Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cartagena Part3 Aerosols Composition
Cartagena Part3 Aerosols Composition
Atmospheric Aerosols
Size distribution - composition part III
Aged
urban
rural
remote
Warneck [1999]
Size Distribution
1500
dN/dD (m m-1cm-3)
dN/dD (m m-1cm-3)
1500
1000
500
1000
500
0
0
Dimetro (m m)
0,1
Dimetro (m m)
10
Size Distributions
dN/dD
dN/dlnD
dN/dlogD
2500
2000
dN/d??? (***)
(cm-3)
1500
(cm-3)
1000
500
(m m-1cm-3)
0
0,1
Dimetro (m m)
10
20000
martimo
continental
16000
rural
-3
dN/dlogD (cm )
urbano
12000
8000
4000
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
D (m m)
0.8
20000
martimo
continental
16000
rural
-3
dN/dlogD (cm )
urbano
12000
8000
4000
0
0.001
0.01
0.1
D (m m)
200
martimo
continental
160
rural
-3
dN/dlogD (cm )
urbano
120
80
40
0
0.001
0.01
0.1
D (m m)
10
100000
martimo
continental
10000
rural
urbano
-3
dN/dlogD (cm )
1000
100
10
1
0.1
0.01
0.001
0.01
0.1
D (m m)
10
10
Nmero
dN-dM/dlogD
Massa
0
0.001
0.01
0.1
D (mm)
10
dN/dD (cm-3)
20000
SP min
SP mx
AM min
AM mx
15000
10000
5000
0
1
10
100
DIMETRO (nm)
1000
CONCENTRAO (??)
0.15
NMERO
0.12
REA
VOLUME
0.09
0.06
0.03
0
1.00
10.00
100.00
DIMETRO (nm)
1000.00
0.25
0.2
Fine Particles
Dp < 2.5 mm
Nanoparticles
Dp < 50 nm
Ultrafine Particles
Dp < 100 nm
0.15
0.1
PM10
Dp < 10 mm
0.05
0
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
Diameter (nm)
Number
Surface
Mass
DIURNAL CICLE
20000
So Paulo
dN/dlogD
15000
30
10000
100
300
5000
0
4
16
HORA LOCAL
20000
15000
dN/dlogD
12
30
10000
100
300
5000
0
14
18
22
HORA LOCAL
10
Rondnia
20
24
9
8
-3
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
1A
2A
3A
4A
5A
6A
7A
8A
9A
10A
Estgios
5,68
5,43
5,57
5,26
4,30
4,74
5,22
8,78
5,24
2,42
5,75
3,66
3,11
2,75
BC
0,02
0,02
0,03
0,05
0,04
0,11
0,18
1,47
0,73
0,49
2,19
0,05
0,02
0,02
Cumulative Fraction
Composition
NARSTO, 2004
NO3-
Sulfate Organics
Organic material contributes 20-50% of the total fine aerosol mass at continental mid-latitudes [Saxena and Hildemann, 1996;
Putaud et al., 2004] and as much as 90% in the tropical forested areas [Andreae and Crutzen, 1997; Talbot et al., 1988; 1990;
Artaxo et al., 1988; 1990; Roberts et al., 2001]
Pb
Concentrao ng/m3
MP2.5
1000
Si
S
K
100
Ca
V
10
Fe
Ni
1
1977
1981
1983
1986
1989
1994
1997
1998
1999
2003
2005
2008
2009
2012
Zn
Monthly variations in selected air pollutants in So Paulo. Solid regression lines show monthly mean concentrations used in
this paper. Error bars summarize the relative uncertainties in pollutant concentration measurements. Data are from the So
Paulo Environmental Company CETESB, 20002013 (http://www.cetesb.sp.gov.br/ar/qualidade-do-ar/32-qualar)
Perez et al., 2015, JGR
60
50
Winter 2012
40
OC/PM2.5= 0.44
EC/PM2.5=0.13
30
20
10
Hetem, mestrado
0
0
10
15
20
25
Projeto NUANCE
b)
d)
c)
LIDAR Retroscatering,
September 12, 2012
AOD maximum
AOD minimum
Aqua Satellite
0,316 0,215
0,927 0,201
0,049 0,005
Terra Satellite
0,187 0,174
0,915 0,024
0,005 0,005
Lopes, 2013
Participao em % de MP2.5
Concentrao em ng/m3
Trace-element concentration
10000.0
1000.0
100.0
g/m3
10.0
1.0
100
10
0.1
0.01
0.001
Botton-up approach
