Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Legal System of Malaysia2
Legal System of Malaysia2
Legal System of Malaysia2
Malaysia practices parliamentary democracy whilst at the same time maintains a system of
Constitutional Monarchy, with His Majesty the Yang di-Pertua Agong (King) as the Head of
State. At the state level, the Sultan or Yang di-Pertua Negeri (Governor) are the Constitutional
Rulers of their respective states.
The Constitution of Malaysia clearly divides the authority of the Federation into three
branches viz: legislative, judiciary and the executive. The division of authority occurs both at
the federal and state levels, in keeping with the concept of federalism which forms the basis of
the government administration.
Under the Federal Constitution the responsibility to conduct elections to the House Of
Representatives, the lower house of Parliament (Dewan Rakyat) and the State
Legislative Assemblies (Dewan Undangan Negeri) in Malaysia is vested with the Election
Commission. In the discharge of its responsibilities, the Election Commission, is being an
independent authority, is not subject in any way to direction as to how elections ought to be
conducted.
The establishment of the Election Commission, consisting of a Chairman, a Deputy Chairman
and five other Members, is laid down in Article 114 of the Federal Constitution. Members of
the Commission are appointed by His Majesty the Yang di-Pertua Agong after consultation
with the Conference of Rulers. In appointing the members, the Yang di-Pertua Agong shall
have regard to the importance of securing an Election Commission which enjoys public
confidence.
The main functions of Election Commission are:
1)
review and delimit Parliamentary and State Constituencies at intervals of not less
than eight years, following the date of completion of the last review;
2)
3)
The policy of the Election Commission is to safeguard, supervise and maintain the democratic
process of the country through free and fair elections. It is the responsibility of the
Commission to ensure that the people are able to elect their representatives by direct votes at
any election.
Who should be registered in these rolls are decided by the Commission and there are
rules and procedures to ensure that qualified citizens who wish to vote get on the register and
do so once only, that unqualified voters do not get on the register and the rolls are updated
periodically.
Absent voters are, for example, persons in government service such as diplomats and
members of the armed forces serving overseas and their families.
Challenge to the validity of election result
Accusations of election fraud and cheating have been rare. Any candidate or voter
who is dissatisfied with the announced result may challenge its validity. He does so not to the
Commission, still less to the legislature, but to the non-political and independent High Court.
A few elections have been voided by the Courts, in which case a fresh election is held.
General Elections
Whenever possible, the practice has been to hold federal and state general elections
simultaneously.
The constitution fixes the life of the federal and every state legislature as five years,
though it may be shorten by an earlier dissolution of Parliament.
5.
6.
The Executive
The Executive which, because of its control of Parliament, is the most powerful
branch in Malaysia.
The Executive consists of the apparatus of Government, principally:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
the Cabinet;
the public service;
the police force; and
the armed forces.
The Judiciary
The Judiciary, of which the distinguishing feature is that, unlike the Legislature and
the Executive which are intertwined and far from separate, the Judiciary on the contrary is
entirely separate from and independent of either of the other two branches.
Separation of powers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Separation of powers a term coined by French political Enlightenment thinker Baron de
Montesquieu, is a model for the governance of democratic states.
Under this model the state is divided into branches, and each branch of the state has separate
and independent powers and areas of responsibility. The normal division of branches is into
the Executive, the Legislative, and the Judicial.
Proponents of separation of powers believe that it protects democracy and forestalls tyranny;
opponents of separation of powers, such as Professor Charles M. Hardin[3] have pointed out
that, regardless of whether it accomplishes this end, it also slows down the process of
governing, it promotes executive dictatorship and unaccountability, and it tends to
marginalize the legislature.
No democratic system exists with an absolute separation of powers or an absolute lack of
separation of powers. Nonetheless, some systems are clearly founded on the principle of
separation of powers, while others are clearly based on a mingling of powers.
Bibliography: