Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Revolutionary Buddha
Revolutionary Buddha
THE REVOLUTIONARY
BUDDHA
WRITER
PUBLISHER
THE REVOLUTIONARY
BUDDHA
with Publisher
Writer
2nd Edition :
Publisher:
Mulnivasi Publication Trust
Survey No.5,4/311,Keshav Nagar,
Mundhava,Pune-411036
Printer :
Chhatrapati Printers
Survey No.5,4/311, Keshav Nagar,
Mundhava, Pune-411036
Rs
Rs. 60/-
INDEX
1.
PREFACE
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
PREFACE
Albert Einstein
had done thousands of misreporting about the life and the teachings of
the Buddha to confuse the peoples.
Due to these misreporting, the peoples accepted the Buddha
as a spiritual religious teacher and not as a revolutionary Buddha.
They dont notice the revolutionary work and the revolutionary
teachings of the Buddha. Due to the spiritual tinge, the peoples find
the Buddha and His Dhamma applicable to the spiritual World only;
they dont find it useful for the material World. Thats why, many
Buddhist countries in the World like China, Korea, Cambodia, Vietnam,
etc although being a Buddhist countries accepted Communist as a
model of revolution to bring a change in the system over there. They
are using Buddha and Buddhism only for the spiritual way of life. If
they would have known the revolutionary life and teachings of the
Buddha, they would have not needed Communism in place of the
Buddhism.
If we will see and compare the life and teachings of the Buddha
and Carl Marx, we see that, Marx only written his revolutionary
teachings in the form of Communism; but if we see the Buddha, we
find that, the Buddha not only presented His revolutionary teachings
but He himself lived a life of a revolutionary and done Himself a
revolution in ancient Indian before 2500 years of Carl Marx. Here, I
dont want to discuss about who is superior or inferior among the
Buddha and Carl Marx; both are the best at their own places. What I
want to say is that, the Buddhas revolutionary teachings in the form
of Buddhism were far ahead and superior in compare to that of the
Marxs Communism. In his later life, Carl Marx himself walked into
the footprints of the Buddha. These issues will be discussed in my
upcoming book named Carl Marxs Buddhism.
Due to hiding of the revolutionary aspect of the life and the
teachings of the Buddha, the Buddhism had attained a thorough
dullness as a whole. One cant understand the real objective of the
Buddhas dedication and devoted work. This has given a kind of
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
10
11
12
The actual history of the Buddha was like this:The Buddha was born in 563 B.C. in India. He belonged to
the SAKHYA Gana. (Ganas were the tribal Republics in an ancient
India).
The Brahmins had made majority of Mulnivasi (i.e. native)
Bahujan Indians their slaves and made their lives miserable. The
Peoples were suffering due to atrocities of an invader Brahmins on
them. Since, the Brahmins were robbing majority of Indians, they were
happy as like todays Capitalists; though the Brahmins were in minority.
The Buddha decided to free majority native (i.e. Mulnivasi)
Indians from the atrocities of these invader Brahmins. The Brahmins
had made native Indians their slaves with the help of their religious
ideology of Brahmanism. Native (i.e. Mulnivasi ) Indians had not their
own religion, thats why, they were suffering.
The Buddha decided to free native (i.e. Mulnivasi) Indians
from the Brahmins slavery by offering them a good humanistic religion.
To create a religion was a very difficult task at the time of the
Buddha. The Brahmins had kept all the religious knowledge to
themselves only. If any non-Brahmins Indian want to gain this
knowledge, then the condition of the Brahmins was that, he must leave
his home and he must become a hermit.
The Buddha had no other option but to leave His home, if He
wants to achieve His goal. So, under big tension, He left his home to
free His peoples from the slavery of the Brahmins and their Brahmanism.
Initially, the Buddhas parents couldnt understand Him and
His objective properly; otherwise, they would have helped Him. They
simply wanted that, their son should become a king greater than His
father. So, they adopted every possible means to keep Buddha
attached to His surroundings. They kept Him in very luxurious and
happy life. But, the Buddha was much worried about the miserable
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
13
life of his peoples. He was sure that, the only way to get freedom to
His peoples was to do a social revolution in India to bring a change in
social system.
To engage further in His life, Gautamas parents done His
marriage with Yashodhara. This marriage further brought restrictions
on His expectations. But, the Buddha had decided firmly to achieve
His goal at any cost. He was finding a way to escape from family
bondage. Finally, He got a chance on the incidence of dispute of Shakya
and Koliyas on the river water. He decided to take advantage of this
dispute. So, He purposefully opposed to Shakyas option of war on
the Koliyas.
There was a fight between SAKHYAS and KOLEYAS on
sharing the water from the river ROHINI. ( Koleya was an another
Gana in an ancient India ).
The Sakhyas declared a war on the Koleyas.
The Sakhyan army chief ordered all young men to join in army
and fight with Koleyas.
The Buddha denied fighting. The Buddha was initially known
by the name of Siddhartha or Gautama before attaining His
Enlightenment.
The army chief wanted to punish Gautama, so, he gave choices
to Siddhartha like,
The death or exile i.e. the social boycott of the family, etc.
This caught the attention of king KOSALA who controlled
both the Ganas.
Siddhartha chose to die.
But the army chief was a bit afraid to kill Him, because of
possible consequences.
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
14
15
16
17
*********
18
19
Buddhas and He himself was the 28th Buddha. The Buddha also had
told Himself that, He is not going to invent a new kind of philosophy
but He is refreshing an old Buddhist philosophy in a new way. Thats
why; He developed His Buddhist philosophy based on the Kapilas
Sankhya philosophy. Indians were giving so much respect to Kapila
that, the Buddhas native birth place (i.e. Kapilavastu ) was named
after Him. This shows that, there was a direct link between Buddha
and the earlier mulnivasi Buddhist philosophers.
To defeat the Buddhists and to nullify the Buddhas revolution,
the Brahmins also told that, the Buddha was the 9th Avatar of Brahmin
God Vishnu. The Brahmins Avatars were devoted to the well-being
of Brahmins only; they had nothing to do with the sufferings of the
Mulnivasis (i.e. native) Indians. Whenever mulnivasis (i.e. native)
Indians done any kind of revolution against the Brahmins supremacy,
the Brahmins found themselves in danger and called for their Avatars
for their help. This is explained in the Brahmins text Bhagvad Geeta in
Sanskrit as, ( YADA YADA HI DHARMASYA . ). So, all the
Brahmins Avatars were against mulnivasis (i.e. native) Indians and
were helping Brahmins to crush the local peoples. The Buddha was
the Patha-Giver to the suffering Mulnivasis (i.e. native) Indians and so
was a great threat to the Eurasian Brahmins. So, how He can be the
Avatar of Brahminical Gods? So, this is a false propaganda of cunning
Brahmins to nullify his great work.
The Buddha was also strictly against the statue worship. By
taking an inspiration from the great Buddha, all Mulnivasis (i.e. native)
Bahujan Great Emancipators (i.e. Mahapurusha) like Mahatma Phule,
Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, Varkari saints, etc and Prophet Mohammad,
Jesus Christ, etc religious leaders also opposed the statue worship.
The statue worship increases the status of Brahmins in the
form of the priests and converts open minded followers into blind
faithed devotees. The Brahmins always provoked priesthood to harass
and cheat the peoples in the name of religion and the God. Thats
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
20
why, the Brahmins killed Lord Buddha, Lord Krishna, all Varkari
Saints, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar and after killing them bodily, the
Brahmins made the statues of these great persons and became the
priests to kill their teachings. The Buddha had expected that, the
peoples will follow his teachings; so, He didnt keep any successor.
He said that, His successor will be His teachings and advised peoples
to follow them to improve their lives. But the peoples engaged
themselves in Brahmin priests. Many Brahmins became Buddhist
monks and they converted the Buddha into the 9th avatar of the
Brahmin God Vishnu and converted Revolutionary Buddhism into a
priestly Mahayan Buddhism.
The Buddha was called as BHAGVAN in Pali language. The
Bhagvan doesnt mean God. The Brahmins purposefully misreported
this word to present the Buddha in the form of the Brahmanical Gods
like Vishnu, Brahma, etc.
The Bhagvan is a Pali word, which means the one who has
eradicated the Brahmanical defilements like anger, greed, hatred, etc.
Bhagga means to eradicate, to destroy and Van means the
Brahmanical defilements like anger, greed, hatred, etc. In Buddhism,
it is said that, Bhagga-rago, bhagga-daso, bhagga-mohiti bhaggava.
It means the one who has eradicated the Brahmanical defilements like
anger, greed, hatred, by his own wisdom.
The Buddha was a revolutionary and He had destroyed the
Brahmanism with His revolutionary mission; thats why, He is called
as a BHAGVAN. Thats why; the Brahmanical Gods like Brahma,
Vishnu, etc are never called as Bhagvan, because they are not the
revolutionary; so they are always called as God but not Bhagvan.
From the word Bhagvan, the name of the color Bhagva did
aroused. The Buddha and his monks were using maroon colored
Chivar. When the Buddha was giving a talk to his followers, the peoples
were listening to Him deeply. At that time, they were feeling Him as
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
21
like a maroon colored figure only. Thats why, from His maroon colored
Chivar; the name of that color became BHAGVA.
The Buddha used this color for his Chivar because it is the
symbol of prosperity of Mulnivasi Indians. The Mulnivasi Indian culture
is the working culture (i.e. Shraman Sanskruti). The Brahmins culture
is a lofty culture. The Brahmins never do any physical work. They
strive on the production of the hard work of Mulnivasi Indians. They
are the parasites on the hard work of Mulnivasi Indians since the
ancient past. After the hard work of the farmers, the Buddha was
observing the crops in the fields as a maroon colored prosperity of
His peoples. The Buddha and His father themselves were the farmers.
So, naturally, the Buddha had a great pride for the farmers. To give a
long lasting memory to this symbol of prosperity, He used this maroon
color of the harvesting crops to His dress code. Also, after a hard
work, He had attained Enlightenment. So, the maroon color of His
dress was the symbol of His dedication, devotion and hard work and
His grand prosperity of the thoughts.
*******
22
23
24
the form of the Buddha- mind. Shankara duly took over these Buddhist
concepts from him and presented them in his own name.
Shankara espoused the theory of Advaita, according to which
the individual Jivatman (or the Soul) of man and the universal
Paramatman (Brahma or God) are one and the same. According to
this, the visible World is only apparent reality and the Brahman as
the Absolute Reality. But when the only reality is Brahman, how
can there be another reality like the concept of Maya? Thus, it is said
that even Maya is unreality! But can Maya be untrue when it causes
the material world to be seen? The inference therefore made is that
Maya is NOT untrue. So, Maya is true and untrue and that is an
inference of the interpreters.
This concept of Illusion, Paradox of an apparent Reality
was actually presented by the Buddha centuries ago; which was
adopted by Shankara and then presented as the theory of Advaita .
