Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2015 District Report Card
2015 District Report Card
NATCHITOCHES PARISH
2014-2015 District Report Card LEA Code: 035
6525 Enrolled 10% Special Education 76% Economically Disadvantaged
LETTER GRADES
NUMBER OF SCHOOLS
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE
HIGH
COMBINATION
TOTAL
PERCENT OF
SCHOOLS
20%
13%
33%
20%
13%
2013-2014
2014-2015
DPS: 77.2
DPS: 81.4
10.0
SCORE
MASTERY +
BASIC +
DISTRICT
STATE
MINORITY
STUDENTS
STUDENTS
WITH DISABILITIES
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS
24%
58%
27%
65%
15%
47%
7%
30%
17%
51%
DISTRICT
STATE
MINORITY
STUDENTS
STUDENTS
WITH
DISABILITIES
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED
STUDENTS
AVERAGE SCORE
STATE
NATIONAL
61%
62%
49%
18%
52%
17.0
19.2
19.7
GRADUATES SCORING 3+
ON ADVANCED PLACEMENT TEST
DISTRICT
STATE
NATIONAL
DISTRICT
STATE
<5%
5.3%
21.6%
40%
28%
STATE
NATIONAL 12/13
MINORITY STUDENTS
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS
72%
75%
81%
67%
29%
66%
During transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and math
assessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure that
the distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.
SPS = 81.7
14/15 vs 13/14
65%
STUDENTS
14/15 vs 13/14
WITH
DISABILITIES
DISTRICT
STATE
61%
62%
53%
22%
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED 14/15 vs 13/14
STUDENTS
56%
A score of 18 or above on the ACT indicates twelfth grade students have minimum
proficiency for college & career success.
SCHOOL
14/15 vs 13/14
48%
DISTRICT
STATE
44%
62%
MINORITY
STUDENTS
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED
STUDENTS
STUDENTS
WITH
DISABILITIES
40% N/A
43%
AVERAGE
SCORE
DISTRICT
STATE
NATIONAL
13/14 vs 12/13
<5%
DISTRICT
STATE
NATIONAL
<5%
5.3%
21.6%
13/14 vs 12/13
47%
DISTRICT
STATE
40%
28%
DISTRICT
13/14 vs 12/13
80%
72%
STATE
NATIONAL 12/13
75%
81%
MINORITY
STUDENTS
75%
STUDENTS
WITH
DISABILITIES
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED
STUDENTS
32%
74%
Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously nonproficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.
SCHOOL
62%
2013-2014
SPS
75.8
STATE
DISTRICT
57%
59%
14/15 vs 13/14
0.0
2014-2015
SPS
81.7
ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE
INFORMATION
DATA CENTER
C
SPS = 67.2
SCHOOL
SCORE
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
11%
24%
27%
BASIC +
48%
58%
65%
NOTE:
The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.
SCORE
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
9%
15%
18%
<5%
7%
10%
11%
17%
19%
BASIC +
45%
47%
55%
27%
30%
35%
48%
51%
57%
HOW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?
Schools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.
CREDITS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
6+
87%
86%
83%
DID THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?
Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.
NON-PROFICIENT
STUDENTS
EXCEEDING
EXPECTATIONS
DISTRICT
14/15
STATE
vs 13/14
TOTAL POINTS
EARNED
10.0
ELA
161
60%
57%
50%
MATH
171
60%
58%
49%
2013-2014
SPS
59.6
14/15 vs 13/14
2014-2015
SPS
67.2
ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE
INFORMATION
DATA CENTER
During transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and math
assessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure that
the distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.
SPS = 123.5
MASTERY +
BASIC +
NOTE:
DISTRICT
STATE
69%
24%
27%
>95%
58%
65%
SCHOOL
SCORE
The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.
SCORE
MASTERY +
BASIC +
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
63%
15%
18%
N/A
7%
10%
63%
17%
19%
>95
%
47%
55%
N/A
30%
35%
>95
%
51%
57%
HOW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?
Schools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.
CREDITS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
6+
>95%
86%
83%
DID THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?
Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.
NON-PROFICIENT
STUDENTS
EXCEEDING
EXPECTATIONS
DISTRICT
14/15
STATE
vs 13/14
TOTAL POINTS
EARNED
N/A
ELA
N/A
N/A
57%
50%
MATH
N/A
N/A
58%
49%
2013-2014
SPS
121.7
14/15 vs 13/14
2014-2015
SPS
123.5
ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE
INFORMATION
DATA CENTER
During transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and math
assessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure that
the distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.
SPS = 109.7
SCHOOL
SCORE
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
55%
24%
27%
BASIC +
92%
58%
65%
NOTE:
The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.
