Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aggregate Stability in Relation To Organic Carbon Content of Eight Different Soils of Bangladesh
Aggregate Stability in Relation To Organic Carbon Content of Eight Different Soils of Bangladesh
Supervised by
Md. Sadiqul Amin
Assistant Professor
Soil Science Discipline
Khulna University
Contents
Title
CHAPTER
3: MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page No.
Acknowledgement
3.1. Sampling
sites
Abstract
3.1.1. Short description of the sampling sites
Contents
3.2. Sample
preparation
CHAPTER
1: INTRODUCTION
List ofAnalysis
Tables
3.3. Laboratory
of Figures
3.3.1. List
Particle
size Analysis
3.3.2. Micro aggregate analysis
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW
3.3.3. Aggregate stability (NSI)
3.3.4. Soil reaction (pH)
2.1. Aggregate stability
3.3.5. Electric conductivity (EC)
2.2. Forces involved in aggregation
3.3.6. Organic carbon
2.3. Correlation of aggregate stability with potential causal factors
3.3.7. Statistical
2.3.1. Soilanalysis
texture
24
24
25
25
25
25
26-27
28
28
28
28
v
vi
vii
viii
viii
3
3
3
4
4
2.3.2.4:Organic carbon
5
CHAPTER
RESULTS
AND
2.3.3.
Chemical dispersing agents
6
DISCUSSION
2.3.4. Clay mineralogy
6
2.4. Aggregate hierarchy concept
7
4. Results
and
discussion
29
2.5. Different mechanism of aggregate breakdown
9
4.1.
Analyses
of Soil methods
29 9
2.6. General
Aggregate
fractionation
29 10
2.7.4.1.1.
SoilpH
organic carbon
Electrical
conductivity(EC)
29 11
2.8.4.1.2.
Forms
of soil organic
carbon
2.8.1.
4.1.3. Mineral
Organic forms
carbon
30 11
2.8.2.
Elemental
organic
C
4.1.4. Particle size distribution
30 11
2.8.3.
4.1.5. Humus
Micro aggregate analysis
30 11
2.8.4.
organic
residue of plants
4.1.6. Altered
Indices of
aggregation
31 12
2.9. Factors
influencing
organic
carbon
level
in
soil
4.1.6.1. Degree of aggregation (DA)
34 13
2.9.1. Soil
carbon
losses
4.1.6.2.
State
of Aggregation (SA)
35 13
2.9.1.1. Type of plant and animal matter entering soil
13
4.1.7. Normalized stability Index (NSI)
35
2.9.1.2. Climatic conditions
13
4.2. Statistical
analysis
36 14
2.9.1.3.
Management practices
4.3.2.9.2.
Relationship
among
soil properties
36 14
Soil carbon
inputs
2.9.2.1. Environmental which govern plant production
14
1.1
CHAPTER 52.9.2.2.
: SUMMARY
AND practices
CONCLUSION
Management
15
2.10. Stabilization and destabilization of soil organic matter
16
5.1. Summary
Conclusion
37 17
2.11. Soil and
Aggregate
Stability and organic matter
2.11.1. Inorganic binding agents
17
CHAPTER 62.11.1.1.
: REFFERENCES
37-45
Oxides
17
2.11.1.2. Calcium
18
Outline
2.11.2. Soil texture
19
2.12. Functions of soil organic matter and effect on soil properties
19
Aggregate stability is an underpinning factor in questions of soil fertility and
2.13. Aggregate stability time relationship
21-23
environmental problems. Resistance of the aggregate to physical stresses
determines soil sensitivity to crusting and erosion (Le Bissonnais, 1996a),
germination and rooting of cultivated plants (Angers and Caron, 1998) and the
ability of a soil to store carbon through the physical protection of organic
molecules (Jastrow and Miller, 1997). The measurement of soil aggregate stability
is important because it can give general information about soil conditions. The
aggregate stability is the ability of the bonds of the aggregates to resist when
Physically
stabilized,
or
protected
from
decomposition,
through
microaggregation, or
(2) Intimate association with silt and clay particles, and
(3) Can be biochemically stabilized through the formation of recalcitrant SOM
compounds.