In this way, Adi Shankaracharya and his followers like
Ramanujacharya and Madhavacharya presented the same Buddhist
concepts in different names like Maya for Buddhas illusion,
Advaita for the Buddhas Paradox of reality and Brahman for
Buddhas Shunyata. Hence, these are typically Crypto-Buddhists.
The Shankaras concept of Maya was actually derived from
Buddhist Illusion. The doctrine of Brahman is very much similar to the
Sunya philosophy of Nagarjuna. The author of Panchadashi also
says, What we call Brahman is the same truth as the Shunya of the
Buddhist.
In the Tantra, Acharya Shankara has been called a cryptoBuddhist; views expressed in Prajnparamit, the Buddhist
Mhyana book, perfectly tally with the Vedantic views propounded
by the Acharya. The author of Panchadashi also says, What we call
Brahman is the same truth as the Shunya of the Buddhist.
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
25
26
********
27
28
29
as like present God worshippers; but they were creating the statues
to remember their great ancestors. The Brahmins accepted this statue
worship from them and converted it into the statues of the Gods.
Likewise, the Brahmins accepted many words from the
language of the Indus peoples and created their Sanskrit language.
The Indus civilization researcher Mr. P.S. Sadar has proved that, the
primitive language of the World was that of the Indus civilization, which
was called as Marhati. From this primitive language of Marhati did
born the Worlds other languages like the French, Greek, English, Latin,
Arabic, Urdu, Marathi, Sanskrit, Tamil, Hindi and so on.
The Brahmins accepted all the words from this primitive
Marhati language of the Indus civilization and given them the hard
pronunciations to convert them into the Sanskrit language. For example,
the Brahmins converted Marhati word Haat into hast (i.e. hand into
English language), daat into sanskrit dant (i.e. tooth in English). Here,
the Brahmins did some hard pronunciations in each and every word
of Marhati language to convert that word into the Sanskrit language.
It is called as Sanskaran (i.e. to reproduce a new word from the
existing words). The Brahmins created their language from the method
of the Sanskaran; so, it is called as the Sanskrit language. (Sanskarit
language means the Sanskrit language).
Similarly, the Brahmins accepted the Pali word ARIYA to
convert into the Sanskrit word ARYA. The Pali language is the
Prakrit language (i.e. the natural primitive language of the mulnivasi
Indus peoples). In Pali language, ARIYA means the great being.
Thats why; Lord Buddha accepted this word in His teachings. The
four Ariya Truths means the four Great Truths. The Brahmins accepted
this Buddhist Pali word ARIYA to present them as the great beings.
While accepting this Pali word into the Sanskrit language, the Brahmins
done sanskaran on it and converted it into the Sanskrit word ARYA
and given it the meaning of the Pali word as the great being. In this
way, by doing a robbery, the Brahmins became the false great being,that
is the Aryas or the Aryans!!
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
30
31
Mulnivasi king Bali via this way of cheating only. When the Brahmins
attacked on his kingdom under the leadership of Waman, great
Mulnivasi king Bali defeated them very easily. So, after this defeat,
the Brahmins adjusted with him silently and then planned a way of
cheating to defeat him.
After the incidence of king Balis defeat, the Brahmins found
that, the direct battle is harmful to them; so, better is to use the way of
cheating and forgery. So, later on, the Brahmins never waged a direct
war against the Mulnivasi Indians. They choose the way of an indirect
war. Due to this indirect war, the Mulnivasi Indians forgot that, the
Brahmins being their enemies in the form of the foreign invaders. The
Mulnivasi Indians trusted on these cunning Brahmins. They trusted on
the Brahmins so much that, all the Mulnivasi Indians accepted the
Aryan Brahmins as their chief Priests and this is the chief reason for
their log lasted slavery. With the help of the power of Priesthood, the
Brahmins imposed an enslaving religion of Brahmanism and made all
native Indians as the slaves of Brahmins. Brahmins called these slaves
as the SHUDRA. In this way, a 4th Varna of the Shudra came into
existence.
The Brahmins always had done a silent war against the the
Mulnivasi Indians to defeat them till date. To control the the Mulnivasi
Indians (i.e. the Shudras), the Brahmins imposed the laws of Manu
via Manusmriti. To misguide the Mulnivasi Indians (i.e. the Shudras),
the Brahmins written 18 Puranas and 18 Sub-Puranas. Also, the
Brahmins written Ramayana, Mahabharata, Geeta, and various Smritis
to engage the Mulnivasi Indians into the slavery of the Brahmanism.
Thats why, to liberate the Mulnivasi Indians, the Buddha found the
importance of an another religion.
After the conquest, the Aryan Brahmins established themselves
as a dominant race. To maintain a position of supremacy on conquered
native Indians (i.e. the Mulnivasis), they created a theology, which
made Brahman the creator of the universe and the father of mankind,
and along with it, they evolved a class of the priests called as a Brahmins.
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
32
33
34
35
***********
36
37
from all religious associations, but that it sealed him away from all
human contacts and made it impossible for him to earn a living. And
where the priesthood had sufficient power, excommunication included
also exile or death. And so, we find that, the principal thunderbolt of
the Catholic clergy was fully developed in the West, many centuries
later by taking inspiration from atrocious Brahmanism.
INSTRUMENTS USED TO ESTABLISH A BRAHMIN
PRIEST STATE
The Brahmins established a Priest state in India with the help
of the following instruments:
1. THE CONCEPT OF THE GOD
The Aryan Brahmins perpetuated their position, privileges,
and sovereignty over the native Mulnivasi Indians only by divine
sanctions. The Revelation was a major instrument used to achieve
and maintain the Priesthood. It was used by all the religious founders
of the World, to influence the peoples. E.g. Lord Krishna presented
himself as a God, the Prophet Mohammed presented himself as a
Prophet of the God, Jesus Christ as a Son of God, etc.
To maintain their priesthood across the country, the Brahmins
used the help of concept God. They presented themselves a God
on the Earth (i.e. Bhu-deva ), so that, nobody shall disobey or insult
them.
2. BY PROCLAIMIMG THE RELIGIOUS BOOKS AS AN
INFALLIABLE
To maintain society in control, the Aryan Brahmins established
various codes, such as The Laws of Manu; the Institutes of Vishnu,
etc. They said that, it was delivered personally by the God; and many
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
38
39
They formulated a stupid theory. We are told that, the Brahmins created
the four castes for the eternal security and prosperity of the World but
instead they created Casteism for their own benefit- to keep their
upper hand over the others; so, the Brahmins put forth the false theory
of the origin of the four Varnas from different parts of the Brahma, the
Creator of the World:
*
That he produced the Brahmins from his head;
*
The Kshatriyas from his arms;
*
The Vaisyas from his thighs;
The Sudras from his feet. (Manu, I, 31; Inst. of Vishnu, II, 114; Varishtha, II, 1-20)
(Note: This is not accepted by science. Does anybody with a little
bit of common sense believe this foolish theory?)
It is important to note that, the first three Varnas ( i.e. Brahmins,
Kshtriyas and the Vaisyas) were that of the Aryans. The Aryans created
a forth Varna named as the Shudra Varna for the all the Mulnivasi
Indians. To include these Mulnivasi Indians into the Varna system of
the Aryans, they postulated this foolish theory. They prohibited
Education and use of weapons for the Shudra Mulnivasi Indians, so
that, nobody among them should raise questions against this foolish
theory or nobody should do the revolt against the invader Aryans.
By this theory, Brahmins reserved all religious, social, political,
educational rights to themselves only. (i. e. 100% reservation to the
Brahmins only in all the aspects of life.) ,
The Kshatriyas reserved the rights to rule, and the Vaishyas
reserved the rights over economy.
The first three Varnas are for the invader Aryans. The fourth
Varna of Shudra was created by Aryan Brahmins for the Mulnivasi
(i.e. native) Indians.
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
40
41
made slaves after conquering. So, from the Aryan perspective, all the
womens were native Indians including the womens with whom they
had married. Thats why; the Aryan Brahmins included all the womens
(even the Brahmin womens) into the Shudra Varna.
*******
42
43
The Shudra Buddhists could not bear the torture, and out of
fear got scattered and became the broken men. This turned in three
main ways.
A Large section of these broken men, out of fear got
surrendered to Brahmins; the Brahmins called them Hindus; who
are present day OBCs.
These surrendered broken men (i.e. present day O.B.C.
Hindus) were assigned various professions in the form of the
punishments like barbers, weavers, washer men, cattle rearers, etc.
Later on, these Shudras were assigned their castes as per their punished
professions. These professional Shudras were also called as Dastakars.
These dastakars are now constitutionally called as Other Backward
Classes (O. B. Cs). These professions were allotted them as a form
of the punishment. Later on, these professions were given the name of
the castes. E.g. the gardener knew by caste Mali, washer men known
by the caste Dhobi and so on.
Some of the Brocken men had fled to the interior areas like
Hills and Forests so as to protect themselves and their Identity from
the Brahmins. Brahmins called them ADIVASIS; now constitution calls
them as the Scheduled Tribes (i.e. ST).
As like Adivasis, some broken men (i.e. defeated the Shudra
Buddhists) didnt accepted the Brahmins social system and kept
wandering in hilly areas. The Brahmins started calling them as BhatakeVimukta (i.e. wanderers). Now, constitution calls them as NT/DNT/
VJNT.
Some Shudra Buddhists didnt surrender to the Brahmins and
kept fighting till the end. But finally, the Aryan Brahmins defeated the
remaining Shudras. These defeated broken men were thrown away
to the outskirt of villages. Due to lack of food, they started eating
dead animal flesh. For eating such dead cattle, these were dubbed as
Untouchables and now constitutionally as Scheduled Castes (SCs)
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
44
So, the present SC, ST & OBCs are the Mulnivasis of this nation and
belong to ONE BLOOD and ONE RACE and ONE RELIGION
i.e. BUDDHISM.
8. THE ARYANS CONVERTED THEIR THREE VARNAS
INTO THE BRAHMIN CASTE
After the successful revolution of the Lord Buddha and
Vardhaman Mahavira, the Aryans found that, the cause of these
revolutions being successful was the one status the Mulnivasi Indians
in the form of their one Shudra Varna. On the other hand, they found
that, the Aryans were devided into three different Varnas named
Brahmin, Kshtriya and the Vaishya Varna. To defeat the Mulnivasi
Indians, it was important for them to get united in one umbrella and to
divide Mulnivasi Indians into different groups. By keeping this in view,
after 185 B.C., the Aryans united their all three Varnas into one group
and named it as the BRAHMIN CASTE. To make this as the supreme
ruler of India, the Brahmins established the Code of Manu i.e.
Manusmriti.