BSOA (biogenic SOA)
12-70 TgC/year
POA
ASOA
2- 12 TgC/year
Total
50-90 TgC/year
The formation, properties and impact of secondary organic aerosol: current and
emerging issues
Isoprene (C5H8)
Three factors:
1. Atmospheric Abundance
2. Chemical reactivity
3. The vapour pressure (or volatility)
of its products
Monoterpenes(C10H16)
Sesquiterpenes (C15H24)
BACTERIA
VIRUSES
POLLEN
FUNGUS
PLANT
DEBRIS
ALGAE
Jaenicke [2005] suggests may be as large a source as dust/sea salt (1000s Tg/yr)
May act as CCN and IN [Diehl et al., 2001; Bauer et al., 2003; Christiner et al., 2008]
Pollen Spores in So
Paulo
(Drum)
Fita
Burkard
7-day Recording Sampler
ROGERS et al., 2001
Lamina
Lminas
Msc. Ana Paula Mendes
Metodology:
Deuteromicetos
Ascomicetos
Mitsporos
Ascsporo
Myxomicetos
Basidiomicetos
Basidisporo
HAINES et al., 2000; Imagens: VALERO, 2013; GUIMARES, 2008; ONTARIO CROPIPM, 2009; ROCA, 2015
results: spores
A Pithomyces chartarum;
K: Diatrypaceae
Grande;
B: Venturia sp.;
L: Ascsporo de 2
clulas sem cor;
C: Torula sp.;
M:
Paraphaeosphaeria
Michotii
D: Basidisporo colorido
indet.;
N: Basidisporos
hialino grande;
E: Spegazzinia sp.;
O:
Aspergillus/Penicilli
um like
F: Myxomyceto;
P: Cladosporium sp.;
G: Gliomastix sp.;
Q: Ascsporo de 4
clulas sem cor;
H: Ascsporo de 4 clulas
com cor;
R: Drechslera-like;
I: Ganoderma sp.;
S: Xylariaceae;
J: Epicoccum nigrum;
T: Periconia sp.
Lat=-23.6o
Lon=- 46.7o
55% gasohol
Metropolitan
Region of So
Paulo
Population:~ 20 million
inhabitants.
Area: 8511 km2
4% ethanol hidrated
85% light-duty fleet
38% flex
3% diesel
2% diesel
12% motorcycles
Important questions
Expansion of urban areas and population growth
Official Data Emission Inventory in the Metropolitan Area of So Paulo for Regulated
Pollutants
Source: CETESB
http://aerosol.ees.ufl.edu/atmos_aerosol/section
07-2.html
Relative risk adjusted to total mortality and PM2.5 concentrations in six cities.
During two periods: 1 from 1974 to 1989 and 2 from 1990 to 1998.
P=Portage, T=Topeka, W=Watertown, L=St. Louis, H=Harriman, S= Steubenville.
Metropolitan Area
So Paulo
Rio de Janeiro
Belo Horizonte
Porto Alegre
Curitiba
Recife
Population (million)
19.9
11.8
5.0
9.8
3.2
3.8
Recife
Belo Horizonte
So Paulo
Porto Alegre
Rio de Janeiro
Curitiba
PM2.5
Std Dev
Black Carbon
Std Dev
BC/PM2.5
So Paulo
30
13
10
0.33
Rio de Janeiro
19
11
0.17
Belo Horizonte
17
0.28
Porto Alegre
16
12
0.22
Curitiba
17
0.27
Recife
12
0.17
MP2.5
Ions composition
Concentration (ug/m3)
10.0
1.0
0.1
0.0
Ions
Curitiba
Rio Janeiro
Recife
So Paulo
Belo Horizonte
Porto Alegre
Mass Balance
The inorganic compounds were considered in the oxidazied form:
Al2O3, SiO2, K2O, CaO3, TiO, VO, MnO2, Fe2O3, NiO,
Cu2O, ZnO, Se, Br, Sr, Zr, Pb
+ ions
+BC
Crustal
Rio de Janeiro
So Paulo
Crustal
Ions
BC
ND
So
Paulo
Ions BC ND
Rio de Janeiro
Belo Horizonte
Porto Alegre
Crustal
Crustal
Ions
BC
ND
Crustal
Ions
BC
ND
Porto Alegre
Curitiba
Recife
Belo Horizonte
Crustal
Ions
BC
ND
Curitiba
Crustal
Ions
BC
ND
Recife
Receptor Modeling
Meteorological data
Air quality
Multivariate Methods
Principal Component Analysis
Source profile
Risk Analysis
Muchas Gracias!