Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ejkm Volume5 Issue2 Article107
Ejkm Volume5 Issue2 Article107
1. Introduction
It was Plato and Aristotle who first studied the
nature of knowledge. Centuries later, in the
1950s, cognitive philosophers like Polanyi and
Wittgenstein, for whom knowledge was explicit,
capable of being coded and stored, and easy to
transfer carried on with scientific research in the
area of social and psychological sciences, and it
is not long ago that business emphasis was given
on the topic. In a series of recently published
management books (Quinn 1992, Drucker 1993,
Nonaka and Takeuchi 1995, Prusak 1997,
Davenport and Prusak 2000 among them) the
implications of knowledge-based work and
knowledge-based competitive advantages are
outlined and the role of knowledge sharing within
the organisation is highlighted. What is interesting
about these books is the fact that they all integrate
theory with practice, in the so-called knowledgebased view of the firm, and therefore surpass the
division between academic research and
management practice (Grant, 1997).
On the other hand, amongst academics, the
knowledge-based view of the firm has received
influences from various research lines. Based
upon Polanyis epistemology, the resourcebased theory (von Krogh and Roos, Wernerfelt) is
acknowledged as the most dominant among
them. Other research lines, like organisational
capabilities and competences (Prahaland and
Hamel),
innovation
and
new
product
development (Teece, Wheelwright and Clark) and
organisational learning (Argyris) have also
contributed significantly. As pioneers in the
emerging knowledge-based view of the firm, one
can easily distinguish the work of Robert Grant,
Ikujiro Nonaka, Karl-Erik Sveiby and Georg von
ISSN 1479-4411
2. A retrospective analysis
Three theories that gave birth to the Knowledgebased Theory of the Firm and, thus, influence to a
great extent the sharing of knowledge within an
organisation, are briefly presented here below.
www.ejkm.com
232
Haris Papoutsakis
3. Sharing knowledge
www.ejkm.com
233
ISSN 1479-4411
www.ejkm.com
234
Haris Papoutsakis
e1
p43
e2
p45
p41
3
SK
p42
p35
p31
p32
1
MT
5
ITsk - ITmp
2
MI
r12
r25
r15
www.ejkm.com
235
ISSN 1479-4411
4.1
B.10
www.ejkm.com
236
B.11
Haris Papoutsakis
2
3
6
Weak About
Extremely
Weak
Strong Strong
4
7____
Strong
Average
C.B7
www.ejkm.com
237
ISSN 1479-4411
5.
References
Allee, V. (2000) Reconfiguring the Value Network, Journal of Business Strategy, July-August, pp36-39
Argyris, C. (1991) Teaching Smart People How to Learn, Harvard Business Review, Vol 69, No.3, pp99-109
www.ejkm.com
238
Haris Papoutsakis
Campbell, D.T. and Fiske, D.W. (1959) Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix,
Psychological Bulletin, Vol 56, No.2, pp81-105
Churchill, G.A. (1979) A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs, Journal of Marketing Research, Vo.
