Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lanka After Tigers
Lanka After Tigers
Concentrating
Power
Eleven months after the Sri Lankan
army crushed the Tamil Tiger rebels in
controversial circumstances, the country
is about to choose a new parliament, the
second election this year. But far from
ushering-in a reconciliation process,
there is talk of authoritarianism,
o N APRIL 8, SRI LANKA WILL HOLD ITS SECOND,
mammoth electoral exercise in just four
months – a parliamentary poll in which
newly re-elected President Mahinda
Rajapakse aims for a two-thirds
parliamentary majority which would give
him a free hand to change the constitution. He won the
presidential election in January by a margin of eighteen
percent over former army commander General Sarath
Fonseka, and the opposition is yet to recover from the defeat.
Despite the jubilation over his victory, this is not
breaches of international law and abuse a fresh start for a country recovering from three
decades of conflict with the Tamil Tigers. The same
of state power. hard-line policies, corruption and nepotism could
S R I L A N K A N P R E S I D E N T M A H I N DA RA J A PA K S E A N D H I S M I L I TA R Y C H I E F S , I N C L U D I N G G E N E RA L S A RAT H FO N S E K A , FA R L E F T,
AT I N D E P E N D E N C E DAY C E L E B RAT I O N S L A ST Y E A R . I S H A RA KO D I K A RA / I R I N
THEWORLDTODAY.ORG APRIL 2010
PAGE 30
TA M I L T R O U B L E S
The presidential poll in January did not mark a
departure from intimidation and violence. History
repeated itself as Rajapakse won his second presidential
election, in part because the minority Tamil community
could not exercise its franchise without fear. In
November 2005, the Tigers’ iron-fist forcibly prevented
Tamils from voting, an exercise that catapulted Rajapakse
into power by a narrow margin.
Months after the Tigers’ defeat, a large number of
Tamils in northeast Sri Lanka could not vote in January
because they were coerced to abstain, unable to register, or
had no transport to reach polling stations. Elsewhere, state
power was brazenly abused and Rajapakse’s main
challenger, Fonseka, was undermined and compared to
the Ugandan dictator Idi Amin. Defeated, he was put
under arrest, court martialed and his supporters have
been threatened and attacked.
For many Tamils, a pressing concern is the resettlement
of some seventy thousand refugees displaced in the final
stages of the war who have returned in recent months
to the Tamil heartland of Jaffna. Many are still unable to
reclaim their houses because they lie inside military buffer
zones. There is little work and only a trickle of cash to
lubricate the local economy.
Humanitarian workers say that livelihood schemes, a
staple of post-disaster planning, are missing in the north
because authorities want to keep out prying eyes, amid
international controversy over the camps for the displaced
and the fate of returnees. Tamil politicians have raised fears
that Tamil areas are being resettled with families from the
majority Sinhalese community.
Equally troubling for Tamils is the lack of an independent
investigation into alleged war crimes during the last phases
of the conflict. A handful of western countries, and Tamil
diaspora groups, are pressing for some kind of
accountability for thousands of civilian deaths. Sri Lanka is
adamant its soldiers did not violate international law.
The European Union has made clear that a credible
process to address alleged violations of international
humanitarian law by both sides during the conflict could
also contribute to the reconciliation process. It has
decided to suspend its $136 million annual trade
preferences for Sri Lankan goods in August.
The United States State Department report on the
conflict and the statement by Philip Alston, the UN
Special Rapporteur for Extrajudicial, Summary or
Arbitrary Executions, underline the need for a credible and
independent investigation.
However, Sri Lanka’s willingness to turn to China,
F L I C K R . C O M / P H OTO S / P E RA M B A RA /4 1 2 9 8 8 2 6 5 3 /