Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Investigation of Toughening Behavior of Epoxy Resin by Reinforcement of Depolymerized Latex Rubber
Investigation of Toughening Behavior of Epoxy Resin by Reinforcement of Depolymerized Latex Rubber
Mayank Agarwal, Mohamand Arif, Ankita Bisht, Vinay K. Singh* and Sunanda Biswas
3 Results
3.1 Characterization of cured epoxy filled
with DNR
The specimens were gold coated and examined by SEM
using a LEO435V6 instrument. The accelerating voltage
was kept at 10 kV and magnification factor of 250. The
SEM test was conducted on the fractured surface to see the
mechanism of the fracture. The state of dispersion of DNR
Table 1Compositions of cured epoxy filled with DNR.
Designation of
composition
C0
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
EP (CY230)
(wt%)
Hardener (HY951)
(wt%)
DNR
(wt%)
100
100
100
100
100
100
9
9
9
9
9
9
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
into the resin matrix plays a significant role on the improvement of the mechanical properties of the cured epoxy. It is
seen from Figure 1AD that DNR are well dispersed in the EP
matrix and sharp surface failure occurs in all the tests. The
absence of any voids indicates a good adhesion between
the DNR and epoxy matrix. Figure 1AC shows that the DNR
added to the epoxy matrix has completely bonded with it
and there is no free volume of DNR in the epoxy matrix.
From Figure 1D, it is evident that there is some free volume
of DNR that has not chemically bonded with the matrix, as
estimated from the observations. Due to this reason, the
mechanical strength increases up to 1 wt% rubber and then
decreases with further increase in the weight percentage of
rubber due to the excess or free volume of rubber.
Figure 1SEM images of fracture surface for several cured epoxy: (A) pure epoxy, (B) 0.5 wt% rubber, (C) 1.0 wt% rubber, (D) 1.5 wt% rubber.
Gage
length
Grip section
14
80
13
Dia. or width
Reduced section
12
11
60
10
50
9
8
40
30
80
70
% Elongation
20
0
60
Elongation (%)
Width of
grip section
70
0.5
1.0
1.5
4
2.5
2.0
Stress (MPa)
Rubber (wt%)
50
40
0 wt% of R
0.5 wt% of R
1.0 wt% of R
1.5 wt% of R
2.0 wt% of R
2.5 wt% of R
30
20
10
0
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
Strain
as shown in Figure 5. In Figure 5, it is seen that a nonlinear relation exists between the modulus of elasticity
and weight percentage of filler materials. The maximum
modulus of elasticity is found for neat resin. It has been
noticed that toughness is found to be maximum at the
addition of 1.0 wt% DNR compared to pure epoxy. This
increase in strength is due to the proper intermolecular
bonding between rubber particle to the resin particles. A
further addition of DNR on the EP decreases the toughness of the DNR-filled cured epoxy due to excess rubber
particles, which is present unbonded. Keeping in view the
importance of the modulus of elasticity and toughness in
design and analysis, an attempt has been made to model
an empirical relation of the following type to interpret the
filler polymer interaction.
Up to 1.0 wt% DNR
E/T=1101 (WR ) 2 -2014 (WR )+1087, R 2 =1
(1)
(2)
Table 2Tensile properties of cured epoxy filled with different weight percentages of DNR.
Designation of
composition
C0
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
DNR (wt%)
Ultimate
strength (MPa)
Elongation (%)
Toughness
(MPa)
Modulus of
elasticity (MPa)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
47.40
52.28
67.33
41.30
39.89
35.26
5.10
9.50
12.58
11.00
7.17
6.80
1.737
3.001
5.229
2.956
1.416
1.226
1889.28
1067.73
912.74
671.76
526.75
513.89
45
2000
Modulus of elasticity
Toughness
44
5
1400
1200
1000
Hardness (HRR)
43
1600
Toughness (MPa)
1800
42
41
40
39
38
37
800
36
600
35
400
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
2.5
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Rubber (wt%)
Rubber (wt%)
3.4 Hardness
All hardness tests are conducted on a Rockwell hardness
testing machine supplied by P.S.I. Pvt. Ltd. (New Delhi,
India) on R scale. The effect of the weight percentage of
DNR on the hardness values of DNR-filled cured epoxy is
shown in Figure 6. It is found that the hardness of neat EP
is 44 HRR. The hardnesses of the fabricated cured epoxy
filled with 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 wt% DNR are 43, 41, 39,
37, and 36 HRR, respectively, as given in Table 3.
Figure 6 indicates that the hardness decreases with
the DNR content, reflecting the reinforcement formed in
the DNR-filled cured epoxy. The variation of the ratio of
the modulus of elasticity with the hardness of DNR-filled
cured epoxy is shown in Figure 7. Figure 7 illustrates that
the hardness value follows a nonlinear relation with the
modulus of elasticity of the DNR-filled cured epoxy. An
attempt has been made to correlate the modulus of elasticity with hardness. The following correlation has been
obtained:
DNR (wt%)
Hardness
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
44
43
41
39
37
36
50
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)/hardness (HRR)
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
E/H
Poly. (E/H)
5
0
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Rubber (wt%)
(3)
percentage of DNR. Equation (3) indicates that the nonlinear relationship between the modulus of elasticity
and hardness has a good correlation. It shows that the
4 Conclusions
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]