It has been recognized for a long time that organic matter serves as a
granulating agent in soils. Baver (1935) observed a correlation of 0.559 (with
0.21 being significant) between the percentage of aggregates larger than
0.05mm and the carbon content of a large number of different soils. This
correlation for aggregates larger than 0.1mm was 0.687, which indicates that
organic matter is conducive to the formation of relatively large stable aggregates.
Agricultural management of soil carbon is a recognized means of improving soil
fertility, reducing soil erosion rates, enhancing soil structural stability and
assisting carbon sequestration.
1.2. Objectives
Therefore objectives of this study were to correlate aggregate stability of some
soils of Bangladesh in relation to organic carbon content of the particular soil
types.
2. Review of Literature
Organic materials are important soil additives to improve soil physical properties.
This is important to sustain the productivity of soils particularly in semi-arid
regions where there is low input of organic materials. Usage of organic based
materials has gained importance within the last few years for sustainable
agriculture and preventing soil degradation. Soil aggregate formation and
aggregate stability have an important role in crop production and sustainable
agricultural management. Soil aggregate formation has an important role
concerning seedsoil relation, hydraulic conductivity and root respiration, the
diffusion of gases within the soil and plant growth. Furthermore, water-stable
aggregates in soil prevent erosion, which is one of the main factors of soil
degradation (Dinel et al. 1991). Structural soil degradation occurs mostly due to
the decrease in soil organic matter caused by excessive soil cultivation (Grandy
et al. 2002).
2.1 Soil organic carbon
According to Grace et al. (1995), it is generally accepted that soil organic matter,
and principally carbon is the precursor to sustainable soil management. Soil
organic matter (SOM) is as important as a reservoir of nutrients such as nitrogen,
phosphorus and sulphur. It also contributes significantly to the formation and
stabilization of soil structure. Active soil organic matter (ASOM) is the
heterogeneous mix of living and dead organic materials (Wander et al. 1994),
including microbial biomass carbon (MBC), easily oxidisable organic carbon
(EOC), water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC), and water soluble carbohydrates
(WSC) measured as anthrone-reactive carbon. As active fractions are usually
more easily affected than total soil organic carbon (TSOC) by management,
measures of them can be used as early indicators of change in SOM status
(Gregorich et al. 1994; Bremer et al. 1994).
Hodges (1991) points out that soil organic matter is important as energy for soil
organisms, in soil structure and stability, water relations, soil erosion control, soil
warming, availability of plant nutrients, ion exchange, chelation and buffering,
crop growth, and incidence of soil-borne diseases. However, by world standards,
Vagen (2000) suggests that the critical soil organic matter content for agricultural
soils is generally regarded to be between 2 and 4 %. The low inherent level in
and
rather
resistant
organic
residues
of
plants,
animals
and
clays. Humus plays a role in aggregate formation and stability. The highly
complex humus molecules contain chemical structures that absorb nearly all
wavelengths of visible light, giving the substances a characteristic of black color
(Bradey and Weil, 2002). The major components of SOM implicated in stabilizing
soil aggregates are humic substances. Several studies have shown that the
humic substances (mostly humic acids) improve aggregate stability (Fortun et al.
1990)
2.2.4 Altered organic residues of plants
Little altered organic residues of plants, animals, and microorganisms (both living
and dead) subject to rather decomposition in soil. The living part of soil organic
matter includes a wide variety of micro-organisms such as bacteria, viruses,
fungi, protozoa and algae. It also includes plant roots, insects, earthworms, and
larger animals such as moles, mice and rabbits that spend part of their life in the
soil. The living portion represents about 5 percent of the total soil organic matter.
