Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Brief History of Inferior Vena Cava Filters and Analysis of Current Devices
A Brief History of Inferior Vena Cava Filters and Analysis of Current Devices
This nitinol filter has a non-tilt spiral shape, designed to be self-centering. It is anchored by
an oversized double ring platform rather than by hooks or struts. This requires that the
filter be sized to the caval diameter. Three sizes are available: small for cavas of 16 to
19mm, medium for 19 to 22mm and large for 22 to 25mm. It is inserted via a 6F system.
The lack of hooks is thought to allow for an extended retrieval window.
FDA approved for permanent use only in 2009. CE marked.
Discussion
Optional filters have become the first choice for most interventional radiologists due to the problems of caval
thrombosis and increased DVT rate associated with permanent filters. However SIR guidelines emphasize that there
are no new unique indications for optional filters as distinct from permanent filters. There remains a paucity of
RCTs of filters in general with a number of unanswered questions concerning the validity of indications for filter
insertion, impact of filters on mortality from PE, risk vs benefit of filter insertion, and long term outcomes. Future
technological advances will include bioabsorbable convertible filters and drug-eluting filters aiming to reduce
endothelialization of components.