International Journal of Mathematics and

Computer Applications Research (IJMCAR)

ISSN(P): 2249-6955; ISSN(E): 2249-8060
Vol. 5, Issue 4, Aug 2015, 137-142
TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.

COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREM OF FOUR MAPPING

PRASHANT CHAUHAN
Department of Applied Science & Humanities, C. E. T. Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

ABSTRACT
Srivastava [12], [9], Dubey & Dubey [3], Bhola & Sharma [1] Pandey &Dubey [6]; Considered three self
mappings and obtained a unique common fixed point. Here we generalized the contraction used by above authors for five
maps and obtained a unique fixed point.

KEYWORDS: Fixed Point Theorems, Mappings, Contraction Mappings, Continuous Mappings, Complete Metric Space
INTRODUCTION
Srivastava [9] used the inequality as follows

[1.1]

d (Tx , E x )d (T y , Fy )
d (Tx , Fy )d (T y , Fy )
d ( E x , f y ) C1
+ C2

d (Tx , T y )
d (Tx , Fy )

+ C 3 d (T x , F y ) + d (T y , F y ) + C4 [d (Tx , Fy ) + d (Ty , E x )]

+ C 5 d (Tx , T y ) + d ( E x , Fy ) + C 6 d (Tx , T y ); x, y X
Tx T y
Then, E, F, T have a unique common fixed point if

C i 0; 0 C1 + 2(C 2 + C 3 + C 4 + C 5 + C 6 ) 1,
0 2(C 4 + C 5 + C 6 ) 1;
Dubey &Dubey [3] have proved a fixed point theorem for three maps S, T &I of a complete metric space (X, d)
satisfying:

q{d ( I x , S x )d (Tx , T y ) + d (T y , S x )d ( I y , T y ) + d ( I x , T y )}

[1.2]

d (S x , Ty )

d (Tx , T y ) + d ( I y , S x ) + d ( I x , T y )

d(Tx , T y ) + d ( I y , S x ) + d ( I x , I y ) 0
0 q < 1, , , 0
Pandey & Dubey [6] obtained a unique common fixed point of three maps E, F&T satisfying.

www.tjprc.org

editor@tjprc.org

138

Prashant Chauhan

[1.3] d(Ex , Fy )

1d(Tx , Fy )d(Tx ,Ty )

d(Tx ,Ty ) + d(Tx , Fy )

] [

+2 d(Tx , Ex ) + d(Ty , Fy ) +3 d(Tx , Fy ) + d(Ty , Fx ) +4d(Tx ,Ty )

Here we have generalized the contraction on five self maps as follows:

T1 , T2 , T3 , T4 & T5 on X to itself
d (T5 x, T1T2 x)d (T5 y, T3T4 y)
d (T5 x, T3T4 y)d (T5 y, T3T4 y)
+ C2

d (T5 x, T5 y)
d (T1T2 x, T3T4 y)

[1.4] d (T1 , T2 x, T3 , T4 y) C1

+ C 3 [d (T5 x, T1T2 x) + d (T5 y, T3T4 y )] + C 4 [d (T5 x, T3T4 y ) + d (T5 y, T1T2 x)]

+ C 5 [d (T5 x, T5 y ) + d (T1T2 x, T3T4 y )] + C 6 d (T5 x, T5 y ).
We see that under certain condition we get a unique common fixed point.

MAIN RESULTS
Let (X, d) be a complete metric space &

Ti : X X ; i = 1,2,3,4,5 be five mapping satisfying [1.4] and [2.1]

as follows
[2.1]

T2 x T5 y;

i 0,

T5 (T1T2 ) = (T1T2 )(T5 ), T5 (T3T4 ) = (T3T4 )(T5 )

T1T2 = T2T1 , T3T4 = T4T3

T1T2 ( X ) T5 ( X ), T3T4 ( X ) T5 ( X )
Then

Ti (i = 1 to 5) have a unique common fixed point in X.