Micro-organisms, earthworms and insects help break down crop residues and
manures by ingesting them and mixing them with the minerals in the soil, and in
the process recycling energy and plant nutrients. Sticky substances on the skin of
earthworms and those produced by fungi and bacteria help bind particles
together. Earthworm casts are also more strongly aggregated (bound together)
than the surrounding soil as a result of the mixing of organic matter and soil
mineral material, as well as the intestinal mucus of the worm. Thus, the living
part of the soil is responsible for keeping air and water available, providing plant
nutrients, breaking down pollutants and maintaining the soil structure therefore
aggregate stabilization. Organisms occur wherever organic matter occurs
(Ingham, 2000). Therefore, soil organisms are concentrated around roots, in litter,
on humus, on the surface of soil aggregates and in spaces between aggregates.
Soils containing less than 20% organic matter by weight are classified as mineral
soil and more than 20% organic matter is commonly called organic soil.
Agricultural soils are essentially mineral soils and fertile mineral soils on an
average contain about 5% organic matter (Johnston, 1991).
Amount of dry matter the plants accumulate over the growing season
system (FAO, 1989). Alley cropping is an agro forestry system in which crops are
grown between rows of planted woody shrubs or trees. These are pruned during
the cropping season to provide green manure and to minimize shading of crops
(FAO, 1993). Besides adding organic matter to the system, perennial trees and
shrubs recycle plant nutrients from deeper soil layers through their rooting
system.
Fig
controlling
2.1:
Factors
C conservation in
soil.
biomass carbon contents of 250g C/g soil, whereas maximum soil structural
stability (determined by MWD) was found at SOC levels of 4.5%. Carter (1992)
suggested that 2.5% could serve as a critical limit to define minimum
concentrations of SOC required to provide optimum structural stability in fine
sandy loams.
Figure 2.2: Effect of increasing SOC content on aggregate stability, measured by wet-sieving
(MWD, mm), using air-dried () and field moist () samples (modified after Haynes, 2000).
fractions have high turnover rates and are sensitive to management (Wander et
al., 1994). Carter (1992) found that maximum levels for an agronomically
designed aggregation index (AI)
were obtained at SOC contents of > 2.5% and at
Functions of Soil organic matter
microbial biomass carbon contents of 250g C/g soil, whereas maximum soil
structural stability (determined by MWD) was found at SOC levels of 4.5%. Carter
(1992) suggested that 2.5% could serve as a critical limit to define minimum
concentrations of SOC required to provide optimum structural stability in fine
sandy loams.
Physical functions
Chemical functions
-Contribute to the cation exchange capacity
-Improves structural stability of soils at various scales
-Influence water retention properties of soils and thus water holding capacity
-Enhances ability of soils to buffer changes in pH
- Reduce concentrations of toxic cations
-Alter soil thermal properties
- Promote binding of SOM to soil minerals.
Fig 2.3: Functions ascribed to SOM note that interaction occurs between the different soil
functions modified from Badlock and Skjemstad, 1999.
An
aggregate is a group of primary particles that cohere to each other more strongly
than to other surrounding soil particles. Most adjacent particles adhere to some
degree. Stability of aggregates is a function of whether the cohesive forces
between particles withstand the applied disruptive force. However, aggregate
stability is often measured on a specific aggregate size class which is not a
measurement
of
whole
soil
structure.
Furthermore,
aggregate
stability
in
surface
charge.
Isomorphic
substitutions,
resulting
in
negative
form on surface hydroxyls and dominate in the case of oxides and hydroxides.
The latter clays are present in the soil with a wide range of crystallinity, and their
effect on aggregation varies. Amorphous iron oxides (Feo) are the most effective
because they not only carry positive charges but also block the negatively
charged sites on layer silicates (Shao and Wang, 1991). The soil colloidal fraction
is thus characterized by a total charge, resulting from the complex interactions
among all the components. Igwe and Nwokocha (2006) investigated the role of
SOC in the restoration of soil fertility and stability of soil micro-aggregates, which
is of special importance in soils that degrade rapidly. They reported that soils
were coarse-textured, deep and low in soil nutrients and SOC, probably due to
high mineralization rates. Micro-aggregate-associated SOC was also low with
most of the SOC protected by the <63 mm fractions. Principal component
analysis revealed that SOC fractions associated with 200063 mm aggregate
sizes were the SOC fractions that best explained the variance in aggregated silt +
clay, indicating their contribution to microaggregate stability. This was attributed
to the production of polysaccharides and materials released by microbial
activities from this recently deposited or incompletely decomposed SOC.