Schools that are K-2 configurations have accountability data based on a paired school, designated by its district.
SCORE
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
41%
15%
18%
19%
7%
10%
42%
17%
19%
BASIC +
86%
47%
55%
58%
30%
35%
88%
51%
57%
DID THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?
Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.
NON-PROFICIENT
STUDENTS
EXCEEDING
EXPECTATIONS
DISTRICT
STATE
ELA
N/A
N/A
57%
50%
MATH
N/A
N/A
58%
49%
2013-2014
SPS
111.5
TOTAL POINTS
EARNED
14/15 vs 13/14
N/A
2014-2015
SPS
109.7
ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE
INFORMATION
DATA CENTER
During transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and math
assessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure that
the distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.
SPS = 123.2
SCHOOL
SCORE
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
56%
24%
27%
BASIC +
92%
58%
65%
NOTE:
The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.
SCORE
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
46%
15%
18%
N/A
7%
10%
45%
17%
19%
BASIC +
85%
47%
55%
N/A
30%
35%
85%
51%
57%
HOW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?
Schools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.
CREDITS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
6+
>95%
86%
83%
DID THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?
Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.
NON-PROFICIENT
STUDENTS
EXCEEDING
EXPECTATIONS
DISTRICT
14/15
STATE
vs 13/14
TOTAL POINTS
EARNED
10.0
ELA
15
80%
57%
50%
MATH
15
73%
58%
49%
2013-2014
SPS
111.3
14/15 vs 13/14
2014-2015
SPS
123.2
ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE
INFORMATION
DATA CENTER
During transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and math
assessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure that
the distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.
SPS = 62.5
SCHOOL
SCORE
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
18%
24%
27%
BASIC +
55%
58%
65%
NOTE:
The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.
Schools that are K-2 configurations have accountability data based on a paired school, designated by its district.
SCORE
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
17%
15%
18%
11%
7%
10%
18%
17%
19%
BASIC +
53%
47%
55%
41%
30%
35%
55%
51%
57%
DID THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?
Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.
NON-PROFICIENT
STUDENTS
EXCEEDING
EXPECTATIONS
DISTRICT
STATE
ELA
N/A
N/A
57%
50%
MATH
N/A
N/A
58%
49%
2013-2014
SPS
66.0
TOTAL POINTS
EARNED
14/15 vs 13/14
N/A
2014-2015
SPS
62.5
ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE
INFORMATION
DATA CENTER
During transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and math
assessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure that
the distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.
D
SPS = 51.1
SCHOOL
SCORE
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
11%
24%
27%
BASIC +
42%
58%
65%
NOTE:
The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.
SCORE
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
10%
15%
18%
9%
7%
10%
11%
17%
19%
BASIC +
40%
47%
55%
27%
30%
35%
41%
51%
57%
HOW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?
Schools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.
CREDITS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
6+
85%
86%
83%
DID THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?
Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.
NON-PROFICIENT
STUDENTS
EXCEEDING
EXPECTATIONS
DISTRICT
14/15
STATE
vs 13/14
TOTAL POINTS
EARNED
0.0
ELA
126
48%
57%
50%
MATH
120
48%
58%
49%
2013-2014
SPS
64.0
14/15 vs 13/14
2014-2015
SPS
51.1
ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE
INFORMATION
DATA CENTER
During transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and math
assessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure that
the distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.
SPS = 32.6
SCHOOL
SCORE
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
<5%
24%
27%
BASIC +
26%
58%
65%
NOTE:
The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.
SCORE
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
<5%
15%
18%
<5%
7%
10%
<5%
17%
19%
BASIC +
26%
47%
55%
<5%
30%
35%
26%
51%
57%
HOW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?
Schools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.
CREDITS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
6+
88%
86%
83%
DID THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?
Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.
NON-PROFICIENT
STUDENTS
EXCEEDING
EXPECTATIONS
DISTRICT
14/15
STATE
vs 13/14
TOTAL POINTS
EARNED
0.0
ELA
108
41%
57%
50%
MATH
103
42%
58%
49%
2013-2014
SPS
36.1
14/15 vs 13/14
2014-2015
SPS
32.6
ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE
INFORMATION
DATA CENTER
During transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and math
assessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure that
the distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.
SPS = 13.7
Page 1 of 2
SCHOOL
SCORE
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
<5%
24%
27%
BASIC +
15%
58%
65%
NOTE:
The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.
Schools that are K-2 configurations have accountability data based on a paired school, designated by its district.
SCORE
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
<5%
15%
18%
<5%
7%
10%
<5%
17%
19%
BASIC +
14%
47%
55%
18%
30%
35%
14%
51%
57%
HOW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?
Schools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.
CREDITS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
6+
60%
86%
83%
DID THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?
Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.
