Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Comparison of Salivary Fluoride Levels
Comparison of Salivary Fluoride Levels
Comparison of Salivary Fluoride Levels
66]
Abstract
Th
a
si is P
te D
ho F
st is
ed av
by aila
m Me ble
ed dk fo
kn no r f
ow w ree
.c Pu d
om b ow
). lica nl
tio oa
ns d f
(w rom
w
w
.
Many industrialized countries have reported a decline in caries prevalence over the past few decades. These reductions have
been related to the regular use of uoride dentifrices. Fluoride dentifrices are the most cost-effective and efcient means of car
ies prevention. However, there have been concerns regarding the risk of uorosis in children due to the ingestion of dentifrices.
This has led to the use of dentifrices with low concentration of uoride. Salivary uoride levels after tooth-brushing have been
shown to be related to the anticaries efcacy of uoride dentifrices. The present study was designed to evaluate the effect of
the concentration of uoride in the dentifrice, on the salivary uoride level in children. Twenty children in the age group of ve
to six years were randomly selected and divided into two groups using, either 500ppm or 1000ppm uoride dentifrice (sodium
monouorophosphate). Salivary uoride levels at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, minutes after brushing were estimated. The data collected
was statistically evaluated using the unpaired t-test. The results showed that salivary uoride levels following use of 500ppm
uoride dentifrice were signicantly lower than 1000ppm uoride dentifrice. The low salivary uoride levels may thereby reduce
the anticaries efcacy. Hence, the pros and cons of recommending a low uoride concentration dentifrice must be judiciously
considered.
Key words: Dental caries, uoridated dentifrices, salivary uoride
a
Postgraduate Student, bProfessor and Head, Department of
Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Nair Hospital Dental College,
Mumbai
20
[Downloaded free from http://www.jisppd.com on Sunday, October 11, 2015, IP: 14.139.236.66]
Th
a
si is P
te D
ho F
st is
ed av
by aila
m Me ble
ed dk fo
kn no r f
ow w ree
.c Pu d
om b ow
). lica nl
tio oa
ns d f
(w rom
w
w
.
Discussion
Results
Group A
Group B
Gender
Boys
5
5
Total
Girls
5
5
10
10
Table 2: Comparison of mean salivary uoride concentrations at different collection intervals between the groups
Duration
Mean
0.261
Immediately
after brushing
(0 min)
15 min
30 min
45 min
60 min
4.72
0.43
0.32
0.29
0.27
0.025
0.022
0.020
0.021
0.022
8.72
2.9
1.5
0.58
0.34
0.061
0.068
0.07
0.022
0.032
Unpaired t-test
T-value
Signicance
0.202
Not Signicant
(P = 0.421)
190.045
108.61
50.37
29.66
5.64
Signicant*
Signicant*
Signicant*
Signicant*
Signicant*
21
[Downloaded free from http://www.jisppd.com on Sunday, October 11, 2015, IP: 14.139.236.66]
Conclusion
Reducing the fluoride concentration of the dentifrice to
reduce the risk of fluorosis is appropriate for very young
children. However, when the child is able to expectorate
properly, the benefits of higher concentration of fluoride,
which raises the salivary fluoride levels significantly, may
outweigh the risk of fluorosis.
Th
a
si is P
te D
ho F
st is
ed av
by aila
m Me ble
ed dk fo
kn no r f
ow w ree
.c Pu d
om b ow
). lica nl
tio oa
ns d f
(w rom
w
w
.
References
1.
2.
3.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
4.
16.
22