2.6.2.3 Chemical dispersing agent
The di-valent and trivalent cations, such as Ca 2+ and Al3+, are tightly adsorbed
and can effectively neutralize the negative surface charge on clay particles;
these cations can also form bridges that bring clay particles close together.
Monovalent ions, especially Na+, with relatively large hydrated raddi, can cause
clay particle to repel and each other and create a dispersed condition. Two things
contribute to the dispersion
1) The large hydrated sodium ion does not get close enough to the clay to
effectively neutralize the negative charges, and
2) The single charge on sodium is not effective in forming a bridge between
clay particles.
Calcium ions associated with clay generally promote aggregation, whereas
sodium ions promote dispersion. Exchangeable sodium - can cause very poor
aggregate stability. Soils with a high percentage of exchangeable sodium are very
likely to disperse and need to be managed carefully.
Fe-oxide rich soils (e.g., many Oxisols) and allophanic soils are among the most
stably micro-aggregated (El-Swaify, 1980;). This is generally interpreted as
evidence that oxides and hydroxides of Al and Fe, as well as amorphous
Fig. 2.4.Aggregate stability as a function of water content for both constrained and
unconstrained samples of each soil.
2.6.2.5 Porosity
breakdown
can
result
from
several
physico-chemical-physical
Swelling causes the volume of the aggregate to increase, and is often followed
by the soil slaking.
Slaking is when the air-dried aggregate breaks into smaller aggregates when
immersed in water. This indicates that the aggregates are not strong enough to
withstand the pressures involved in wetting. Some soils are strong enough to
withstand this pressure, and increasing the organic matter content of the soil
may increase aggregate stability. Slaked soils can also disperse.
Dispersion is caused by breakdown of the clay aggregate into individual clay
particles.
Ashman et al. (2003) reviewed two of the most commonly used aggregate
fractionation methods: The slaking method is commonly used to simulate wetting
stresses in the field and the shaking method to simulate mechanical disruption
followed by wet sieving. Slaking refers to the disintegration of large aggregates
(2-5mm
diameter)
into
finer
aggregates
when
placed
in
water.
Rapid
Figure 2.6: Influence of fractionation procedures on biological and chemical properties of different
aggregate sizes (Ashman et al., 2003).
in
surface
charge.
Isomorphic
substitutions,
resulting
in
negative
(ii)
Kay and Angers (1999) and Greenland et al. (1975) observed relationships
between SOC content and aggregate stability. Using the Emerson crumb test,
Greenland et al. (1975) found that at SOC <2%, soil aggregates were considered
unstable, moderately stable at 2-2.5% and very stable at SOC contents >2.5%.
Carter (1992) also found that maximum structural stability was obtained at 4.5%
SOC.
2.8.1 Inorganic binding agents
2.8.1.1 Oxides
The aggregating and SOM stabilizing effect of oxides has been emphasized in
many studies. The aggregating effect of oxides is mainly at the microaggregate
level (Oades et al., 1989) but also macroaggregation has been related to oxide
content (Imhoff et al., 2002). Shang and Tiessen 1998) reported that the
stabilization of C in tropical soils is highest in stable microaggregates consisting
of oxides, soil organic matter and minerals. Oxides can act as binding agents in
three ways
(1) Organic materials adsorb on oxide surfaces (Oades et al., 1989);
(2) An electrostatic binding occurs between the positively charged oxides and
negatively charged clay minerals (El-Swaify and Emerson, 1975); and
(3) A coat of oxides on the surface of minerals forms bridges between primary
and secondary particles (Muggler et al., 1999).
