Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Use of The Theory of Grinding Kinetics To Calculate Tower Mills Characteristics
Use of The Theory of Grinding Kinetics To Calculate Tower Mills Characteristics
Use of The Theory of Grinding Kinetics To Calculate Tower Mills Characteristics
T. Furuyama
Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
ABSTRACT
The present study deals with a new approach in calculating the size of Tower Mills. The method
is derived from the application of grinding kinetics theory on the analysis of by-gone operational
data. It requires only information on the capacity of the mill to be designed, the product fineness and
the Bonds work index to give an accurate and simple prediction of Tower Mill characteristics. An
example illustrates the different steps of calculation.
Keywords: Grinding kinetics;Tower mills; Characteristics
INTRODUCTION
grodifferential equation of batch grinding (Sedlatshek and Bass, 1953; Harris, 1968)
2 D ( x, t )
D( x, t )
=
S ( x, t )
t x
x
(1)
xm
D( , t )
B ( , x)
+
S ( , t )
d
x
x
is given by
=
R( x, t ) R( x, 0) exp(k x n t )
(2)
in which R ( x, t ) is the percentage of particles coarser than sieve size x after grinding for
time t [hours] a feed material having size distribution R ( x, 0 ) , x: diameter of particles [m],
k: rate constant [(m)nh]-1, and n: uniformity
constant.
Formula (2) stands for a narrowly sized feed
and requires that exponents n and m should
have the same value in the selection s(x) = k.xn
and breakage B ( , x ) = ( x / )
functions, and
=
R p ( x ) R f ( x ) exp k x
n
Wb
is fixed and in a Tower
W
Mill = 10 to 15.
So, substituting W from the above relation
into (6) and rearranging gives:
F
F
F
(7)
xc*n =
=
=
Wb k ' Wb
k W
k
the mill (W). =
(3)
in which, indexes p and f represent the products (ground material) and feed (material undergoing comminution) respectively; is the
retention time, which is expressed as
W
(4)
=
F
where W is the weight of ground materials
retained inside the mill: [tons] and F is the mill
capacity: [tons/h].
Thus, substituting (4) into (3) and rearranging gives:
n
W n
x
R p ( x=
) exp k x = exp
F
x
c
(5)
in which,
F
(6)
xc*n =
k W
In the case x has the same value as the characteristic parting size ( x c* ) of a closed circuit
( )
R p xc=
1/=
e 0.368) That
means,
(8)
about
351
Fig. 1
=
n 1.751 0.422 ln (Wi ) r = 0.855**
(9)
1.2
1.1
1.0
Uniformity
constant/n/n
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
Bonds work index [Wi]/(kWh/t)
352
Fig. 2
353
354
1500 horsepower or 1120 kW), to produce particles whose average diameter varied from 20
m to 2 m.
Through-put E/(t/h)
[ Dm ] =
Dm ]
[=
0.250 [ E ]
0.421
0.856 0.421
Dm ]
[=
or
(12)
0.608 [ F ]
A different expression of equation (12) can
be drawn from the previously established correlations (10) and (11) between F and E:
0.250 8.25 [ F ]
(11)
0.360
F E1.168 Dm 2.375
1.168
= Dm 2.774 F = k1 Dm 2.774
Through-put E/(t/h)
355
(12')
(13)
Relationship between k (modified rate constant) and D m (effective diameter of the mill)
Substituting correlations F Dm 2.774 and
=
or
Wb xc n Dm 2.340 xc n
xc n
D 0.434
k ' = k2 . m n
xc
(14)
356
=
n
N
xc 88.6 Dm 0.879
(16)
88.6 [ Dm ]
N]
[=
0.879
= k3
(15)
Dm1.313
xc n
A more accurate expression for the correlation (16) is obtained in plotting data from
TABLE 1 as illustrated in Fig. 8:
D 1.313
k'
45.5 m n
=
x
N
c
0.792
Dm
45.5
=
0.800
xc n
( )
(17)
Fig. 8 [(Modified rate constant) / (Screw r.p.m)] vs [(Mill dia.), (Particle size)]
( )
K/(1/(hm^n))
20
k ' Dm 1
N x n D exp D
c* b
b
0.994
20
Dm
k '
1
=
0.32
exp
N
0.800
n
D
Db
xc*
b
(18)
when the exponent of x in the recurrent formula
=
y 0.32 x 0.994 is taken for 1, approximately.
Fig. 9
K vs Ball diameter
Fig. 10 [(Modified rate constant) / (Screw r.p.m)] vs [(Mill dia.), (Particle size), (Ball dia.)]
3. The value of
xc *
c
x*
358
=
(18.1
)0.669
Consequently,
=
xc* n
6.94
88.6 [12.1]
[N ] =
0.879
Wb =
4.80 Dm 2.34 =
4.80 (1.21)
=
74.9rpm
Table 2 summarizes the results of the calculation and gives the characteristics of the most
suitable Tower Mill that could be used in this
case. However, the calculated W i and N values
indicates that the ore is of poor grindability and
the required mill would produce materials
coarser than those really obtained in practice.
Some adjustment in the rotation of the stirring
device and correction in the weight of grinding
media made in accordance with the diameter of
mill might settle this difference.
( )
20
exp =
0.115
20
6. Finally, the total weight of balls (grinding
media) W b can be estimated through equation (8):
2.34
= 7.5tons
Dm
1
k =' 0.32 N
0.800
n
D
xc*
b
Table 2
6.8
F
=
= 8.5tons
k ' xcn* 0.115 6.94
=
Wb
Calculated
Suitable
Capacity
Items
F
t/h
6.80
6.42
Xp
63
60
Passing percent
1-R p
90
90
Wi
kWh/t
13.0
12.05
Uniformity constant
0.669
0.720
Dm
1.21
1.042
Screw speed
rpm
74.9
86.0
Corrected K
1/(h^n)
0.115
0.1173
Wb
8.5
8.0
10
Material: limestone
modified rate constant k. Besides, the characteristic parting size of particles ( xcn* ) and the
quantity of materials to be ground (F) can be
used to determinate the effective diameter (D m )
of the mill, the total weight of grinding media
(W b ), the frequency of the screw-like stirring
device, and increase the accuracy in the estimate of the energy consumption, eventually.
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
Chujo, K.,1949. Kagakukogaku to Kagakukikai (Annual Report
359
Relationship between Bonds work index (W i ) and uniformity constant (n) of grinding kinetics on Tower Mill milling
limestone. (To be published)
Sedlatshek, K. and Bass, I., 1953. Powder Metall. Bull., 6: 148.
360