Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ferroelectric-Field-Effect-Enhanced Electroresistance in Metal/ferroelectric/ Semiconductor Tunnel Junctions
Ferroelectric-Field-Effect-Enhanced Electroresistance in Metal/ferroelectric/ Semiconductor Tunnel Junctions
Ferroelectric-field-effect-enhanced
electroresistance in metal/ferroelectric/
semiconductor tunnel junctions
Zheng Wen1,2,3 , Chen Li1,2,3 , Di Wu1,2,3 *, Aidong Li1,2,3 and Naiben Ming1,2,3
Ferroelectric tunnel junctions (FTJs), composed of two metal
electrodes separated by an ultrathin ferroelectric barrier, have
attracted much attention as promising candidates for nonvolatile resistive memories. Theoretical14 and experimental59
works have revealed that the tunnelling resistance switching in
FTJs originates mainly from a ferroelectric modulation on the
barrier height. However, in these devices, modulation on the
barrier width is very limited, although the tunnelling transmittance depends on it exponentially as well10 . Here we propose a
novel tunnelling heterostructure by replacing one of the metal
electrodes in a normal FTJ with a heavily doped semiconductor.
In these metal/ferroelectric/semiconductor FTJs, not only the
height but also the width of the barrier can be electrically
modulated as a result of a ferroelectric field effect11,12 , leading
to a greatly enhanced tunnelling electroresistance. This idea
is implemented in Pt/BaTiO3 /Nb:SrTiO3 heterostructures, in
which an ON/OFF conductance ratio above 104 , about one to
two orders greater than those reported in normal FTJs, can be
achieved at room temperature6,9,1318 . The giant tunnelling electroresistance, reliable switching reproducibility and long data
retention observed in these metal/ferroelectric/semiconductor
FTJs suggest their great potential in non-destructive readout
non-volatile memories.
In quantum mechanics, the wavefunction of an electron can
leak through a barrier as long as the barrier is sufficiently low and
sufficiently thin. The electron therefore has a finite probability of
being found on the opposite side of the barrier10 . Conventionally, a
tunnel junction consists of two metal electrodes and a nanometrethick insulating barrier layer sandwiched inside. The transmittance
of a tunnel junction depends exponentially on the height and the
width of the barrier10 . Superconductor Josephson junctions19 and
magnetic tunnel junctions20 are well-known examples that have
attracted much attention. Recently, great technological advances
have been achieved in the growth of perovskite oxide thin films.
Ferroelectricity is found to exist even in thin films of several unit
cells (u.c.) in thickness, which makes it possible to realize FTJs by
employing ultrathin ferroelectrics as barriers21,22 .
The concept of FTJs can be dated back to the early 1970s,
when Esaki et al. reported a possible FTJ using bismuth niobate as the barrier23 . However, the control mechanism of FTJs
was formulated only very recently24 . Unlike conventional tunnel
junctions, the barrier height seen by electrons in a FTJ can be
switched between a high and a low value by polarization re-
1 National
Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China, 2 Department of Materials Science and Engineering,
College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China, 3 National Center of Microstructures and Quantum Manipulation,
Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China. Present address: Ningxia Key Laboratory of Photovoltaic Materials, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021,
China. *e-mail: diwu@nju.edu.cn
NATURE MATERIALS | VOL 12 | JULY 2013 | www.nature.com/naturematerials
617
LETTERS
a
F
M
F
M
EF
Ec
EF
Ec
Ev
Ev
Figure 1 | Resistive switching mechanism. ad, Schematic drawings of the metal/ferroelectric/semiconductor structures and corresponding potential
energy profiles for the low (a,c) and the high (b,d) resistance states. In a,b, M, F, and S represent the metal, the ferroelectric and the semiconductor,
respectively. A heavily doped n-type semiconductor is taken as an example. In the ferroelectric barriers, the red arrows denote the polarization directions
and the large plus and minus symbols represent positive and negative ferroelectric bound charges, respectively. The plus and dot symbols in the metal
and n-type semiconductor electrodes represent holes and electrons, respectively. The circled plus symbols represent ionized donors. A rectangular
barrier, denoted by dashed lines in c,d, is assumed when the ferroelectric is unpolarized. As a simplification, we further assume that ferroelectric bound
charges at the metal/ferroelectric interface can be perfectly screened. The barrier height at the metal/ferroelectric interface is, therefore, fixed and does
not change with the polarization reversal.
