Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2008 Muffin1 FC PDF
2008 Muffin1 FC PDF
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/222211683
CITATIONS
READS
80
170
4 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:
H P Vasantha Rupasinghe
Dalhousie University
129 PUBLICATIONS 1,844 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Food
Chemistry
Food Chemistry 107 (2008) 12171224
www.elsevier.com/locate/foodchem
Abstract
Apple fruit skin, a rich source of dietary bre and phenolics, is a by-product of apple processing. The eect of baking on the dietary
bre, phenolics, and total antioxidant capacity was investigated using a model system of muns incorporated with dried apple skin
powder (ASP) as a value-added food ingredient. The blanched, dehydrated, and ground ASP contained approximately 41% total dietary
bre and oxygen radical absorption capacity (ORAC) of 52 mg Trolox equivalents g1 dry weight. The total dietary bre content, total
phenolic content, and total antioxidant capacity of muns were positively correlated to the amount of ASP incorporated into muns.
The mean percent recovery of quercetin glycosides, catechins, chlorogenic acid, phloridzin, and cyanidin galactoside after baking were
61%, 57%, 53%, 44%, and 20%.
Crown Copyright 2007 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Malus domestica; Apple skin; Food ingredient; Dietary bre; Polyphenolics; Antioxidant; Baking
1. Introduction
Interest in nutrition and disease prevention is driving
consumer demand for value-added foods or functional
foods with higher levels of antioxidants and dietary bre
(de Roos, 2004). It is widely accepted that increased consumption of fruits and vegetables can reduce the risk of
cancer, heart disease, and stroke (Liu, 2003). Phenolic compounds present in fruits have been demonstrated to possess
anti-inammatory and anticarcinogenic properties and the
ability to prevent a variety of chronic diseases (Boyer &
Liu, 2004). Apples are a good source of phenolic compounds (Eberhardt, Lee, & Liu, 2000), especially the skin,
is rich in many health-enhancing phytonutrients including
avonoids and phenolic acids (Boyer & Liu, 2004). Constituents of apple skins inhibited the HepG2 (human hepato*
0308-8146/$ - see front matter Crown Copyright 2007 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.09.057
1218
1219
1220
Table 1
Chemical composition, total phenolic content and total antioxidant
capacity of ASP
Characteristics
Idared
Chemical
composition
(dry weight
basis)
Total phenolic
content
Total antioxidant
Capacity
Northern
Spy
3.16 0.16
10.23 0.28
4.86 0.06
80.25
3.23 0.11
11.10 0.64
4.46 0.08
79.91
11.2 0.7
8.1 0.8
32.1 1.8
19.9 1.4
6.3 0.6
13.1 0.9
510 40
30.5 1.3
21.8 1.7
9.2 0.8
12.3 0.4
680 60
4628 616
5588 644
7157.9 623.7
8080.0 617.4
46459 2012
58361 5400
Table 2
The concentration of polyphenolic compounds of dried apple skin powder
prepared from Idared and Northern Spy apples
Polyphenols
category
Compound
Flavonols
Apple cultivar
Dihydrochalcones
Phenolic acids
Anthocyanins
Flavan-3-ols
a
Quercetin-3galactoside
Quercetin-3glucoside
Quercetin-3rhamnoside
Quercetin-3rutinoside
Quercetin
Phloridzin
Phloretin
Chlorogenic acid
Cyanidin-3galactoside
Catechin
Epicatechin
Northern
Spy
75.6 4.4
94.4 3.2
16.2 1.3
21.4 0.4
28.8 3.1
62.6 2.8
2.7 0.4
10.2 0.6
0.2 0.9
54.9 2.7
1.3 0.1
33.0 4.0
127.5 11.9
0.2 0.3
37.1 1.9
0.8 0.1
62.0 8.5
51.0 8.2
7.8 0.4
33.4 1.8
8.6 0.3
49.4 2.7
1221
Table 4
Dietary bre content (% dry weight) of muns incorporated with ASP of
Idared
Apple skin powder (% w/w
incorporation)
Insoluble
bre
Soluble bre
Total
dietary bre
0
8
16
24
Statistics
SEM, d.f
0.9 0.10b
1.2 0.10ab
1.8 0.28a
2.0 0.66a
T*
0.1054, 11
0.5 0.07c
2.3 0.60bc
3.9 0.72ab
5.5 0.1.51a
T***
0.2560, 11
1.3 0.09d
3.5 0.56c
5.8 0.80b
7.6 0.89a
T***
0.1906, 11
*
Values are means standard deviation; n = 3; means in columns without
letters in common dier signicantly (P < 0.05).