16, No.1, pp64-73
Ciborra, C. and Patriotta, G. (1998) Groupware and Teamwork in RandD: Limits to Learning and Innovation, RandD
Management, Vol 28, No.1, pp43-52
Davenport, T.H. and Probst, G. (2002) Knowledge Management Case Book: Siemens Best Practices, 2nd Ed., Publicis Corporate
Publishing, and John Wiley and Sons, Berlin and Munich
Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L. (2000) Working Knowledge: How Organisations Manage what theyKnow, Harvard Business School
Press, USA
Drucker, P. (1993) Post-Capitalist Society, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK
Drucker, P.F. (2002) 'Theyre Not Employees, Theyre People in Harvard Business Review, Vol 80, No.2, pp70-77
Dyer, J.H. and Nobeoka, K. (2000) Creating and Managing a High-performance Knowledge-sharing Network: The Toyota Case,
Strategic Management Journal, Vol 21, pp345-367
Earl, M.J. and Scott, I.A. (1999) What is a Chief Knowledge Officer?, Sloan Management Review, Vol 40 Issue 2, pp29-38
Gibbert, M., Jonczyk, C. and Volpel, S. (2000) ShareNet The Next Generation Knowledge Management. In Knowledge
Management Case Book: Siemens Best Practices, Davenport, T.H. and Probst, G., (Eds), 2nd Ed. 2002, Publicis Corporate Pub.,
and John Wiley and Sons, Munich, pp22-39
Grant, R.M. (1996a) Prospering in Dynamically-competitive Environments: Organisational Capability as Knowledge Integration,
Organisation Science, Vol 7, No.4, pp. 375-387
Grant, R.M. (1996b) Towards a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 17, Special Issue
entitled Knowledge and the Firm, Winter, pp109-122
Grant, R.M. (1997) Knowledge based View of the Firm: Implications for Management Practice, Long Range Planning, June, Vol
30, Issue 3, pp450-454
Kalpers, S., Kastin, K., Petrikat, K., Scheon, S., and Spath, J. (2002) How to Manage Company Dynamics: An Approach for
Mergers and Acquisitions Knowledge Exchange. In Knowledge Management Case Book: Siemens Best Practices, Davenport,
T.H. and Probst, G., (Eds), 2nd Ed. 2002, Publicis Corporate Pub., and John Wiley and Sons, Munich, pp187-206
McNurlin, B.C. and Sprague, R.H.Jr. (2004) Information Systems Management in Practice, Sixth Ed., Pearson Educational Inc., New
Jersey
Nonaka, I. (1991) The Knowledge-Creating Company, Harvard Business Review, Vol 9, No.6, pp96-104
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company, Oxford University Press, Boston, MA
Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990) The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, Vol 68, No.3, pp79-91
Polanyi, M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension, Doubleday, New York, NY
Porter, M.E. (1980) Competitive Strategy. Techniques for Analysing Industries and Competitors, The Free Press, New York, NY
Porter, M.E. (1985) Competitive Advantage. Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, The Free Press, New York, NY
Prusak, L. (1997) Knowledge in Organisations, Butterworth-Heinemann, USA
Quinn, J.B. (1992) Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry, The Free Press, New York, NY
Ruggles, R. (1998) The State of the Notion: Knowledge Management in Practice, California Management Review, Vol 40, No.3,
pp80-89
Seely Brown, J. (1991) Research that Reinvents the Corporation, Harvard Business
Review, Vol 69, No.1, pp102-111. Republished (1998) in Harvard Business Review on Knowledge Management, Boston, Harvard Business School Press, pp153-180,
and again (2002) as a Best of Harvard Business Review, Vol 80, No.8, pp105-114
Sveiby, K.E. (2001) A Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm To Guide Strategy Formulation, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol
2, No.4, pp344-358
Teece, D.J. (2000) Strategies for Managing Knowledge Assets: The Role of Firm Structure and Industrial Context, Long Range
Planning, Vol 33, pp35-54
Venkatraman, N. (1989) The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence, The Academy of
Management Review, Vol 14, No.3, pp423-444
von Krogh, G. and Roos, J. (1995): A Perspective on Knowledge, Competence and Strategy, PersonnelReview, Vol 24, No.3,
pp56-76
von Krogh, G. and Roos, J. Eds, (1996) Managing Knowledge: Perspectives on Cooperation and Competition, Sage Publications
Ltd, London
Wernerfelt, B., (1984) A resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 5, pp171-180
Wernerfelt, B., (1995) The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 16, No.3, pp171174
Wittgenstein, L. (1995): Philosophical Investigations (First Ed. 1953), Blackwell
Wheelwright, S.C. and Clark, K.B. (1992) Revolutionising Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality,
The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan, Inc., New York, NY
Zack, M.H. (1999) Managing Codified Knowledge, Sloan Management Review, Vol 40, Issue 4, pp45-58
Appendix
Information technology and sharing knowledge
A.10. In general, the role and the level of contribution of Information Technology (IT) as a tool and/or
enabler, to support shared knowledge between [Manufacturing] group and [Quality or RandD] group is:
www.ejkm.com
239
ISSN 1479-4411
Descriptive Statistics
Variable: A10
Anderson-Darling Normality Test
7,142
0,000
A-Squared:
P-Value:
Mean
StDev
Variance
Skewness
Kurtosis
N
Minimum
1st Quartile
Median
3rd Quartile
Maximum
5,25893
0,87760
0,770190
-6,2E-01
0,333033
112
3,00000
5,00000
5,00000
6,00000
7,00000
5,5
6,0
5,42325
1,01043
5,00000
6,00000
B.10. In general, the role and the level of contribution of Information Technology (IT) as a tool and/or
enabler, to support shared knowledge between [Quality or RandD] group and [Manufacturing] group is:
Descriptive Statistics
Variable: B10
Anderson-Darling Normality Test
A-Squared:
P-Value:
6,702
0,000
Mean
StDev
Variance
Skewness
Kurtosis
N
5,19820
1,10223
1,21491
-7,4E-01
-1,3E-01
111
Minimum
1st Quartile
Median
3rd Quartile
Maximum
2,00000
5,00000
5,00000
6,00000
7,00000
5,5
6,0
5,40553
1,26992
5,00000
6,00000
A.11. In general, the use of the Information Technology (IT) infrastructure in the [Manufacturing] group is:
www.ejkm.com
240
Haris Papoutsakis
Descriptive Statistics
Variable: A11
Anderson-Darling Normality Test
7,562
0,000
A-Squared:
P-Value:
Mean
StDev
Variance
Skewness
Kurtosis
N
Minimum
1st Quartile
Median
3rd Quartile
Maximum
5,21429
0,90473
0,818533
-8,9E-01
0,834893
112
2,00000
5,00000
5,00000
6,00000
7,00000
5,5
6,0
5,38369
1,04166
5,00000
6,00000
B.11. In general, the use of the Information Technology (IT) infrastructure in the [Quality or RandD] group is:
Descriptive Statistics
Variable: B11
Anderson-Darling Normality Test
A-Squared:
P-Value:
Mean
StDev
Variance
Skewness
Kurtosis
N
Minimum
1st Quartile
Median
3rd Quartile
Maximum
5,400
0,000
5,54128
0,95774
0,917261
-5,1E-01
0,283797
109
3,00000
5,00000
6,00000
6,00000
7,00000
5,5
6,0
5,72312
1,10499
5,00000
6,00000
www.ejkm.com
241
ISSN 1479-4411
Descriptive Statistics
Variable: CA7
Anderson-Darling Normality Test
7,312
0,000
A-Squared:
P-Value:
Mean
StDev
Variance
Skewness
Kurtosis
N
Minimum
1st Quartile
Median
3rd Quartile
Maximum
5,17857
0,91252
0,832690
-8,7E-01
0,836032
112
2,00000
5,00000
5,00000
6,00000
7,00000
5,1
5,2
5,3
5,4
5,5
5,6
5,7
5,8
5,9
5,34943
1,05063
5,00000
5,85003
Descriptive Statistics
Variable: CB7
Anderson-Darling Normality Test
A-Squared:
P-Value:
Mean
StDev
Variance
Skewness
Kurtosis
N
Minimum
1st Quartile
Median
3rd Quartile
Maximum
9,922
0,000
5,38393
0,72591
0,526947
-5,9E-01
0,163108
112
3,00000
5,00000
5,00000
6,00000
7,00000
5,5
6,0
5,51985
0,83578
5,00000
6,00000
CA/B.8. In general, the use of the Information Technology (IT) infrastructure, between the three groups is:
www.ejkm.com
242
Haris Papoutsakis
Descriptive Statistics
Variable: CA8
Anderson-Darling Normality Test
A-Squared:
P-Value:
Mean
StDev
Variance
Skewness
Kurtosis
N
Minimum
1st Quartile
Median
3rd Quartile
Maximum
5,336
0,000
5,22321
0,94640
0,895672
5,60E-02
-2,6E-01
112
3,00000
5,00000
5,00000
6,00000
7,00000
5,1
5,2
5,3
5,4
0,83660
1,08964
www.ejkm.com
5,40042
5,00000
243
5,00000
ISSN 1479-4411
www.ejkm.com
244