook on contracts and obligations. Chapter 6 discusses rescissible contracts, which are valid but allow rescission under certain conditions, such as economic damage. Chapter 7 covers voidable contracts that have valid essential elements but defective consent that allows annulment. Chapter 8 describes unenforceable contracts that are valid but unenforceable in court without ratification. Chapter 9 defines void or inexistent contracts that produce no legal effect due to defects in essential elements or compliance with formalities.
This summary covers chapters 6-9 from a law textbook on contracts and obligations. Chapter 6 discusses rescissible contracts, which are valid but allow rescission under certain conditions, such as economic damage. Chapter 7 covers voidable contracts that have valid essential elements but defective consent that allows annulment. Chapter 8 describes unenforceable contracts that are valid but unenforceable in court without ratification. Chapter 9 defines void or inexistent contracts that produce no legal effect due to defects in essential elements or compliance with formalities.
CHAPTER 6: RESCISSIBLE CONTRACTS Rescissible contracts are those validly agreed upon because all the essential elements exist and, therefore, legally effective but in the cases established by law, the remedy of rescission is granted in the interest of equity. Binding force of rescissible contract. They are valid although subjects to rescission by the court when there is economic damage to one of the parties or to the third person. Rescission is a remedy granted by the law to the contracting parties and sometimes even to third persons in order to secure reparation of damages. Requisites of rescission. (1) The contract must be validly agreed upon. (2) There must be lesion or pecuniary prejudice to one or to a 3rd person. (3) The rescission must be based upon a case especially provided by a law. (4) There must be no other legal remedy to obtain reparation for the damage. (5) The party asking for rescission must be able to return what he is obliged to restore by reason of the contract. (6) The object of the contract must not legally in the possession of third persons who did not act in bad faith and; (7) The period for filing the action for rescission must not have prescribed. Cases of Rescissible Contracts.(1); Contracts entered into in behalf of wards (2); Contracts agreed upon in the representation of absentees (3); Contracts undertaken in fraud of creditors. (4); Contracts which refer to things under litigation. Payments made in the state of insolvency. Payments must have been made for the obligation to whose fulfillment the debtor could not be compelled at the time they were effected. Nature of action for rescission. Rescission is not a principal remedy. It is only subsidiary. Extent of rescission. The entire contract need bot to be set aside by rescission if the damage can be repaired by partial rescission. Rescission creates obligation of mutual restitution. The object of the contract with its fruits and, the price thereof with legal interest. When rescission not allowed. The remedy of rescission cannot be availed of if the party who demands rescission cannot return what he is obliged to restore under the contract. Contracts approved by the courts. If a contract entered into in behalf or a ward or absentee has been approved by the court. When alienation in fraud of creditors. Alienation by gratuitous title and alienation by onerous title. This provision establishes prima facie presumptions of fraud. Period for filing action for rescission. For person under guardianship the period shall begin from the termination of incapacity. For absentees, from the time domicile is known Persons entitled to bring action. (1) the injured party or the defrauded creditor; (2) his heirs assigns, or successors in interest; or (3) the creditors of the above entitled to subrogation.
CHAPTER 7: VOIDABLE CONTRACTS
Voidable or annullable contracts are those which possess all the essential of a valid contracts but one of the parties is incapable of giving consent or consent is vitiated by mistake, violence, intimidation, undue influence or fraud. Binding force of voidable contracts. They are valid and binding between the parties unless annulment by a proper action in court. Kinds of voidable contracts. (1) Legal incapacity to give consent, where one of the parties is incapable of giving consent to the contract; or (2) Violation of consent, where the vitiation is done by mistake, violence, intimidation, undue influence, or fraud. Annulment is a remedy provided by law, for reason of public interest, for the declaration of inefficacy of a contract based on a defect or vice in the consent of one of the contracting parties in order to restore them to their original position in which they were before the contract was executed. Period for filing action for annulment. (1) In case of intimidation, violence or undue influence, from the time intimidation etc., ceases. (2) In case of mistake or fraud, from the time it is discovered. (3) In case of contracts entered into by minors or incapacitated persons from the time the guardianship ceases. Meaning and effect of ratification. Ratifications means that one voluntarily adopts some defective contracts which, without his subsequent consent. Ratification cleanses the contract from all its defects from the moment it was constituted. Kinds of ratification. Express and implied or tacit. Requisites of ratification. (1) There must be knowledge of the reason which renders the contract voidable: (2) such reason must have ceased Conformity of guilty party to ratification not required. Ratification is unilateral act by which party waives the defect in his consent. Effect of ratification retroactive. Ratification cleanses the contract of all its defect from the moment it was executed. Partly entitled to bring an action to annul. (1) The plantiff must have an interest in the contract; and (2) The victim and not the party responsible for the defect is the person who must assert the same. Right of strangers to bring action. One who is not a party to the contract or an assignee thereunder, or does not represent those who took part therein, has, no legal capacity to challenge the validity of such contract. Guilty party without right to bring action. The guilty party, including his successor in interest cannot ask for annulment. This rule is sustained by the principle that he who comes to court must come with clean hands. Duty of mutual restitution upon annulment. (1) if the contract is annulled, the parties, as general rule, must restore to each other the subject matter of the contract with its fruits. Restitution by an incapacitated person. The incapacitated person is obliged to make restitution only to the extent that he was benefited by the thing received by him. Effect of loss of thing to be returned. If the thing to be returned is lost without the fault of the person obliged to make restitution there is no more obligations to return such thing.