To divide the Mulnivasi Indians, the Brahmins created different
castes among them in the name of their punished professions. The
farmers were called as Kunabhi, now, they are called as Maratha in
some regions of the Maharasthra, the gardeners were called as Mali,
the cloth washers were called as Dhobi, etc. In this way, among the
Shudra Varna of the Mulnivasi Indians, the Brahmins created 6000
different castes. Also, in each caste, the Brahmins created 12 and half
different castes. In this way, among the Shudra Mulnivasi Indians, the
Brahmins created about 75,000 different castes. To break the unity
among these peoples, the Brahmins given unequal grading to these
castes, so each caste were superior to some other castes and also
was inferior to some other castes. In this way, every caste was
considering superior to its inferior caste peoples and was trying to
gain the superior status of the Brahmins. Now a day also, this situation
can be seen. Eg. Kunbhi are calling themselves as Maratha, Bhangi
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
45
are calling them as Valmiki. But their status is remained same as earlier;
though the name was changed.
9. THE CONCEPT OF THE LIVING GODS
The Brahmins presented themselves as a living Gods on the
Earth and asked Mulnivasi (i.e. native) Indians to worship them next
to the God. This was their tactic to enslave mulnivasi Indian peoples
in the name of God.
The Brahmins told the peoples that, the Brahma, as the creator
of mankind, was the Great Father; and the Brahmins, as his primary
creatures was his direct representatives and the microcosmic replicas
of the Brahma (God) on the Earth. Therefore, the Brahmins were
calling themselves as the living Gods or the lesser Brahmas on the
Earth. Thats why, the Brahmins call themselves as the Bhudeva (i. e.
the Living Gods on the Earth). It was this concept of the Brahmins,
which inspired the clergy of the Catholic Church to designate themselves
as the Holy Fathers.
**********
46
47
48
49
50
51
favorable to them and avoided to teach the things against them. This
made them possible to Brahamanise the peoples.
THE OUTBRUST AGAINST THE BRAHAMANISM
The peoples were suffering under the atrocities of Brahmanism.
The peoples wanted freedom but the Brahmanism had kept no scope
for their freedom. The Brahmins had captured peoples in jailed religion
by introducing various imaginary concepts like Heaven, Hell, good
deeds, bad deeds, God and its wrath, Soul, Re-birth, etc.
If anyone will break religious rules of the Brahmanism, he will
be liable to the Gods punishment which is offering torturous Hell with
torturous after-life. These rules are not applicable to the bloody
Brahmins because they are the living Gods on the Earth! The Brahmins
are happy in this life on the Earth because they have done good deeds
in their past lives. They will not get Hell and Hellish after-life even
after their bad deeds in this life because they are the Brahmins by the
birth. No one can punish them; not even God because they are
themselves God!
If anyone is poor or suffering in this life; then, it is because of
his bad deeds in his past life. If you want to get rid of such life and if
you want a better future life; then do good deeds. It means what?
make Brahmins and their Gods happy. How do they become happy?
by offering them precious gifts, presents, donations, by presenting
them cows, crops, money, beautiful girls, wine or whatever the
Brahmins do demand.
What happened because of this? The Brahmins started
becoming more and richer. Whereas,the general peoples started
becoming more and more poor. The Brahmins became happier;
whereas, the poor Mulnivasi Indian peoples became unhappy. In this
way, the Brahmins were the real cause of general peoples sufferings
and miserable life; but the cunning Brahmins blamed its reason to the
poor peoples bad deeds in their past lives. This was a way to escaped
themselves from the blame of Mulnivasi Indians sufferings.
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
be the real follower of the Buddha and his Dhamma. He must identify
Buddhist devotees first and should covert them into Buddhist followers.
How to identify a Buddhist devotee? A Buddhist devotee is
one who follows Buddhism blindly as a faith in the form of simply
mugging Buddhist Trisarana, Panchsheela and Ashta-gatha, who preys
in front of the Buddhas statue and worships the Buddha in the form
of the statue, who sits blindly by doing Vipassana, who follows Hindu
festivals and Gods, who follows Casteism, etc. These peoples call
themselves as a Buddhists but in reality, they are simply the Buddhist
devotees and not the Buddhist followers. The Buddhist devotees are
harmful to the Buddha and his Dhamma and they are the reason for
the fall of Buddhism. A devotee is a danger to Buddhism and helps
indirectly to the Brahmanism. A devotee indirectly kills the Buddha by
killing his revolutionary teachings and helps the Brahmins.
What we want is a follower and not a devotee. A Buddhist
follower walks on the path of the Buddha; he is a direct opposite to
the devotee. A follower never believes in the blind faith and mugging
Buddhas teachings or sitting blindly in the meditation. He goes in the
field and tries to eradicate Brahmanism to relieve peoples from their
sufferings as like Buddha had done in his life.
The Buddhas order of the monks was the followers of the
Buddha and not the devotees. So, they worked in the field and done
a direct war against the Brahmanism. The Buddha advised them,
Freed am I, O Monks, from all bonds, whether divine or human. You
too, O Monks, are freed from all bonds, whether divine or human.
Go forth, O Monks, for the good of the many, for the
happiness of the many, out of compassion for the World. For the
good, benefit, and the happiness of the men. O, let not two go by one
way. Preach, O Monks, the Dhamma, excellent in the beginning,
excellent in the middle, excellent in the end, both in spirit and in the
letter. Proclaim the Holy life altogether, perfect and the pure.
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
60
There are the beings, with a little dust in their eyes, who, not
hearing the Dhamma, will fall away. There will be those who understand
the Dhamma.
In the above message, the Buddha advises his follower monks
to spread his ideology all over the World in all four directions. With
the help of his noble ideology and well trained and devoted monks
only, the Buddha, as a single person was able to spread his Dhamma
all over the World and was able to do revolution. The Buddhas
revolution was the Worlds first kind of revolution done by a single
person without any bloodshed.
At one incidence, the Buddha asked monks, Monk, if peoples
wont listen to you and abuse you, then what you will do? The Monk
answered, I will preach. Then Buddha asked, Monk, if peoples
will hurt you and wont listen to you, then what you will do? The
monk answered, still I will try to preach.. Buddha then asked, If
peoples still wont listen and will try to kill you, then what you will
do? Then monk answered, Still I will try to preach. Buddha said,
You are my real follower. Buddhism will boom with the help of such
followers only.
After Buddhas death, the Brahmins started inserting their
teachings in Buddhism and called it Mahayana under the patronage of
the Kushan Emperor Kanishka. In Mahayana, the Brahmins given
Buddha the status of the God and started his prayers and the cult of
devotees started thence in Buddhism. Also, thousands of Brahmins
became the Buddhist Monks and they kept misbehaving (like drinking
wine, cheating, abusing girls, etc ) in the name of the Buddhist monks
to defame the Buddhism and its monks. Due to such misbehavior of
the Monks, the peoples started hating Buddhism and lead to the fall
of Buddhism in India. Emperor Ashoka had expelled such 60,000
Brahmin monks from the order of the Buddhist monks.
The Brahmin Monks also started Meditation (i.e. Vipassana)
to kill the Buddhas revolutionary teachings. They also started
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
61
62
the order to be like the worriers. At one time, the Monks asked the
Buddha, Warriors, warriors, Lord, we call ourselves. In what way
then we are warriors? The Buddha said, We wage a war, O disciples,
therefore, we are called as warriors.
The Monks further asked to the Buddha, for what Lord, we
wage a war?. The Buddha replied, for the lofty virtues, for high
Endeavour, for the sublime wisdom- for these things we do wage a
war; therefore, we are called warriors. Where virtue is in danger, do
not avoid fighting, do not be meanly-mouthed; you must fight; you
must wage a war.
The Buddha had waged a war against the Brahmins and their
Brahmanism. The Brahmins had made Mulnivasi Indians their slaves
and had robed their virtues. The Buddha wanted to regain the virtue
of his peoples i.e. Mulnivasi Indians; thats why, he had waged a war.
It was a direct revolution to get freedom to the Mulnivasi Indians from
the slavery of Brahmanism. Thats why; the Buddha called himself
and his monks as warriors and advises to fight for the Truth.
After the counter-revolution in 185 B.C., Brahmins hide
warrior Buddha and presented the silent Buddha in meditating position
with the eyes closed. Due to this, the monks forgot their revolutionary
and fighter attitude and became the peace- lover and meanly-mouthed
monks. We see numerous such kinds of Monks at present also in
Buddhism. The Buddha didnt expect this. This non-fighter attitude of
the Monks also became one of the reasons for the decline and the fall
of the Buddhism from India. So, for the welfare and progress of
Buddhism, and for upholding the truth of the Dhamma, the Monks
must be fighters; they must be warriors.
63
64
********
65
With the help of the Vedas, the Brahmins had enslaved the
womens in India. All the womens including the Brahmin womens
were also declared as the Shudra by the Brahmins. This is because,
when the Brahmins attacked India, they didnt bring their womens
with them. So, after defeating the native (i.e. Mulnivasi) Indians,
Brahmins married with the widows of the killed soldiers of the native
(i.e. Mulnivasi) Indians. Since, these womens were the native (i.e.
Mulnivasi) Indians, the Brahmins declared them as the Shudra. The
Brahmins used them only for the breeding purpose. So, the Brahmins
declared the daughters or the sons of these females as the Shudras.
At the age of 8 years, the Brahmins were doing the ceremony of
Upnayana to convert this boy of Shudra female into Aryan Brahmin
male. This conversion ceremony was like a new birth to the child, so,
a Brahmin boy was considered as a TWICE BORN (i.e. DWIJA).
Brahmins daughters were considered as the Shudra; owing to their
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
66
gender. This shows that, the Brahmins had a deep hatred towards the
India womens. The cause behind this is that, when the Brahmins had
invaded in India in 3100 B.C., at that time, there was a Matriarchal
system in India. It means that, the womens were the rulers. So, during
the war, Indian womens defended vigorously with the invader
Brahmins. So, as hatred towards them, the Brahmins included them in
the Shudra Varna.
The Buddha revolution rejected the Brahmanism; so, womans
got a hope of freedom. The Buddha freed Indian womens from
Brahmins slavery by accepting them into his order of the monks. Since
being the Shudras, the Brahmins had denied womens education and
freedom. But due to Buddhas revolution, womens not only became
simple monks but many womens became the well known Arhats!
The Buddha was the first person in the World to given freedom
to the womens by accepting them in the religious activities freely. In
other countries, when the womens were suffering in deep darkness,
at that time, the Buddha had given womens a respectful life, glory
and Enlightenment!!
2.
AN ERA OF SCIENCE AND EDUCATION
STARTED.
The Brahmins had denied an education to the Shudras (i.e.
the Mulnivasi Indians). The Brahmins had held the Vedas as the prime
object of the knowledge. But, in the Vedas, we can see only the
superstitions, which crafts and animal killing in Yadgnyas and drinking
Soma. This led to an era of Darkness and sufferings. The Buddha had
denied the Vedas and approved education to all the peoples including
the womens. This given a new breakthrough and the peoples started
learning and thinking. This given birth to the scientific attitude and
emerged ancient great Indian scientists like Aryabhatta. Also, medical
field gained boom and Ayurveda was at its peak. The Great physician
like Jivaka was the Buddhas personal physician. He was even doing
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
67
*******
68
69
70
******
71
72
In this way, finally, the Brahmanism moved into a thoroughgoing pantheism, and prepared to take a refuge into Buddhism by
developing a philosophy which denied that the Vedas were in
themselves sufficient for the Salvation.