Proof: Let

x0 , x1 , x 2 X and T1T2 ( X ) T5 ( X ) such that

T1T2 ( x0 ) = T5 ( x1 ), T3T4 ( x1 ) = T5 ( x 2 )
T3T4 ( X ) T5 ( X )
Since

T1T2 x 2 n = T5 x 2 n +1 , T3T4 x 2 n +1 = T5 x 2 n+1 , replace x x 2 n & y x 2 n 1 , then we have from [1.4]

[2.3]

d (T5 x 2 n +1 , T5 x 2 n ) = d (T1T2 x 2 n , T3T4 x 2 n 1 )

d (T1T2 x 2 n , T3T4 x 2 n 1 ) C1

+ C2

d (T5 x 2 n , T1T2 x 2 n )d (T5 x 2 n 1 , T3T4 x 2 n 1 )

d (T5 x 2 n , T5 x 2 n 1 )

d (T5 x 2 n , T3T4 x 2 n 1 )d (T5 x 2 n 1 , T3T4 x 2 n 1 )

d (T1T2 x 2 n , T3T4 x 2 n 1 )

Impact Factor (JCC): 4.6257

NAAS Rating : 3.80

Common Fixed Point Theorem of Four Mapping

139

+ C 3 [d (T5 x 2 n , T1T2 x 2 n ) + d (T5 x 2 n 1 , T3T4 x 2 n 1 )]

+ C 4 [d (T5 x 2 n , T3T4 x 2 n 1 ) + d (T5 x 2 n 1 , T1T2 x 2 n )]
+ C 5 [d (T5 x 2 n , T5 x 2 n 1 ) + d (T1T2 x 2 n , T3T4 x 2 n 1 )]
+ C 6 d (T5 x 2 n , T5 x 2 n 1 ).
Which yields from (2.2) and using Property of Metric Space.

d (T5 x 2 n +1 , T5 x 2 n ){1 C1 C 3 C 5 } d (T5 x 2 n1 , T5 x 2 n )(C 3 + C 4 + C 5 )

Or
[2.4]

d (T5 x 2 n +1 , T5 x 2 n ) Kd (T5 x 2 n , T5 x 2 n 1 )

Where

0<K =

(C 3 + C 4 + C 5 )
<1
1 C1 C 3 C 5

Thus

[T5 x2n ] is a Cauchy Sequence in complete metric space X & have a common fixed point u in X such that

[2.5]

T5 x 2 n +1 = u = nT5 x 2 n

Now if
[2.6]

T1T2 u T5 u then

(T1T2 u , T5 u ) lim d (T1T2 u , T3T4T5 x 2 n +1 )

C1

lim d (T5 u, T1T2 u )d (T5T5 x 2 n +1 , T3T4T5 x 2 n +1 )

d (T5 u1 , T5T5 x 2 n +1 )

+ C2

d (T5 u, T3T4T5 x 2 n +1 )d (T5T5 x 2 n +1 , T3T4T5 x 2 n +1 )

d (T1T2 u, T3T4T5 x 2 n +1 )

+ C 3 [d (T5 u , T1T2 u ) + d (T5T5 x 2 n+1 , T3T4T5 x 2 n +1 )]

+ C 4 [d (T5 u , T3T4T5 x 2 n +1 ) + d (T5T5 x 2 n+1 , T1T2 u )]
+ C 5 [d (T5 u , T5T5 x 2 n+1 )d (T1T2 u , T3T4T5 x 2 n +1 )] + C 6 [d (T5 u , T5T5 x 2 n +1 )]
Which Reduced to

d (T1T2 u , T5 u )(1 C 5 C 4 C 3 ) 0 .
[2.7]

d (T1T2 u , T5 u ) 0

www.tjprc.org

editor@tjprc.org

140

Prashant Chauhan

Which is a Contraction therefore

T1T2 (u ) = T5 (u ), Also we have T5 (u ) = T3T4 (u ), hence

[2.8]

T1T2 (u ) = T5 (u ) = T3T4 (u ), and

T5 (T5 u ) = T5 (T1T2 u ) = T1T2 (T1T2 u ) = T1T2 (T3T4 u ) = T1T2 (T5 u ) = T5 (T3T4 u )

[2.9]

= T3T4 (T5 u ) = T3T4 (T1T2 u ) = T3T4 (T3T4 u )

Now if

T1T2 u T3T4 (T1T2 u )

d (T 5 u , T1T 2 u ) d (T 5 T1T 2 u , T 3 T 4 T 3 T 4 u )
d (T 5 u , T 5 T 3 T 4 u )

[2.10]

d (T1T 2 u , T 3 T 4 (T1T 2 u )) C 1

+ C2

d (T5 u, T3T4T3T4 u )d (T5T3T4 u, T3T4T3T4 u )

d (T1T2 u, T3T4T3T4 u )

+ C 3 [d (T5 u , T1T2 u ) + d (T5T3T4 u , T3T4T3T4 u )]