Extinguishment of action for annulment. If the person who has a right
to institute an action for annulment, will not be able to restore the thing which he may be obliged to return in the case the contract is annulled. Effect where a party cannot restore what he is bound to return. When a contract is annulled, a reciprocal obligation of restitution is created. CHAPTER 8: UNENFORCEABLE CONTRACTS Unenforceable contracts are those that cannot be enforced in court or sued upon by reason of certain defects provided by law until and unless they are ratified according to law. Binding force of unenforceable contracts. While rescissible and voidable contracts are valid and enforceable unless they are rescinded, unenforceable contracts, although valid, are unenforceable in court unless they are cured. Kinds of unenforceable contracts. (1) Those entered into in the name of another by one without, or acting in excess of authority; (2) Those that do not comply with the statute of frauds; (3) Those where both parties are incapable of giving. Meaning of unauthorized contracts. Are those entered into the name of another person by one who has been given no authority or legal representation beyond his power. Statute of Frauds. History, Purpose and Application. Agreement within the scope of the Statute of Frauds. (1) Agreements not to be performed within one year; (2) Promise to answer for the debt, default or miscarriage of another; (3) Agreement in consideration of marriage other than mutual promise to marry; (4) Agreement for sale of goods etc. at the price not less than 500.00; (5) Agreement for leasing for a longer period than one year; (6) agreement for the sale of real property or an interest therein; (7) Representation as to the credit of a third person. Modes of ratification under the Statute. (1) by failure to object to the presentation of oral evidence to prove the contract; (2) by acceptance of benefits under the contract. Right of a party where contract enforceable. (1) Accordingly, a party to an oral sale or real property cannot compel the other to put the contract in public document for purposes of registration; (2) Similarly, the right of one party to have the other execute a public document is not available in a donation of realty when it is in private instrument because the donation is void. When unenforceable contract becomes a valid contract. If the ratification is made by the parents or guardians, as the case may be, of both contracting parties, or by the both contracting parties after attaining or regaining capacity the contract is validated and its validity retroacts to the time it was entered into. Right of the third person to assail an unenforceable contract. Strangers to a voidable contract cannot bring an action to annual the same neither can they assail or question a contract because of its unenforceability. CHAPTER 9: VOID OR INEXISTENT CONTRACTS
Void contracts are those which, because or certain defects, generally
produce no effect at all. Inexistent contracts refer to agreements which lack one or some or all of the elements or do not comply with formalities which are essentials for the existence of a contract. Characteristics of a void or inexistent contract. (1) Generally, it produces no force and effect whatsoever; (2) It cannot be ratified; (3) The right to set up the defense of illegality cannot be waived; (4) The action or defense for the declaration of its inexistence does not prescribe; (5) The defense of illegality is not available to third persons whose interests are not directly affected; and (6) It cannot give rise to a valid contract. Instances of void or inexistent contracts. (1) Contracts whose cause, object or purpose is contrary to law; (2) Contracts which are absolutely simulated or fictitious; (3) Contracts without cause or object; (4) Contracts whose object is outside the commerce of men; (5) Contracts which contemplate an impossible service; (6) Contracts where the intention of the parties relative to the object cannot be ascertained; (7) Contracts expressly prohibited or declared void by the law. Action or defense is imprescriptible. If a contract is void, a party thereto can always bring a court action to declare it void or inexistent; and a party against whom a void a contract is sought to be enforced, can always raise the defense of nullity, despite the passage of time. Rules where the contract is illegal and the act constitutes a criminal offense. (1) where both parties are in pari delicto; (2) where only one party is guilty. Recovery usurious interest. Any rate of interest of interest in excess of the maximum allowed under the Usury Law is usurious and if paid, may be recovered together with interest thereon from the date of payment in a proper action for the same. Recovery where contract entered into for illegal purpose. (1) the contract is for illegal purpose; (2) the contract is repudiated before the purpose has been accomplished or before any damage has been caused to a third person; (3) the court considers that public interest will be subserved by allowing recovery. Recovery by an incapacitated person. Recovery can be allowed if one of the parties is incapacitated and the interest of justice so demands. Recovery where contract not illegal per se. (1) The agreement is not illegal per se but merely prohibited; (2) The prohibition is designed for the protection of the plaintiff; and (3) public policy would be enhance by allowing the plantiff to recover what he has paid or delivered Prohibited sale of land. (1) A land sold in violation of the constitutional prohibition against the transfer of lands to aliens may be recovered; (2) the principle of in pari delicto is not applicable to a homestead which has been illegally sold within period of five years in violation of the homestead law. Recovery of amount paid in excess of ceiling price. A statute fixing the maximum price of any article or commodity is usually known as the ceiling law. Recovery of additional compensation for service rendered beyond time limit. Presidential Decree No. 442, otherwise known as the labor code sets forth that the normal hours of work of any employees shall not exceed eight hours a day.
Recovery of amount of wage less than minimum fixed. If an employee
receives less than the minimum wage rate, he can still recover the deficiency with legal interest, and the employer shall be criminally liable. Effects of illegality where contract indivisible/divisible. (1) When the consideration is entire or single, the contract indivisible; (2); Where the contract is divisible or severable, that is, the consideration is made up of several parts. Divisible contracts distinguished from divisible obligation. The test of the former is divisibility of its cause while the latter, its susceptibility of partial fulfillment Persons entitled to raise defense of illegality or nullity. In voidable and unenforceable contracts, third persons are not allowed to bring an action to annul or to assail, as the case may be, said contracts. Void contracts cannot be novated. An illegal contract is void and inexistent and cannot, therefore, give rise to a valid contract.
Waller v. City of New York, Temporary Restraining Order by J. Lucy Billings and Plaintiffs Pleading on Order to Show Cause Before J. Michael Stallman, Case No. 112957-2011 (N.Y. County Supr. Ct. Nov. 15, 2011)