From above discussion, we can see that, though the Brahmins
initially presented themselves as a living Gods on the Earth but over
the time, due to Mulnivasi peoples public outburst, their condition
became so miserable that, later on, they had to abandon their own
philosophy of the Vedas and had to take a refuge in human friendly
Buddhism.
The most prominent Brahmin who had taken refuge into
Buddhism was Adi Shankaracharya. He adopted each and every
principle of the Buddhism into Brahmanism and presented it in the
name of Hinduism. Thats why, he becomes as a Crypto-Buddhist
and Hinduism as a Crypto-Buddhism. In this way, to misguide the
Mulnivasi Indian Buddhists, the Brahmins converted Buddhism into
Hinduism.
From the above discussion, we can see that, Hinduism is
nothing but an altered form of Buddhism and every Hindu is a defeated
Buddhist by the Brahmins. The Brahmins defeated Buddhists and
destroyed Buddhism in every possible way and mixed their
Brahmanism into the principles of Buddhism and given it the name as
Hinduism.
So, in the simple words, we can say that, Hinduism is nothing
but a defeated Buddhism with a dirty mask of Brahmanism. In
Hinduism, there is dirt of the Brahmanism in the form of Casteism, unequality, etc. If this dirt of Brahmanism is removed from Hinduism,
then it remains as a pure Buddhism!!
73
74
invades into his enemy organizations and destroy it. Every time, the
Brahmins destroyed the Mulnivasi Indians revolts by this method only
since 5000 years.
The Buddhist Sangha was the chief missionary of the Buddhist
movement. So, the Brahmins entered into it to eradicate Buddhism.
Many Brahmins become the fake monks; they were called as the
Crypto-Buddhists. At the time of the Buddha alone, about 75% were
the Brahmin monks. Due to the influence of the Buddha they didnt
done any contradictory activities but once the Buddha was gone in
483 B.C., the Brahmin monks started showing their original picture.
Many Brahmin monks were using abusive words about the Buddha
to show their hatred towards the Buddha and his Dhamma. A Monk
Subhadra really enjoyed Buddhas death and said that, its good that,
we are freed from the Buddhas orders!
The Brahmin monks started misreporting about the teachings
about the Buddha; so that, there should be a confusion among the
Monks. This lead to the disintegration of the united Buddhist Sangha
and within 100 days only, the Brahmins succeeded in dividing Buddhism
into 18 different sects. This was the first success of the Brahmin monks
towards eradication of the Buddhism from India!
To defame the noble Buddhism and its noble Monks, the
Brahmin monks started doing anti-social activities like cheating,
abusing, drinking wine, harassing girls, etc. This lead to the destruction
of the nobility of Buddhism and its Monks and the general peoples
started hating them. The peoples started saying that, the Buddhism
and its Sangha was good at the time of the Buddha but now it is of no
use. The peoples stopped co-operating the original Monks and this
lead to the despair among the Monks and among the Buddhist society.
Up to the time of the Emperor Ashoka, the Brahmins had invaded the
Buddhist Sangha in so much huge number that, it was difficult to see a
single noble Monk! The noble Monks were so much tired to see
downfall of Monks that, they better decided to leave the Sangha and
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
75
gone on the mountains. All good and noble Mulnivasi monks had left
Buddhism, so the Buddhist Sangha was full of fake Brahmin Monks
(i.e. the Crypto-Buddhists) only. Replacing the Buddhist Sangha with
the Brahmin monks by expelling the Mulnivasi Monks was the second
victory of the Brahmins over the Buddhism!
3. BY ENTERING INTO THE BUDDHIST MAURYAN
EMPIRE IN THE FORM OF THE SOLDIERS
The Brahmins found that, only gaining their control over the
Buddhist Sangha was not sufficient. Still there were some noble
Mulnivasi monks and the peoples were adherent to the original
teachings of the Buddha. The Brahmins started calling them with
derogatory term of Hinyana (i. e. a lesser way of the Buddhism).
To detach them from Hinyana, the Brahmins decided to enter
in the Mauryan Government in the form of the soldiers. After Ashoka,
the Brahmins entered in huge numbers in the Mauryan army. In 185
B.C., the Brahmin Pushya mitra Shunga became a chief army officer.
When Bridhratha (the grand-son of Ashoka) was watching the army
cadres, that time, a Brahmin named Pushyamitra Shunga attacked on
him and killed him. This conspiracy was managed by Brahmin Patanjali,
Walmiki, Manu with the help of Pushya mitra Shunga.
After the fall of the Mauryan Empire, the Brahmin king
Pushyamitra Shunga ordered direct killings of the original Mulnivasi
Buddhist Monks and the follower peoples. He had given orders that,
anyone who will bring a cut head of Buddhist Monk; he will be awarded
with 100 gold coins. In a hope, many Buddhist Mulnivasi peoples
killed their own Monks. Brahmin Monks also burnt the Buddhist books
and destroyed the Buddhist Viharas. The Brahmins converted these
Viharas into the Brahmins temples (now they are recognized as the
Hindu temples). The Brahmins also destroyed the Buddha statues
within these Viharas and converted them into either the statues of the
Shiva or the Vishnu. The Brahmins also blended the Buddhas teachings
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
76
77
them that, these tribes are the descendents of Kshatriya Ram and
Krishna but since now they had accepted the Buddhism; their status
of kshatriya was lost and due to Buddhism they have degraded
themselves to the status of the Shudra. Actually, the fact is that, the
Brahmins had allotted the status of Shudra to all Indians including
these tribes. The Buddha had freed the Shudras from this status and
made them able to be the rulers of the country. So, the real fact is that,
it is the Brahmins who had degraded the status of the total Indians to
the lower status of the Shudra and it is the Buddha who had elevated
them from this lower status of the Shudra to the higher status of rulers.
The cunning BrahminAdi Shankaracharya had given misleading
information to the tribal Buddhists like Huns, Gurjars, etc. Not all
tribal men fallen prey to the cunning tactics of Brahmin Adi
Shankaracharya but some greedy tribal Buddhists accepted his false
concept and started calling them as Rajputs. Rajput was also a
derogatory term given by Cunning Brahmin Adi Shankaracharya to
these tribal Buddhists to insult them. The real meaning of RAJPUT is
THE ILLEGAL OFFSPRING OF A KING! See the notorious
Brahmins!! Even they dont respect their helping peoples.
After accepting the fake concept of the Kshatriya, these
tribal Buddhists became Rjputs and started killing their own brothers
who were the remaining tribal Buddhists. In Rajasthan, there were so
much Buddhist Viharas and Chaityas that, one town was named as
Chaityagad. Later on, Rajputs started calling it as Chitod. So, the
name Chitod is misnomer of the word Chaityagad.
6. BY ABSORBING THE BUDDHAS TEACHINGS
INTO THE BRAHMANISM
This was the last effort by the Brahmins to eradicate Buddhism
en route from India. The Brahmins found that, in spite of the above
destructive activities, the Mulnivasi Indians were not ready to forget
the memories of the Buddha and his teachings. When the Brahmins
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
78
found that, its not possible to eradicate the influence of Lord Buddha
from the peoples mind, they decided to accept the Buddha and his
teachings into the fold of Brahmanism and nullify Buddha and his
Buddhism.
The Brahmins were working on this issue since the fall of the
Mauryan Empire in 185 B.C. In view of this, the Brahmins had written
Ramayana, Mahabharata and Bhagavad-Gita. The Brahmins presented
Ram in Ramayana and Krishna in Mahabharata and Bhagavad-Gita
to replace Lord Buddha. Ram is an imaginary person; so Ramayana
is also an imaginary story. The real Ram is the Brahmin Pushyamitra
Shunga and his court poet, a Brahmin, named as Valmiki had written
Ramayana on him. The Buddha was known as a MARYADA
PURUSHOTTAM due to his nobility, kindness and humanity. The
Brahmins applied these noble characteristics to this imaginary character
of Ram and started calling him as a MARYADA PURUSHOTTAM!
Also, the Lord Krishna was a Mulnivasi king and he was an
enemy of the invader Aryan Brahmins. But to replace the Lord Buddha,
the Brahmins presented him in the place of the Buddha.
The Brahmins wrote the stories of Ramayana and Mahabharata in an
interesting way. Slowly over the generations, the peoples started getting
interest in these stories and accepted Ram and Krishna as equal to
the status of the Lord Buddha.
When the Brahmins found that, Ram and Krishna couldnt
replace the Lord Buddha completely, they decided to accept the
Buddha and his teachings in the fold of the Brahmanism. Thats why;
the Brahmins added all the teachings of the Buddha in BhagavadGita.
It is the Brahmin Adi Shankaracharya who adopted each and
every principle of the Buddhism into Brahmanism and presented it in
the name of Hinduism. Shankaracharya was responsible to absorb
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
79
the Buddha into Hinduism and recognize the Buddha as the ninth avatar
(i.e. an incarnation) of the Brahmin God Vishnu! This, he had done
purposely to eradicate Buddhism from India. Thats why; he is called
as a Crypto-Buddhist and his religion Hinduism as a Crypto-Buddhism.
Shankara established Hinduism to reduce the appeal of
Buddhism and to re-establish supremacy of the Brahmins. While doing
so, he copied the Buddhism and presented it (as it is) as Hinduism in
his own name. Observing the importance of the Buddhist Sangha as a
centre of learning, preaching and revolution, he too set up monasteries
and called them as Mathas .
The peoples found each and every aspect of Buddhism in
Shankaras newly found religion of Hinduism. In other words, we can
say that, they found Hinduism as Buddhism only; the name only
appearing to be changed!! So, they freely accepted Hinduism as a
modified version of Buddhism. Due to this, Buddhism lost its appeal
in India and the Brahmins gained importance. Shankara integrated
the sound teachings of Buddha into the Vedic religion, and given birth
to Hinduism; which is solely Buddhism.
********
80
81
82
shrines of Shiv and Vishnu. Wright records that there had been a
curious intermixture of the two religions with Buddhist priests officiating
at the temples of Pashupati (Shiv) and all the four castes following the
religion of Buddha.? Shankaracharya had directed such persecutions.
Many local hill Buddhist kings now invited Brahmins to their domains
to get them elevated to the rank of Kshatriyas. And many were
encouraged to attack Buddhist monasteries.
Several Nepalese accounts state that the followers of Buddha
were ruthlessly persecuted, slain, exiled and forcibly converted. Though
many converted rather than face death, humiliation or exile. The
attackers tested their faith by making them perform Hinsa, or the
sacrifice of live animals, that was abhorrent to Buddhists and Jains.
Many Bhikshunis, or nuns, were forcibly married and the learned
Grihasthas were forced to cut off the distinguishing knot of hair on top
of their heads. 84,000 Buddhist works were searched for and
destroyed.
It is believed that, Shankara introduced pilgrimages to these
holy places in the Himalayas for the first time to prevent their relapse
into Buddhist or animist ways. As sufficient local Brahmins could not
be found who were willing to preach in such remote places he imported
Nambudri Brahmin priests from Kerala who, to this day, officiate at
Badrinath, and Kedarnath.
Later, as the mountain settlements grew other Brahmins like
the Joshis and Pants from Maharashtra, Gairolas from Bengal and
Negis from Gujarat were also invited to settle in the hills. Holy
pilgrimages then ensured a constant influx of Hindu pilgrims with the
presence of many traders, priests and rulers who had a vested interest
in sustaining pilgrimages to these sacred spots.
The Buddhism, that had been strong in India in the 7th Century
was completely obliterated a century later due to the Brahmins
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
Thus, we can see that, what happened in India was repeated in the
West. In India, the Brahmins established a priest state under the
Brahmanism; similarly, in the West, the Church established a priest
state under the Christianity. Both lead India and the West into the long
Dark Age of the Priesthood, by rejecting Buddhism.
Initially, both the Brahmanism and the Church rejected
Buddhism for their selfish benefits but over the time, by seeing a public
outrage, they accepted Buddhism indirectly. The Brahmins accepted
it and given it the name as Hinduism; the Church accepted it and given
it a name as the Modern Christianity. Both are finally same: Both
Hinduism and Modern Christianity are altered forms of the Buddhism!
Finally, the Buddha won! Finally, the Buddhism won!! And it
will win an entire World as the peoples gradually will be educated!!!
90
91
92
It was not easy to free the peoples from the Brahmins slavery;
though he was a king because the Brahmins were the priests and they
had a good prestige in the eyes of king as well as society. As a prince
and the future king, it was easy for him to throw off the yoke of the
Brahmanism by mere fighting. But on deep thinking, he found that, it
was not so easy to gain independence from Brahmanism in this way,
and it was not the clever way at all. So, it was necessary for him to
seek another way, the way of gaining independence without
bloodshed- the peaceful independence.
What is the other way? What should be done? He thought,
thought, and thought. How could he do it, without the Brahamanised
Kosalans thinking that they had lost their control?
93
94
95
home of his own, then peoples might have talked a wrong about him.
He was aware of this. So, to get a public support to his home leaving,
he had purposefully opposed Shakyas opinion and pushed him in
trouble. He was aware that, by taking opposite stand against the
Shakya Gana, the army chief will order him to leave Shakya Gana.
He wanted this order only. So, he happily left his home and told his
noble cause of his leaving to his parents and wife. By listening to his
noble and great purpose for the welfare of the society, they also agreed
to his leaving home and his great work.
By making all things favorable, Gautama left the Sakya Gana
and became the parivraajaka i.e. the wanderer.
Any great work needs a great devotion. Without a full devotion,
nothing can be achieved. Buddha wanted to relieve the sufferings of
the peoples by relieving them from an atrocious Brahmanism, which
was a root cause of all sufferings.
It was not an easy task. The Brahmins were the ruling class at
that time. To protest against the Brahmins means to protest against
the King. It was a revolutionary work. Such a revolution would need
a great devotion.
So, He decided to renounce the world on the day his son,
Rahula, was born. To gain knowledge at that time, it was must to
renounce the World and to become a hermit. So, He renounced the
world by cutting off His hair, wearing the yellow robes and became a
Shramana.
If He had not taken that opportunity, it would have been
difficult for Him to renounce the world. It was the love of property;
wife and son were like the enemies which tied his neck, hands, and
feet. They would prevent Him from going anywhere. The love of wife
and son would destroy his plan for independence. If he could not
conquer the enemy inside His mind, how could He conquer the enemy
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
96
outside? Though He loved his parents, wife, son, and property, but
He loved the independence of His kingdom and people more. When
He decided to renounce the world, the important problem was where
He should go to first.
97
Siddhatthas refusal had many effects. First of all, the King Bimbisara
now trusted Him and did not fear that He would usurp His throne. In
this way, Siddhartha could stay there happily and openly. Ties of amity
were thus established with Bimbisara. As a result, King Pasenadi of
Kosala would not dare to do anything dangerous to Him. Though
these two kingdoms had close relationships to each other, but in the
politics and the power, they were the competitors of each other secretly.
This, however, was only the beginning of Siddhatthas political
play. He did not want to fight with the Aryan military power only, but
also with the power of the Aryan faith (i.e. Brahmanism) too. He wanted
to destroy both the power of Aryan military and faith in His kingdom.
In order to upset the Brahmanism, the Aryans faith, it was necessary
for Him to study deeply and test the religion of the Brahmanism first.
If He himself did not study and test it, how could he say that it was not
a good one? So, He decided to study and evaluate the available
knowledge first.
AN ENLIGHTENMENT OF SIDDHARTHA
Since, all the teaching schools and teachers were residing in
the jungles only; Siddhartha went in jungle and started gaining different
kinds of knowledge from the different teachers. So He began to study
under Alara Kalama and Uddaka Ramaputta until He knew everything
that the Aryans knew. He assimilated and evaluated it thoroughly and
rapidly. He learned basic Mulnivasi philosophy from Alara Kalama,
Udak Ramputaa, etc; who were all Mulnivasi (i.e. native) Indian
teachers. The most striking thing is that, the Buddha never made any
Brahmin teacher in his life. His first five disciples were also his
colleagues, who were native Mulnivasi Indians.
He studied everything that the Aryans knew. He even evaluated
this knowledge on Himself. But He was not satisfied because He found
that it was not sufficient to relieve the peoples sufferings. He found
that, the Brahmins presented the Vedas as a home of the supreme
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
98
knowledge; but after studying it, the Buddha found that, there is nothing
useful in the Vedas for the well-being of the society. He found the
Vedas nothing but an empty of knowledge like the deserts and so He
rejected the Vedas. Siddhartha tried to study and practice every kind
of knowledge (i.e. Vidya) and Yogas which were popular in those
days. He applied himself to Meditation, and various Yogas
accompanied by complete cessation of breathing, by reducing his food
to a grain of rice each day, and by living on seeds and grass etc.
Mahasihanada Sutta, He found that He had reached the limit of selfmortification, yet He had not attained Enlightenment. So, He denied
these thoughts.
To evaluate many such ideologies and philosophies available
at that time, He sat under a tree and started thinking deeply about the
Worldly sufferings. He started assimilating all Mulnivasi native
ideologies and philosophies like Charvaka, Sankhya, Lokayata, etc
to form a new philosophy.
The Brahmins propagated a wrong story about Him that, the
Buddha sat under a tree for the Meditation only, but its totally wrong.
There, He started thinking logically about the people and their
problems. He thought that, there must be another way to
Enlightenment. He thought of the way of Meditation which he had
once practiced when He was a child. In that a meditation He didnt
sat simply closing his eyes; He started thinking deeply about the nature
of the Worldly sufferings, the cause of these sufferings and the ways
to relieve these sufferings. Since this kind of Meditation was full of
thinking (i.e. Thoughtful meditation or the Philosophers Meditation), it
needed lot of energy and stomach full of food.
At that time, Siddhartha was on empty stomach. So, He
decided to take food first and then start the Thoughtful Meditation or
the Philosophers Meditation afterwards. Incidentally, Vishakha, a
natural worshipper, came to worship the Piple tree and was delighted
to see Siddhartha sitting there below the tree. She completed her
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
99
100
found that, the Brahmanism is the reason for peoples cravings and
desires for the Worldly things. So, He decided to alleviate the sufferings
of the peoples by eradicating the Brahmanism. So, He waged a war
against the Brahmanism by propagating Buddhism. The slogan of His
war was BAHUJAN HITAY, BAHUJAN SUKHAY (it means,
majority in progress, majority in happiness), which is similar to todays
Communism. The slogan of the Brahmins supremacy over the slave
Indians was ALPAJAN HITAY, ALPAJAN SUKHAY (it means,
minority in happiness, minority in progress) which is similar to todays
Capitalism.
The Buddha found that, the cause of peoples sufferings was
the Brahmins and their Brahmanism. To get rid of this Brahmanism,
the Lord Buddha offered His humanistic religion of Buddhism. The
Buddhism was a direct answer of the Lord Buddha to the Brahmins
atrocious Brahmanism.
The Buddha was a prince and after becoming a king, it was
easy for Him to eradicate the Brahmanism from the land of India. But,
even after becoming a World emperor, it was difficult for Him to kill
the Brahmanism. Because,there was no other religious ideology to
counter the Brahmanism. The Christianity or the Islam was not
developed yet. So, He decided to create His own religion to counter
the atrocious Brahmanism. The Buddha was also aware that, the
Brahmanism was an ideology and an ideology cant be killed by any
weapon like sword, knife, etc. An ideology must be killed by an
ideology only! So, to kill an atrocious ideology of the Brahmins (i.e.
Brahmanism), He left His home against His will. He and His family
beared the huge sufferings for the wellbeing of their peoples. This was
a greatest devotion of Lord Buddha and His family for the welfare of
the society. So, His home leaving event of Siddhartha is known as
MAHA-BHINISHKRAMAN!! This great even of MAHABHINISHKRAMAN is the golden event in the history of humanity,
which brought a turning point in the human life on the Earth.
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
101
102
However, later on, He realized that, if He did not preach His new
teachings (i.e. the Dhamma), how could His people, His relatives,
and His parents, His country gain the freedom from an atrocious
Brahmanism? His chief purpose of renouncing the world was to liberate
His kingdom and His peoples from the slavery the Brahmanism. By
attaining the status of the Buddha hood, He was near to that goal,
then why should He despair? Only He Himself could help His people,
His relatives, His parents, His wife, son, and His peoples. To explain
this situation, the Pitaka presented the story of the deity Brahma
Sahampati (means the Buddhas inner mind) appeared before Him
and requested Him to preach His teachings, pleading that some men
could understand it. So, He surveyed the world with His minds eye
and saw the different natures of mankind like the three kinds of lotuses:
some born in the water, grown up in the water, do not rise above the
water but thrive hidden under the water; some born in the water, grown
up in the water, reach to the surface while a third type grown up in the
water, stands up out of the water and the water does not touch it.
Likewise this, some peoples are intelligent and understanding able to
perceive the Buddhas teachings (i.e. the Dhamma); some can take
interest in it; whereas, some ignorant peoples (due to lack of proper
education and understanding), could be made understandable, with
the efforts of intelligent ones like the order of the monks i.e. Bhikkhus.