LETTERS
a
F
M
F
M
EF
Ec
EF
Ec
Ev
Ev
Figure 1 | Resistive switching mechanism. ad, Schematic drawings of the metal/ferroelectric/semiconductor structures and corresponding potential
energy profiles for the low (a,c) and the high (b,d) resistance states. In a,b, M, F, and S represent the metal, the ferroelectric and the semiconductor,
respectively. A heavily doped n-type semiconductor is taken as an example. In the ferroelectric barriers, the red arrows denote the polarization directions
and the large plus and minus symbols represent positive and negative ferroelectric bound charges, respectively. The plus and dot symbols in the metal
and n-type semiconductor electrodes represent holes and electrons, respectively. The circled plus symbols represent ionized donors. A rectangular
barrier, denoted by dashed lines in c,d, is assumed when the ferroelectric is unpolarized. As a simplification, we further assume that ferroelectric bound
charges at the metal/ferroelectric interface can be perfectly screened. The barrier height at the metal/ferroelectric interface is, therefore, fixed and does
not change with the polarization reversal.
LETTERS
b
200
1.00
Phase ()
nm
0
0.10
Amplitude (a.u.)
100
100
1 m
200
0.01
Voltage (V)
500 nm
180
()
a.u.
30
pA
Figure 2 | Morphology and ferroelectricity of ultrathin BTO and correlation between polarization reversal and resistance switching. a, Morphology of a
7 u.c. BTO surface on Nb:STO semiconductor substrates. b, Local PFM hysteresis loops: top, phase signal; bottom, amplitude signal. c,d, PFM out-of-plane
phase (c) and amplitude (d) images recorded after writing an area of 3 3 m2 with 5 V and then the central 1.5 1.5 m2 square with +5 V using a
biased conductive tip. e, Current mapping over the same area shown in c,d, demonstrating the polarization direction-dependent resistance in the
BTO/Nb:STO heterostructure.
619
LETTERS
b
Resistance ()
106
104
105
104
OFF
ON
103
103
102
101
100
2
1
0
1
Voltage (V)
ON
OFF
105
103
105
104
105
103
104
103
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Sample number
103
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Nb concentration (wt%)
107
106
101
ON/OFF ratio
10 years
OFF
As-written
After 24 h
101
OFF
105
Resistance ()
107
Current (A)
Resistance ()
109
Resistance ()
104
w
5
105
wr
OFF
ON
wr
ON/OFF ratio
107
Conductance ratio
ON
104
OFF
107
0.6 0.3
0
0.3 0.6
Voltage (V)
ON
101
103
105
Time (s)
104
103
107
109
ON
100
101
102
Cycles
103
Figure 3 | TER of Pt/BTO/Nb:STO FTJs at room temperature. a, Resistance hysteresis loops. The loop composed of dark squares (green circles) is
measured using the pulse train shown schematically in the bottom-left (top-right) inset. The device is preset to the ON (OFF) state by a positive (negative)
3.6 V pulse. The corresponding domain evolution is shown schematically in the bottom-right, top-left and middle-left insets for the ON, OFF and
intermediate (ON OFF) states, respectively. The testing pulse train is composed of write pulses (w) following a triangular profile between +3.6 and
3.6 V and read pulses (r) of +0.1 V following each write pulse. b, Conductance ratio as a function of write amplitude. The measurement starts from an
unpolarized state. At a certain write amplitude, a pair of write pulses with opposite polarity is applied, as illustrated in the inset. The data points are the
ratio between tunnelling currents collected by +0.1 V read (r) pulses after the positive and negative write (w) pulses. c, ON/OFF ratio read at +0.1 V as a
function of Nb doping concentration in Nb:STO. The data points are averaged over 20 devices for each Nb concentration. d, ON and OFF state resistances
(upper panel) and the corresponding ON/OFF ratios (bottom panel) of 20 different devices. e, Retention properties. The inset shows currentvoltage
curves collected before and after 24 h retention measurement. f, Bipolar resistance switching properties.