Table 3
Proximate composition of the muns incorporated with ASP
Apple skin powder (% w/w incorporation)
Moisture (%)
Ash (%)
Idared
0
4
8
16
24
32
Statistics
SEM, d.f
31.39 0.68
30.18 0.60
30.94 0.31
30.52 0.52
30.99 0.42
30.93 0.63
TNS
0.1285, 17
27.01 0.52
27.16 0.30
26.71 0.61
26.36 0.23
26.65 0.32
27.16 1.24
TNS
0.1507, 17
7.29 0.08a
7.13 0.00a
6.85 0.12ab
6.27 0.04bc
6.10 0.04cd
5.55 0.59d
T***
0.0597, 17
1.39 0.05
1.38 0.06
1.38 0.06
1.48 0.05
1.47 0.09
1.54 0.07
TNS
0.0702, 17
Northern Spy
0
4
8
16
24
32
Statistics
SEM, d.f
30.71 0.16
31.73 1.11
30.56 0.31
32.09 0.84
30.98 0.59
31.76 0.33
TNS
0.1534, 17
27.53 0.77
28.74 0.98
27.76 0.46
27.36 0.77
27.89 1.18
27.35 1.26
TNS
0.2231, 17
7.32 0.14a
7.13 0.16a
6.93 0.13a
6.36 0.17b
6.19 0.04b
5.60 0.32c
T***
0.0434, 17
1.42 0.02
1.39 0.07
1.40 0.15
1.46 0.07
1.52 0.13
1.52 0.12
TNS
0.0258, 17
Means standard deviation followed by dierent letters within a column for each cultivar are signicantly dierent at *P 6 0.05, **P 6 0.01, ***P 6 0.001.
1222
Table 5
The mean percent recovery of polyphenolic compounds of dried apple skin powder after baking in a model mun system
Polyphenols category
Compound
Idared
Flavonols
Dihydrochalcones
Phenolic acids
Anthocyanins
Flavan-3-ols
Northern Spy
Flavonols
Dihydrochalcones
Phenolic acids
Anthocyanins
Flavan-3-ols
a
b
Estimated amount
Detected amount
Quercetin-3-galactoside
Quercetin-3-glucoside
Quercetin-3-rhamnoside
Quercetin-3-rutinoside
Quercetin
Phloridzin
Phloretin
Chlorogenic acid
Cyanidin-3-galactoside
Catechin
Epicatechin
12.21 0.42
2.63 0.12
4.65 0.28
0.44 0.12
0.04 0.13
8.86 0.25
0.20 0.43
5.33 0.98
20.59 0.41
1.26 0.05
5.39 0.12
7.82 0.32
1.54 0.16
2.60 0.30
0.32 0.11
1.60 0.65
3.99 0.08
1.68 0.76
2.70 0.06
3.23 0.89
0.80 0.06
3.00 0.32
64.05
58.6
55.9
73.4
4503.2
45.0
825.6
50.7
15.7
63.5
55.6
Quercetin-3-galactoside
Quercetin-3-glucoside
Quercetin-3-rhamnoside
Quercetin-3-rutinoside
Quercetin
Phloridzin
Phloretin
Chlorogenic acid
Cyanidin-3-galactoside
Catechin
Epicatechin
15.25 1.10
3.46 0.24
10.11 0.54
1.65 0.11
0.03 0.12
5.99 0.21
0.14 0.26
10.01 1.51
8.24 0.40
1.39 0.02
7.98 0.17
8.80 0.32
1.90 0.16
6.20 0.30
1.08 0.10
0.30 0.71
2.56 0.09
1.01 0.76
5.60 0.09
2.04 0.82
0.76 0.06
4.40 0.33
57.7
55.0
61.3
65.6
1160.9
42.8
743.0
55.9
24.8
54.7
55.2
1400
Idared
Northern Spy
1200
1223
1000
800
600
400
4. Conclusions
FRAP
(g TE g-1 DW)
2000
1500
1000
500
10000
ORAC
(g TE g-1 DW)
8000
6000
4000
2000
16
24
32
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Technology Development Program of the Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture and the Nova Scotia Fruit Growers Association.
References
Association of Ocial Analytical Chemist (AOAC) (2000). Ocial
Methods of Analysis, 17th ed. MD, USA.
Benzie, I., & Strain, J. (1996). The ferric reducing ability of plasma
(FRAP) as a measure of antioxidant power: The FRAP assay.
Analytical Biochemistry, 239, 7076.
Bermink, M. R. (1994). Fibre analysis. In S. S. Nielson (Ed.), Introduction
to the chemical analysis of foods (pp. 169180). Boston, MA, USA:
Jones and Bartlett Publishers Inc.
Beta, T., Nam, S., Dexter, J. E., & Sapirstein, H. D. (2005). Phenolic
content and antioxidant activity of pearled wheat and roller-milled
fractions. Cereal Chemistry, 82, 390393.
Boyer, J., & Liu, R. H. (2004). Apple phytochemicals and their health
benets. Nutrition Journal, 3, 5.
Buchner, N., Krumbein, A., Rohn, S., & Kroh, L. W. (2007). Eect of
thermal processing on the avonols rutin and quercetin. Rapid
Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 20, 32293235.
1224