Thus, thinking this, He decided to preach His teachings to
such kind of peoples first. It is very important and meaningful to plan
first before doing anything. The teaching of the Buddha was the very
new kind of teaching in contrast to the prevalent Brahmanism at that
time. So, if He could not gain success at the first time, it would make
Him despair and His mission would be failed. So, it was very important
for Him to think, plan and work out according to such plan. His first
aim was to find intelligent and understanding persons. So, He first
thought of His two teachers, Alara Kalama and Uddaka Ramaputta;
who were curious, intelligent and understanding. But He knew that,
both of them had recently died. Then He thought further of the other
five Monks, or Pancavaggiyas, who had been with Him and left
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
103
Him when He had begun to take food after giving up his severe selfmortification. They were now at Benares in the Deer Park, Isipatana.
So, the Buddha decided to go to Benares to teach these five monks.
The questions is, why didnt He teach the people in Rajgaha
first? or Was it necessary for Him to go to Benares which was more
than 150 miles from Rajgaha? He must have planned thoroughly.
The reason is as mentioned above. And the other reason is that Benares
was the center of the Brahmanism and Jainism, and was the vassal of
the Brahmanised king Pasenadi of Kosala. If He could convert the
five monks there, it would mean that his Enlightenment was not in vein
and his mission would be successful. And, if His purpose was successful
at the first time, it could increase His hope and the confidence. These
five intelligent, noble and dedicated persons could further help Him
spread His teachings and if conditions go favorable; they in together
could spread His teachings in an entire kingdom and even could the
king of that kingdom. The well known theme is that, well begun is
half done and a unity is more powerful than singularity. If works
accordingly, the goal of the freedom of His kingdom clearly achieved.
So, after remaining awhile at Uruvela, He started for Banaras. On the
way, He met a naked Jain ascetic, but He did not teach him. He had
to work according to His plan.
When He reached Isipatana, the Deer Park, the five monks,
Pancavaggiyas, showed an unsuitable attitude to Him. It was because
they believed that self-mortification was the only way to Enlightenment.
However, the Buddha tried to explain to them that He was now the
Enlightened One and had come to preach them the way to gain
Enlightenment. At last, they believed and began to listen to Him.
The first sermon which the Buddha preached to the five monks
was called as Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta. The gist of that sermon
is that one must avoid the extremes of either self-mortification or selfindulgence. Next, one must practice the Middle Way which consists
of the eightfold path. And then the Buddha taught them the Four Noble
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
104
Truths like the nature of sufferings, the origin or the root cause of
sufferings, the cessation of sufferings and the method of bringing about
the cessation of the sufferings. At the end of the sermon, one of these
five Monks, named Kondanna, understood the sermon totally and
gained the pure or spotless Eye of Truth i.e. the Dhamma-Cakkhu
(i.e. the vision of the Buddha). This Monk was thus the first disciple
who gained the Dhamma-Cakkhu,of the Buddha or the pure Eye of
Truth.
The Buddha, then, formally admitted these five Monks as the
first members of the Sangha. Buddha established Sangha or the Order
of the Monks as a community of an intelligent and nobles ones who
are dedicated to the noble cause of preaching the Buddhas teachings.
The Sangha is a torch-bearer of the Buddhas teachings. It is an example
set by the Buddha with His own teachings of a noble, pure, trained
and educated, knowledgeable community in front of the society. The
Sangha shows the world that the Buddhas teachings are practicable,
perfect, and easily understandable and can give liberation (i.e. Nirvana)
to anyone in this life only; there is no need to wait until death, to get
liberation; as is told by the other religious teachers.
105
peoples were getting scared and more they scared; more they were
harassed by the priests.
Due to the fear of the peoples revolt against an uncontrolled
power of the priests, the priests devised the theory of an infallibility of
the religious scriptures. If anyone will dare to examine these scriptures
validity, he was given dreadful punishments like painful killings or en
excommunication. These peoples were called as Pakhandi and were
considered a threat to the priest state of the Brahmins. Thats why, the
Brahmins declared Charvakas, Lokayata, Buddhists as the Pakhandi
and given them the painful punishments. To give the torturous
punishments to these peoples, the Brahmins had implemented the Laws
of Manusmriti in their priestly state of India. By taking the inspirations
from the Indian Brahmins, the Christian fathers and Islamic Maulanas
also prescribed the painful and the dreadful punishments to the
unbelievers and declared their religious gospels as an infallible and
unquestionable.
After getting enlightened, the Buddha found that, the peoples
suffering and the real cause to their sufferings is the priestly supremacy
of the Brahmins. The Brahmins were in minority (i. e. 3% in population),
so they were unable to rule the majority of Mulnivasi Indians directly.
So, they devised the indirect weapons like spreading misunderstandings
in the form Blind faith in the name of the Religion and God. The Buddha
called these misunderstandings and confusion created by the
Brahmanism as the Defilements.
At present also, the Brahmins are ruling over India with the
help of these misunderstandings. Their media is helping them a lot in
this case. The real enemies of all Indians are the Eurasian Brahmins.
But to divert attention away from them, the Brahmins display new
enemies every time in front of the Mulnivasi Indians. During the British
India, the Brahmins presented British as the enemies of all Indians. In
the Independent India, the Brahmins present Muslims as the enemies
of all Indians. Brahmins are doing terrorist activities all over Indian to
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
106
107
gatha are not just for mugging as like a devotee but they are for the
actual practical implementation as like the true follower of the Buddha
for the well-being of the society.
The Buddha found that, there are some natural calamities like
flood, famine, etc that gives sufferings to the humans; these are the
natural sufferings. This requires a broad and strong mind with the good
confidence to overcome the grief resulting from the natural sufferings.
For this, the Buddha advised the Tenfold path i.e. Dash-shila. It is
also called as the Ten Commandments of the Buddha. These ten
commandments of the Buddha were adopted in Judaism as the Ten
Commandments of the Moses and later on in Christianity as the Ten
Commandments of the Jesus.
108
109
110
111
This kind of doctrine is made by the Brahmins to tell the peoples that,
their misery is due to their bad deeds in past life and to overcome this,
they should worship the Brahmin priests and their Gods. Indirectly,
this is nothing but a conspiracy against the peoples to make them fool
and to get benefit of their ignorance.
This Brahmnic theory of the Karma is totally rejected by the
Buddha. The Buddha attacked on the Soul which is the base of this
theory.
In the Buddhist theory of the Karma, there is no Soul, so, no
transmigration of the Soul and the future consequences of the
misfortune in the future birth due to good or bad deeds in the past life.
The Buddha said, Reap as you sow. It means the effects of the
good or bad deeds are seen in this life on the Earth only. There is no
need to wait for the future births to see the effects. Thus, the Buddhas
Law of Karma applied only to the Karma and its effect in the present
life. It has no concern about the past or the future births.
Thus, the Buddhist theory of Karma is totally scientific based.
It states that, the body as being the matter disintegrates but its
consciousness is an energy remains constant and gets changed into an
another energy and gets mixed with the Universal energy of the space.
In easy words, we can say that, according to the Buddha, the
Kamma is nothing but the energy. The Buddha said that, this Kamma
or the energy never dies. The Rebirth means rebirth of this energy in
another form. This theory of Kamma and Re-birth explained by the
Buddha was presented by the great scientist Einstein some 2500 years
later. The Einstein also proved that, the Energy never dies, it can neither
be converted nor destroyed; it only changes its form from one form to
another form. This is the Rebirth in the words of the Buddha.
*******
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
112
113
Others may ask question: How can the Buddha not believe in
the existence of the Soul, and yet say that He is not an annihilationist?
In other words: How the Buddha can believe in the Rebirth but not in
the existence of Soul? This is because, the Buddha believed in the
Rebirth of the Energy but not in the existence of the Soul. To answer
to this question, we will have to focus on following questions: 1.Rebirth
of what? And, the rebirth of the whom?
2. THE REBIRTH OF THE WHAT?
This question is almost always ignored. It is because of the
mixing of the two questions that so much confusion has arisen.
According to the Buddha, body is composed of four elements of
Existence. They are (1) Prithvi; (2) Apa; (3) Tej; and (4) Vayu.
What happens to these four elements when a body dies? Some
says that, these elements also die along with the body while others say
that, these elements do not die. The Buddha said: These elements
dont die, even though the body dies. These elements are everlasting
and join to the mass of similar elements floating in space.
When the four elements from this floating mass join together,
a new birth takes place. The elements need not be, and are not
necessarily, from the same body which is dead. They may be drawn
from different dead bodies.
This is what the Buddha meant by rebirth. This is the kind of
rebirth in which the Buddha believed. The Great light is thrown upon
the subject by Sariputta in his dialogue with Maha-Kotthita.
In Shravasti, a mendicant, Maha-Kotthita, rising from his
meditations, went to Sariputta and asked him some questions which
troubled him. Maha-Kotthita asked, How many things must quit the
body, when the body dies?
Sariputta answered, Vitality, heat, and consciousness.
Maha-Kotthita asked, What is the difference between a
lifeless corpse and an almsman in trance, in which perception and
feelings are stilled?
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
114
Sariputta replied, In the corpse not only are the plastic forces
of the body and speech and mind stilled and quiescent, but also vitality
is exhausted, heat is quenched, and the faculties of sense broken up;
whereas in the almsman in trance vitality persists, heat abides, and the
faculties are clear, although respiration, observation, and perception
are stilled and quiescent.
This probably is the best and most complete exposition of
Death or Annihilation.
Next question is: What is heat?
In this dialogue, heat means the Energy.
Thus the final answer to the question: What happens when
the body dies? Is that, the body ceases to produce energy or body is
free of energy.
The Annihilation has therefore a two-fold aspect. In one of its
aspects it means cessation of production of energy. In another aspect
it means a new addition to the stock of general floating mass of energy.
Because of this two-fold aspect of the annihilation, the Buddha
said that he was not an absolute annihilationist. He was an annihilationist
so far as soul was concerned but He was not an annihilationist so far
as matter was concerned.
In other words, He believed in the regeneration or rebirth of
matter but not in the rebirth of the soul.
So interpreted, the Buddhas view is in consonance with the
modern science.
According to the science, Energy is never lost; it is always
constant. Likewise, the Buddha said that, even though, the body dies
away but the integral component of the body never dies. They get
integrated into the general floating energy of the space and are always
constant.
115
********
116
117
He has said: Love all, so that you may not wish to kill
any. This is a positive way of stating the principle of Ahimsa.
From this, it appears that the doctrine of Ahimsa does not say
Kill not. It says, Love all.
It is quite clear that, the Buddha meant to make a distinction
between will to kill and need to kill.
He did not ban killing where there was need to kill. What he
banned was killing where there was no need and no gain in killing but
only a will to kill.
The Lord Buddha was the follower of the Middle path. He
was against any kind of an extrimitism. This golden mean of Lord
Buddha was applicable to his teaching of the Ahimsa (i.e. non-violence)
also. The Buddhas advice about Ahimsa (i.e. non-violence) was that,
for the benefits of the others, dont do any kind of Himsa (i.e. the
Violence). Because,an unnecessary violence can cause misery and
sufferings to the other beings. So, for the well being of other beings, it
is unjustifiable. E.g. Hitler done unnecessary killings in 2nd World war;
this is unjustifiable violence or the himsa.