surface in response to the polarization reversal in the ferroelectric barrier. The enhanced TER, long retention and good
switching reproducibility make the proposed scheme a promising
candidate for non-volatile resistive memories. If a ferromagnetic
semiconductor and/or a multiferroic barrier are used, the idea
presented here can be readily extended to multiferroic tunnelling
devices, where four or more non-volatile states with high resistance contrast may be realized in a single memory node1318 .
Moreover, the continuously tunable OFF state resistance observed
here actually functions as a memristor and suggests potential
applications of metal/ferroelectric/semiconductor heterostructures
in memristive devices24,25 .
Methods
BTO thin films were epitaxially grown on (001) single-crystalline Nb:STO (0.7wt%
Nb) substrates by pulsed laser deposition using a KrF ( = 248 nm) excimer laser
(Coherent COMPexPro 205). The films were deposited with 2.5 J cm2 laser energy
density at 2 Hz repetition, keeping the substrate temperature at 750 C and the
O2 pressure at 5 103 mbar. The thickness of BTO was controlled at 7 u.c. by
counting the intensity oscillations of the specular spot in the reflective high-energy
electron diffraction pattern.
The crystal structure of the ultrathin BTO was characterized using
high-resolution X-ray diffraction at the BL14B1-XRD beam line of Shanghai
Synchrotron Radiation Facility. The surface morphology, local ferroelectric
properties and current mapping were measured using an Asylum Research
Cypher scanning probe microscope. Olympus AC240TM Pt/Ti-coated silicon
cantilevers were adopted in the PFM measurements. Hysteresis loops were
NATURE MATERIALS | VOL 12 | JULY 2013 | www.nature.com/naturematerials
References
1. Tsymbal, E. Y. & Kohlstedt, H. Tunneling across a ferroelectric. Science 313,
181183 (2006).
2. Kohlstedt, H., Pertsev, N. A., Contreras, J. R. & Waser, R. Theoretical
currentvoltage characteristics of ferroelectric tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. B
72, 125341 (2005).
3. Zhuravlev, M. Y., Sabirianov, R. F., Jaswal, S. S. & Tsymbal, E. Y. Giant
electroresistance in ferroelectric tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94,
246802 (2005).
4. Pantel, D. & Alexe, M. Electroresistance effects in ferroelectric tunnel barriers.
Phys. Rev. B 82, 134105 (2010).
5. Garcia, V. et al. Giant tunnel electroresistance for non-destructive readout of
ferroelectric states. Nature 460, 8184 (2009).
6. Chanthbouala, A. et al. Solid-state memories based on ferroelectric tunnel
junctions. Nature Nanotech. 7, 101104 (2012).
7. Gruverman, A. et al. Tunneling electroresistance effect in ferroelectric tunnel
junctions at the nanoscale. Nano Lett. 9, 35393543 (2009).
8. Crassous, A. et al. Giant tunnel electroresistance with PbTiO3 ferroelectric
tunnel barriers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 042901 (2010).
9. Pantel, D. et al. Tunnel electroresistance in junctions with ultrathin ferroelectric
Pb(Zr0.2 Ti0.8 )O3 barriers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 232902 (2012).