2013-2014
SPS
22.8
2014-2015
SPS
13.7
ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE
INFORMATION
DATA CENTER
During transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and math
assessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure that
the distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.
SPS = 13.7
Page 2 of 2
SCHOOL
14/15 vs 13/14
8%
STUDENTS
14/15 vs 13/14
WITH
DISABILITIES
DISTRICT
STATE
61%
62%
6%
N/A
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED 14/15 vs 13/14
STUDENTS
10%
A score of 18 or above on the ACT indicates twelfth grade students have minimum
proficiency for college & career success.
SCHOOL
14/15 vs 13/14
N/A
DISTRICT
STATE
44%
62%
MINORITY
STUDENTS
STUDENTS
WITH
DISABILITIES
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED
STUDENTS
AVERAGE
SCORE
N/A
8.4
N/A N/A
DISTRICT
STATE
NATIONAL
13/14 vs 12/13
<5%
DISTRICT
STATE
NATIONAL
<5%
5.3%
21.6%
13/14 vs 12/13
<5%
DISTRICT
STATE
40%
28%
13/14 vs 12/13
<5%
DISTRICT
72%
STATE
NATIONAL 12/13
75%
81%
MINORITY
STUDENTS
<5%
STUDENTS
WITH
DISABILITIES
N/A
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED
STUDENTS
<5%
Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously nonproficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
57%
STATE
59%
0.0
14/15 vs 13/14
SPS = 13.7
ACADEMIC COMPARISON
ALTERNATIVE
SCHOOLS
ALL SCHOOLS
86%
83%
21%
ALTERNATIVE
SCHOOLS
ALL SCHOOLS
18%
19%
10%
SCHOOL
ALTERNATIVE
SCHOOLS
ALL SCHOOLS
13.7
18.9
88.8
ALTERNATIVE
SCHOOLS
ALL
SCHOOLS
Mastery +
<5%
<5%
27%
Basic
13%
13%
38%
Below Basic
85%
84%
35%
LEVEL
>95%
ALTERNATIVE
SCHOOLS
ALL SCHOOLS
91%
69%
ALTERNATIVE
SCHOOLS
ALL
SCHOOLS
<5%
5%
22%
8%
15%
39%
Fair
27%
26%
25%
Needs
Improvement
65%
54%
13%
LEVEL
PERSISTENCE COMPARISON
CONTINUED ENROLLMENT RATE
The percentage of students who continue to be enrolled
in school at the end of the year
SCHOOL
ALTERNATIVE
SCHOOLS
ALL SCHOOLS
87%
83%
>95%
CREDIT ACCUMULATION
Average number of credits earned by the end of the freshman year.
SCHOOL
ALTERNATIVE
SCHOOLS
ALL SCHOOLS
6.9
4.8
7.1
Excellent
Good
ALTERNATIVE
SCHOOLS
ALL
SCHOOLS
<5%
11%
75%
GED/HiSET
26%
14%
<5%
Certificate of
Achievement
<5%
<5%
<5%
Other Nongraduates
72%
71%
20%
LEVEL
SPS = 75.2
Page 1 of 2
MASTERY +
BASIC +
NOTE:
DISTRICT
STATE
8%
24%
27%
34%
58%
65%
SCHOOL
SCORE
The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.
Schools that are K-2 configurations have accountability data based on a paired school, designated by its district.
SCORE
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
8%
15%
18%
<5%
7%
10%
8%
17%
19%
BASIC +
31%
47%
55%
12%
30%
35%
34%
51%
57%
HOW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?
Schools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.
CREDITS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
6+
93%
86%
83%
DID THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?
Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.
2013-2014
SPS
67.3
2014-2015
SPS
75.2
ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE
INFORMATION
DATA CENTER
During transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and math
assessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure that
the distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.
SPS = 75.2
Page 2 of 2
SCHOOL
14/15 vs 13/14
50%
STUDENTS
14/15 vs 13/14
WITH
DISABILITIES
DISTRICT
STATE
61%
62%
42%
13%
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED 14/15 vs 13/14
STUDENTS
44%
A score of 18 or above on the ACT indicates twelfth grade students have minimum
proficiency for college & career success.
SCHOOL
14/15 vs 13/14
31%
DISTRICT
STATE
44%
62%
MINORITY
STUDENTS
19%
STUDENTS
WITH
DISABILITIES
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED
STUDENTS
N/A
27%
AVERAGE
SCORE
DISTRICT
STATE
NATIONAL
13/14 vs 12/13
<5%
DISTRICT
STATE
NATIONAL
<5%
5.3%
21.6%
13/14 vs 12/13
40%
DISTRICT
STATE
40%
28%
13/14 vs 12/13
85%
DISTRICT
72%
STATE
NATIONAL 12/13
75%
81%
MINORITY
STUDENTS
83%
STUDENTS
WITH
DISABILITIES
46%
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED
STUDENTS
89%
Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously nonproficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.