In a kaolinitic soil, this binding of oxides to minerals will reduce the cation
exchange capacity of the kaolinite and increases the positive charge property of
the kaolinite, further promoting the aggregation through electrostatic binding
(Dixon, 1989).
2.8.1.2. Calcium
It is generally accepted that calcium is a critical element for the stabilization of
SOM and aggregates through its role in the formation claypolyvalent cation
organic matter complexes (Clough and Skjemstad, 2000). Because calcium exerts
its influence at the scale of the organo-mineral complexation, its stabilization
effect is mostly observed at the microaggregate level, but it can also indirectly
increase macroaggregation through a stimulation of microbial activity in acidic
soils (Chan and Heenan, 1999). Additions of calcium to field soils, in the form of
lime or gypsum, increased (10%) the aggregation level (Chan and Heenan,
1998, 1999). However, an initial temporary decrease (13%) in aggregate
stability has been observed upon the application of lime to variable charged soils.
This temporal decrease in aggregation has been related to an increase in soil pH
(Roth and Pavan, 1991) and microbial activity (Chan and Heenan, 1998, 1999)
upon lime application to these acidic soils. An increase in pH of a variable charge
soil leads to an increase of negative charges (Roth and Pavan, 1991), resulting in
a dominance of repulsive forces over edge-to-face flocculation of kaolinite or
Fig
2.6:
Monniers
conceptual
model.
Aggregate
stability
inputs
(green
of
aggregative
(microbial
factors
corpses,
substances).
These curves emphasize the necessity for replenishing organic matter in soils to
maintain stable granulation. Stabilization of the aggregates formed results from
the transitory products of microbial metabolism and the final stable humus that is
produced. This soil quality, the agronomical structure, i.e. the particle size
distribution of soil, and the resistance of aggregates against water and tillage;
determines its fertility and productivity. This property is might be characterized
by the stability of these soil structural units against disrupting effects (Six et al.,
2000). Soil aggregates could be disrupted by several effects, for example slaking
in water i.e. because of too intense wetting during irrigation (Emerson, 1977).
Wetting, in general, disrupts aggregates because of the effect of entrapped air in
the pores (i.e., slaking), as well as causing clay swelling and dispersion. During
drying, clay particles may form bridges and coatings on larger grains (Singer et
al., 1992; Attou et al., 1998), leading to a closer contact between particles and
increasing the solid phase cohesion (Kemper and Rosenau, 1984). The
flocculation and cementation of mineral particles into secondary units with
organic and inorganic substances are the main soil aggregation processes (Duiker
et al., 2003), producing aggregates of a variety of sizes. On the other hand,
rewetting may break large aggregates into smaller ones, offsetting the stabilizing
effect of drying.
Poor aggregate stability can result in:
Water logging
Soil
series
Bajoa
Bajoa
Physiography
Drainage
Land use
Well
drained
Fallow-Fallow-T.aman
Well
drained
T. aman-Fallow
Jhalkathi
Poor
T. aus-T. aman-Fallow
Dumuria
Imperfect
T.aman-Fallow
Garuri
Sara
Ganges meander
Poor
Jute-T.aman-Robi
Imperfect
Aus-Robi crops
floodplain
7
Harta
Peat basin
Poor
Mixed aus-B.amanFallow
Shrimang
al
Well
Late Pleistocene
Shrimang
al
piedmont
Tea
drained
Well
drained
Tea
Fig
3:
The
material which passed through the screen is transferred from the brown paper
onto the next smallest screen (i), Aggregates collected on top of the screen are
transferred into plastic bags, tubes, or jars for storage (ii).
3.3 Laboratory analysis
3.3.1 Particle size analysis
The particle size analysis of the soils was carried out by combination of sieving
and hydrometer method as described by Gee and Bauder (1986). Textural classes
were determined using Marshalls Triangular Coordinator system.
