Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Low-Pro Le Antennas and Personal Communication Antennas - New
Low-Pro Le Antennas and Personal Communication Antennas - New
Low-Pro Le Antennas and Personal Communication Antennas - New
07/12/2014
< 3,
> 6
Antenna gain:
0 dBi
Radiation efciency:
50%
Bandwidth:
The low gain specication is due to the need for a very low
directivity pattern to minimize signal variations as handset
position is varied.
The handsets themselves are generally one of two shapes, clam
shell (that fold in the middle) or bar (single block). The antenna
design differs for these two form factors.
07/12/2014
07/12/2014
The MSA is usually less than 0.05 thick, where is the free
space wavelength.
The basic feeds for the patch are a probe feed using a coaxial
transmission line below the ground plane or an edge feed using a
coplanar microstrip transmission line connected to an edge of the
patch.
The edge-fed patch is a very low prole antenna that also can
include other components using microwave integrated circuit
techniques and the feed network when arrayed.
This offers the advantage of low-cost, controlled-dimension
construction.
The radiation pattern is a single, broad unidirectional beam
broadside to the patch due to the ground plane greatly reducing
the back radiation (zero for an innitely large ground plane).
The MSA it is narrowband, leading to its biggest design
challengeachieving adequate bandwidth.
07/12/2014
07/12/2014
For rectangular patch the length, L, of the patch is usually 0.3333 <
< 0.5 , where is the free space wavelength
The patch is selected to be very thin <<
The height of the dielectric substrate ,t , is usually 0.003
0.05
The dielectric constant of the substrate is typically in the range
2.2 12.
Microstrip patch antennas radiate primarily because of the fringing
fields between the patch edge and the ground plane.
For good antenna performance, a thick dielectric substrate having a low
dielectric constant is desirable since this provides better efficiency,
larger bandwidth and better radiation.
However, such a configuration leads to a larger antenna size.
In order to design a compact Microstrip patch antenna, higher dielectric
constants must be used which are less efficient and result in narrower
bandwidth.
Hence a compromise must be reached between antenna dimensions
and antenna performance
Antennas Lecture Notes, prepared by Y. A.S. Dama, An-Najah National University
Methods of Analysis
The most popular models for the analysis of Microstrip patch antennas
are the transmission line model, cavity model, and full wave model.
The transmission line model is the simplest of all and it gives good
physical insight but it is less accurate
07/12/2014
Most of the electric field lines reside in the substrate and parts of some
lines in air.
As a result, this transmission line cannot support pure transverse
electric-magnetic (TEM) mode of transmission, since the phase
velocities would be different in the air and the substrate.
Instead, the dominant mode of propagation would be the quasi-TEM
mode.
An effective dielectric constant must be obtained to account fir
the fringing and the wave propagation in the line.
The value of is slightly less than , because the the fringing fields
around the edge of the patch are not confined in the dielectric substrate
but also spread in the air.
+ 1 1
10
+
1+
2
2
0.5
. (1)
Where
: is the width of the Patch
: is the height of the dielectric
: is the dielectric constant of substrate
07/12/2014
Fringing makes the patch effectively longer than its physical length, so
the resonant length is less than a half-wavelength
In order to operate in the fundamental TM10 the length of the patch
must be slightly less than where is the wavelength in the
dielectric
0.49 = 0.49
Along the width of the patch, the voltage is maximum and current
is minimum due to the open ends.
The fields at the edges can be resolved into normal and tangential
components with respect to the ground plane.
07/12/2014
07/12/2014
+ 0.264
= 0.412
(3)
0.258
+ 0.8
The design formulas begin with a more accurate equation for the
resonant patch length:
= 0.5
2 ..(4)
= + 2 ..(5)
10
07/12/2014
= cos
, = 0 ..(6)
, = 90 (7)
11
07/12/2014
= 90
2
2
1
= 3.77
12
07/12/2014
= 90
2
2
1
+ 1 2
=
2
2
The length is then recalculated using the more accurate formulas
in (1), (3) and (4)
13
07/12/2014
14
07/12/2014
=
4
4
It provides ease of fabrication and simplicity in modeling as well
as impedance matching
as the thickness of the dielectric
bandwidth of the antenna hampers
15
07/12/2014
The main advantage of this type of feeding scheme is that the feed
can be placed at any desired location inside the patch in order to
match with its input impedance.
This feed method is easy to fabricate and has low spurious radiation
Its major disadvantage is that it provides narrow bandwidth and is
difficult to model
Also, for thicker substrates, the increased probe length makes the
input impedance more inductive, leading to matching problems
As the probe from the patch edge, ,
is increased the input resistance decreases
as follows,
2
= 90
2
1
3 108
=
= 15
2 109
15
0.5 = 0.5
= 0.5
= 5.06
2.2
For high efciency the following width is selected at resonance,
=
+ 1
=
2
2
1
2
15 2.2 + 1
=
2
2
1
2
= 5.929
0.5
+ 1 1
10
=
+
1+
2
2
2.2 + 1 2.2 1
10 0.1588
=
+
1+
2
2
5.929
0.5
= 2.133
16
07/12/2014
+ 0.264
= 0.412
0.258 + 0.8
+ 0.3
5.929
+ 0.264
0.1588
= 0.412
0.1588 = 0.084
5.929
2.133 0.258
+ 0.8
0.1588
2.133 + 0.3
= 0.012
2.22
4.892
15
= 3.77
2
2
1
2.22
= 90 2.21
4.892 2
5.929
= 247.124
= 50 247.124 = 111.16
17
07/12/2014
60
2.2
ln
60
8
ln
+
8 0.1588
+
= 111.16
4 0.1588
= 9.833 0.082
We take the shortest wdith
+ 1 1
10
=
+
1+
2
2
2.2 + 1 2.2 1
10 0.1588
=
+
1+
2
2
0.082
0.5
= 1.73
15
=
=
= 2.85
4
4 4 1.73
18
07/12/2014
120
L=4.892 cm
2.85 cm
Wm
W=5.929 cm
WT=0.082
cm
19
07/12/2014
(b) Calculate input impedance for a probe feed 0.55 cm in from the edge.
3 108
= =
= 8.065
3.72 109
a)
= 90
2
2
1
b) = 0.55 cm
= 90
= 88.68
= 90
4.532 1.74 2
4.531 2.31
= 296.85
0.55
= 296.85 2
1.74
20