Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Inversion of The Filial-Paternal Relationship in Flannery O'Connor's "Everything That Rises Must Converge"
The Inversion of The Filial-Paternal Relationship in Flannery O'Connor's "Everything That Rises Must Converge"
Ian Iracheta
Facultad de Filosofa y Letras
Letras Inglesas, Colegio de Letras Modernas
Universidad Nacional Autnoma de Mxico
often talked about in the passive, more so when in direct relation to her son. Her
identity seems to an extent effaced in order to let Julian hoard the spotlight, as
evidenced by the fact that the mothers name is not even given at any point in the story.
What does this mean? This woman is only ever referred to in terms of her relationship
to the son, as is shown in the very first sentence: the genitive form of Julian, a noun in
the possessive declension working as an adjective, modifies the noun mother. This is
a pattern that we see repeated and never corrected throughout the entire short story.
By refusing to name the mother, as well as by only giving her an identity when related
to her son, the author says that she only exists insofar as he is there to define her.
The next sentence in the story becomes even more illustrative. So on Wednesday
nights Julian had to take her2 downtown on the bus for a reducing class at the Y (405).
In this passage Julian is shown as being the agent. The narrator states very explicitly
that Julian is the one who will take her. It is important to notice that the narrator avoids
a construction such as She had him accompany her on Wednesday nights, or any
other variant thereof, which would give a remnant of agency to the mother.
The inequality of their relationship is therefore expressed in grammatical terms;
however, this is only one of the many ways in which it is constructed. Julian sees his
mother as an inferior. His wanting to teach her a lesson that would last her a while
(413) demonstrates this fact to its logical extreme. In a complete reversion of the
traditional parent-child roles, Julian thinks that it is he who should be in charge of
educating his mother, and acts upon such judgment by literally conducting her through
her life. Julian put[s] his hand under her elbow and hoist[s] her up on the creaking
2Emphasisadded
2
Ian Iracheta
Facultad de Filosofa y Letras
Letras Inglesas, Colegio de Letras Modernas
Universidad Nacional Autnoma de Mxico
step (410), he orders her not to take [the hat] back, (407), and to shut up and enjoy
it (410). This superiority, first expressed in grammatical terms by dint of a biased
narrator, becomes much more overt in the ending of the short story. Julian tells his
mother I hate to see you behave like this. Just like a child. I should be able to expect
more of you (420), thereby establishing a complete reversal of roles.
In conclusion, the authors decision to make Julian the grammatical agent, and his
mother merely a passive receptor is meant to emphasise the exchange of roles we can
appreciate as the narrative develops. It also serves to illustrate just how deep-rooted this
switching actually is. In a way, the inversion of roles has a double footing in the short
story, as we see it embodied in both grammatical and narrative levels: in terms of the
events of the short story, Julian hoisting his mother up and ushering her into the bus
shows the reader that he has physical dominion over his mother, at least in that respect;
furthermore, this superiority is also displayed in the narrative discourse, by dint of
possessive determiners and the play between a passive and an agent. The result of this is
that we can see the inversion of roles both in the story, that is to say, in the sequence of
events (Abbott 16), as well as in the narrative discourse, or in the way those events
are represented (Abbott 16).
However, one question still remains to be asked. If Julians perspective is
what interested the author, why not simply narrate the story in first person? As Abbott
says, a focalizer is the lens through which we characters and events in the narrative
(66), and indeed most of the time the story is relayed to the reader tinged with Julians
thoughts. Why bother then on writing from the perspective of a third-person narrator
when a first-person point of view could have achieved a similar effect? Put simply, it is
Ian Iracheta
Facultad de Filosofa y Letras
Letras Inglesas, Colegio de Letras Modernas
Universidad Nacional Autnoma de Mxico
Ian Iracheta
Facultad de Filosofa y Letras
Letras Inglesas, Colegio de Letras Modernas
Universidad Nacional Autnoma de Mxico
Works Cited:
Abbott, H. Porter. The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. London: Cambrdige
University Press, 2002. Print.
Fludernik,Monika.AnIntroductiontoNarratology.NewYork:Routledge,2009.Print.
OConnor, Flannery. Everything That Rises Must Converge The Complete Stories. New
York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1971. Kindle.