3.3.2 Microaggregate analysis
Soil structure was evaluated by microaggregate analysis of the soils following the
method Kachinskii (1965) with the exception that hydrometer was used to
determine the particle size distribution instead of pipette method. The state of
aggregation and dispersion factor were calculated by the using the following
equations (Baver and Rhoades, 1932)
State of aggregation =
Dispersion factor =
ab
x
100
y
by
sieving
after
dispersing
the
soils
with
5%
sodium
DL = 1 n
[(n 1) i]
i
DLSi
Where n = number of aggregate size classes. i = 1 for the smallest size class.
The disruption level of a size class upon slaking (DLSi) was calculated by the
following formula:
{( Pio S io ) ( Pi S i )}
( Pio S io ) ( Pi S i )
2
DLSi =
1
Pio S io
where DLSi = disruption level for each size class i; Pio = proportion of total
sample weight in size class i before disruption (i.e., rewetted); Pi = proportion of
total sample weight in size class i after disruption (i.e., slaked); Sio = proportion
of sand with size i in aggregates of size i (= aggregate-sized sand) before
disruption; Si = proportion of sand with size i in aggregates of size i after
disruption.
The whole soil DL (max) was calculated by the following formula:
n
DL (max) = 1 n
[(n 1) i]
i
DLSi (max)
The maximum disruption [DLSi (max)] was calculated with the following formula:
( P
io
Pp ) ( Pio Pp )
DLSi (max) =
1
Pio S io
Pp = primary sand particle content with the same size as the aggregates size
class after complete disruption of the whole soil.
3.3.4
Soil pH (1:2.5) was determined electrochemically with the help of glass electrode
pH meter as suggested by Jackson (1973).
3.3.5 Electrical conductivity (EC)
The electrical conductivity of the soil was measured at a soil: water ratio of 1:5 by
an EC meter as described by USSL staff (1954).
3.3.6 Organic carbon
Soil organic carbon was determined by wet oxidation method of Walkley and
Blacks method as described by Piper (1950) and Jackson (1973).
3.3.7 Statistical analysis
Organic carbon content with respect to aggregate stability and soil properties
were analyzed using MINITAB basic statistics.
4. Result and discussion
4.1. General Analyses of Soil
4.1.1 Soil reaction (pH)
pH of Bajoa series varied from 6.79-7.64 (Table 4.1). Jhalkathi series was
calcareous and pH value was 7.89. Harta and Tea soils were non calcareous. pH
of Harta series and Shrimangal soil series was 5.18 and 5.19-5.72, respectively.
Sara soil series demonstrate alkaline characteristics (8.04).
4.1.2 Electrical conductivity (EC)
The EC values of soil sample were shown in (Table-4.1). Most soils shows slightly
saline to moderately saline behavior. Harta soil series was highly saline and EC
ranged from 4.25-17.11 dS/m. EC of Sara, jhalakathi, and Bajoa soil series were
4.75 dS/m, 2.04-4.75dS/m and 1.45-2.11 dS/m respectively. The EC value of Tea
soil was in the range of non- saline (0.78 to 1.45) ds/m.
Table-4.1: properties of soil series
Sampl
e no
1
2
3
4
5
Soil
Series
%OC
pH
EC
(ds/m)
%
Sand
%Silt
%
Clay
Texture
Bajoa
1.68
7.64
2.11
9.00
55.0
0
36.00
Silty Clay
Loam
Bajoa
1.40
6.79
1.45
4.00
47.0
0
49.00
Silty Clay
Jhalkathi
1.42
7.89
4.75
4.00
58.0
0
38.00
Silty Clay
loam
Dumuria
2.11
7.9
7
7.40
5.00
43.0
0
52.00
Garuri
1.23
7.7
7
0.78
5.00
61.0
0
34.00
Silty Clay
Silty Clay
loam
Sara
0.96
8.04
4.75
30.00
31.0
0
39.00
Clay Loam
Harta
5.37
5.18
17.11
4.00
47.0
0
49.00
Silt loam
Shrimang
al
0.88
5.19
0.78
60.00
18.0
0
22.00
Sandy Clay
Loam
Shrimang
al
1.03
5.72
1.45
60.00
19.0
0
21.00
Sandy Clay
Loam
6
7
content was higher in fine textured soil (Table-4.1). Cook (1962) reported that
fine textured soils contain roughly
In Jhalakati series the percentage of sand, silt and clay along the depth
were 4-33%, 3.00-58% and 38-64.00%, correspondingly. As the silt fraction and
clay is dominated so the textural classes was silty clay loam.