But, if someone unnecessary hurts you or hampers your
freedom and progress or if someone does injustice with you, then
simply to follow Ahimsa (i.e. non-violence) is useless. In such a case,
to give justice, you must do violence or himsa.
So, Buddhas Ahimsa (i.e. non-violence) is of realistic and
scientific in nature; which is of prime importance for better survival.
The Buddha was against the Violence but He was on the side of the
Justice. For Justice whenever Violence is essential, he had given
permission.
The conversation of the Buddha and Sinh Senapati (Vaishali
Commander) as given below, Sinha had heard that, the Buddha was
spreading the thoughts of non-violence. He asked the Buddha
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
118
119
120
121
His teachings without getting tired. Like the Buddha also, as His
followers, we must free ourselves and our peoples from the bondage
of the Brahmanical slavery to attain our Nirvana.
122
123
same compound with the male monks, but it could afford opportunity
for other religions which were opposing Buddhism, particularly
Brahmanism, to take an attack on Buddhism regarding the morality of
the Bhikkhus.
At last, due to the profound efforts of the Mahaprajapati
Gautami and on advice of Ananda, the Buddha decided to admit the
womens in the order of the Monks.
The Buddha was aware that, the Brahmins were most powerful
caste at that time; so, they might thwart him by all possible means and
it would have made his future plans unsuccessful. He thus had to
proceed carefully. He wanted to eradicate the Brahmanism, but slowly
and steadily. So, initially, He opposed the womens entry into His
order. He wanted to test the reaction of the Brahmans first. The news
of Pajapatis request for ordination spread everywhere. He rejected
her request thrice. During this time He had seen the Brahmins reaction.
What was the Brahmins reaction? -Nothing happened. So, the Buddha
decided to admit her and her accompanying Sakyan women to the
Order. He Himself had accepted her and the other accompanying
womens with her and not by the request from Ananda. He had that
much wisdom.
To get their freedom, the womens in the Brahmanic societies
started to enter more and more in the Buddhist order. The womens
are the most important part in the family; if a lady in one family gets
converted; then the whole family gets converted. The womens also
started to take part in the Buddhas revolution against the Brahmins
openly. It helped to weaken the Brahmanic system very fast. The
Buddhas timing took effect beyond His expectation. This well planned
programme made the Buddha as a most respected person at His time.
He had no direct enemy. Even Brahmins, against whom He had opened
up is revolutions were respecting Him greatly.
The Brahmins again propagated a wrong story about the
Buddhas giving permission to the womens in His order. The Brahmins
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
124
had falsely told about the Buddhas claiming that, the womens entry
into the Buddhist order of monks will ruin the Buddhism within 500
years. This is a cheap mischief done by the cunning Brahmins after the
fall of the Buddhism. The Brahmins themselves had destroyed
Buddhism from India; they are the real reasons for the fall of the across
the India. But to escape themselves from this accusation and to accuse
the Indian womens for the fall of Buddhism; the Brahmins composed
this wrong story about Lord Buddha and introduced it in His life.
The Brahmins hated Indian womens because, with the help
of them only, the Buddha was successful in doing a complete revolution
against the Brahmanism. Also, in the eyes of the Eurasian Brahmins,
the Indian womens were the Shudras. So, as to express their burning
hatred towards the Indian womens; the Brahmins accused them for
the fall of the Buddhism and put these words in the mouth of the
Buddha. This also helped the Brahmins in other way. The Brahmins,
who were the real reasons for the destruction and fall of the Buddhism
from India, got escaped easily by putting the Indian womens as
causative agents for this event.
125
126
127
therein never dies out; the energy changes its form from one type of
energy to another type of energy. E.g. A light energy can be converted
into an electric energy and an electric energy can be converted into
heat energy with the help of the heater. Here energy is the same; it
never dies out but it gets reborn in the different forms. This is what the
Buddha had explained about the rebirth; which is totally a scientific
explanation.
To make the peoples depended on the priests; the Brahmins
had put forth the theory of the Brahma, the Supreme God or the
Creator of everything and to pray to Him. So, to relieve peoples from
the Brahmins clutches, the Buddha said that, there is no supreme being
like the God or creator or the Brahma. The Universe is run by the
Law of the Nature; so there is only the flux of the events in the Universe
and every event has a definite cause. So, everyone must believe in his
own action (Kamma): we ourselves are responsible for our own action;
if we will do good deeds, the result will be good and if we do the bad
deeds, then result will be bad. Thats why, the Buddha said, You
reap, what you sow
Thats why, to relieve peoples from their sufferings, the Buddha had
advised them the fivefold path (i.e. Panchasheel) and the eight fold
path (i.e. Asthang Marg) to get relieve them from the Brahmanism
and the Brahmins unsocial behaviors first like stealing, killing,
alcoholism, sexual immorality, etc
The Brahmins were the creators of an inequality in the form of
the Varna and the caste system and the inferior status of the women in
the society. So, to relieve the peoples from this disintegration, the
Buddha rejected any type of an inequality. Thats why, in Buddhism
there is no caste at all. Everyone has equality. They are only different
by Kamma. Anyone has a chance to elevate himself in accordance
with his action and wishes. Also, in Buddhism, the womens are equal
to the men.
128
The Brahmanism was meant for the benefit of the priestly caste
(of the Brahmins among the Aryans) and the supporters of it (i.e. the
Kshatriyas and the Vaishyas of the Aryans). However, due to an
unequal grading, each caste was claiming superior than the other. This
led to dividing among the Indians. The Brahmins being addicted to the
superior most state, they done all the measures to curb all the
revolutionary thoughts and movements (thoughts of equality) among
the other three Varnas by dividing them into 6000 different castes.
From these points of view, we can see the fighting between
Buddhism and Brahmanism, strictly speaking between the religions of
the Mongoloids and the Aryans, in the fields of the morality and social
welfare. They fought each other all the time, both secretly and openly.
The Buddhism fighting for the noble cause, for the welfare of the all;
whereas, the Brahmanism fighting for the cheap cause, for the benefit
of their Brahmin caste only. They fought each other all the times, both
secretly and openly; this fight is still going on and it will be continued
until the Brahmanism is eradicated totally from the World!
129
130
131
132
hands and feet. Due to the heavy assault, she died on the spot in front
of the Buddha.
From this situation, we can understand how much the Brahmins
hated the Buddha. In this hatred only the Brahmins decided to kill the
Buddha to arrest his revolution against the Brahmins and their
Brahmanism. The Brahmins mixed a poisonous plant named Sukar in
the food offered by Chunda, the Goldsmith. Due to this poisoning, the
Buddha suffered with heavy dysentery with profuse loss of blood.
The Buddha felt that, His weakness was beyond his strength; it was
unable for Him to survive further. So, He told Ananda that, He wont
be able to survive further and His death is imminent. On the day of
Vishakha, He concealed Ananada and given His last teaching and
attained Mahaparinirvana.
The Buddha was aware that, the real reason for His death
were the Brahmins but innocent Chunda, who was a Goldsmith, who
was a Mulnivasi Indian will be suffered and the peoples of his caste
would be suffered for years to come, if peoples will know the reason
to the Buddhas Nirvana being the poisonous food offered by him to
the Buddha. To clear this issue, the Buddha advised Ananda not to
blame Chunda for His Death.
To give a set back to the Buddhas revolutionary mission, the Brahmins
also killed Sariputra and Mogallana after few months of the Death of
the Buddha.
133
is: if Buddhas mission was against the Brahmins, then why He admitted
them in His mission?
We must understand the situation at that time to answer this
question. Every revolution has a meaning in reference to the prevalent
situation at the time of the revolution. The Buddha was the first
revolutionary in India, who had done a massive revolt against the ruling
Brahmins. While studying the society, He found that, though Brahmins
were the rulers, but He had found innocence in their general behavior.
He also observed that, there was not a much hatred and enmity
between the Brahmins and Mulnivasi Indians. This was the first reason.
Also, the Buddha wanted to give Brahmins a chance to prove
their innocence. He was aware that, the Brahmins were the foreign
invaders in India; but He wanted to give them a chance for the better
development of the Brahmins as well as Mulnivasi Indians. This was
the second reason.
The Buddha was not much aware of the cunningness and
cruelty of the Brahmins. Initially, the Brahmins were cruel at the time
of their invasion in India. They had killed numerous Mulnivasi Indians;
the evidences of these killings were given in Rig-Veda. Later on, the
Brahmins also had killed Mulnivasi Indians philosophers named
Charvakas brutally. This was after few centuries of the invasion and
the Brahmins were not properly settled in India. So, the Buddha thought
that, this may be due to their despair while getting settled in India.
Till the time of the Buddha in the 6th B.C., the Brahmins were
well settled and they had adopted some kind of innocence from the
Mulnivasi Indians. The Buddha thought that, they will further improve
in their behavior by understanding His humanistic teachings and their
cruelty and hatred will be declined. So, to give Brahmins a humanistic
lesson, the Buddha admitted them in His order. This was the third
reason.
The gentle attitude of the Buddha towards the Brahmins was
the chief reason for the decline and fall of the Buddhism from India.
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
134
The Buddha was somewhat aware of the cunning, cruel and criminal
attitude of the Brahmins, but He overlooked these misbehaviors of
the Brahmins to give them a chance to improve under the influence of
His noble and humanistic teachings. The Buddha had many expectations
from the Brahmins but the Brahmins never fulfilled any of His
expectations. They did everything against His wishes. The Brahmin
monks were the first to break the rules of the Buddha. The Brahmins
never adopted the Buddhas Loving kindness. They preserved their
cunningness, hatred and cruelty even under the strong attack of the
Buddhas forgiveness and the Loving kindness.
Over the period of time, the Brahmins cruel intentions became
worse. The Brahmins were addicted to supremacy and their oligarchy
in India. Due to the Buddhas strong revolution, they had lost their
power and they were forced to live a general life in an Indian society.
This again insulted them and they became more cruel, cunning and
criminal in nature. With these intentions, they opened a direct war
against the Buddhism- the Brahmins burnt thousands of the Buddhist
books, killed crores of the Buddhist peoples and the monks, and
destroyed numerous Buddhist Viharas and Chaityas.
Due to the Brahmins strong addiction to their supremacy and
due to their cruel, cunning and criminal attitude, this same cycle
repeated every time. Each time, the Mulnivasi Indians had forgiven
the Brahmins but the Brahmins never forgiven Mulnivasi Indians. Thats
why, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, a well known philosopher and Indians
most Intellectual once had said that, the Indian history is the history
of revolution and cross revolution; the Mulnivasi Indians done
revolution every time and the Brahmins done counter-revolution each
time. Each time, the Mulnivasi Indians tried to adjust with the
Brahmins, but at the same time, the Brahmins attacked severely on
the Mulnivasi Indians.