10. Griffiths, D. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005).
11. Mathews, S., Ramesh, R., Venkatesan, T. & Benedetto, J. Ferroelectric field
effect transistor based on epitaxial perovskite heterostructures. Science 276,
238240 (1997).
12. Miller, S. L. & McWhorter, P. J. Physics of the ferroelectric nonvolatile memory
field effect transistor. J. Appl. Phys. 72, 59996010 (1992).
13. Garcia, V. et al. Ferroelectric control of spin polarization. Science 327,
11061110 (2010).
14. Gajek, M. et al. Tunnel junctions with multiferroic barriers. Nature Mater. 6,
296302 (2007).
15. Pantel, D., Goetze, S., Hesse, D. & Alexe, M. Reversible electrical switching
of spin polarization in multiferroic tunnel junctions. Nature Mater. 11,
289293 (2012).
16. Hambe, M. et al. Crossing an interface: Ferroelectric control of tunnel
currents in magnetic complex oxide heterostructures. Adv. Fun. Mater. 20,
24362441 (2010).
LETTERS
17. Yin, Y. W. et al. Coexistence of tunneling magnetoresistance and
electroresistance at room temperature in La0.7 Sr0.3 MnO3 /(Ba,Sr)TiO3 /
La0.7 Sr0.3 MnO3 multiferroic tunnel junctions. J. Appl. Phys. 109,
07D915 (2011).
18. Yin, Y. W. et al. Enhanced tunneling electroresistance effect due to a
ferroelectrically induced phase transition at a magnetic complex oxide
interface. Nature Mater. 12, 397402 (2013).
19. Giaever, I. Energy gap in superconductors measured by electron tunneling.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 147148 (1960).
20. Tedrow, P. M. & Meservey, R. Spin-dependent tunneling into ferromagnetic
nickel. Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 192195 (1971).
21. Fong, D. D. et al. Ferroelectricity in ultrathin perovskite films. Science 304,
16501653 (2004).
22. Kim, Y. S. et al. Critical thickness of ultrathin ferroelectric BaTiO3 films.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 102907 (2005).
23. Esaki, L., Laibowitz, R. B. & Stiles, P. J. Polar switch. IBM Tech. Discl. Bull. 13,
21612162 (1971).
24. Chanthbouala, A. et al. A ferroelectric memristor. Nature Mater. 11,
860864 (2012).
25. Kim, D. J. et al. Ferroelectric tunnel memristor. Nano Lett. 12,
56975702 (2012).
26. Sze, S. M. & Ng, K. K. Physics of Semiconductor Devices 3rd edn, Ch. 4
(Wiley, 2007).
27. Takizawa, M. et al. Angle-resolved photoemission study of Nb-doped SrTiO3 .
Phys. Rev. B 79, 113103 (2009).
28. Choi, K. J. et al. Enhancement of ferroelectricity in strained BaTiO3 thin films.
Science 306, 10051009 (2004).
29. Lu, H. et al. Enhancement of ferroelectric polarization stability by interface
engineering. Adv. Mater. 24, 12091216 (2012).
Acknowledgements
This work was jointly sponsored by State Key Program for Basic Research of China
(2009CB929503), Natural Science Foundation of China (51222206 and 91022001), and
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK2012016). Shanghai Synchrotron
Radiation Facility is greatly acknowledged for providing the beam time and technical
assistance. The authors would like to thank J. Yao and D. Beck from Asylum Research for
valuable advice on PFM measurements.
Author contributions
D.W. conceived this work and conducted the calculations. D.W. and Z.W. designed
the experiment. Z.W. fabricated the devices and performed the measurements.
Z.W., C.L., D.W., A.L. and N.M. analysed the data. Z.W. and D.W. wrote the
manuscript. D.W. and N.M. directed the project. All authors discussed the data and
contributed to the manuscript.
Additional information
Supplementary information is available in the online version of the paper. Reprints and
permissions information is available online at www.nature.com/reprints. Correspondence
and requests for materials should be addressed to D.W.
621