SCHOOL
41%
DISTRICT
57%
STATE
59%
8.5
14/15 vs 13/14
B
SPS = 99.1
SCHOOL
SCORE
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
35%
24%
27%
BASIC +
77%
58%
65%
NOTE:
The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.
SCORE
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
24%
15%
18%
5%
7%
10%
29%
17%
19%
BASIC +
66%
47%
55%
28%
30%
35%
73%
51%
57%
HOW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?
Schools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.
CREDITS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
6+
84%
86%
83%
DID THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?
Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.
NON-PROFICIENT
STUDENTS
EXCEEDING
EXPECTATIONS
DISTRICT
14/15
STATE
vs 13/14
TOTAL POINTS
EARNED
8.9
ELA
51
67%
57%
50%
MATH
29
62%
58%
49%
2013-2014
SPS
99.9
14/15 vs 13/14
2014-2015
SPS
99.1
ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE
INFORMATION
DATA CENTER
During transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and math
assessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure that
the distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.
C
SPS = 82.2
SCHOOL
SCORE
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
27%
24%
27%
BASIC +
65%
58%
65%
NOTE:
The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.
SCORE
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
11%
15%
18%
6%
7%
10%
22%
17%
19%
BASIC +
41%
47%
55%
38%
30%
35%
59%
51%
57%
HOW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?
Schools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.
CREDITS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
6+
>95%
86%
83%
DID THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?
Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.
NON-PROFICIENT
STUDENTS
EXCEEDING
EXPECTATIONS
DISTRICT
14/15
STATE
vs 13/14
TOTAL POINTS
EARNED
4.6
ELA
25
68%
57%
50%
MATH
19
47%
58%
49%
2013-2014
SPS
89.5
14/15 vs 13/14
2014-2015
SPS
82.2
ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE
INFORMATION
DATA CENTER
During transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and math
assessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure that
the distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.
B
SPS = 91.8
SCHOOL
SCORE
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
24%
24%
27%
BASIC +
71%
58%
65%
NOTE:
The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.
SCORE
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
23%
15%
18%
13%
7%
10%
21%
17%
19%
BASIC +
83%
47%
55%
47%
30%
35%
67%
51%
57%
HOW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?
Schools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.
CREDITS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
6+
91%
86%
83%
DID THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?
Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.
NON-PROFICIENT
STUDENTS
EXCEEDING
EXPECTATIONS
DISTRICT
14/15
STATE
vs 13/14
TOTAL POINTS
EARNED
10.0
ELA
48
81%
57%
50%
MATH
45
80%
58%
49%
2013-2014
SPS
65.4
14/15 vs 13/14
2014-2015
SPS
91.8
ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE
INFORMATION
DATA CENTER
During transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and math
assessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure that
the distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.
SPS = 76.5
SCHOOL
SCORE
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
14%
24%
27%
BASIC +
58%
58%
65%
NOTE:
The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.
SCORE
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
12%
15%
18%
7%
7%
10%
14%
17%
19%
BASIC +
56%
47%
55%
32%
30%
35%
57%
51%
57%
HOW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?
Schools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.
CREDITS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
6+
75%
86%
83%
DID THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?
Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.
NON-PROFICIENT
STUDENTS
EXCEEDING
EXPECTATIONS
DISTRICT
14/15
STATE
vs 13/14
TOTAL POINTS
EARNED
9.5
ELA
62
63%
57%
50%
MATH
46
72%
58%
49%
2013-2014
SPS
68.5
14/15 vs 13/14
2014-2015
SPS
76.5
ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE
INFORMATION
DATA CENTER
During transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and math
assessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure that
the distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.
D
SPS = 60.3
SCHOOL
SCORE
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
12%
24%
27%
BASIC +
46%
58%
65%
NOTE:
The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.
Schools that are K-2 configurations have accountability data based on a paired school, designated by its district.
SCORE
ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
STATE
MASTERY +
8%
15%
18%
<5%
7%
10%
11%
17%
19%
BASIC +
38%
47%
55%
28%
30%
35%
43%
51%
57%
DID THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?
Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.
NON-PROFICIENT
STUDENTS
EXCEEDING
EXPECTATIONS
DISTRICT
STATE
ELA
85
64%
57%
50%
MATH
85
71%
58%
49%
2013-2014
SPS
38.4
TOTAL POINTS
EARNED
14/15 vs 13/14
10.0
2014-2015
SPS
60.3
ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE
INFORMATION
DATA CENTER
During transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and math
assessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure that
the distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.