Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Manufacturing Engineering IML401E Homework #2 Case #2
Manufacturing Engineering IML401E Homework #2 Case #2
IML401E
Homework #2
Case #2
GRUP 5
030100381
050090440
030100403
030100412
030100414
030100421
030100422
030100423
030100424
030100427
1. INTRODUCTION
The objective of this study is the selection of cutting data (such as nc, f,
ap) and tool materials (PCD,ceramic, CBN and carbide cutting tools) in order
to improve the surface roughness in precision turningoperation of parts made
of pure titanium (GRADE 2). Machining parameters and tool materials
areconsidered as input parameters. The surface roughness is selected as the
process output measure ofperformance. A Taguchi approach is employed to
gather experimental data. Then, based on signal-tonoise(S/N) ratio, the best
sets of cutting parameters and tool materials specifications have been
determined.
roughness (Sa and Sz). Table 7 shows the response table for S/N ratio of Sa for
smaller is better obtained for different parameter levels.
From the S/N ratio analysis (Fig. 2 and 3) the optimal machining conditions
were 100 m/min cutting speed (level 2), 0.038 mm/rev feed rate (level 1),0.1 mm
depth of cut (level 3), PCD cutting tools (level 1) for parameter Sa.150 m/min cutting
speed (level 4), 0.048 mm/rev feed rate (level 2), 0.125 mm depth of cut (level 4),
PCD cutting tools (level 1) for parameter Sz. respectively.
5. Conclusion
Surface roughness is an important measure of performance in machining
operations. This study investigates the overall effects of turning parameters (cutting
speed. depth of cut and feed rate) and kind of cutting tool geometry specifications
on surface roughness of Ti (Grade 2) parts. To model the process. Taguchi method
has been employed for experimental tests. surface methodolog was used to
determine optimal values of input parameters to achieve the minimum surface
roughness; as the process output characteristics.
The optimal machining conditions were 100 m/min cutting speed (level 2), 0.038
mm/rev feed rate(level 1), 0.1 mm depth of cut (level 3), PCD cutting tools (level 1)
for parameter Sa. 150 m/min cutting speed (level 4), 0.048 mm/rev feed rate
(level2), 0.125 mm depth of cut (level 4), PCD cutting tools (level 1) for parameter
Sz, respectively.
In addition the effects (in percent) of each these parameters on the output have
been determined. It is shown that the kind of the cutting tool has the most
significant effect on the surface roughness