In Harta soil series the percentage of sand, silt and clay was 4.00-62.00%, 584.00% and 12.00-33.00% respectively and define textural class was silt loam as
because of silt fraction is predominant.
SRDI (1977) reported that percentage sand, silt and clay in Bajoa, and Sara series
were 0.5-4.2%, 51.2-66.6% and 32.6-47.9%; and 10.3-21.5%, 64.7-75.4% and
7.6-16.4%, respectively.
The percentage of sand,silt and clay of Dumuria and Garuri series was 5.0018.00%,3-43.00%, 52.00-79% and 5.00-42.00%, 34.00%-54.00% respectively.
Textural class of these two soil was silty clay and silty clay loam. In Shrimangal
soil series the percentage of sand, silt and clay was 60.00-67.00%, 5.00-18.00%
and 22.00-28.00% respectively and the textural classes was sandy clay loam.
4.1.5 Micro aggregate analysis
Micro aggregate composition of soils is one of the most important indexes of soil
structure. Results of micro aggregate analysis are regarded to be essential for
agronomic characterization of the soils. Micro aggregate analysis of a soil
together with its particle size analysis gives an idea about the degree of
dispersion of the soil under natural condition and its potential capacity for
structural formulation. Kachinskii (1965) stated that micro aggregates having
0.25-0.05 mm and 0.05-0.01 mm diameter are most valuable from agronomic
point of view. If micro aggregates increase water holding capacity and improve
air and water permeability of soils.
A plot of the summation percentage against the corresponding particle size for
particle size analysis and microaggregate analysis on a semi-logarithmic graph
paper give an idea of the state of micro aggregation of the soil (Fig: 4.2). The
higher the area between the two curves the higher the state of micro aggregation
of the soil. The state of aggregation, degree of aggregation and dispersion factor
of soil varies comparatively. The highest state of aggregation found in Harta soil
series, at this sample degree of aggregation and dispersion factor were 0.60%
and 275 Shrimongol soil series shown lower state of aggregation as well as lower
dispersion factor 47.62%, respectively.
Table-4.2: Structural Indices of soil
Structural Indices
Soil Series
State of Aggregation
Degree of Aggregation
Dispersion Factor
Bajoa
21
0.23
186.11
Jhalkathi
29
0.30
168.42
Dumuria
13
0.14
151.92
Garuri
37
0.39
158.82
Harta
58
0.60
275.00
Sara
32
0.46
89.74
Bajoa
21
0.22
146.94
Shrimangal
0.18
127.27
Shrimangal
15
0.38
47.62
From graph value it being interpreted for Bajoa soil series (Fig:4.2), state of
aggregation is greater as because of the higher the area between the two curves
indicates the higher the state of micro aggregation of the soil.
Harta soil series shows higher state of aggregation than any other soil as because
of it comprises the maximum area deviate from the two curves. Harta soil also
contain highest amount of organic
enhance the
stabilization of soil. Sara and Dumuria soil series shows lower state of
aggregation and higher dispersion factor (Fig: 4.2).
Jhalakati soil series exhibit higher state of aggregation similar to Bajoa soil series
(Fig: 4.2).
Lowest state of aggregation was found in Shrimangal soil series (Fig4.2).
Distance between the two curves was sparse in contrast to other soil series
curves. Organic matter content of this soil sample was also little (0.88%).