Over the period of time, the Brahmins became more and more
cruel, cunning and criminal in nature. During the Buddhas time, they
were less cruel; so the Buddha had admitted them in the Buddhism.
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
135
136
137
king. But He did not enter the city directly; He only stayed at a palm
grove about six miles away from the capital to testify the attitude of
the king and his kingdom towards Him.
The King Bimbisara had once told the Buddha to come to
teach him, whenever He would become get his enlightenment. Now,
He was an enlightened one, so what would be the king Bimbisaras
reaction? If Bimbisara had invited Him truly from the bottom of his
heart, he would have undoubtedly come to see the Buddha. But initially,
he didnt take much interest in the Buddhas stay. Later on, when he
knew that the Buddha is accompanied by a lot of Monks from Benares
along with the three Kassapa brothers, he immediately came out to
see Him, accompanied by his officials and a lot of people. The peoples
got confused to see the Buddha and Kassapa together; they did not
know who was the greater among them. But when Kassapa told that
he was the disciple of the Buddha, the peoples concentrated their
interest on the Buddha. Due to Kassapas respect, it was very easy
for the Buddha to convert the King and his peoples.
After converting the King Bimbisara and the peoples of
Magadha, the Buddha went directly to the Kosala Kingdom. This
was his chief goal to liberate his kingdom and the peoples there. The
King of Kosala was a relative of the King of Magadha by marriage.
So, it was not so difficult for the Buddha to convert King Pasenadi of
Kosala and the peoples there. And then Savatthi, the capital of Kosala,
became the center of the Buddhist movement in those days.
Anathapindika the millionaire and Visakha were the most prominent
attendants of the Buddha.
The Lord Buddha was highly venerated by all the kings and
their peoples. Though King Pasenadi was respected by his Kosalan
peoples but the Buddha was respected by all the kings and the peoples
in India and in the World. The King Pasenadi might be thinking, Now,
just as the Sakyans treat Tathagata (Buddha). Is not the Samana
Gotama well born? Then I am not well born. The Samana Gotama is
strong, I am weak. He is attractive, I am not comely, the Samana
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
138
Gotama has great influence, and I have but little influence. Though
King Pasenadi was the conqueror of Sakyans kingdom, nevertheless
the Buddha, the son of Sakyans, now could conquer him, and so
many people of many kingdoms of India. The King Pasenadi and
King Bimbisara were the Conquerors only inside their kingdom, but
the Buddha was the Conqueror of the conquerors entirely. After
defeating the Kings, the Buddha defeated the Brahmins and by
eradicating the influence of the Brahmanism from the minds of kings
and their peoples, He defeated the Brahmins and their Brahmanism.
It was the absolute conquest of the Buddha. He made a conquest
over not merely the Indian people, but his influence has been prevailing
all over the whole World.
139
140
141
142
At last, in the full moon day of Visakha in 483 B.C., the Buddha
reached the Sala Grove of the Mallas, on the side of the river
Hiranyavati to get a nirvana. He told Ananda to spread out for him a
couch with its head to the north, between the twin Sala trees and then
laid down on His right side, with one leg resting on the other. It was
called Sinhaseyya, or the lying of the lion.
He had told Ananda in detail what should be done to his body
after his entering into Nirvana. He gave opportunity to the Monks to
ask Him whatever they were doubtful about. Even during the last
moments, He preached to Subbadda, the wonderer, who became the
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
143
144
145
146
the 28th Buddha. It means that, the Buddhist philosophy was the basic
philosophy of the Indus civilization. On excavation of the Indus valley
in the Sindha region of India, they have found the peoples worshipping
the Piple tree. Under this tree only, the Buddha had gained his final
knowledge; so, for the Buddhist peoples all over the World, the Piple
tree is the sacred tree. This tree was also sacred during the times of
the Indus civilization. On excavation of it, they have also found a dome
like Stupa; which is similar like the Buddhist Stupa. Also, a statue of
the meditating yogi called as Pashupati is also found. The Buddha is
also shown in the meditating position. The excavations of the Indus
civilization are found all over India. The basic tenets of the Buddhas
philosophy are similar to the philosophy of the Indus peoples. The
Buddha developed his philosophy from the Kapilas Sankhya
philosophy. The Kapila was a well known philosopher of the Indus
civilization. Also, the Buddhas native place was Kapilavastu; its name
was derived from Kapila.
The Buddhism is the philosophy of an Equality, Fraternity and
Brotherhood. Thats why, during the time of an Indus civilization and
the Buddhist Mauryan Empire, India was the Worlds highly developed
country. India was known as the Golden Country (SONE KI
CHIDIYA) during that time. When peoples of Europe, Arab and
America were wondering in jungles as like animals; at that time, India
was the centre of the knowledge and development. Indian Mulnivasi
Naga peoples given the knowledge to the Arabs and the Western
peoples. This incidence is notified in the Quran and the Bible as the
Naga delivering the knowledge to the Adam and the Eve. Due to this
knowledge only, this animal like wondering couple starts behaving
like a well developed and knowledgeable human and gets changed
into Human form from its pre-historic form. Since then, the peoples in
the Arab and the Western World were behaving like the humans. So,
the couple of Adam and Eve are considered as the 1st couple of the
human race in that area. It doesnt mean that, the peoples were not
living before Adam and Eve; the peoples were living there, but like
animals, they were living in the jungles due to lack of the knowledge!
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
147
The Buddha had advised His Monks to spread his knowledge all
over the World to convert peoples from animal like attitudes to the
humans to bring happiness in their life. The Indian Monks were known
as the Naga peoples by the Arab and the Western peoples, because
the tribe of Mulnivasi Indians was called as the Naga tribe and the
Indians were known as the Naga peoples. So, after gaining the
knowledge from these Naga Monks, succeeding generations of the
peoples there started worshipping these knowledgeable Naga Monks
in the form of the snake Naga (i.e. cobra). The Indian Mulnivasi Nagas
were themselves using the stick with an emblem of Naga snake on the
top of this stick; also, they were using flags and caps with emblem of
Naga snake. They were using this emblem to present themselves as
belonging to the Naga tribe of India. Shiva, the 1st philosopher king of
Mulnivasis Indus civilization was also shown in the pictures having a
Naga snake around his naked; since, he belongs to the Naga tribe.
Also, the Buddha is shown sitting on a Naga snake; to show that, he
belongs to the Naga tribe of India.
*****
148
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. The Buddha and his Dhamma- Dr. B.R. Ambedkar.
2. The revolution and counter-revolution in an ancient India- Dr. B.R.
Ambedkar.
3. Carl Marx and the Buddha- Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
4. Lakkhana Sutta, Sacred Books of the Buddhists, Vol. IV, Dialogues
of the Buddha, Part III, translated by T.W. Rhys Davids and C.A.F.
Rhys Davids, London: Published for the Pali Text Society by Luzac &
Company LTd., 1975, p.138.
5. Agganna Sutta, Dialogues of the Buddha, Part III, p.80.
6. Lakkhana Sutta, Dialogues of the Buddha, Part III, p.137.
7. Ariyapariyesana Sutta, The Middle Length Sayings, Vol. I, tr. by
I.B. Horner, London: Luza & Company Ltd., 1954, p.207;
Mahasaccaka Sutta, M.L.S. Vol. I,p.295; Bodhirajakumara Sutta,
M.L.S. Vol. II, p.281; Sangarava Sutta, M.L.S. Vol. II, p.401.
8. Ariyapariyesana Sutta, The Middle Length Sayings, Vol. I, pp.207208; Bodhirajakumara Sutta, M.L.S. Vol. II, p.281; Sangarava Sutta,
M.L.S. Vol. II, p.401; Mahasaccaka Sutta, M.L.S. Vol. I, p.295.
9. The decline and the fall of the Buddhism in an ancient India.- K.
Jamanadas.
10. An annihilation of the castes- Dr. B. R. Ambedkar.
11. Mahasihanada Sutta, M.L.S. Vol. I, pp.91-110.
12. Ariyapariyesana Sutta, M.L.S. Vol. I, pp.214-15;
Bodhirajakumara Sutta, M.L.S. Vol. II, p.281.
13. Ariyapariyesana Sutta, M.L.S. Vol. I , pp.213; Bodhirajakumara
Sutta, M.L.S. Vol. II, p.281.
14. Ariyapariyesana Sutta, M.L.S. Vol. I, pp.214-15;
Bodhirajakumara Sutta, M.L.S. Vol. II, p.281; Mahavagga, The
Book of the Discipline. Vol. IV, tr. by I. B. Horner, London: Luzac &
Company Ltd., 1951, pp.11-2.
15. Mahavagga, The Book of the Discipline. Vol. IV, pp.15-8.
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
149
150
151
55. Who killed Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, why killed for what reason
killed? Prof. Vilas Kharat.
56. See G.P. Malalasekera and K.N. Jayatilleke, Buddhism and the
Race Question (Wheel 200/201).
57. Tirupati Balaji is an ancient Buddhist pilgrimage. K. Jamanadas.
58. 3. Ahir, D.C. 2005. Buddhism Declined in India: How and Why?
Delhi: B.R. Publishing.
59. Yu-Ki Or, Buddhist Records of the Western Countries written by
Hsien-tsang (circa 650 AD). Taken from Translations by Thomas
Watters (1904) and Samuel Beal (1884) Hsien-tsang: Buddhist Records
of the Western Countries)
60. Messengers of light: Chinese Buddhist pilgrims in India by Paul
Magnin Unesco Courier, Vol. 48 No.5 May.1995 Pp.24-27.
61. Disappearance Of Buddhism From India: The Role Of Shashanka
: Buddhist Living : Mingkok : Buddhistdoor
62. Kantowsky, D. 2003. Buddhists in India Today: Descriptions, Pictures
and Documents. Delhi: Manohar Publications: 156.
63. Goyal, S.R. 1987. A History of Indian Buddhism. Meerut: 394.
64. Walshe, Maurice. 1995. The Long Discourses of the Buddha. Boston:
Wisdom. [A translation of the Dgha Nikya].
65. Vajira, Sister, and Francis Story. 1988. The Last Days of the Buddha.
Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.
66. Schumann, Hans W. 1989. The Historical Buddha. Translated by
M. OC. Walshe. London and New York: Arkana.
67. Oldenberg, Hermann. [1908] 1991. The Doctrine of the Upanisads
and the Early Buddhism. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
68. OFlaherty, Wendy D. 1981. The Rig Veda. New York: Penguin.
69. Nyanamoli, Bhikkhu, and Bhikkhu Bodhi. 1995. The Middle Length
Discourses of the Buddha. Baston: Wisdom. [A translation of the
Majjhima Nikya].
70 Erdosy, George. 1993. The Archaeology of Early Buddhism. In
Studies on Buddhism in Honour of Prof. A. K. Warder, edited by N. K.
Wagle and F. Watanabe, pp. 40-56. Toronto: University of Toronto,
Centre for South Asian Studies.
THE REVOLUTIONARY BUDDHA
152