+ C 4 [d (T5 u , T3T4T3T4 u ) + d (T5T3T4 u , T1T2 u )]
+ C 5 [d (T5 u , T5T3T4 u ) + d (, T1T2 u , T3T4T3T4 u )] + C 6 d (T5 u , T5T3T4 u ) .
Therefore (2.10) reduces to

d (T5 u , T5T5 u )(1 2C 4 2C 5 C 6 ) 0

Or equivalently
(2.11)

d (T5 u , T5T5 u ) 0

Which is a Contraction, therefore

T5 (T5 (u )) = T5 (u )
Also

T3T4 (T1T2 u ) = T1T2 u

Thus we get
Thus

T1T2 u = v is a common fixed point of T5T1T2 & T3T4 , if possible we take another common fixed point of

T1T2T5 & T3T4 .Thus

[d ( , w)] = [d (T1T2 v, T3T4 w)]

[2.12] which is a view of [1.4] yields
Impact Factor (JCC): 4.6257

NAAS Rating : 3.80

141

Common Fixed Point Theorem of Four Mapping

d ( , w) C1

[d (T5 , T1T2 )]d (T5 w, T5T4 w) + C [d (T5 , T3T4 w)d (T5 w, T3T4 w)]
d (T5 , T5 w)

d (T1T2 , T3T4 w)

+ C 3 [d (T5 , T3T4 ) + d (T5 w, T3T2 w)] + C 4 [d (T5 , T3T4 w) + d (T5 w, T1T2 )]

+ C 5 [d (T5 , T5 w) + d (T1T2 , T3T4 w)] + C 6 d (T5 , T5 w)
Equation [2.12] reduced to

d ( , w)(1 2C 4 2C 5 C 6 ) 0
Or equivalently

d ( , w) = 0 = w
Now to show that is a unique common fixed point of

T1 , T2 , T3 , T4 & T5 we find that

T1 ( ) = T1 (T1T2 v) = T1 (T2T1v) = T1T2 (T1 ) T1

Which implies that
obtain

T1 is as another fixed point of T1 & T2 .Hence by uniqueness of fixed point of T1 & T2 , we

a fixed point of T , similarly a unique fixed point of T , T , T

1

& T5 .Hence proved.

REFERENCES
1.

Bhola P.K. &Sharma P.L. (1991): Common fixed point Theorem for Three Maps.Bull.Cal.Math.Soc.83, 398-400.

2.

Dinesh Rani Chug, Renu Chug &Ramesh Kumar (1996): A theorem on common fixed point for five mappings on
metric space. The Mathematics Equation XXX, 1933-201.

3.

Dubey R.P. &Dubey B, N. (1991): Common fixed point theorem for three mappings rational inequality. G Anita
42, 75-80.

4.

M. Abbas, B.E. Rhoades (2009): Fixed and periodic point results in cone metric Spaces,Appl. Math. Lett.22, 511515.

5.

Pachpatte, B.G. (1980): Some fixed point theorem for mapping in 2-metric space hung Yuan J; 8, 7-12.

6.

Pandey P.K. & Dubey R.K. (1992): On common fixed point theorem of three mappings. Mathematics Student 61,
97-100.

7.

Pathak H.K.&Dubey R.P.(1991):A common fixed point theorem for three commuting mappings in uniform
spaces. The Mathematics Education XXV, 110-113.

8.

Rawat Pratimma & Sharma P.L. (1980): Common fixed point theorem for three mapping Acta Ciencia Indica
XVII, 351-354.

9.

Srivastava Rakesh (1993): On common fixed point theorem of three mappings. Ganita 44, 81-95.

10. S. Rezapour, Halbarani(2008): Some notes on the paper cone metric spaces and fixed point theorem of
contractive mappings, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 345, 719-724.
www.tjprc.org

editor@tjprc.org

142

Prashant Chauhan

11. Yian Zhao ,Guang Xing Song, X. Huang, Xiaoyan Sun, Guotao Wang, 23 (2010): New common fixed point
theorems for maps on cone metric spaces, Applied Mathematics Letters, 1033-1037.
12. Srivastava Rakesh (1991): Common fixed point theorem for continuous mapping Ganita 71-74.
13. V. Berinde, (2009): A common fixed point theorem for compatible quasi contractive self Mappings in Metric
Spaces, Appl. Math. Computer. 213,348-354.

Impact Factor (JCC): 4.6257

NAAS Rating : 3.80