4.1.6 Indices of aggregation
4.1.6.1 Degree of aggregation (DA)
The highest value of DA was found 0.60% (Table-4.2) for Harta soil series and
the lowest value was 0.14% for dumuria soil series respectively. In sandy clay
loam soil highest value was found for shrimangal soil series and lowest value for
Dumuria soil series that was silty clay in texture (Table-4.1).Degree of
aggregation for Sara, Bajoa and Jhalakati was 0.46%, 0.23% and 0.30%
respectively (Table-4.2) .Textural class of Sara was Clay loam, Bajoa and
jhalakati was silty clay loam correspondingly.
4.1.6.2 State of aggregation (SA)
The highest value of SA was found for Harta soil series 58% in silt loam soil,
organic carbon % was (5.37). In sandy clay loam texture the lowest value was 7%
for shrimanmgal soil series. In silty clay loam soil the highest value was 37% for
Garuri soil series and lowest value was 21% for Bajoa soil series (Table-4.2). State
of aggregation for clay loam soil was 32% for sara soil series. In silty clay soil the
lowest value of SA was 13% for Dumuria soil series. State of aggregation for
jhalakati soil was 29% that was silty clay loam in texture (Table-4.1).
4.1.6.3 Dispersion factor
4.1.7 Normalized stability index (NSI)
The highest NSI value was estimated 1.01 for Garuri soil series and the lowest
value was estimated 0.38 for Bajoa soil series silty clay loam in texture (Fig: 4.1).
In sandy clay loam soil the highest value was 0.91 for shrimangal soil series. In
silty clay soil NSI value was 0.82 for Dumuria soil series and 0.79 for jhalakati soil
series that was silty clay loam in textural class (Table-4.1). In clay loam soil
highest NSI value was 0.75 for sara soil series.
NSI vs % OC
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
%OC 2.00
1.00
0.00
% OC
NSI
Soil series
Variable
Mea
n
Media
n
St.
Dev
Minimu
m
% OC
1.51
1.40
0.66
0.88
2.96
pH
7.01
7.64
1.09
5.18
8.04
EC ds/m
4.51
2.11
5.24
0.78
17.11
NSI
0.73
0.79
0.21
0.38
1.01
%Sand
20.11
5.00
24.08
4.00
60.00
%Silt
46.22
47.00
21.34
18.00
84.00
%Clay
33.67
36.00
13.18
12.00
52.00
State of aggregation
25.89
21.00
15.37
7.00
58.00
Degree of
aggregation
0.32
0.30
0.148
0.14
0.60
Dispersion factor
150.2
151.9
63.2
47.6
275.0
Dev
Maximu
m
*St.
=
standard deviation
4.3 Relationship among soil properties
Organic carbon associated with 8-2mm and 0.25-0.05mm was negatively
correlated with % sand and % clay (Table-4.4). Organic carbon associated with
8-2mm and 0.25-0.05mm was positively correlated with % silt. Organic carbon
content was positively correlated with state of aggregation and degree of
aggregation .State of aggregation was positively correlated with % clay and was
negatively correlated with % sand (Table-4.4). Degree of aggregation was
positively correlated with state of aggregation and state of aggregation was
negatively correlated with dispersion factor.
Table 4.4: Correlations among selected soil properties
pH
% OC
pH
-0.283
0.461
EC ds/m
NSI %Sand
%Silt
%Clay
SA
DF
0.347
%Clay
SA
DA
0.327* -0.381
0.444 -0.609
0.864*
0.390
DF
0.311
0.099
0.881
0.878
0.231
0.082
0.003
As soil aggregation strongly affected by soil organic carbon content and type of
soil. It can be conclude that yet soil aggregate is badly affected by soil organic
carbon content rather than type of soil also play a vital role in soil aggregate
status. From my result, Harta soil series contain large amount of % OC, but as it
was peat basin soil so aggregate status was poor. Similarly Sara soil contain little
amount of % OC but aggregate status was rich as it was Ganges meander
floodplain soil and inherited texture clay loam.